SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Archie JW. 1996. Measures of homoplasy. In: SandersonMJ, HuffordL, eds. Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 153188.
  • Armbruster WS. 1992. Phylogeny and the evolution of plant–animal interactions. Bioscience 41: 1220.
  • Armbruster WS. 1993. Evolution of plant pollination systems: hypotheses and tests with the neotropical vine Dalechampia. Evolution 47: 14801505.
  • Armbruster WS, Baldwin BG. 1998. Switch from specialized to generalized pollination. Nature 394: 632.
  • Baker HG, Baker I. 1983. Floral nectar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: JonesCE, LittleRJ, eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 117141.
  • Beardsley PM, Yen A, Olmstead RG. 2003. AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57: 13971410.
  • Bruneau A. 1997. Evolution and homology of bird pollination syndromes in Erythrina (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany 84: 5471.
  • Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Keller S, Wolfe A, Thomson JD. 2006. Anther evolution: pollen presentation strategies when pollinators differ. American Naturalist 167: 288296.
  • Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Thomson JD. 2003. Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees, and the divergence of pollination modes in Penstemon. Evolution 57: 27422752.
  • Clinebell RR, Bernhardt P. 1998. The pollination ecology of five species of Penstemon (Scrophulariaceae) in the tallgrass prairie. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 126136.
  • Cruden RW, Hermann SM, Peterson S. 1983. Patterns of nectar production and plant–pollinator coevolution. In: BentleyB, EliasT, eds. The biology of nectaries. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press, 80125.
  • Datwyler SL, Wolfe AD. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships and morphological evolution in Penstemon subg. Dasanthera (Veronicaeae). Systematic Botany 29: 165176.
  • Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586608.
  • Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Endress PK. 1996. Homoplasy in angiosperm flowers. In: SandersonMJ, HuffordL, eds. Homoplasy: the Recurrence of similarity in evolution. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 303325.
  • Fenster C, Armbruster S, Wilson P, Dudash M, Thomson JD. 2004. Floral specialization and pollination syndromes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 375403.
  • Freeman CE, Harrison JS, Janovec JP, Scogin R. 2003. Inferred phylogeny in Keckiella (Scrophulariaceae) based on noncoding chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 28: 782790.
  • Freeman CE, Reid WH, Becvar JE, Scogin R. 1984. Similarity and apparent convergence in the nectar-sugar composition of some hummingbird-pollinated flowers. Botanical Gazette 145: 132135.
  • Gould SJ. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA, USA: Belknap Press.
  • Grant V. 1994. Historical development of ornithophily in the western North American flora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 1040710411.
  • Healy SD, Hurley TA. 2001. Foraging and spatial learning in hummingbirds. In: ChittkaL, ThomsonJD, eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 127147.
  • Janson CH. 1992. Measuring evolutionary constraints: a Markov model for phylogenetic transitions among seed dispersal syndromes. Evolution 46: 136158.
  • Johnson SD, Linder HP, Steiner KE. 1998. Phylogeny and radiation of pollination systems in Disa (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 402411.
  • Kay KM, Reeves PA, Olmstead RG, Schemske DW. 2005. Rapid speciation and the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Neotropical Costus subgenus Costus (Costaceae): evidence from nrDNA ITS and ETS sequences. American Journal of Botany 92: 18991910.
  • Lange RS, Scobell SA, Scott PE. 2000. Hummingbird syndrome traits, breeding system, and pollinator effectiveness in two syntopic Penstemon species. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 253263.
  • Lodewick R, Lodewick K. 1999. Key to the genus Penstemon and its related genera in the tribe Cheloneae (Scrophulariaceae). Eugene, OR, USA: K. Lodewick.
  • Macior LW. 1986. Floral resource sharing by bumblebees and hummingbirds in Pedicularis (Scrophulariaceae) pollination. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 113: 101109.
  • Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2001. Macclade 4.03. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.
  • Mant JG, Schiestl FP, Peakall R, Weston PH. 2002. A phylogenetic study of pollinator conservatism among sexually deceptive orchids. Evolution 56: 888898.
  • Penneys DS, Judd WS. 2005. A systematic revision and cladistic analysis of Charianthus (Melastomataceae) using morphological and molecular characters. Systematic Botany 30: 559584.
  • Perret M, Chautems A, Spichiger R, Kite G, Savolainen V. 2003. Systematics and evolution of tribe Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae): evidence from phylogenetic analyses of six plastid DNA regions and nuclear ncpGS. American Journal of Botany 90: 445460.
  • Rausher M. ( in press ). Evolutionary transitions in floral color. International Journal of Plant Sciences.
  • Ree RH. 2005. Phylogeny and the evolution of floral diversity in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 166: 595613.
  • Stebbins GL. 1989. Adaptive shifts toward hummingbird pollination. In: BockJH, LinhartYB, eds. The evolutionary ecology of plants. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 3960.
  • Straw RM. 1963. Bee-fly pollination of Penstemon ambiguus. Ecology 44: 818819.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. Paup* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) 4.0, Beta10. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.
  • Thompson JN. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Thomson JD. 2003. When is it mutualism? American Naturalist 162: S1S9.
  • Thomson JD, Wilson P. (in press). Explaining evolutionary shifts between bee and hummingbird pollination: convergence, divergence, and directionality.International Journal of Plant Sciences.
  • Weigend M, Gottschling M, Hoot S, Ackermann M. 2004. A preliminary phylogeny of Loasaceae subfam. Loasoideae (Angiospermae: Cornales) based on trnL(UAA) sequence data, with consequences for systematics and historical biogeography. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 4: 7390.
  • Whittall JB, Hodges SA. 2007. Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 447: 706709.
  • Williams NM, Thomson JD. 1998. Trapline foraging by bumble bees III. Temporal patterning of visits. Behavioral Ecology 9: 612621.
  • Wilson P, Castellanos MC, Hogue JN, Thomson JD, Armbruster WS. 2004. A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons. Oikos 104: 345361.
  • Wilson P, Castellanos MC, Wolfe A, Thomson JD. 2006. Shifts between bee- and bird-pollination among penstemons. In: WaserNM, OllertonJ, eds. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 4768.
  • Wolfe AD, Datwyler SL, Randle CP. 2002. A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of the Cheloneae (Scrophulariaceae) based on ITS and matK sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 138148.
  • Wolfe AD, Randle CP, Datwyler SL, Morawetz JJ, Arguedas N, Diaz J. 2006. Phylogeny, taxonomic affinities, and biogeography of Penstemon (Plantaginaceae) based on ITS and cpDNA sequence data. American Journal of Botany 94: 16991713.
  • Zufall RA, Rausher MD. 2004. Genetic changes associated with floral adaptation restrict future evolutionary potential. Nature 428: 847850.