A laticifer is thus named because it contains a latex. ‘Latex’ derives from poetical Latin and denotes a (frequently special) type of liquid; the Latin plural of ‘latex’ is ‘latices’. In its general botanical sense, latex is of highly variable chemical composition, is not necessarily of a milky appearance, and may contain precipitates of various sorts, or suspended colloids, or a variety of dissolved solutes (cf. Esau, 1965; Mahlberg, 1993). Moreover, because latex frequently is milky in appearance, a tissue that contains it may occasionally be termed ‘lactiferous’ (e.g. Haug et al., 2005); and here the ‘lact’ comes from a Latin root denoting breast milk. This author inclines toward the view that, if a tissue is known to contain laticifers in the sense of Esau (1965), it is certainly laticiferous, whereas, if a tissue is known only to exude upon puncture a whitish liquid, then it is still laticiferous because its exudate (however stored in the tissue) is certainly not breast milk.
Laticifers and secretory ducts: two other tube systems in plants
Article first published online: 13 DEC 2007
© The Author (2007)
Volume 177, Issue 4, pages 877–888, March 2008
How to Cite
Pickard, W. F. (2008), Laticifers and secretory ducts: two other tube systems in plants. New Phytologist, 177: 877–888. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02323.x
Symplastic transport itself is more a distributed mechanism than one concentrated in a supracellular anatomical feature (i.e. tube), and it was therefore placed beyond the scope of this survey. However, recent relevant reviews have treated the significance of plasmodesmograms (Van Bel & Oparka, 1995); the role of plasmodesmata in symplastic transport (Roberts & Oparka, 2003); long-distance transport in nonvascular plants (Raven, 2003); the role of cytoplasmic streaming in symplastic transport (Pickard, 2003); and macromolecular trafficking (Oparka, 2004).
With the flowering of molecular taxonomy, the structure of taxonomic trees underwent and is still undergoing a period of great change. In this paper the tendency is to adhere to traditional nomenclature but within a framework of the tree structure continuously updated by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website (http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/welcome.html) hosted by the Missouri Botanical Garden. The URLs http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/treeapweb2map.html and botany.hawaii.edu are also of value.
Exactly how to differentiate these plant products from one another is something of a judgement call (cf. Nair, 1995). However, polysaccharides are generally the prominent component in a gum. A gum will dissolve in (or form a suspension with) water to yield a viscous (and often adhesive) jelly, paste, or syrup. Gums are insoluble in organic solvents of low dielectric constant. Resins, in contrast, are classified as aromatic because of the prominence of ring compounds (often heavy and nonvolatile) in them. Resins are not water soluble but dissolve readily in organic solvents of low dielectric constant. Essential oils are lower molecular weight aromatic compounds of a distinctive odor (essence) which characterizes their source; they are a common constituent of resins.
In modern usage, the ‘apoplast constitutes all compartments beyond the plasmalemma’ (Sattelmacher, 2001, p. 167) while, by exclusion, the symplast seems to include everything within the plasmalemma. This view, while formally correct, does not encompass the normally unvoiced expectation that both these spaces should be filled with electrolyte of unremarkable properties; and a laticifer vacuole filled with rubber particles or a duct loaded with terpenoids may require rethinking some generalizations.
- Issue published online: 13 DEC 2007
- Article first published online: 13 DEC 2007
- Received: 4 May 2007Accepted: 28 October 2007
The following supplementary material is available for this article online:
Text S1 A bibliography of material judged superfluous for the casual reader but essential for the reader who wishes to probe more deeply.
This material is available as part of the online article from:
(This link will take you to the article abstract.)
Please note: Blackwell Publishing are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the journal at New Phytologist Central Office.
|NPH_2323_sm_TextS1.doc||53K||Supporting info item|
|NPH_texts1.doc||53K||Supporting info item|