SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • arbuscular;
  • clonality;
  • evolution;
  • mycorrhiza;
  • speciation;
  • population genetics

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Contents

Summary 1
I. Introduction1
II. Taxonomy and species recognition2
III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi4
IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi6
V. Individuals, genets or clones?8
VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota9
VII. Conclusion10
Acknowledgements 11
References 11

Summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the phylum Glomeromycota are found globally in most vegetation types, where they form a mutualistic symbiosis with plant roots. Despite their wide distribution, only relatively few species are described. The taxonomy is based on morphological characters of the asexual resting spores, but molecular approaches to community ecology have revealed a considerable unknown diversity from colonized roots. Although the lack of genetic recombination is not unique in the fungal kingdom, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are probably ancient asexuals. The long asexual evolution of the fungi has resulted in considerable genetic diversity within morphologically recognizable species, and challenges our concepts of individuals and populations. This review critically examines the concepts of species, communities, populations and individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.


I. Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi represent some of the most abundant organisms on this planet, where they form symbiotic associations with most land plants and are found in almost all vegetation systems from the sub-polar regions to the tropical rain forests, and even in some aquatic ecosystems. (Read, 1991; Nielsen et al., 2004). They form a unique symbiosis with the roots of most land plants, and their evolutionary success despite being asexual challenges our view on fungal evolutionary biology. Molecular analyses and studies of fossilized material suggest that the fungi have their origin with the first land plants, and the symbiosis may have been essential for the adaptation of plants to the terrestrial environment in the Ordovician (Berbee & Taylor, 1993; Remy et al., 1994; Redecker et al., 2000). Plant–soil interactions cannot be studied without considering mycorrhizal fungi, as they constitute a considerable and important part of the microbial biomass in many terrestrial ecosystems (Fig. 1) (Jastrow & Miller, 1997). The importance of mycorrhizal fungi in nutrient uptake of plants has received most attention, and has been the focus of several research programmes (Smith & Read, 1997). The effects on plants are not limited to the nutritional status of individual plants, but may also affect the composition and development of plant communities (Grime et al., 1987; van der Heijden et al., 1998). Although several earlier studies are entitled: ‘The effect of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza on ...’, it is now generally accepted that although many arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi show low host specificity, species may differ in their effects on plant growth (Ravnskov & Jakobsen, 1995). This could be because of differences among species in their ability to acquire nutrients (Smith et al., 2004) and to provide the host plant with an improved stress tolerance toward drought (Michelsen & Rosendahl, 1990) and pathogens (Rosendahl, 1985).

image

Figure 1. Gerbera roots colonized by Glomus mosseae (BEG 83). The external mycelium with resting spores around the root is visible. The hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are able to extend the root system and exploit a greater soil volume.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The acknowledgement of physiological and ecological differences between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has necessitated an assignment of species names, or even isolate or strain identification, for the fungi of interest. Without such identification, it is not possible to compare studies and explain discrepancies between results obtained from apparently similar studies. More recent studies have focused on the distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi along environmental gradients and their potential influence on plant communities. The fungal species are often identified from their DNA sequences, and our interpretation of the studies needs not only a consensus on taxonomy and species recognition, but also on the concepts of abundance and diversity.

Diversity has been used and misused as a concept in both ecology and politics. The basic idea is to describe the multiplicity of nature, and there is no doubt that it is an important measure in ecology and conservation biology. Studies of microorganisms challenge the concept for several reasons. First, it is not possible to use the same criteria for species recognition in animals, plants, fungi and bacteria; second, individuality may not have the same meaning in these groups. The clonal structure of Glomeromycota populations may further challenge the concept of diversity as a measurable size, as the distinction between populations and individuals becomes less apparent. Problems in standardization of concepts create unnecessary problems and misunderstandings when different experiments are compared. This review will attempt to discuss critically the concepts of species, communities, populations and individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

II. Taxonomy and species recognition

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi belong to the Glomeromycota. They were formerly placed in the Zygomycota (Thaxter, 1922; Gerdemann & Trappe, 1974), but molecular analyses suggest that they should have their own phylum (Schüßler et al., 2001). The affinity to Zygomycota was based on the interpretation of the spores as azygospores, which are zygospores with only one gametangium. Later, the spores were considered to be a sporangium in which the spores do not develop, or a merosporangium with only one spore. The homology of the spores to other known fungal structures has never been established, and recent studies suggest that the Zygomycota are polyphyletic. At present the Glomeromycota has no obvious affinity to other major phylogenetic groups in the kingdom Fungi (James et al., 2006). The interpretation of homologies between Glomeromycota spores and other fungal structures is further complicated by the fact that Glomeromycota spores may, among themselves, represent different morphological and functional structures. In some Glomus species such as G. intraradices, the structure of the spore wall is simple, whereas the spores in Scutellospora spp. can have several inner membranous walls and develop complex germination shields. The finding of dimorphic species with both Glomus and Acaulospora morphs further suggests that all spores in the Glomeromycota may not represent homologous structures (Morton & Redecker, 2001).

The first classification systems were not always based on the Botanical Code, but used descriptive names such as yellow vacuolated (YV) for Glomus mosseae, honey-coloured sessile for Acaulospora laevis, etc. (Mosse & Bowen, 1968); or E1, E2, E3, etc. (Gilmore, 1968). These descriptive names were often mistaken for isolate or strain numbers. For example, the famous E3 isolate from Rothamsted Experimental Station only resembled Gilmore's E3 from California, but was actually isolated in the UK. The first taxonomic monograph was published in 1974 by Gerdemann & Trappe (1974), but no attempts to monograph the Glomeromycota have been made since that time. As an alternative, N. Schenck and Y. Perez at the University of Florida collected the species descriptions in a manual that was used at the taxonomic workshops in the 1980s and 1990s. A major breakthrough in species identification has been the establishment of culture collections and reference strains: Banque Européenne des Glomales (BEG) in Europe and the International Culture Collection of Vesicular (Arbuscular) Mycorrhizal Fungi (INVAM) in North America. The descriptions found on the INVAM web page (http://invam.caf.wvu.edu), provided by Joe Morton, have served as a reference for species designation by researchers worldwide. The descriptions are based on INVAM cultures, and do not attempt to cover the variation in morphological characters. Although there are problems with correct identification of species in various culture collections, these collections have greatly facilitated comparisons among experiments where such bona fide cultures are used.

The taxonomic system was based on interpretation of morphological features of the resting spores, and later studies have included characters related to the ontogeny of the spores (Franke & Morton, 1994). Interpretation of these characters has laid the ground for several controversies among taxonomists, a phenomenon not specific to mycorrhizal research. The main discussion has focused on the spore wall characters, where the relevance of the number and position of walls and wall layers has been a key issue. A so-called murograph was included in the description of some species, and new species were described containing up to seven walls. Several users of the classification found it very hard to identify species based on the descriptions (Koske, 1986), and some claimed that the number of walls depended more on the age of the spore and how hard you pressed the cover slip, than on the actual taxonomic identity (J. C. Dodd, personal communication). The discussion on whether arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi had several walls (sensu Walker, 1983) or one wall with several layers (Berch, 1987) may have been regarded as a purely academic debate, but the discussion reflected the question of whether or not the diversity had a common origin, or if the wall characters were independent characters. Later studies of wall ontogeny of Scutellospora pellucida showed that walls or wall layers cannot be seen as independent characters, as the inner walls differentiate during germination of the spore (Franke & Morton, 1994). On several occasions Morton has made a plea for a hierarchical interpretation of taxonomic characters (Morton et al., 1992; Morton 1995), but species are still described without such interpretation of the characters.

The number of recognizable species in the Glomeromycota is not apparent. Despite the worldwide distribution of the fungi, relatively few species have been described. Some authors recognize c. 200 species, but some additional descriptions exist and some of the descriptions could be synonyms. Recently, A. Schüßler in Munich listed all described species in Glomeromycota. The list is updated, and available from: http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~schuessler/amphylo/amphylo_species.html. There are 104 described species in the genus Glomus alone, but interpretation of some of these descriptions can be problematic. For some species the herbarium specimens are unavailable and it is not possible to verify the descriptions; in other cases the material is in a very bad condition and the taxonomic features are no longer recognizable. This is often combined with old, rather vague descriptions of the material, leaving interpretation of key characters open for discussion.

1. Species concepts and species recognition

The number of species depends to a great extent on the concept used to recognize the species. Most biologists agree on an evolutionary species concept based on Darwinian evolution that defines species as: ‘a single lineage of ancestor-descendent populations which maintains its identity from other such lineages and which has its own evolutionary tendencies and historical fate’ (Wiley, 1978). However, the evolutionary species concept is a theoretical concept, and cannot be used to recognize or diagnose species. Instead, morphological, biological and phylogenetic species concepts can be regarded as operational concepts, as they all intend to recognize evolutionary species (Mayden, 1997). Based on this, Taylor et al. (2000) used the term ‘species concept’ for the theoretical concept and the term ‘species recognition’ for the operational concepts.

Taylor et al. (2000) discussed various species recognition concepts in fungi and proposed the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR). The basic idea of GCPSR is that in a phylogenetic tree, concordant branches represent species, whereas incongruity caused by recombination is found within species. They state that a drawback of the concept is that it will not be useful for strictly clonal organisms, but claim that such organisms may not exist, and that the studies of primarily clonal fungi have shown that recombination takes place. They conclude that if true clonal fungi exist, they are very rare, but they do not consider the Glomeromycota. Recombination has not yet been proved in the Glomeromycota, and most evidence suggests that the fungi have evolved asexually. The lack of incongruity to delimit species means that GCPRS cannot be used to recognize arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species.

Presently, there is no formalized operational species concept in Glomeromycota. Species are described based on morphology and information from sequences of ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA). The access to sequence information has not changed the criteria for species recognition in the Glomeromycota, and studies based on rDNA have often confirmed the morphologically defined species (Fig. 2). Some new descriptions of Glomeromycota taxa include sequence information, which is particularly valuable for delimiting taxa with few available morphological characters (Walker et al., 2007). The molecular data have substantially changed the systematic, and several new genera and families have been erected (Walker & Schüßler, 2004; Walker et al., 2007).

image

Figure 2. Unrooted parsimonious tree showing three closely related Glomus species isolated from the same field in Denmark. The analysis is based on sequences of LSU rDNA and introns in the protein-coding genes TOR1 and FOX1 amplified from single spores (Stukenbrock & Rosendahl, 2005c).

Download figure to PowerPoint

III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Previously, community studies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi relied on the presence of resting spores in the soil. These spore surveys are often criticized, as it cannot be determined if species are truly absent or they are present but not sporulating. A comparison of communities is thus not possible if the communities are dominated by nonsporulating fungi. For example, Sparling & Tinker (1975) observed fewer spores in permanent vegetation and suggested that sporulation is related to disturbed systems. Quantitative studies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities based on the presence of spore numbers are also complicated as some species produce few spores on the mycelium, whereas cluster-forming species such as G. intraradices, G. versiforme or G. fasciculatum produce hundreds of spores on the same hypha. Although the spore surveys may not provide sufficient information on communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, they have revealed interesting patterns (Walker et al., 1982; Bever et al., 2001). A problem with the previous spore-based community studies is that they are sometimes difficult to interpret and relate to more recent studies, as the species identification is uncertain and may have changed over time. In several studies from the 1970s and 1980s, Glomus fasciculatum appears to be a very common species, but after the species was redescribed (Walker & Koske, 1987) it was shown to be uncommon; reports of G. fasciculatum in older surveys and experiments must have been of other species. Application of molecular techniques has made such comparisons more reliable as sequences are deposited in GenBank and can be compared with other known species.

1. Species known only from environmental samples

The molecular approach to community ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has revealed a large unknown diversity, and has shown that known species sometimes can account for only a minor proportion of the diversity. In a community study from a perennial grassland in Denmark, four out of 11 phylogenetic clusters in Glomus belonged to species where only sequence information is available (Rosendahl & Stukenbrock, 2004), and only one sequence type of 10 was identified from another site in a study from Scotland (Gollotte et al., 2004). These studies are based on large subunit (LSU) rDNA, whereas most studies are based on small subunit (SSU) rDNA. The resolution of these genes is different, and a direct comparison of phylogenetically defined taxa is not possible. Closely related taxa such as G. caledonium and G. geosporum have only 2- or 3-bp substitutions in SSU, but can be easily separated by their morphology and their LSU rDNA sequence.

In phylogenetic lineages with no known morphologically defined species, it is not possible to make this evaluation. Often lineages are defined as taxa, but the taxa defined solely from trees based on single genes should be referred to as phylogenetic clusters rather than phylogenetic species, as the later implies species defined based on gene concordances (Taylor et al., 2000). Divergence in one locus may give a history only of the locus, not of the species, as different genes or gene regions may be subjected to different mutation rate, selection pressure, etc. To detect cryptic species, phylogenies inferred from more than one genomic region (multilocus DNA sequence phylogenies) must be used. Such phylogenies should detect speciation before the whole genome has diverged (Kohn, 2005).

The gene tree approach to taxon recognition is sensitive to sampling bias. Often only sequences from a particular location are included in the phylogenetic analysis. If some taxa are poorly represented in an area, or intermediate phylogenetic lineages are missing, artificial high similarity between distant taxa may occur. In a community study from Denmark (Rosendahl & Stukenbrock, 2004), where samples were taken as individual root fragments, some groups were clearly better represented than others (Fig. 3). In the phylogenetic lineage with G. intraradices (often referred to as Glomus Ab), several sequences were found only once. If the level of sequence divergence observed between the morphologically defined species G. caledonium, G. mosseae and G. geosporum is used to delimit species, at least 15 phylogenetic taxa can be defined in this study. All sequences fall within five main lineages, but interestingly two of the main lineages (I and II) have no known morphologically defined species.

image

Figure 3. NeighborNet split network (Huson & Bryant, 2006) based on least-square distances of 300 LSU rDNA sequences obtained from single-root fragment in a 0.1-km2 coastal grassland in Denmark (Rosendahl & Stukenbrock, 2004). Yellow circles are sequence types of known species: D, G. mosseae; E, G. caledonium; F, G. geosporum; M, G. intraradices, P, G. microaggregatum. Red circles are unique sequences (singletons); blue circles are clusters with no known related species.

Download figure to PowerPoint

2. Species abundance and distribution

From the community studies, it is obvious that communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi follow the same distribution pattern as many other organisms, with few very common species, and a number of more and more rare species (Fig. 4). Which fungi are common and which are rare depends on the habitat. We still know little about the autecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, but from several observations it can be concluded that fungi such as G. mosseae, G. caledonium, G. geosporum and Scutellospora pellucida are common in arable soils, whereas the patterns in woodlands and uncultivated grasslands are less apparent. This is mainly because very few such systems have been studied. In their overview of studies of global arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities, Öpik et al. (2006) conclude that some fungi could be specific to forests. However, this comparison was based on very few studies, and there was an obvious correlation between the number of studies at different sites and the number of phylogenetic groups found.

image

Figure 4. Distribution of sequence types in Fig. 3, showing that the community is dominated by a single type.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The development of molecular tools to characterize microbial communities has resulted in a considerable increase in the number of community studies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The fungi have been identified using either sequencing (Van Tuinen et al., 1998) or denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) approaches (de Souza et al., 2004; Lekberg et al., 2007) following the isolation and PCR of fungal DNA. In studies where Glomeromycota DNA from roots has been sequenced, the ribosomal genes have been targeted: either the SSU, first used by the group at York University (Helgason et al., 1998, 2002); or the LSU, used in Dijon (Van Tuinen et al., 1998) and Copenhagen (Kjøller & Rosendahl, 2000). In many studies, only one pair of primers (NS31 and AM1) for SSU was used to cover the diversity in Glomeromycota (Helgason et al., 1998). This primer pair will amplify most but not all groups (Redecker et al., 2003), and several nonglomalean sequences may be amplified (Douhan et al., 2005), making subsequent use of DGGE and T-RFLP problematic. The LSU provides a better resolution, but several primers are necessary for amplifying all genera of Glomeromycota. Another important disadvantage of targeting the ribosomal genes is that copies of the multi-copy gene may vary within a single spore, making subsequent cloning necessary (Scheublin et al., 2004). If the amplified PCR products are cloned, the quantitative aspect is lost, which can be important when host preferences or responses to environmental gradients are studied. To retain the quantitative aspect, LSU rDNA was amplified from 1-cm root fragments and sequenced directly, and the frequency of sequence types was quantified as the number of colonized root fragments (Rosendahl & Stukenbrock, 2004; Stukenbrock & Rosendahl, 2005b). Although both approaches have drawbacks, the results have been remarkably similar, showing a limited diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in most vegetation systems.

The species richness in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities is not easy to estimate because of problems in identifying nonsporulating species. A study of spore diversity in a field in North Carolina revealed 37 species recognized as spores either sampled directly or trapped on plants (Bever et al., 2001). This relatively high species richness probably reflects the sampling intensity, rather than characteristics of the area. The authors made no attempt to extrapolate from the study, but noted that the richness in the field was similar to what has been reported from continents. Öpik et al. (2006) compared most community studies and found that the average number of species (taxa) ranged from 1 to 29. However, the criterion for species recognition is crucial for interpreting and comparing community studies as well as the different genetic markers used to identify species.

IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

The concept of a population is used widely in ecology, population genetics and evolutionary biology. Several definitions can be found, but the central theme is that a population is used to describe a group of individuals of a certain species. Two main paradigms exist: the ecological and the evolutionary. The ecological paradigm identifies a population as: ‘a group of organisms of the same species occupying a particular space at a particular time’ (Krebs, 1994). Although this definition may sound precise, the problem is that different researchers may look at different space and time scales, and thus not draw the same conclusions. To overcome this problem, the ecological population concept can be amended by adding: ‘and have the opportunity to interact with each other’ (Waples & Gaggiotti, 2006). The evolutionary paradigm is centred on the definition by Dobzhansky (1937): ‘a community of individuals of a sexually reproducing species within which mating takes place’. This definition emphasizes the reproductive interaction between the individuals, and has some obvious limitations when considering fungal populations. The broader definition by Waples & Gaggiotti (2006), which identifies a population as ‘a group of individuals of the same species living in close enough proximity that any member of the group can potentially mate with any other member’, is more appropriate to mycology. The main idea in the evolutionary paradigm is that populations can be characterized by their allele diversity. Differences in allele frequencies reflect subdivisions between populations. Gene flow is the main introgression of new alleles into a population and the main mechanism to reduce genetic differentiation between populations. However, in strictly asexual organisms the genes are linked and can only move as a block. This type of gene flow is better termed ‘genotype flow’. In arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi without recombination, it makes no sense to talk about gene flow, as gene flow considers single alleles. With complete linkage of alleles, the individuals will migrate and will keep their genetic integrity.

1. Global migration or endemism?

Populations of microbial eukaryotes are believed to cover continents because of the effective dispersal of airborne spores. This is often referred to as the ‘ubiquitous dispersal hypothesis’ (Finlay, 2002; Fenchel & Finlay, 2004), and is based on the famous citation ‘everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ (Baas Becking, 1934). The hypothesis suggests that fungi have large effective population size, and that genetic drift plays a minor role in evolution of the fungi. The hypothesis is controversial and has been challenged by population genetic studies of cosmopolitan fungi, demonstrating that what may look as cosmopolitan is actually hidden endemism (Taylor et al., 2006). Several species in the Glomeromycota are known to occur on different continents supporting the ubiquitous dispersal hypothesis. However, genetic differentiation between geographical isolates has not been studied, and it is not known if the morphologically recognized species hide endemic cryptic species. Alternatively, the apparent global distribution of some arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species could be a recent phenomenon caused by human activity related to agriculture. Several studies have demonstrated global migration among fungal pathogen populations (Goodwin et al., 1994; Zhan et al., 2003).

Recombination and gene flow are important factors in shaping the genetic structure of populations. Asexual fungi evolve without the homogenizing effect of recombination and gene flow. The individual genotypes within a population can evolve differently by the accumulation of mutations in loci that are not under selection. In time, this genetic differentiation of clonal individuals can lead to a phenotypic or functional differentiation. Dispersal becomes important in fungi where individuals that differ from the most frequent genotype have a selective advantage and can establish or even become dominating in an area. Among pathogens, such asexual dispersal may initiate epidemics and even pandemics. The human pathogen Penicillium manefii is an example of an asexual fungus in which, despite widespread aerial dispersal, isolates of the species showed extensive spatial genetic structure at local and country-wide scales (Fisher et al., 2005). The authors suggested that this endemism is a consequence of the lack of sexual reproduction that has led to evolution of niche-adapted genotypes despite the extensive aerial dispersal of the pathogen. Their results are interesting when considering arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. If asexuality has led to the evolution of niche-adapted genotypes, it is reducing the potential of the fungus to diversify. In a heterogeneous environment, variance in fitness between clonal lineages is expected to lead to populations that are adapted to local conditions (Goddard et al., 2005). In this case, limited dispersal becomes an inevitable consequence of asexuality, as invading clones are outcompeted by better-adapted local competitors because of the decreased ability of invaders to diversify within novel environments (Buckling et al., 2003).

2. Ancient origin without recombination?

Despite an early observation of zygospore formation in Gigaspora (Tommerup & Sivasithamparam, 1990), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are generally believed to be asexual. Recombination can be shown by analyses of linkage of multiple alleles (index of association) (Maynard Smith et al., 1993). This has been used to demonstrate recombination in Coccidium immitis, where no sexual state has been observed (Burt et al., 1996). In arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, analysis has not so far revealed signs of recombination in data obtained from pot cultures or field-collected spores (Rosendahl & Taylor, 1997; Stukenbrock & Rosendahl, 2005a). A single study found recombination in a data set based on inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers obtained from field-collected spores (Vandenkoornhuyse et al., 2001). However, dominant markers such as ISSR are problematic for estimating linkage, as the homology between the alleles is difficult to verify. If the alleles are not homologous, analyses such as index of association (Maynard Smith et al., 1993) may suggest recombination erroneously. A study by Gandolfi et al. (2003) used haplotype networks to demonstrate that DNA sequences from the same Glomus species may show signs of recombination. Unfortunately, the data were based on sequences from GenBank, and some of the data sets contained sequences from more than one species. Some of these species are only distantly related, and the reticulate structure of the haplotype networks is more easily explained by a saturation of mutations rather than recombination.

Linkage of alleles indicates lack of recombination, but will not prove that the organisms are ancient asexuals. Normark et al. (2003) hypothesized that a clonal population structure would appear after few asexual generations if the effective population size (Ne) is low. This was based on the assumption that the coalescent time since the most common recent ancestor is approximately 2Ne generations (Birky, 1996). The coalescence model assumes a neutral model, and the actual coalescent time would be less if the loci are linked. We know little about the population size and generation time of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, but if the population size is low, the recombining structure of populations should be lost in few thousand generations (Normark et al., 2003).

A genomic signature that would advocate for an ancient asexual evolution would be strong divergence between alleles in the same locus, as has been shown for diploid bdeloid rotifers (Mark Welch & Meselson, 2000). However this would only be the case with diploid organisms, as the pattern of divergence is equally consistent with the organism being sexual and haploid. Strong divergence has been observed in genes that may have a common origin and may suggest an ancient asexual evolution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Kuhn et al., 2001; Pawlowska & Taylor, 2004).

Evidence against an ancient asexual evolution would be the existence of genes involved in sexual functions. Preliminary studies have found possible candidate genes, and this may change our view of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as ancient asexuals (Colard et al., 2007). Further evidence of recent meiotic events would be the presence of selfish genetic elements or retrotransposons, which are believed to disappear in the absence of meiosis (Hickey, 1982; Arkhipova & Meselson, 2000). Retrotransposons have been detected in Glomeromycota genomes, but contained stop codons and were not expressed in either hyphae or germinating spores (Gollotte et al., 2006).

3. Genetic structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi populations

The genetic structure of a population refers to the distribution of genetic variation, and can be studied by hierarchical sampling and analysis of genetic variation within and between fields, plots, subplots, etc. Nei's (1987) analysis of genetic variation and analysis of molecular variance (amova) (Excoffier et al., 1992) are two methods for estimating population differentiation directly from molecular data and for testing hypotheses regarding factors that may cause such differentiation.

AFLP data analysed by amova (Koch et al., 2004) and multilocus genotyping of arbuscular mycorrhizal spore populations in agricultural systems, analysed using Nei's approach (Stukenbrock & Rosendahl, 2005a), showed a patchy distribution of genotypes within populations of common mycorrhizal species. A patchy distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal populations will arise when genotypes in the field are structured as distinct mycelia that are able to establish and maintain their genetic integrity. In an agricultural system with annual crops, the turnover of root systems requires germination of new mycorrhizal spores every year. In a model that will explain the observed pattern, the spores germinate in the spring and hyphae of the same genotype fuse into a common mycelial network (Fig. 5). This will result in genetically uniform hyphal networks producing new spores of the same genotype. Vegetative incompatibility between Glomus isolates from geographically different areas has been reported by Giovannetti et al. (2003), also demonstrating a high frequency of self-fusion between hyphae of the same isolates. If self-recognition in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ensures hyphal fusion only between hyphae of the same genotype, this mechanism may be regarded as a genetic bottleneck, excluding rare or mutated genotypes from the mycelial networks. It is, however, important to note that the genetic background for incompatibility in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is not known, and could be different from what has been studied in Ascomycota (Glass et al., 2004).

image

Figure 5. Hypothesis explaining how mycelial networks are formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in disturbed systems such as agroecosystems. In winter, resting spores are distributed in the soil. Different genotypes are represented by different colours. The population consists of three common genotypes (blue, red, yellow) and three rare genotypes (green, pink, turquoise). In spring the spores have germinated and mycelia with the same genotypes anastomose and form hyphal networks. Rare and unique genotypes will not anastomose and the dominant genotypes will be favoured.

Download figure to PowerPoint

V. Individuals, genets or clones?

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

We know very little about what constitutes the individual mycelium of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Several authors have discussed individuality in fungi, but no conceptual agreement exists. This is partly because individuals can be defined in both genetic and physiological terms. The mycelium that grows from a spore (sexual or asexual) or a hyphal fragment will, in physical or physiological terms, constitute an individual. However, the genetic or evolutionary unit will comprise genetically identical fragments or spores derived from mating between two nuclei. Such units can be defined as genets. In plants, genets are defined as all vegetative derivatives of a seed, including vegetative propagated plants from stolons or rhizomes. In mycology, the same definition can be used for many basidiomycetes with dikaryotic or diploid mycelia. In Basidiomycota, fusion between two haploid gametes will form a new dikaryotic mycelium. Even if the fungus may have subsequent asexual propagation, the genets are similar to plant genets in both functional and genetic aspects. This definition is not directly applicable for fungi with haploid mycelia such as the Ascomycota, Zygomycota and Glomeromycota (Hijri & Sanders, 2004). In Ascomycota, fusion of gametes or gametangia will result in dikaryotic ascogenic hyphae that will form the asci where meiosis takes place. This structure is often part of a fruiting body (ascoma), which is neither a functional nor an evolutionary unit. Anderson & Kohn (1995) proposed that genets of haploid fungi (e.g. Ascomycota) are defined as all vegetative derivatives of the fusion of two genetically unlike gametic nuclei and the following meiosis. For fungi with asexual reproduction, genets can be composed of several functional units, but they will all have the same origin. If the origin is not known, the term ‘clone’ is used to cover organisms with the same multilocus genotype. The term clone often refers to genetically identical individuals, but clones of ancient origin might accumulate mutations during mitotic cycles. Such nearly identical clones can be defined as belonging to the same clonal lineage. Identification of such lineages can be difficult if the organisms are ancient asexuals and/or distributed over wide areas, as the organisms may develop new phenotypes and genetic differences that could be interpreted as representing more than one genet.

1. Recognizing genets and clones of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Very few authors have addressed the issue of individuals and genets of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Again, it is important to distinguish between functional or physical coherent mycelia and genetic evolutionary units. Studies have been made of the extension and growth rate of individual hyphae (Mosse et al., 1982; Warner & Mosse, 1983) suggesting that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi could be capable of forming extensive coherent mycelia. However, it is not known if the mycelia are coherent or fragmented into smaller ramets. Anastomosis in arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelia can be observed in roots as H-connection, and between hyphae of germinating spores (Mosse, 1959). These anastomoses may result in a reticulate growth of the mycelium, and may also allow possible nuclear migrations between individual mycelia. The experimental system set up by Manuela Giovannetti and coworkers in Pisa has made it possible to observe hyphal anastomosis in vivo, and revealed that the germinating hyphae of G. mosseae and other arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi anastomose shortly after germination (Giovannetti et al., 2001). In a later study they demonstrated that mycelia colonizing different host plants form anstomoses, which makes it possible to have an infinite hyphal network that connects different plant species (Giovannetti et al., 2004). Nuclear migration through the anastomoses was also observed, but a study using isolates from different geographical locations showed that anastomoses occurred only within the same isolate of G. mosseae (Giovannetti et al., 2003). The studies were conducted under laboratory conditions and therefore cannot be translated to field conditions, but the potential of forming hyphal networks has led several authors to discuss their role in nutrient acquisition of the plant (Jakobsen et al., 1992; Jansa et al., 2003).

If arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi grow as fragmented mycelia all belonging to the same clone, such mycelia may not differ phenotypically. This raises the question of functional redundancy – a subject that has been discussed by several authors. Fitter (2005), in his presidential address, discusses functional redundancy and comes to the conclusion that the concept of functional redundancy may itself be redundant, as the question can be reduced to: what determines the ability of numerous species with similar ecological function to coexist? The question is highly relevant for Glomeromycota, as the coexistence of clonal lineages of the same phylogenetic type or species is a fact within fields (Stukenbrock & Rosendahl, 2005a). Functional differences between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi may exist, but so far it has not been possible to assign specific functions to species or isolates. A large variation was seen in phosphorus uptake and the amount of external mycelium within isolates of both G. mosseae and G. caledonium, but isolates within each species were strikingly similar in their length-specific hyphal phosphorus uptake. (Munkvold et al., 2004). Furthermore, isolates of G. intraradices from one field differed in their effect on plant growth (Koch et al., 2006). This indicates that the functional diversity could be structured in the field, but in order to study this a more detailed sampling of species and isolates from various spatial scales is required.

2. Homokaryons, heterokaryons or polyploids?

Some authors have claimed that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi represent multigenomic organisms (Kuhn et al., 2001; Sanders, 2002), and it has been hypothesized that this heterokaryotic structure has arisen by hyphal anastomosis between genetically different mycelia and by accumulation of mutations (Bever & Wang, 2005). The issue is controversial, and raises several questions regarding the ecology and evolution of such multigenomic organisms. Studies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in situ have not confirmed the multigenomic status of the fungi. Instead, the fungi seem to form discrete and genotypic uniform mycelia. (Stukenbrock & Rosendahl, 2005a).

The existence of high genetic variability within spores cannot be questioned, and multiple variants of ribosomal genes are known to occur within single spores (Sanders et al., 1995; Corradi et al., 2007). However, whether the observed polymorphism is structured between genetically different nuclei (Kuhn et al., 2001), between different sets of chromosomes (Pawlowska & Taylor, 2004), or within each nucleus as duplicated genes (Hosny et al., 1999; Rosendahl & Stukenbrock, 2004) is a matter of debate. In sexual organisms, tandemly repeated copies of rDNA genes are homogenized by concerted evolution, a process where unequal crossing-over and gene conversion will homogenize sequences during meiosis. The lack of meiosis excludes concerted evolution and leads to different gene variants in genomes, as observed in other asexual organisms (Gandolfi et al., 2001).

The hypothesis of multigenomic mycorrhizal mycelia raises several questions regarding the biology and evolution of such organisms. Hyphal fusion and heterokaryon formation is a known phenomenon in filamentous Ascomycota (Glass et al., 2004). Although there are apparent benefits associated with heterokaryon formation, heterokaryosis by hyphal fusion is believed to be virtually excluded in nature by genetic differences at heterokaryon incompatibility loci. This nonself recognition mechanism prevents the establishment of a compatible heterokaryon between genetically different individuals. The patchy distribution of fungal genotypes in nature may reflect this nonself recognition mechanism, which could ensure genetic integrity of the mycelia.

The possible existence of heterokaryosis in the mycelia of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi raises another important question. How would gene regulation be coordinated between the populations of genetically different nuclei in one continuous mycelium? In studies regarding patterns of gene expression, heterokaryosis has not been reported. It is striking that when the gene diversity is studied from markers developed from cDNA, no sign of heterokaryosis is seen, whereas markers developed from degenerated primers result in several gene variants within each spore. Future research on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi should focus not only on the genetic background of hyphal anastomosis, but also on variation in cDNA libraries within and between populations of different mycorrhizal genotypes.

VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Species are regarded as a fundamental unit in biology, yet the true existence of such units can be questioned. Speciation has been reviewed by several authors, but few reviews focus on speciation in fungi (Kohn, 2005). As stated earlier, reproductive isolation is believed to be an important factor for speciation in sexual species. Within the species, interbreeding will unify the individuals, and the restricted gene flow between species will allow the species to diverge. In asexual organisms, this unifying effect of interbreeding does not exist, and it has been postulated that asexual species do not exist as the individual is the only evolutionary unit (Coyne & Orr, 1998). Whether speciation occurs in asexual organisms is still unclear, but if reproductive isolation cannot explain the existence of species, then adaptation to specific niches must be a crucial factor in speciation (Coyne & Orr, 1998). This suggests that speciation can occur sympatrically in different niches, and that asexual species can be revealed as phylogenetically distinct clades. Most asexual organisms are probably of recent origin, and it is difficult to study the processes of speciation. Asexual ascomycetes such as Penicillium and Aspergillus have closely related sexual relatives, and their origins are probably due to loss of a sexual cycle (LoBuglio et al., 1993). Other results indicate that asexuality in the rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae could be the result of loss of a mating type during adaptation to rice, and thereby also a recent event related to the onset of agriculture in Asia (Couch et al., 2005). An exception is the previously mentioned asexual bdelloid rotifer that may be more than 100 million yr old. Interestingly, recent results show that these organisms diversify into entities similar to sexual organisms, and raise the question as to whether sex is necessary for speciation (Fontaneto et al., 2007). The Glomeromycota have no known closely related sexual species and, as discussed earlier, their asexuality could also be of ancient origin. Similar to the bdelloid rotifers, morphological species do exist, and the species are supported by phylogenetic analyses of molecular data. The closely related species G. mosseae, G. geosporum and G. caledonium clearly represent entities with a morphological and genetic integrity (Fig. 2). The age of the divergence of these species is not known, but it could be between 10 and 100 million yr. If speciation occurs without recombination and with complete linkage of genes, selective sweeps must have occurred at various times. Such selective sweeps may make intermediate lineages extinct, leaving lineages that are genetically distant (Fig. 6). If the linkage of genes has resulted in the evolution of genetically distant individuals that can be regarded as physiological species, the phylogenetic and morphological species that we recognize today may represent a much higher level in the genealogical hierarchy compared with other fungi.

image

Figure 6. A long asexual evolution may result in very different genotypes belonging to the same clone. Complete linkage of loci will result in selective sweeps that will make intermediate genotypes extinct, leaving distantly related genotypes. A–C, recent genotypes that are recognized as isolates, species or even genera depending on the time scale of the ancient asexual evolution.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The genetic differentiation in Glomus spp. populations observed within fields can be the result of niche differentiation in a heterogeneous soil environment (Figs 2, 3). Both experimental and retrospective studies support this hypothesis. An arbuscular mycorrhizal community assembly was shown experimentally to depend on the phylogenetic relatedness of species, suggesting that reduced competition between distinct evolutionary lineages promotes their coexistence (Maherali & Klironomos, 2007). This experimental study was conducted with phylogenetically distant arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, but a similar pattern was observed in an analysis of 400 Glomus sensu stricto sequences obtained from perennial grassland in Denmark (Rosendahl & Stukenbrock, 2004), where the sequences were organized in a distinct pattern with five major lineages above species level. However, the study also revealed that there were several sequence types coexisting within these clades. Similarly, a study from an agricultural field showed that several genotypes of three Glomus species were able to coexist (Stukenbrock & Rosendahl, 2005a). Whether these genotypes compete is not known, but other studies have shown that isolates within the same species can be phenotypically different, which may allow them to coexist in the same habitat (Koch et al., 2004; Munkvold et al., 2004). Although it may be tempting to suggest that the haplotypes have evolved as a result of niche differentiation, the number of mutation suggests that the diversification is ancient, at least exceeding the age of Denmark (approx. 10 000 yr). The diversification must therefore have occurred in a different environment, and the haplotypes colonized the field later.

VII. Conclusion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are often referred to as mysterious, and very different from other fungi. This review has attempted to explain Glomeromycota diversity within the paradigms of population genetics and evolutionary biology, and there are no apparent features of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that contradict our understanding of speciation and population differentiation. The most important feature of the Glomeromycota is the possible existence of ancient asexual lineages. Coyne & Orr (2004) suggest that asexual species are not biological species but a collection of ‘microspecies’, with each individual propagating its own genetic lineage. This certainly seems to be the case with the ‘clones’ of Glomus spp. and the G. intraradices isolates from Switzerland (Koch et al., 2006), but could also be the case further in the genealogical hierarchy if the morphological species have evolved asexually. The Glomeromycota species may be recognized as microspecies sensu Coyne & Orr (2004), but a significant difference from other such clonally propagated entities is the considerable age of the lineages. The speciation events can be ancient, and even genera within the families may have evolved asexually. If the last meiotic events are ancient, Glomeromycota may consist of very few clones or clonal lineages with several morphological species originating from the same clone. Future studies should use coalescence-based models to determine the age of the speciation events. This is, however, complicated by the ancient origin and asexual evolution with many selective sweeps that have eliminated intermediate lineages. Before any conclusion can be drawn on speciation and population divergence, it is important to note that very few fungi have been studied at the population level: only two studies use population genetics, and these are restricted to agricultural fields in Denmark and Switzerland.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Taxonomy and species recognition
  5. III. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  6. IV. Populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  7. V. Individuals, genets or clones?
  8. VI. Speciation in Glomeromycota
  9. VII. Conclusion
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References
  • Anderson JB, Kohn LM. 1995. Clonality in soilborne, plant pathogenic fungi. Annual Review of Phytopathology 33: 369391.
  • Arkhipova I, Meselson M. 2000. Transposable elements in sexual and ancient asexual taxa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 1447314477.
  • Baas Becking LGM. 1934. Geobiologie of inleiding tot de milieukunde. The Hague, the Netherlands: W.P. Van Stockum & Zoon.
  • Berbee ML, Taylor JW. 1993. Dating the evolutionary radiations of the true fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 11141127.
  • Berch SM. 1987. Endogonaceae: taxonomy, specificity, fossil record, phylogeny. In: MukerjiKG, SinghVP, eds. Frontiers in applied microbiology, Vol. 2. Lucknow, India: Print House, 161188.
  • Bever JD, Schultz PA, Pringle A, Morton JB. 2001. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: more diverse than meets the eye, and the ecological tale of why. Bioscience 51: 923931.
  • Bever JD, Wang M. 2005. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: hyphal fusion and multigenomic structure. Nature 433: E3E4, doi:10.1038/nature03294
  • Birky CW. 1996. Heterozygosity, heteromorphy, and phylogenetic trees in asexual eukaryotes. Genetics 144: 427437.
  • Buckling A, Wills MA, Colegrave N. 2003. Adaptation limits diversification of experimental bacterial populations. Science 302: 21072109.
  • Burt A, Carter DA, Koenig GL, White TJ, Taylor JW. 1996. Molecular markers reveal cryptic sex in the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 770773.
  • Colard A, Corradi N, Sanders IR. 2007. Do AMF harbour meiosis-specific genes in their genome? Biology07. The Annual Meeting of the Swiss Zoological, Botanical and Mycological Societies. Zurich, Switzerland: ETH.
  • Corradi N, Croll D, Colard, A, Kuhn G, Ehinger M, Sanders IR. 2007. Gene copy number polymorphisms in an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal population. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73: 366369.
  • Couch BC, Fudal I, Lebrun M-H, Tharreau D, Valent B, Kim PV, Nottéghem J-L, Kohn LM. 2005. Origins of host-specific populations of the blast pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, in crop domestication with subsequent expansion of pandemic clones on rice and weeds of rice. Genetics 170: 613630.
  • Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 353: 287305.
  • Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.
  • Dobzhansky T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
  • Douhan GW, Petersen C, Bledsoe CS, Rizzo DM. 2005. Contrasting root associated fungi of three common oak-woodland plant species based on molecular identification: host specificity or non-specific amplification? Mycorrhiza 15: 365372.
  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479491.
  • Fenchel T, Finlay BJ. 2004. The ubiquity of small species: patterns of local and global diversity. BioScience 54: 777784.
  • Finlay BJ. 2002. Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science. 296: 10611063.
  • Fisher MC, Hanage WP, De Hoog S, Johnson E, Smith MD, White NJ, Vanittanakom N. 2005. Low effective dispersal of asexual genotypes in heterogeneous landscapes by the endemic pathogen Penicillium marneffei. PLoS Pathogens 1: 159165.
  • Fitter AH. 2005. Darkness visible: reflections on underground ecology. Journal of Ecology 93: 231243.
  • Fontaneto DE, Herniou, Boschetti C, Caprioli M, Melone G, Ricci C, Barraclough TG. 2007. Independently evolving species in asexual bdelloid rotifers. PLoS Biology 5: e87.
  • Franke M, Morton JB. 1994. Ontogenetic comparisons of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Scutellospora heterogama and Scutellospora pellucida: revision of taxonomic character concepts, species descriptions, and phylogenetic hypotheses. Canadian Journal Botany 72: 122134.
  • Gandolfi A, Bonilauri P, Rossi V, Menozzi P. 2001. Intraindividual and intraspecies variability of ITS1 sequences in the ancient asexual Darwinula stevensoni (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Heredity 87: 449455.
  • Gandolfi A, Sanders IR, Rossi V, Menozzi P. 2003. Evidence of recombination in putative ancient asexuals. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 754761.
  • Gerdemann JW, Trappe JM. 1974. Endogonaceae in the Pacific Northwest. Mycologia Memoir 5: 176.
  • Gilmore AE. 1968. Phycomycetous mycorrhizal organisms collected by open pot culture methods. Hilgardia 39: 87105.
  • Giovannetti M, Fortuna P, Citernesi AS, Morini S, Nuti MP. 2001. The occurrence of anastomosis formation and nuclear exchange in intact arbuscular mycorrhizal networks. New Phytologist 151: 717724.
  • Giovannetti M, Sbrana C, Avio L, Strani P. 2004. Patterns of belowground plant interconnections established by means of arbuscular mycorrhizal networks. New Phytologist 164: 175181.
  • Giovannetti M, Sbrana C, Strani P, Agnolucci M, Rinaudo V, Avio L. 2003. Genetic diversity of isolates of Glomus mosseae from different geographical areas detected by vegetative compatibility testing and biochemical and molecular analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 616624.
  • Glass NL, Rasmussen C, Roca MG, Read ND. 2004. Hyphal homing, fusion and mycelial interconnectedness. Trends in Microbiology 12: 135141.
  • Goddard MR, Godfray HC, Burt A. 2005. Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434: 636640.
  • Gollotte A, L’Haridon F, Chatagnier O, Wettstein G, Arnould C, Van Tuinen D, Gianinazzi-Pearson V. 2006. Repetitive DNA sequences include retrotransposons in genomes of the Glomeromycota. Genetica 128: 455469.
  • Gollotte A, Van Tuinen D, Atkinson D. 2004. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising roots of the grass species Agrostis capillaries and Lolium perenne in a field experiment. Mycorrhiza 14: 111117.
  • Goodwin SB, Cohen BA, Fry WE. 1994. Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 1159111595.
  • Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ. 1987. Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature 328: 420422.
  • Van Der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR. 1998. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396: 6972.
  • Helgason T, Daniell TJ, Husband R, Fitter AH, Young JPW. 1998. Ploughing up the wood-wide web? Nature 394: 431.
  • Helgason T, Merryweather JW, Denison J, Wilson P, Young JPW, Fitter A. 2002. Selectivity and functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas of co-occurring fungi and plants from a temperate deciduous woodland. Journal of Ecology 90: 371384.
  • Hickey DA. 1982. Selfish DNA: a sexually-transmitted nuclear parasite. Genetics 101: 519531.
  • Hijri M, Sanders IR. 2004. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices is haploid and has a small genome size in the lower limit of eukaryotes. Fungal Genetics and Biology 41: 253261.
  • Hosny M, Hijri M, Passerieux E, Dulieu H. 1999. rDNA units are highly polymorphic in Scutellospora castanea. Gene 226: 6171, 417.
  • Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254267.
  • Jakobsen I, Abbott LK, Robson AD. 1992. External hyphae of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium subterraneum. 1: Spread of hyphae and phosphorus inflow into roots. New Phytologist 120: 371380.
  • James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox C, Celio G, Gueidan C, Fraker E, Miądlikowska J et al . 2006. Reconstructing the early evolution of the fungi using a six gene phylogeny. Nature 443: 818822.
  • Jansa J, Mozafar A, Frossard E. 2003. Long-distance transport of P and Zn through the hyphae of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in symbiosis with maize. Agronomie 23: 481488.
  • Jastrow JD, Miller RM. 1997. Soil aggregate stabilization and carbon sequestration: feedbacks through organomineral associations. In: LalR, KimbleJ, FolletR, StewartB, eds. Soil processes and the carbon cycle. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 207222.
  • Kjøller R, Rosendahl S. 2000. Detection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomales) in roots by nested PCR and SSCP (single stranded conformation polymorphism). Plant & Soil 226: 189196.
  • Koch AM, Croll D, Sanders IR. 2006. Genetic variability in a population of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi causes variation in plant growth Ecology Letters 9: 103110.
  • Koch AM, Kuhn G, Fontanillas P, Fumagalli L, Goudet J, Sanders IR. 2004. High genetic variability and low local diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 23692374.
  • Kohn LM. 2005. Mechanisms of fungal speciation. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43: 279308.
  • Koske RE. 1986. Keys to Glomus species with spores lacking characteristics that make them easy to identify. Mycological Society of America Newsletter 37: 59.
  • Krebs CJ. 1994. Ecology. New York, NY, USA: HarperCollins College Publishers.
  • Kuhn G, Hijri M, Sanders IR. 2001. Evidence for the evolution of multiple genomes in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 414: 745748.
  • Lekberg Y, Koide RT, Rohr JR, Aldrich-Wolfe L, Morton JB. 2007. Role of niche restrictions and dispersal in the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Journal of Ecology 95: 95105.
  • LoBuglio KF, Pitt JI, Taylor JW. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of two ribosomal DNA regions indicates multiple independent losses of a sexual Talaromyces state among asexual Penicillium species in subgenus Biverticillium. Mycologia 85: 592604.
  • Maherali H, Klironomos JN. 2007. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science 316: 17461748.
  • Mark Welch DB, Meselson M. 2000. Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual reproduction or genetic exchange. Science 288: 12111215.
  • Mayden RL. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In: ClaridgeMF, DawahHA, WilsonMR, eds. Species: the units of biodiversity. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 381424.
  • Maynard Smith J, Smith NH, O’Rourke M, Spratt BG. 1993. How clonal are bacteria? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 90: 43844388.
  • Michelsen A, Rosendahl S. 1990. The effect of VA mycorrhiza and drought stress on the growth of Acacia nilotica and Leucaena leucocephala seedlings. Plant & Soil 124: 713.
  • Morton JB. 1995. Taxonomic and phylogenetic divergence among five Scutellospora species (Glomales, Zygomycetes) based on comparative developmental sequences. Mycologia 87: 127137.
  • Morton JB, Franke M, Cloud G. 1992. The nature of fungal species in Glomales and their role in endomycorrhizal associations. In: ReadDJ, LewisDH, FitterA, AlexanderI, eds. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Tucson, AZ, USA: CABI/University of Arizona Press, 6573.
  • Morton JB, Redecker D. 2001. Two new families of Glomales, Archaeosporaceae and Paraglomaceae, with two new genera, Archaeospora and Paraglomus, based on concordant molecular and morphological characters. Mycologia 93: 181195.
  • Mosse B. 1959. The regular germination of resting spores and some observations on the growth requirements of an Endogone sp. causing vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 42: 273286.
  • Mosse B, Bowen GD. 1968. A key to the recognition of some Endogone spore types. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 51: 469483.
  • Mosse B, Warner A, Clarke CA. 1982. Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. XIII. Spread of an introduced VA endophyte in the field and residual growth effects of inoculation in the second year. New Phytologist 90: 521528.
  • Munkvold L, Kjøller R, Vestberg M, Rosendahl S, Jakobsen I. 2004. High functional diversity within species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 164: 357364.
  • Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
  • Nielsen KB, Kjøller R, Olsson PA, Schweiger PF, Andersen FØ, Rosendahl S. 2004. Colonization intensity and molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the aquatic plants Littorella uniflora and Lobelia dortmanna in southern Sweden. Mycological Research 108: 616625.
  • Normark BB, Judson OP, Moran NA. 2003. Genomic signatures of ancient asexual lineages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 6984.
  • Öpik M, Moora M, Liira J, Zobel M. 2006. Composition of root-colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in different ecosystems around the globe. Journal of Ecology 94: 778790.
  • Pawlowska TE, Taylor JW. 2004. Organization of genetic variation in individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 427: 733737.
  • Ravnskov S, Jakobsen I. 1995. Functional compatibility in arbuscular mycorrhizas measured as hyphal P transport to the plant. New Phytologist 129: 611618.
  • Read DJ. 1991. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia 47: 376390.
  • Redecker D, Hijri I, Wiemken A. 2003. Molecular identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots: perspectives and problems. Folia Geobotanica 38: 113124.
  • Redecker D, Kodner R, Graham LE. 2000. Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician. Science 289: 19201921.
  • Remy W, Taylor TN, Hass H, Kerp H. 1994. Four-hundred-million-year-old vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 1184111843.
  • Rosendahl S. 1985. Interactions between the vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum and Aphanomyces euteiches root rot of peas. Journal of Phytopathology 114: 3140.
  • Rosendahl S, Stukenbrock E. 2004. Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in undisturbed vegetation revealed by analyses of LSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Ecology 13: 31793186.
  • Rosendahl S, Taylor JW. 1997. Development of multiple genetic markers for studies of genetic variation in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using AFLP. Molecular Ecology 6: 821829.
  • Sanders IR. 2002. Ecology and evolution of multigenomic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. American Naturalist 160: 128141.
  • Sanders IR, Alt M, Groppe K, Boller T, Wiemken A. 1995. Identification of ribosomal DNA polymorphisms among and within spores of the Glomales: application to studies on the genetic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. New Phytologist 130: 419427.
  • Scheublin TR, Ridgway KP, Young JPW, Van Der Heijden MGA. 2004. Nonlegumes, legumes, and root nodules harbor different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 62406246.
  • Schüßler A, Schwarzott D, Walker C. 2001. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: phylogeny and evolution. Mycological Research 105: 14131421.
  • Smith SE, Read DJ. 1997. Mycorrhizal fungi, 2nd edn. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Smith SE, Smith FA, Jakobsen I. 2004. Functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses: the contribution of the mycorrhizal P uptake pathway is not correlated with mycorrhizal responses in growth or total P uptake. New Phytologist 162: 511524.
  • De Souza FA, Leeflang P, Kowalchuk GA, Van Veen JA, Smit E. 2004. PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiling of the inter- and intraspecies 18S rRNA gene sequence heterogeneity is an accurate and sensitive method to assess species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of the genus Gigaspora. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 14131424.
  • Sparling GP, Tinker PB. 1975. Mycorrhizas in Pennine grassland. In: SandersFE, MosseB, TinkerPB, eds. Endomycorrhizas. London, UK: Academic Press, 545560.
  • Stukenbrock EH, Rosendahl S. 2005a. Clonal diversity and population genetic structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus spp.) studied by multilocus genotyping of single spores. Molecular Ecology 14: 743752.
  • Stukenbrock EH, Rosendahl S. 2005b. Distribution of dominant arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi among five plant species in undisturbed vegetation of a coastal grassland. Mycorrhiza 15: 497503.
  • Stukenbrock EH, Rosendahl S. 2005c. Development of multiple co-dominant genetic markers from single spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by nested multiplex PCR. Fungal Genetics and Biology 42: 7380.
  • Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, Hibbett DS, Fisher MC. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31: 2132.
  • Taylor JW, Turner E, Townsend JP, Dettman JR, Jacobson D. 2006. Eukaryotic microbes, species recognition and the geographic limits of species: examples from the kingdom Fungi. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361: 19471963.
  • Thaxter R. 1922. LXXXIX. A revision of the Endogonaceae. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 57: 291341.
  • Tommerup IC, Sivasithamparam K. 1990. Zygospores and asexual spores of Gigaspora decipiens, an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Mycological Research 94: 897900.
  • Van Tuinen D, Jacquot E, Zhao B, Gollotte A, Gianinazzi-Pearson V. 1998. Characterization of root colonization profiles by a microcosm community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using 25S rDNA-targeted nested PCR. Molecular Ecology 7: 879887.
  • Vandenkoornhuyse P, Leyval C, Bonnin I. 2001. High genetic diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: evidence for recombination events. Heredity 87: 243253.
  • Walker C. 1983. Taxonomic concepts in the Endogonaceae: spore wall concepts in species descriptions. Mycotaxon 18: 443455.
  • Walker C, Koske RE. 1987. Taxonomic concepts in the Endogonaceae. IV. Glomus fasciculatum redescribed. Mycotaxon 30: 253262.
  • Walker C, Mize CW, McNabb HS. 1982. Populations of endogonaceous fungi at two locations in central Iowa. Canadian Journal of Botany 60: 25182529.
  • Walker C, Schüßler A. 2004. Nomenclatural clarifications and new taxa in the Glomeromycota. Mycological Research 108: 981982.
  • Walker C, Vestberg M, Demircik F, Stockinger H, Saito M, Sawaki H, Nishmura I, Schüssler A. 2007. Molecular phylogeny and new taxa in the Archaeosporales (Glomeromycota): Ambispora fennica gen. sp. nov., Ambisporaceae fam. nov., and emendation of Archaeospora and Archaeosporaceae. Mycological Research 111: 137153.
  • Waples RS, Gaggiotti O. 2006. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology 15: 14191439.
  • Warner A, Mosse B. 1983. Spread of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi between separate root systems. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 80: 353354.
  • Wiley EO. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Systematic Zoology 27: 1726.
  • Zhan J, Pettway RE, McDonald BA. 2003. The global genetic structure of the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola is characterized by high nuclear diversity, low mitochondrial diversity, regular recombination, and gene flow. Fungal Genetics and Biology 8: 286297.