SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Den Bakker HC, Zuccarello GC, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME. 2004. Evolution and host specificity in the ectomycorrhizal genus Leccinum. New Phytologist 163: 201215.
  • Baxter JW, Dighton J. 2001. Ectomycorrhizal diversity alters growth and nutrient acquisition of grey birch (Betula populifolia) seedlings in host-symbiont culture conditions. New Phytologist 152: 139149.
  • Cline ET, Ammirati JF, Edmonds RL. 2005. Does proximity to mature trees influence ectomycorrhizal fungus communities of Douglas-fir seedling? New Phytologist 166: 9931009.
  • Colwell RK. 2005. estimate s: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 7.5. User's guide and application. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates .
  • Conn C, Dighton J. 2000. Litter quality influences on decomposition, ectomycorrhizal community structure and mycorrhizal root surface acid phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 489496.
  • Cullings KW, Vogler DR, Parker VT, Finley SK. 2000. Ectomycorrhizal specificity patterns in a mixed Pinus contorta and Picea engelmannii forest in Yellowstone National Park. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66: 49884991.
  • Dickie IA, Koide RT, Steiner KC. 2002. Influences of established trees on mycorrhizas, nutrition, and growth of Quercus rubra seedlings. Ecological Monographs 72: 505521.
  • Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113118.
  • Gehring CA, Theimer TC, Whitham TG, Keim P. 1998. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure of pinyon pines growing in two environmental extremes. Ecology 79: 15621572.
  • Grogan P, Baar J, Bruns TD. 2000. Below-ground ectomycorrhizal community structure in a recently burned bishop pine forest. Journal of Ecology 88: 10511062.
  • Grubisha LC, Trappe JM, Molina R, Spatafora JW. 2002. Biology of the ectomycorrhizal genus Rhizopogon. VI. Re-examination of infrageneric relationships inferred from phylogenetic analyses of ITS sequences. Mycologia 94: 607619.
  • Hashizume H, Nakada G, Shinzato T, Somego M, Takikawa S, Uchimura E. 1993. Illustrated practical dendrology. Tokyo, Japan: Asakura shoten.
  • Heltshe J, Forrester NE. 1983. Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics 39: 111.
  • Hibbet DS, Gillbert L-B, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature 407: 506508.
  • Horton TR, Bruns TD. 1998. Multiple-host fungi are the most frequent and abundant ectomycorrhizal types in a mixed stand of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and bishop pine (Pinus muricata). New Phytologist 139: 331339.
  • Horton TR, Molina R, Hood K. 2005. Douglas-fir ectomycorrhizae in 40- and 400-year-old stands: mycobiont availability to late successional western hemlock. Mycorrhiza 15: 393403.
  • Ishida TA, Kimura MT. 2003. Assessment of within-population genetic structure in Quercus crispula and Q. dentata by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Ecological Research 18: 619623.
  • Jonsson L, Dahlberg A, Nilsson M-C, Kårén O, Zackrisson O. 1999. Continuity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in self-regenerating boreal Pinus sylvestris forests studied by comparing mycobiont diversity on seedlings and mature trees. New Phytologist 142: 151162.
  • Jonsson LM, Nilsson MC, Wardle DA, Zackrisson O. 2001. Context dependent effects of ectomycorrhizal species richness on tree seedling productivity. Oikos 93: 353364.
  • Jumpponen A. 2003. Soil fungal community assembly in a primary successional glacier forefront ecosystem as inferred from rDNA sequence analyses. New Phytologist 158: 569578.
  • Kennedy PG, Izzo AD, Bruns TD. 2003. There is high potential for the formation of common mycorrhizal networks between understorey and canopy trees in a mixed evergreen forest. Journal of Ecology 91: 10711080.
  • Kernaghan G, Widden P, Bergeron Y, Légaré S, Paré D. 2003. Biotic and abiotic factors affecting ectomycorrhizal diversity in boreal mixed-woods. Oikos 102: 497504.
  • Koide RT, Xu B, Sharda J, Lekberg Y, Ostiguy N. 2005. Evidence of species interactions within an ectomycorrhizal fungal community. New Phytologist 165: 305316.
  • Koike T. 1988. Leaf structure and photosynthetic performance as related to the forest succession of deciduous broad-leaved trees. Plant Species Biology 3: 7787.
  • Kõljalg U, Larsson K-H, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Høiland K, Kjøller R, Larsson E, Pennanen T, Sen R, Taylor AFS, Tedersoo L, Vrålstad T, Ursing BM. 2005. UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 166: 10631068.
  • Korkama T, Pakkanen A, Pennanen T. 2006. Ectomycorrhizal community structure varies among Norway spruce (Picea abies) clones. New Phytologist 171: 815824.
  • Kranabetter JM, Hayden S, Wright EF. 1999. A comparison of ectomycorrhiza communities from three conifer species planted on forest gap edges. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 11931198.
  • Kretzer A, Li YN, Szaro T, Bruns TD. 1996. Internal transcribed spacer sequences from 38 recognized species of Suillus sensu lato: phylogenetic and taxonomic implications. Mycologia 88: 776785.
  • Lee KJ, Kim YS. 1987. Host specificity and distribution of putative ectomycorrhizal fungi in pure stands of twelve tree species in Korea. Korean Journal of Mycology 15: 4869.
  • Luoma DL, Eberhart JL, Amaranthus MP. 1997. Biodiversity of ectomycorrhizal types form southwest Oregon. In: KayeTN, ListonA, LoveRM, LuomaDL, MeinkeRJ, WilsonMV, eds. Conservation and management of native plants and fungi. Corvalis, OR, USA: Native Plant Society of Oregon, 249253.
  • Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209220.
  • Massicotte HB, Molina R, Tackaberry LE, Smith JE, Amaranthus MP. 1999. Diversity and host specificity of ectomycorrhizal fungi retrieved from three adjacent forest sites by five host species. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 10531076.
  • Molina R, Massicotte H, Trappe JM. 1992. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community-ecological consequences and practical implications. In: AllenMJ, ed. Mycorrhizal functioning. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 357423.
  • Moser MA, Petersen CA, D’Allura JA, Southworth D. 2005. Comparison of ectomycorrhizas of Quercus garryana (Fagaceae) on serpentine and non-serpentine soils in southwestern Oregon. American Journal of Botany 92: 224230.
  • Nantel P, Neumann P. 1992. Ecology of ectomycorrhizal-basidiomycete communities on a local vegetation gradient. Ecology 73: 99117.
  • Nara K. 2006. Pioneer dwarf willow may facilitate tree succession by providing late colonizers with compatible ectomycorrhizal fungi in a primary successional volcanic desert. New Phytologist 171: 187198.
  • Nara K, Nakaya H, Wu B, Zhou Z, Hogetsu T. 2003. Underground primary succession of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a volcanic desert on Mount Fuji. New Phytologist 159: 743756.
  • Newton AC, Haigh JM. 1998. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Britain: a test of the species–area relationship, and the role of host specificity. New Phytologist 138: 619627.
  • O'Dell TE, Ammirati JF, Schreiner EG. 1999. Species richness and abundance of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete sporocarps on a moisture gradient in the Tsuga heterophylla zone. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 16991711.
  • Oden NL, Sokal RF. 1986. Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Systematic Zoology 35: 608617.
  • Peter M, Ayer F, Egli S, Honegger R. 2001. Above- and below-ground community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in three Norway spruce (Picea abies) stands in Switzerland. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 11341151.
  • R Development Core Team . 2006. R : a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.Royal-project.org .
  • Richard F, Millot S, Gardes M, Selosse MA. 2005. Diversity and specificity of ectomycorrhizal fungi retrieved from an old-growth Mediterranean forest dominated by Quercus ilex. New Phytologist 166: 10111023.
  • Sawada H, Oomura K, Sibano S, Fujiwara A, Kaji M. 2006. Enumeration data (1994–2005) for a long-term ecological research plot at Tokyo University Forest in Chichibu. Enshurin 45: 71218.
  • Seiwa K, Kikuzawa K, Kadowaki T, Akasaka S, Ueno N. 2006. Shoot life span in relation to successional status in deciduous broad-leaved tree species in a temperate forest. New Phytologist 169: 537548.
  • Smith JE, McKay D, Niwa CG, Thies WG, Brenner G, Spatafora JW. 2004. Short-term effects of seasonal prescribed burning on the ectomycorrhizal fungal community and fine root biomass in ponderosa pine stands in the Blue Mountains of Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 24772491.
  • Smith SE, Read DJ. 1997. Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 2nd edn. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
  • Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Larsson E, Kõljalg U. 2006. Diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a wooded meadow. Mycological Research 110: 734748.
  • Toljander JF, Eberhardt U, Toljander YK, Paul LR, Taylor AFS. 2006. Species composition of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community along a local nutrient gradient in a boreal forest. New Phytologist 170: 873883.
  • Walker JF, Miller OK, Horton JL. 2005. Hyperdiversity of ectomycorrhizal fungus assemblages on oak seedlings in mixed forests in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Molecular Ecology 14: 829838.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisMA, GelfandDH, SniskyJJ, WhiteTJ, eds. PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Berkeley, CA, USA: Academic Press, 315322.