SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ågren J, Danell L, Elmquist T, Ericson L, Hjälten J. 1999. Sexual dimorphism and biotic interactions. In: GeberMA, DawsonTE, DelphLF, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 217246.
  • Ainsworth C. 2000. Boys and girls come out to play: the molecular biology of dioecious plants. Annals of Botany 86: 211221.
  • Alström-Rapaport C, Lascoux M, Gullberg U. 1997. Sex determination and sex ratio in the dioecious shrub Salix viminalis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 493497.
  • Błocka-Wandas M, Sliwinska E, Grabowska-Joachimiak A, Musial K, Joachimiak AJ. (In press) . Male gametophyte development and two different DNA classes of pollen grains in Rumex acetosa L., a plant with an XX/XY1Y2 sex chromosome system and a female-biased sex ratio. Sexual Plant Reproduction.
  • Bierzychudek P, Eckhart V. 1988. Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist 132: 3443.
  • Bino RJ, De Vries JN, Kraak HL, Van Pijlen JG. 1992. Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in tomato seeds during priming and germination. Annals of Botany 69: 231236.
  • Bino RJ, Van Tuyl JM, De Vries JN. 1990. Flow cytometric determination of relative nuclear-DNA contents in bicellulate and tricellulate pollen. Annals of Botany 65: 38.
  • Carlsson-Graner U, Elmqvist T, Ågren J, Gardfjell H, Ingvarsson P. 1998. Floral sex ratios, disease and seed set in dioecious Silene dioica. Journal of Ecology 86: 7991.
  • Charlesworth D. 2002. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88: 94101.
  • Conn JS, Blum U. 1981. Sex ratio of Rumex hastatulus: the effect of environmental factors and certation. Evolution 35: 11081116.
  • Crawford RMM, Balfour J. 1990. Female-biased sex ratios and differential growth in Arctic willows. Flora 184: 291302.
  • Delph LF. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in life history. In: GeberMA, DawsonTE, DelphLF, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 149174.
  • Doležel J, Göhde W. 1995. Sex determination in dioecious plants Melandrium album and M. rubrum using high resolution flow cytometry. Cytometry 19: 103106.
  • Eppley SM. 2001. Gender-specific selection during early life history stages in the dioecious grass Distichlis spicata. Ecology 82: 20222031.
  • Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  • Freeman DL, Klikoff LG, Harper KT. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193: 597599.
  • Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Knapp S. 1991. Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 96: 985989.
  • Grabowska-Joachimiak A, Ṡliwińska E, Pigula M, Skomra U, Joachimiak A. 2006. Genome size in Humulus lupulus L. and H. japonicus Siebold & Zucc. (Cannabaceae). Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 75: 207214.
  • Hardy ICW. 2002. Sex ratios. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hilfiker K, Gugerli F, Schütz JP, Rotach P, Holderegger R. 2004. Low RAPD variation and female-biased sex ratio indicate genetic drift in small populations of the dioecious conifer Taxus baccata in Switzerland. Conservation Genetics 5: 357365.
  • De Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL. 2002. Sex ratios in dioecious plants. In: HardyICW, ed. Sex ratios. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 349364.
  • Joubès J, Chevalier C. 2000. Endoreduplication in higher plants. Plant Molecular Biology 43: 735745.
  • Korpelainen H. 1991. Sex ratio variation and spatial segregation of the sexes in populations of Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella (Polygonaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 174: 183195.
  • Korpelainen H. 2002. A genetic method to resolve gender complements investigations on sex ratios in Rumex acetosa. Molecular Ecology 11: 21512156.
  • Lloyd DG. 1974a. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32: 1134.
  • Lloyd DG. 1974b. Female predominant sex ratios in angiosperms. Heredity 32: 3444.
  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43: 177216.
  • Matsunaga S, Kawano S. 2001. Sex determination by sex chromosomes in dioecious plants. Plant Biology 3: 481488.
  • Mosiolek M, Pasierbek P, Malarz J, Moœ M, Joachimiak AJ. 2005. Rumex acetosa Y chromosomes: constitutive or facultative heterochromatin? Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica 43: 161167.
  • Navajas-Pérez R, De La Herrán R, López Gonzáles G, Jamilena M, Lozano R, Ruiz Rejón C, Ruiz Rejón M, Garrido-Ramos MA. 2005. The evolution of reproductive systems and sex-determining mechanisms within Rumex (Polygonaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplastidial sequence data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 19291939.
  • Negrutiu I, Vyskot B, Barbacar N, Georgiev S, Moneger F. 2001. Dioecious plants. A key to the early events of sex chromosome evolution. Plant Physiology 127: 14181424.
  • Nicotra AB. 1998. Sex ratio variation and spatial distribution of Siparuna grandiflora, a tropical shrub. Oecologia 115: 102113.
  • Pan G, Zhou Y, Fowke LC, Wang H. 2004. An efficient method for flow cytometric analysis of pollen and detection of 2n nuclei in Brassica napus pollen. Plant Cell Reports 23: 196202.
  • Parker JS. 1990. Sex-chromosomes and sexual differentiation in flowering plants. Chromosomes Today 10: 187198.
  • Price HJ, Dillon SL, Hodnett G, Rooney WL, Ross L, Johnston JS. 2005. Genome evolution in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae). Annals of Botany 95: 219227.
  • Putwain PD, Harper JL. 1972. Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. V. mechanisms governing the sex ratio in Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella. Journal of Ecology 60: 113129.
  • Rychlewski J, Zarzycki K. 1975. Sex ratio in seeds of Rumex acetosa L. as a result of sparse or abundant pollination. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 18: 101114.
  • Rychlewski J, Zarzycki K. 1986. Genetical and ecological mechanisms regulating the sex ratio in populations of Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh. (Polygonaceae). Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes ETH 87: 132140.
  • Smith BW. 1963. The mechanism of sex determination in Rumex hastatulus. Genetics 48: 12651288.
  • Stehlik I, Barrett SCH. 2005. Mechanisms governing sex-ratio variation in dioecious Rumex nivalis. Evolution 59: 814825.
  • Stehlik I, Barrett SCH. 2006. Pollination intensity influences sex ratios in dioecious Rumex nivalis: a wind-pollinated plant. Evolution 60: 12071214.
  • Stehlik I, Blattner FR. 2004. Sex-specific SCAR markers in the dioecious plant Rumex nivalis (Polygonaceae) and implications for the evolution of sex chromosomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 238242.
  • Suda J, Kron P, Husband BC, Trávníček P. 2007. Flow cytometry and ploidy: applications in plant systematics, ecology and evolutionary biology. In: DoleželJ, GreilhuberJ, SudaJ, eds. Flow cytometry with plant cells: analysis of genes, chromosomes and genomes. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley, 103130.
  • Taylor DR. 1994. The genetic basis of sex-ratio in Silene alba (=S. latifolia). Genetics 136: 641651.
  • Taylor DR. 1999. Genetics of sex ratio variation among natural populations of a dioecious plant. Evolution 53: 5562.
  • Taylor DR, Ingvarsson PK. 2003. Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals. Genetica 117: 2735.
  • Vyskot B, Hobza R. 2004. Gender in plants: sex chromosomes are emerging from the fog. Trends in Genetics 9: 432438.
  • Wagenitz G. 1981. Gustav Hegi, Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, Vol. III(I). Berlin, Germany: Parey.
  • Westergaard M. 1958. The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Advances in Genetics 9: 217281.
  • Zarzycki K, Rychlewski J. 1972. Sex ratios in Polish natural populations and in seedling sampling of Rumex acetosa L. and R. thyrsiflorus Fing. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botonica 15: 135151.
  • Żuk J. 1963. An investigation on polyploidy and sex determination within the genus Rumex. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 32: 567.
  • Żuk J. 1969. Autographic studies in Rumex with the special reference to sex chromosomes. Chromosomes Today 2: 183188.