SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agrawal AA. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294: 321326.
  • Ågren GI. 1985. Theory for growth of plants derived from the nitrogen productivity concept. Physiologia Plantarum 64: 1728.
  • Albrectsen BR, Gardfjell H, Orians CM, Murray B, Fritz RS. 2004. Slugs, willow seedlings and nutrient fertilization: intrinsic vigor inversely affects palatability. Oikos 105: 268278.
  • Albrectsen BR, Gutierrez L, Fritz RS, Fritz RD, Orians CM. 2007. Does differential seedling mortality caused by slugs alter the foliar traits and subsequent susceptibility of hybrid willows to a generalist herbivore? Ecological Entomology 32: 211220.
  • Anten NPR, Schieving F, Werger MJA, Schuffelen P. 1995. Optimal leaf area indices in C3 and C4 mono- and dicotyledonous species at low and high nitrogen availability. Physiologia Plantarum 95: 541550.
  • Attiwill PM, Adams MA. 1993. Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytologist 124: 561582.
  • Berenbaum MR. 1995. The chemistry of defense: theory and practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 28.
  • Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA. 1985. Resource limitation in plants – an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 363392.
  • Bongue-Bartelsman M, Phillips DA. 1995. Nitrogen stress regulates gene expression of enzymes in the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway of tomato. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 33: 539546.
  • Chapin FS III. 1989. The cost of tundra plant structures: evaluation of concepts and currencies. American Naturalist 133: 119.
  • Chapin FS III. 1991. Integrated responses of plants to stress: a centralized system of physiological responses. Bioscience 41: 2936.
  • Chapin FS III, Autumn K, Pugnaire F. 1993. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. American Naturalist 142: S78S92.
  • Chew V. 1976. Comparing treatment means: a compendium. Hortscience 11: 348357.
  • Crone EE, Jones CG. 1999. The dynamics of carbon–nutrient balance: effects of cottonwood acclimation to short- and long-term shade on beetle feeding preferences. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 635656.
  • Ericsson T. 1995. Growth and shoot:root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant and Soil 168–169: 205214.
  • Fritz RS, Hochwender CG, Lewkiewicz DA, Bothwell S, Orians CM. 2001. Seedling herbivory by slugs in a willow hybrid system: developmental changes in damage, chemical defense, and plant performance. Oecologia 129: 8797.
  • Geiger DR, Koch KE, Shieh W-J. 1996. Effect of environmental factors on whole plant assimilate partitioning and associated gene expression. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 12291238.
  • Hagerman AE, Butler LG. 1989. Choosing appropriate methods and standards for assaying tannins. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 17951810.
  • Hamilton JG, Zangerl AR, DeLucia EH, Berenbaum MR. 2001. The carbon–nutrient balance hypothesis: its rise and fall. Ecology Letters 4: 8695.
  • Han K, Lincoln DE. 1997. The impact of plasticity and maternal effect on the evolution of leaf resin production in Diplacus aurantiacus. Evolutionary Ecology 11: 471484.
  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283335.
  • Hirose T. 1987. A vegetative plant growth model: adaptive significance of phenotypic plasticity in matter partitioning. Functional Ecology 1: 195202.
  • Ingestad T. 1982. Relative addition rate and external concentration: driving variables used in plant nutrition research. Plant, Cell & Environment 5: 443453.
  • Ingestad T, Ågren GI. 1991. The influence of plant nutrition on biomass allocation. Ecological Applications 1: 168174.
  • Ingestad T, Ågren GI. 1992. Theories and methods on plant nutrition and growth. Physiologia Plantarum 84: 177184.
  • Koricheva J. 2002. Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses. Ecology 83: 176190.
  • Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E, Keinänen M. 1998. Regulation of woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: hypothesis testing by means of meta-analysis. Oikos 83: 212226.
  • Körner C. 1991. Some often overlooked plant characteristics as determinants of plant growth: a reconsideration. Functional Ecology 5: 162173.
  • Kytö M, Niemelä P, Larsson S. 1996. Insects on trees: population and individual response to fertilization. Oikos 75: 148159.
  • Lambers H, Poorter H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advances in Ecological Research 23: 187261.
  • Lee I, Fynn RP, Short TH. 2000. Development and evaluation of a computer- controlled fertigation system. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 16: 279284.
  • Lewinsohn E, Gijzen M, Muzika RM, Barton K, Croteau R. 1993. Oleoresinosis in grand fir (Abies grandis) saplings and mature trees. Modulation of this wound response by light and water stresses. Plant Physiology 101: 10211028.
  • Lindroth RL, Koss PA. 1996. Preservation of Salicaceae leaves for phytochemical analyses: further assessment. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22: 765771.
  • Loomis WE. 1932. Growth–differentiation balance vs. carbohydrate–nitrogen ratio. American Society for Horticultural Science Proceedings 29: 240245.
  • Lorio PL Jr. 1986. Growth–differentiation balance: a basis for understanding southern pine beetle–tree interactions. Forest Ecology and Management 14: 259273.
  • Luxmoore RJ. 1991. A source–sink framework for coupling water, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of vegetation. Tree Physiology 9: 267280.
  • Marcelis LFM. 1996. Sink strength as a determinant of dry matter partitioning in the whole plant. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 12811291.
  • McDonald AJS. 1990. Phenotypic variation in growth rate as affected by N-supply: its effects on net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf weight ratio (LWR) and specific leaf area (SLA). In: LambersH, CambridgeML, KoningsH, PonsTL, eds. Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. The Hague, the Netherlands: SPB Publishing, 3544.
  • Mihaliak CA, Lincoln DE. 1985. Growth pattern and carbon allocation to volatile leaf terpenes under nitrogen-limiting conditions in Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). Oecologia 66: 423426.
  • Nichols-Orians CM, Fritz RS, Clausen TP. 1993. The genetic basis for variation in the concentration of phenolic glycosides in Salix sericea: clonal variation and sex-based differences. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 21: 535542.
  • Orians CM. 1995. Preserving leaves for chemical analyses: a comparison of methods using three willow taxa. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 12351243.
  • Orians CM, Fritz RS. 1995. Secondary chemistry of hybrid and parental willows: phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in Salix sericea, S. eriocephala and their hybrids. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 12451254.
  • Orians CM, Griffiths M, Roche BM, Fritz RS. 2000. Phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in Salix sericea, S. eriocephala and their F1 hybrids: Not all hybrids are created equal. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 28: 619632.
  • Orians CM, Lower S, Fritz RS, Roche BM. 2003. The effects of plant genetic variation and soil nutrients on secondary metabolism and growth in a shrubby willow, Salix sericea: patterns and constraints on the evolution of resistance traits. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 233247.
  • Patrick JW. 1988. Assimilate partitioning in relation to crop productivity. Hortscience 23: 3340.
  • Poorter H, Garnier E. 1999. Ecological significance of inherent variation in relative growth rate and its components. In: PugnaireFI, ValladaresF, eds. Handbook of functional ecology. New York, NY, USA: Dekker, 81120.
  • Potter JW, Jones WJ. 1977. Leaf area partitioning as an important factor in growth. Plant Physiology 59: 1014.
  • Robson DS. 1959. A simple method for constructing orthogonal polynomials when the independent variable is unequally spaced. Biometrics 15: 187191.
  • Rowell-Rahier M. 1984. The presence or absence of phenolglycosides in Salix (Salicaceae) leaves and the level of dietary specialization of some of their herbivorous insects. Oecologia 62: 2630.
  • SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS® procedures guide, version 8. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
  • Scheible W-R, Morcuende R, Czechowski T, Fritz C, Osuna D, Palacios-Rojas N, Schindelasch D, Thimm O, Udvardi MK, Stitt M. 2004. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiology 136: 24832499.
  • Shipley B, Meziane D. 2002. The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass. Functional Ecology 16: 326331.
  • Stamp N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Quarterly Review of Biology 78: 2355.
  • Stamp N. 2004. Can the growth–differentiation balance hypothesis be tested rigorously? Oikos 107: 439448.
  • Tahvanainen J, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Kettunen J. 1985. Phenolic glycosides govern the food selection pattern of willow feeding leaf beetles. Oecologia 67: 5256.
  • Wallin KF, Raffa KF. 2001. Effects of folivory on subcortical plant defenses: can defense theories predict interguild processes? Ecology 82: 13871400.
  • Waterman PG, Mole S. 1989. Extrinsic factors influencing production of secondary metabolites in plants. In: BernaysEA, ed. Insect–plant interactions, Vol. 1. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 107134.
  • White JW, Mastalerz JW. 1966. Soil moisture as related to container capacity. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 89: 758765.
  • Wilkens RT, Spoerke JM, Stamp NE. 1996. Differential responses of growth and two soluble phenolics of tomato to resource availability. Ecology 77: 247258.