SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bilger W, Schreiber U, Buck M. 1996. Determination of the quantum efficiency of photosystem II and non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in the field. Oecologia 102: 425432.
  • Björkman O, Demmig B. 1987. Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170: 489504.
  • Bond WJ. 1989. The tortoise and the hare: ecology of angiosperm dominance and gymnosperm persistence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 36: 227249.
  • Brodribb TJ, Feild TS. 2000. Stem hydraulic supply is linked to leaf photosynthetic capacity: evidence from New Caledonian and Tasmanian rainforests. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 13811388.
  • Brodribb T, Feild T, Jordan G. 2007. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiology 144: 18901898.
  • Brodribb TJ, Hill RS. 1997. The light response characteristics of morphologically diverse group of southern hemisphere conifers. Oecologia 110: 1017.
  • Brodribb TJ, Hill RS. 2004. The rise and fall of the Podocarpaceae in Australia – a physiological explanation. In: HemsleyAR, PooleI, eds. The evolution of plant physiology. London, UK: Academic Press, 379381.
  • Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM. 2003. Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiology 132: 21662173.
  • Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM. 2006. Declining hydraulic efficiency as transpiring leaves desiccate: two types of response. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 22052215.
  • Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA, Palma B. 2005. Leaf hydraulic capacity in ferns, conifers and angiosperms: impacts on photosynthetic maxima. New Phytologist 165: 839846.
  • Bucholtz JT. 1951. A flat-leaved pine from Annan, Indo-China. American Journal of Botany 38: 157244.
  • Bucholtz JT, Gray NE. 1948. A taxonomic revision of the genus Podocarpus. I. The sections of the genus and their divisions with respect to leaf anatomy. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29: 4963.
  • Chaney R. 1947. Tertiary centers and migration routes. Ecological Monographs 17: 139148.
  • Cochard H, Venisse JS, Barigah TS, Brunel N, Herbette S, Guilliot A, Tyree MT, Sakr S. 2007. Putative role of aquaporins in variable hydraulic conductance of leaves in response to light. Plant Physiology 143: 122133.
  • Davis M, Shaw R. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternery climate change. Science: 673679.
  • Day T, Heckathorn S, DeLucia E. 1991. Limitations of photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. (Loblolly Pine) at low soil temperatures. Plant Physiology 96: 12461254.
  • Dick JM, Jarvis PE, Leakey RRB. 1991. Influence of male and female cones on needle CO2 exchange rates of field-grown Pinus contorta doug. Trees. Functional Ecology 5: 422432.
  • Eckert A, Hall B. 2006. Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and patterns of diversification for Pinus (Pinaceae): phylogenetic tests of fossil-based hypotheses. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 166182.
  • Enright N, Hill R. 1995. Ecology of the southern conifers. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
  • Farjon A, Styles B. 1997. Pinus (Pinaceae). In: Flora Neotropica Monograph 75. New York, NY, USA: New York Botanical Gardens.
  • Florin R. 1963. The distribution of conifer and taxad genera in time and space. Acta Horti Bergiani 20: 121312.
  • Genty B, Briantais J, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 990: 8792.
  • Gower ST, Reich PB, Son Y. 1993. Canopy dynamics and aboveground production of five tree species with different leaf longevities. Tree Physiology 12: 327345.
  • Griffith MM. 1957. Folar ontogeny of Podocarpus macrophyllus with special reference to transfusion tissue. American Journal of Botany 44: 705715.
  • Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost T. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. American Naturalist 159: 396419.
  • Hill RS, Brodribb TJ. 1999. Southern conifers in time and space. Australian Journal of Botany 47: 639696.
  • Hubbard RM, Ryan MG, Stiller V, Sperry JS. 2001. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 113121.
  • Ickert-Bond S. 2000. Cuticle micromorphology of Pinus krempfii Lecomte (Pinaceae) and additional species from South-East Asia. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 301317.
  • Jach M, Ceulemans R. 2000. Effects of season, needle age and elevated CO2 on photosynthesis in Scots pine. Tree Physiology 20: 145157.
  • Jose S, Merritt S, Ramsey C. 2003. Growth nutrition photosynthesis and transpitarion responses of longleaf pine seedlings to light, water and nitrogen. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 335344.
  • Koskela J, Hari P, Pipatwattanakul D. 1999. Analysis of gas exchange of Merkus pine populations by the optimality approach. Tree Physiology 19: 511518.
  • Lee DW, Bone RA, Tarsis SL, Storch D. 1990. Correlates of leaf optical properties in tropical forest sun and extreme-shade plants. American Journal of Botany 77: 370380.
  • Lusk CH, Wright I, Reich PB. 2003. Photosynthetic differences contribute to competitive advantage of evergreen angiosperm trees over evergreen conifers in productive habitats. New Phytologist 160: 329336.
  • Millar CL. 1998. Early evolution of pines. In: RichardsonDM, ed. Ecology and biogeography of pinus. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press, 6991.
  • Mirov N. 1967. The genus Pinus. New York, NY, USA: Ronald Press.
  • Nguyen D, Thomas P. 2004. Conifers of Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: World Publishing House.
  • Peters J, Morales D, Jimenez M. 2003. Gas exchange characteristics of Pinus canariensis needles in a forest stand on Tenerife, Canary Islands. Tree Physiology 17: 492500.
  • Pitterman J, Sperry J, Wheeler J, Hacke U, Sikkema E. 2006. Mechanical reinforcement of tracheids compromises the hydraulic efficiency of conifer xylem. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 16181628.
  • RichardsonDM, RundelP, eds. 1998. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus: an introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith S, Stockey R. 2001. A new species of Pityostrobus from the lower cretaceous of California and its bearing on the evolution of pinaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 669681.
  • Stockey R. 1994. Mesozoic Araucariaceae: morphology and systematic relationships. Journal of Plant Research 107: 493502.
  • Tan W, Hogan G. 1995. Limitations to net photosynthesis as affected by nitrogen status in jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany 46: 407413.
  • Teskey RO, Whitehead D, Linder S. 1994. Photosynthesis and carbon gain by pines. Ecological Bulletins 43: 3549.
  • Turnbull MH, Tissue DT, Griffin KL, Rogers GND, Whitehead D. 1998. Photosynthetic acclimation to long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration in Pinus radiata is related to age of needles. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 10191028.
  • Wang X-R, Szmidt A, Nguyen H. 2000. The phylogenetic position of the endemic flat-needle pine, Pinus krempfii (Pinaceae) from Vietnam, based on PCR-RFLP analysis of chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 220: 2136.
  • Warren C, Adams M. 2000. Trade-offs between the persistence of foliage and productivity in two Pinus species. Oecologia 124: 487494.
  • Will R, Barron G, Burkes C, Shiver B, Teskey R. 2001. Relationship between intercepted radiation, net photosynthesis, respiration, and rate of stem volume growth of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii stands of different densities. Forest Ecology and Management 154: 155163.
  • Willard A, Syring J, Gernandt D, Liston A, Cronn R. 2006. Fossil calibration of molecular divergence infers a moderate mutation rate and recent radiations for Pinus. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 90101.
  • Zhang J, Marshall J. 1995. Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthestic gas exchange among populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus ponderosa in different environments. Functional Ecology 9: 402412.