Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms

Authors

  • Jeroni Galmés,

    1. Grup de Recerca en Biologia de les Plantes en Condicions Mediterrànies, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Carretera de Valldemossa Km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Hipólito Medrano,

    1. Grup de Recerca en Biologia de les Plantes en Condicions Mediterrànies, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Carretera de Valldemossa Km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jaume Flexas

    1. Grup de Recerca en Biologia de les Plantes en Condicions Mediterrànies, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Carretera de Valldemossa Km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author

Errata

This article is corrected by:

  1. Errata: Corrigendum Volume 175, Issue 4, 792, Article first published online: 6 August 2007

Author for correspondence: Jeroni Galmés
Tel: +34 971 259556
Fax: +34 971 173184
Email: jeroni.galmes@uib.es

Summary

  • • Whether photosynthesis is limited during water stress and recovery because of diffusive or biochemical factors is still open to debate, and apparent contradictions appear when various studies on species with different growth forms are compared.
  • • Ten Mediterranean species, representing different growth forms, were subjected to different levels of water stress, the most severe followed by rewatering. A quantitative limitation analysis was applied to estimate the effects of water stress on stomatal (SL), mesophyll conductance (MCL) and biochemical limitations (BL).
  • • Results confirmed a general pattern of photosynthetic response to water stress among C3 plants when stomatal conductance (gs) is used as a reference parameter. As gs values decreased from a maximum to approx. 0.05 mol H2O m−2 s−1, the total photosynthetic limitation rose from 0 to approx. 70%, and this was caused by a progressive increase of both SL and MCL limitations, while BL remained negligible. When lower values of gs were achieved (total photosynthetic limitation increased from 70 to 100%), the contribution of SL declined, while MCL still increased and BL contributed significantly (20–50%) to the total limitation.
  • • Photosynthetic recovery of severely stressed plants after rewatering showed a dominant role of MCL, irrespective of the degree of photosynthesis recovery.

Ancillary