SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aldasoro JJ, Aedo C, Navarro C. 2005. Phylogenetic and phytogeographical relationships in Maloideae (Rosaceae) based on morphological and anatomical characters. Blumea: Journal of Plant Taxonomy and Geographyraphy 50: 332.
  • Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. 1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 9: 229241.
  • Bashaw EC, Hanna WH. 1990. Apomictic reproduction. In: Chapman GP, ed. Reproductive versatility in the grasses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 100130.
  • Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 1995. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Annals of Botany 76: 113176.
  • Bicknell RA, Koltunow AM. 2004. Understanding apomixis: Recent advances and remaining conundrums. Plant Cell 16: S228S245.
  • Bicknell RA, Lambie SC, Butler RC. 2003. Quantification of progeny classes in two facultatively apomictic accessions of Hieracium. Hereditas 138: 1120.
  • Bino RJ, De Vries JN, Kraak HL, Van Pijlen JG. 1992. Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in tomato seeds during priming and germination. Annals of Botany 69: 231236.
  • Bino RJ, Lanteri S, Verhoeven HA, Kraak HL. 1993. Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stage in seed tissues. Annals of Botany 72: 181187.
  • BD Biosciences. 2005. Facscalibur technical specifications. [ http://www.bdbiosciences.com/immunocytometry_systems/brochures/FACSCalibur_specs.shtml ]. San Jose, CA, USA: BD Biosciences.
  • Burton TL, Husband BC. 1999. Population cytotype structure in the polyploid Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae). Heredity 82: 381390.
  • Campbell CS, Evans RC, Morgan DR, Dickinson TA, Arsenault MP. in press. Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Plant Systematics and Evolution.
  • Campbell CS, Greene CW, Bergquist SE. 1987. Apomixis and sexuality in three species of Amelanchier, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). American Journal of Botany 74: 321328.
  • Campbell CS, Greene CW, Neubauer BF, Higgins JM. 1985. Apomixis in Amelanchier laevis, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). American Journal of Botany 72: 13971403.
  • Celotti N. 1995. The pollen tube pathway and obturator in hawthorn sexual reproduction. BSc Honours Thesis. Kingston, ON, Canada: Queen's University.
  • Clausen J. 1961. Introgression facilitated by apomixis in polyploid Poas. Euphytica 10: 8794.
  • Corner EJH. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Czapik R. 1985a. Apomictic embryo sacs in diploid Waldsteinia geoides Willd. (Rosaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Seriea Botanica 27: 2937.
  • Czapik R. 1985b. Secondary nucleus in Rosoideae. In: Willemse MTM, Van Went JL, eds. 8th International Symposium on Sexual Reproduction in Seed Plants, Ferns and Mosses. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Pudoc, 150152.
  • Czapik R. 1983. The secondary nucleus in four species of the genus Rubus. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Seriea Botanica 25: 179188.
  • Czapik R. 1996. Problems of apomictic reproduction in the families Compositae and Rosaceae. Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica: a Journal of Plant Ecology and systematics 31: 381387.
  • Dickinson TA. 1983. Crataegus crus-galli L. sensu lato in Southern Ontario: Phenotypic variation and variability in relation to reproductive behavior. PhD Thesis. London, ON, Canada: University of Western Ontario.
  • Dickinson TA, Belaoussoff S, Love RM, Muniyamma M. 1996. North American black-fruited hawthorns. I. Variation in floral construction, breeding system correlates, and their possible evolutionary significance in Crataegus sect. Douglasii Loudon. Folia geobotanica and phytotaxonomica. A Journal of Plant Ecology and Systematics 31: 355371.
  • Dickinson TA, Phipps JB. 1986. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae) XIV. The breeding system of Crataegus crus-galli sensu lato. Ontario. American Journal of Botany 73: 116130.
  • Dickson EE, Arumuganathan K, Kresovich S, Doyle JJ. 1992. Nuclear DNA content variation within the Rosaceae. American Journal of Botany 79: 10811086.
  • Donovan DM. 1981. Hybrid populations in some native trees raised from seed. International Plant Propagators’ Society, Combined Proceedings 31: 381383.
  • Evans RC. 1999. Molecular, morphological, and ontogenetic evaluation of relationships and evolution in the Rosaceae. PhD thesis. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto.
  • Evans RC, Dickinson TA. 2005. Floral ontogeny and morphology in Gillenia (‘Spiraeoideae’) and subfamily Maloideae C. Weber (Rosaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 427447.
  • Greilhuber J, Ebert I. 1994. Genome size variation in Pisum sativum. Genome 37: 646655.
  • Greyson RI, Raman K. 1975. Differential sensitivity of ‘double’ and ‘single’ flowers of Nigella damascena (Ranunculaceae) to emasculation and GA3. American Journal of Botany 62: 531536.
  • Greyson RI, Tepfer SS. 1967. Emasculation effects on the stamen filament of Nigella hispanica and their partial reversal by gibberellic acid. American Journal of Botany 54: 971976.
  • Gu C, Spongberg SA. 2003. Crataegus Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 475 1753. In: Wu Z, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China, Vol. 9. (Pittosporaceae Through Connaraceae). Beijing, China: Science Press; St Louis, MO, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 111117.
  • Guo F, Huang B-Q, Han Y, Zee S-Y. 2004. Fertilization in maize indeterminate gametophyte1 mutant. Protoplasma 223: 111120.
  • Hjelmqvist H. 1962. The embryo sac development in some Cotoneaster species. Botaniska Notiser 115: 208236.
  • Jankun A, Kovanda M. 1986. Apomixis in Sorbus sudetica (Embryological studies in Sorbus 1). Preslia 58: 719.
  • Jankun A, Kovanda M. 1987. Apomixis and origin in Sorbus bohemica (Embryological studies in Sorbus 2). Preslia 59: 97116.
  • Jankun A, Kovanda M. 1988. Apomixis at the diploid level in Sorbus eximia (Embryological studies in Sorbus 3.). Preslia 60: 193213.
  • Kalkman C. 2004. Rosaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 343386.
  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Niwot, CO, USA: University Press of Colorado.
  • Koltunow AM, Johnson SD, Bicknell RA. 2000. Apomixis is not developmentally conserved in related, genetically characterized Hieracium plants of varying ploidy. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12: 253266.
  • Leblanc O, Peel MD, Carman JG, Savidan Y. 1995. Megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis in Tripsacum species (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 5763.
  • Lo E, Stefanovic S, Dickinson TA. in press. Crataegus and Mespilus (Pyreae; Rosaceae) – Two genera or one? Systematic Botany.
  • Longley AE. 1924. Cytological studies in the genus Crataegus. American Journal of Botany 11: 295317.
  • Love R, Feigen M. 1978. Interspecific hybridization between native and naturalized Crataegus (Rosaceae) in Western Oregon. Madroño 25: 211217.
  • Mabberley DJ. 1997. The plant book: a portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Macklin JA. 2001. Systematics of Crataegus series Coccineae. (Rosaceae). PhD Thesis. London, ON, Canada: University of Western Ontario.
  • Maheshwari P. 1950. An introduction to the embryology of the angiosperms. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Matzk F, Meister A, Schubert I. 2000. An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of monocots and dicots. Plant Journal 21: 96108.
  • Muniyamma M, Phipps JB. 1979a. Cytological proof of apomixis in Crataegus (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 66: 149155.
  • Muniyamma M, Phipps JB. 1979b. Meiosis and polyploidy in Ontario species of Crataegus in relation to their systematics. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 21: 231241.
  • Muniyamma M, Phipps JB. 1984a. Studies in Crataegus. XI. Further cytological evidence for the occurrence of apomixis in North American hawthorns. Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 23162324.
  • Muniyamma M, Phipps JB. 1984b. Studies in Crataegus. X. A note on the occurrence of diplospory in Crataegus dissona Sarg. (Maloideae, Rosaceae). Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 26: 249252.
  • Muniyamma M, Phipps JB. 1985. Studies in Crataegus. XII. Cytological evidence for sexuality in some diploid and tetraploid species of North American hawthorns. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 13191324.
  • Naumova TN, Hayward MD, Wagenvoort M. 1999. Apomixis and sexuality in diploid and tetraploid accessions of Brachiaria decumbens. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12: 4352.
  • Nogler GA. 1972. Genetic der Aposporie bei Ranunculus auricomus. II. Endospermzytologie. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 82: 5463.
  • Nogler GA. 1984. Gametophytic apomixis. In: Johri BM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 475518.
  • Ormerod MG. 1994. Flow cytometry: a practical approach. Oxford, UK: IRL press.
  • Péchoutre F. 1902. Contribution à l’étude du développement de l’ovule et de la graine des Rosacées. Annales des sciences naturelles. Botanique: l’Anatomie, la Physiologie et la Classification des Végétaux Vivants et Fossiles. Series 8 8: 1158.
  • Phipps JB, O’Kennon RJ, Lance RW. 2003. Hawthorns and medlars. Cambridge, UK: Royal Horticultural Society.
  • Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh SH, Smedmark JEE, Morgan DR, Kerr M, Robertson KR, Arsenault MP, Dickinson TA, Campbell CS. in press. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution.
  • Price HJ, Johnston JS. 1996. Analysis of plant DNA content by Feulgen microspectrophotometry and flow cytometry. In: Jauhar PP, ed. Methods of genome analysis in plants. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 115132.
  • Purich MA. 2005. Characterizing hybridization between native and non-native Crataegus species. MSc Thesis. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto.
  • Quarin CL. 1999. Effect of pollen source and pollen ploidy on endosperm formation and seed set in pseudogamous apomictic Paspalum notatum. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11: 331335.
  • Reddy PS, D’Cruz R. 1968. Mechanism of Apomixis in Dichanthium annulatum (Forssk) Stapf. Botanical Gazette 130: 7179.
  • Rutishauser A. 1954. Die Entwicklungserregug des Endosperms bei pseudogamen Ranunculusarten. Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Schaffhausen 25: 145.
  • Savidan YH. 2000. Apomixis: genetics and breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 18: 1386.
  • Smith PG, Phipps JB. 1988. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae, Maloideae), XIX. Breeding behaviour in Ontario Crataegus Series Rotundifoliae. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 19141923.
  • Talent N, Dickinson TA. 2005. Polyploidy in Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry of nuclear DNA amounts. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 12681304.
  • Temsch EM, Greilhuber J. 2001. Genome size in Arachis duranensis– a critical study. Genome 44: 826830.
  • Tucker MR, Araujoc A-CG, Paech NA, Hecht V, Schmid EDL, Rossell J-B, de Vries SC, Koltunow AMG. 2003. Sexual and apomictic reproduction in Hieracium subgenus Pilosella are closely interrelated developmental pathways. Plant Cell 15: 15241537.
  • Vinkenoog R, Scott RJ. 2001. Autonomous endosperm development in flowering plants: how to overcome the imprinting problem? Sexual Plant Reproduction 14: 189194.
  • Warmke HE. 1954. Apomixis in Panicum maximum. American Journal of Botany 41: 511.
  • Williams EG, Knox RB. 1982. Quantitative analysis of pollen tube growth in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Journal of Palynology 18: 6574.
  • Yeboah Gyan K, Woodell SRJ. 1987. Flowering phenology, flower colour and mode of reproduction of Prunus spinosa L. (Blackthorn); Crataegus monogyna Jacq. (Hawthorn); Rosa canina L. (Dog Rose); and Rubus fruticosus L. (Bramble) in Oxfordshire, England. Functional Ecology 1: 261268.
  • Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.