SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrahamson LP, Robison DJ, Volk TA, White EH, Neuhauser EF, Benjamin WH, Peterson JM. 1998. Sustainability and environmental issues associated with willow bioenergy development in New York (USA). Biomass & Bioenergy 15: 1722.
  • Akin DE. 2007. Grass lignocellulose – strategies to overcome recalcitrance. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 137: 315.
  • Al Afas N, Pellis A, Niinemets U, Ceulemans R. 2005. Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. I. Clonal and year-to-year differences in leaf and petiole characteristics and stand leaf area index. Biomass & Bioenergy 28: 536547.
  • Andrews M, James EK, Cummings SP, Zavalin AA, Vinogradova LV, McKenzie BA. 2003. Use of nitrogen fixing bacteria inoculants as a substitute for nitrogen fertiliser for dryland graminaceous crops: progress made, mechanisms of action and future potential. Symbiosis 35: 209229.
  • Argus GW. 1997. Infrageneric classification of Salix (Salicaceae) in the new world. Systematic Botany Monographs 52: 1121.
  • Armstrong A. 1997. The United Kingdom network of experiments on site/yield relationships for short rotation coppice. Research Information Note 294. Farnham, UK: Forestry Commission, Forest Research.
  • Armstrong A, Johns C, Tubby I. 1999. Effects of spacing and cutting cycle on the yield of poplar grown as an energy crop. Biomass & Bioenergy 17: 305314.
  • Atienza SG, Satovic Z, Petersen KK, Dolstra O, Martin A. 2002. Preliminary genetic linkage map of Miscanthus sinensis with RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 946952.
  • Atienza SG, Satovic Z, Petersen KK, Dolstra O, Martin A. 2003. Identification of QTLs influencing agronomic traits in Miscanthus sinensis Anderss. I. Total height, flag-leaf height and stem diameter. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 123129.
  • Austin RB, Ford MA, Morgan CL, Yeoman D. 1993. Old and modern wheat cultivars compared on the Broadbalk wheat experiment. European Journal of Agronomy 2: 141147.
  • Baldani JI, Reis VM, Baldani VLD, Dobereiner J. 2002. A brief story of nitrogen fixation in sugarcane – reasons for success in Brazil. Functional Plant Biology 29: 417423.
  • Baum C, Weih M, Verwijst T, Makeschin F. 2002. The effects of nitrogen fertilization and soil properties on mycorrhizal formation of Salix viminalis. Forest Ecology and Management 160: 3543.
  • Beale CV, Bint DA, Long SP. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis in the C4 grass Miscanthus×giganteus, growing in the cool temperate climate of southern England. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 267273.
  • Beale CV, Long SP. 1995. Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy conversion in cool climates. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 641650.
  • Beale CV, Morison JIL, Long SP. 1999. Water use efficiency of C4 perennial grasses in a temperate climate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 96: 103115.
  • Bell MJ, Garside AL. 2005. Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical Queensland, Australia. Field Crops Research 92: 23; 231–248.
  • Von Blottnitz H, Curran MA. 2007. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 15: 607619.
  • Boddey RM, Polidoro JC, Resende AS, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S. 2001. Use of the 15N natural abundance technique for the quantification of the contribution of N2 fixation to sugar cane and other grasses. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 889895.
  • Bridgeman TG, Darvell LI, Jones JM, Williams PT, Fahmi R, Bridgwater AV, Barraclough T, Shield I, Yates N, Thain SC et al . 2007. Influence of particle size on the analytical and chemical properties of two energy crops. Fuel 86: 6072.
  • Van Den Broek R, Vleeshouwers L, Hoogwijk M, Van Wijk A, Turkenburg W. 2001. The energy crop growth model SILVA: description and application to Eucalyptus plantations in Nicaragua. Biomass & Bioenergy 21: 335349.
  • Brooking IR. 1993. Effect of temperature on kernel growth-rate of maize grown in a temperate maritime environment. Field Crops Research 35: 135145.
  • Brunner AM, DiFazio SP, Groover AT. 2007. Forest genomics grows up and branches out. New Phytologist 174: 710713.
  • Bungart R, Grunewald H, Huttl RF. 2001. Productivity and water budget of two poplar clones on a mine spoil in the Lusatian lignite mining region. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 120: 125138.
  • Bunn SM, Rae AM, Herbert CS, Taylor G. 2004. Leaf-level productivity traits in Populus grown in short rotation coppice for biomass energy. Forestry 77: 307323.
  • Calderini DF, Dreccer MF, Slafer GA. 1997. Consequences of breeding on biomass, radiation interception and radiation-use efficiency in wheat. Field Crops Research 52: 271281.
  • Campos H, Cooper M, Edmeades GO, Loffler C, Schussler JR, Ibanez M. 2006. Changes in drought tolerance in maize associated with 50 years of breeding for yield in the US corn belt. Maydica 51: 369381.
  • Cannell MGR, Milne R, Sheppard LJ, Unsworth MH. 1987. Radiation interception and productivity of willow. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 261278.
  • Cassman KG, Liska AJ. 2007. Food and fuel for all: realistic or foolish? Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1: 1823.
  • Ceulemans R, Deraedt W. 1999. Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture. Forest Ecology and Management 121: 923.
  • Ceulemans R, Isebrands JG. 1996. Carbon acquisition and allocation. In: StettlerRF, BradshawHD Jr, HeilmanPE, HinckleyTM, eds. Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press, 355399.
  • Ceulemans R, McDonald AJS, Pereira JS. 1996. A comparison among eucalypt, poplar and willow characteristics with particular reference to a coppice, growth-modelling approach. Biomass & Bioenergy 11: 215231.
  • Ceulemans R, Stettler RF, Hinckley TM, Isebrands JG, Heilman PE. 1990. Crown architecture of Populus clones as determined by branch orientation and branch characteristics. Tree Physiology 7: 157167.
  • Chang MCY. 2007. Harnessing energy from plant biomass. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 11: 677684
  • Chapple C, Ladisch M, Meilan R. 2007. Loosening lignin's grip on biofuel production. Nature Biotechnology 25: 746748.
  • Chen F, Dixon RA. 2007. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nature Biotechnology 25: 759761.
  • Christian DG, Poulton PR, Riche AB, Yates NE. 1997. The recovery of 15N labelled fertilizer applied to Miscanthus×giganteus. Biomass & Bioenergy 12: 2124.
  • Christian DG, Poulton PR, Riche AB, Yates NE, Todd AD. 2006. The recovery over several seasons of 15N labelled fertilizer applied to Miscanthus×giganteus ranging from 1 to 3 years old. Biomass & Bioenergy 30: 125133.
  • Christian DG, Riche AB 1999. Establishing fuel specifications of non-wood biomass crops. ETSU Report. Oxford, UK: Energy Technology Support Unit.
  • Clifton-Brown JC, Jones MB. 1997. The thermal response of leaf extension rate in genotypes of the C4 grass Miscanthus: an important factor in determining the potential productivity of different genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 15731581.
  • Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I. 2000. Water use efficiency and biomass partitioning of three different Miscanthus genotypes with limited and unlimited water supply. Annals of Botany 86: 191200.
  • Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Andersson B, Basch G, Christian DG, Kjeldsen JB, Jorgensen U, Mortensen JV, Riche AB, Schwarz KU et al . 2001. Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe. Agronomy Journal 93: 10131019.
  • Clifton-Brown JC, Neilson B, Lewandowski I, Jones MB. 2000. The modelled productivity of Miscanthus×giganteus (Greef et Deu) in Ireland. Industrial Crops & Products 12: 97109.
  • Clifton-Brown JC, Stampfl PF, Jones MB. 2004. Miscanthus biomass production for energy in Europe and its potential contribution to decreasing fossil fuel carbon emissions. Global Change Biology 10: 509518.
  • Cocco D. 2007. Comparative study on energy sustainability of biofuel production chains. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A − Journal of Power and Energy 221: 637645.
  • Cooke JEK, Weih M. 2005. Nitrogen storage and seasonal nitrogen cycling in Populus: bridging molecular physiology and ecophysiology. New Phytologist 167: 1930.
  • Crow P, Houston TJ. 2004. The influence of soil and coppice cycle on the rooting habit of short rotation poplar and willow coppice. Biomass & Bioenergy 26: 497505.
  • Danalatos NG, Archontoulis SV, Mitsios I. 2007. Potential growth and biomass productivity of Miscanthus×giganteus as affected by plant density and N-fertilization in central Greece. Biomass & Bioenergy 31: 145152.
  • DeBell DS, Clendenen GW, Harrington CA, Zasada JC. 1996. Tree growth and stand development in short-rotation Populus plantings: 7-year results for two clones at three spacings. Biomass & Bioenergy 11: 253269.
  • Deckmyn G, Laureysens I, Garcia J, Muys B, Ceulemans R. 2004. Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model secrets. Biomass & Bioenergy 26: 221227.
  • Deraedt W, Ceulemans R. 1998. Clonal variability in biomass production and conversion efficiency of poplar during the establishment year of a short rotation coppice plantation. Biomass & Bioenergy 15: 391398.
  • Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Blake TJ, Kosola K, Kort J. 2001. Physiological ecology of poplars. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press.
  • Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Kim H, Tambour L, Clement-Vidal A. 2006. Ecomeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 2. Simulating genotype responses to phosphorus deficiency. Functional Plant Biology 33: 325337.
  • Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Quilot B, De Reffye P. 2005. Environmental and genetic control of morphogenesis in crops: towards models simulating phenotypic plasticity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 12891302.
  • Donald CM. 1968. Breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385403.
  • Dunnett AJ, Shah N. 2007. Prospects for bioenergy. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 1: 118.
  • Duvick DN, Cassman KG. 1999. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States. Crop Science 39: 16221630.
  • Elawad SH, Gascho GJ, Shih SF. 1980. The energy potential of sugarcane and sweet sorghum. In: KlassDL, WeatherlyJW, eds. Energy from biomass and wastes IV. Chicago, IL, USA: Institute of Gas Technology, 65105.
  • Farrell AD, Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Jones MB. 2006. Genotypic variation in cold tolerance influences the yield of Miscanthus. Annals of Applied Biology 149: 337345.
  • Foulkes MJ, Scott RK, Sylvester-Bradley R. 2001. The ability of wheat cultivars to withstand drought in UK conditions: resource capture. Journal of Agricultural Science 137: 116.
  • Foulkes MJ, Snape JW, Shearman VJ, Reynolds MP, Gaju O, Sylvester-Bradley R. 2007. Genetic progress in yield potential in wheat: recent advances and future prospects. Journal of Agricultural Science 145: 1729.
  • Gabrielle B, Denoroy P, Gosse G, Justes E, Andersen MN. 1998. Development and evaluation of a CERES-type model for winter oilseed rape. Field Crops Research 57: 95111.
  • Glynn C, Ronnberg-Wastljung AC, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Weih M. 2004. Willow genotype, but not drought treatment, affects foliar phenolic concentrations and leaf-beetle resistance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 113: 114.
  • Granda CB, Zhu L, Holtzapple MT. 2007. Sustainable liquid biofuels and their environmental impact. Environmental Progress 26: 233250.
  • Hamelinck CN, Van Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC. 2005. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass & Bioenergy 28: 384410.
  • Hanley SJ, Mallott MD, Karp AT. 2006. Alignment of a Salix linkage map to the Populus genomic sequence reveals macrosynteny between willow and poplar genomes. Tree Genetics and Genomes 3: 3548.
  • Heaton E, Voigt T, Long SP. 2004. A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass & Bioenergy 27: 2130.
  • Heilman PE, Hinckley TM, Roberts DA, Ceulemans R, eds. 1996. Production physiology. In: CeulemansR, IsebrandsJG, eds. Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Press, 459489.
  • Hein KRG. 2005. Future energy supply in Europe – challenge and chances. Fuel 84: 11891194.
  • Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Mann MK, Volk TA. 2004. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of generating electricity from willow biomass. Renewable Energy 29: 10231042.
  • Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Volk TA. 2003. Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass & Bioenergy 25: 147165.
  • Hernandez P, Dorado G, Laurie DA, Martin A, Snape JW. 2001. Microsatellites and RFLP probes from maize are efficient sources of molecular markers for the biomass energy crop Miscanthus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 616622.
  • Herve C, Ceulemans R. 1996. Short-rotation coppiced vs non-coppiced poplar: a comparative study at two different field sites. Biomass & Bioenergy 11: 139150.
  • Hinckley TM, Brooks JR, Cermak J, Ceulemans R, Kucera J, Meinzer FC, Roberts DA. 1994. Water flux in a hybrid poplar stand. Tree Physiology 14: 10051018.
  • Hughes E, Benemann JR. 1997. Biological fossil CO2 mitigation. Energy Conversion and Management 38: S467S473.
  • Hunter T, Peacock L, Turner H, Brain P. 2002. Effect of plantation design on stem-infecting form of rust in willow biomass coppice. Forest Pathology 32: 8797.
  • Inman-Bamber NG, Muchow RC, Robertson MJ. 2002. Dry matter partitioning of sugarcane in Australia and South Africa. Field Crops Research 76: 7183.
  • Isebrands JG, Host GE, Bollmark L, Porter JR, Philippot S, Stevens E, Rushton K. 1996. A strategy for process modelling of short-rotation Salix coppice plantations. Biomass & Bioenergy 11: 245252.
  • Van Ittersum MK, Leffelaar PA, Van Keulen H, Kropff MJ, Bastiaans L, Goudriaan J. 2003. On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 201234.
  • Jackson PA. 2005. Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 92: 23; 277–290.
  • Johnson JD, Tognetti R, Paris P. 2002. Water relations and gas exchange in poplar and willow under water stress and elevated atmospheric CO2. Physiologia Plantarum 115: 93100.
  • Joshi CP, Mansfield SD. 2007. The cellulose paradox – simple molecule, complex biosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10: 220226.
  • Jurginger M, Faaij A, Rosillo-Calle F, Wood J. 2006. The growing role of biofuels – opportunities, challenges and pitfalls. International Sugar Journal 108: 618629.
  • Karacic A, Weih M. 2006. Variation in growth and resource utilisation among eight poplar clones grown under different irrigation and fertilisation regimes in Sweden. Biomass & Bioenergy 30: 115124.
  • Kauter D, Lewandowski I, Claupein W. 2003. Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use – a review of the physiological basis and management influences. Biomass & Bioenergy 24: 411427.
  • Keoleian GA, Volk TA. 2005. Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24: 385406.
  • Kiniry JR, Sanderson MA, Williams JR, Tischler CR, Hussey MA, Ocumpaugh WR, Read JC, VanEsbroeck G, Reed RL. 1996. Simulating Alamo switchgrass with the ALMANAC model. Agronomy Journal 88: 602606.
  • Kiniry JR, Tischler CR, Van Esbroeck GA. 1999. Radiation use efficiency and leaf CO2 exchange for diverse C4 grasses. Biomass & Bioenergy 17: 95112.
  • Kirchhof G, Eckert B, Stoffels M, Baldani JI, Reis VM, Hartmann A. 2001. Herbaspirillum frisingense sp. nov., a new nitrogen-fixing bacterial species that occurs in C4 fibre plants. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 51: 157168.
  • Kirchhof G, Reis VM, Baldani JI, Eckert B, Dobereiner J, Hartmann A. 1997. Occurrence, physiological and molecular analysis of endophytic diazotrophic bacteria in gramineous energy plants. Plant and Soil 194: 4555.
  • Kopp RF, Abrahamson LP, White EH, Burns KF, Nowak CA. 1997. Cutting cycle and spacing effects on biomass production by a willow clone in New York. Biomass & Bioenergy 12: 313319.
  • Kuzovkina YA, Weih M, Romero MA, Charles J, Hurst S, McIvor I, Karp A, Trybush S, Labrecque M, Teodorescu I et al . 2008. Salix: botany and global horticulture Horticultural Reviews 34: 448490
  • Lambert RJ, Johnson RR. 1978. Leaf angle, tassel morphology, and performance of maize hybrids. Crop Science 18: 499502.
  • Lange J-P. 2007. Lignocellulose conversion: an introduction to chemistry, process and economics. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1: 3948.
  • Larsson S. 1998. Genetic improvement of willow for short-rotation coppice. Biomass & Bioenergy 15: 2326.
  • Laureysens I, Deraedt W, Indeherberge T, Ceulemans R. 2003. Population dynamics in a 6-year old coppice culture of poplar. I. Clonal differences in stool mortality, shoot dynamics and shoot diameter distribution in relation to biomass production. Biomass & Bioenergy 24: 8195.
  • Laureysens I, Pellis A, Willems J, Ceulemans R. 2005. Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. II. Second rotation results. Biomass & Bioenergy 29: 1021.
  • Lawton JR. 1976. Seasonal variation in the secondary phloem from the main trunks of willow and sycamore trees. New Phytologist 77: 761777.
  • Ledin S. 1996. Willow wood properties, production and economy. Biomass & Bioenergy 11: 7583.
  • Legendre BL, Burner DM. 1995. Biomass production of sugarcane cultivars and early-generation hybrids. Biomass & Bioenergy 8: 5561.
  • Lemus R, Lal R. 2005. Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24: 121.
  • Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brown JC, Andersson B, Basch G, Christian DG, Jorgensen U, Jones MB, Riche AB, Schwarz KU, Tayebi K et al . 2003a. Environment and harvest time affects the combustion qualities of Miscanthus genotypes. Agronomy Journal 95: 12741280.
  • Lewandowski I, Schmidt U. 2006. Nitrogen, energy and land use efficiencies of Miscanthus, reed canary grass and triticale as determined by the boundary line approach. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 112: 335346.
  • Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Christou M. 2003b. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass & Bioenergy 25: 335361.
  • Liang ZS, Yang HW, Shao HB, Han RL. 2006. Investigation on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of poplar under soil water deficits on the loess plateau. Colloids and Surfaces B − Biointerfaces 53: 2328.
  • Linderson M-L, Iritz Z, Lindroth A. 2007. The effect of water availability on stand-level productivity, transpiration, water use efficiency and radiation use efficiency of field-grown willow clones. Biomass & Bioenergy 31: 460468.
  • Lindroth A, Bath A. 1999. Assessment of regional willow coppice yield in Sweden on basis of water availability. Forest Ecology and Management 121: 5765.
  • Lindroth A, Verwijst T, Halldin S. 1994. Water-use efficiency of willow – variation with season, humidity and biomass allocation. Journal of Hydrology 156: 119.
  • Londo M, Vleeshouwers L, Dekker J, De Graaf H. 2001. Energy farming in Dutch desiccation abatement areas: yields and benefits compared to grass cultivation. Biomass & Bioenergy 20: 337350.
  • Long SP. 1983. C4 photosynthesis at low-temperatures. Plant, Cell & Environment 6: 345363.
  • Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, Ort DR. 2006. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 315330.
  • Luquet SF, Cirilo AG, Otegui ME. 2006. Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in argentine maize hybrids. Field Crops Research 95: 383397.
  • MAFF. 2000. Fertiliser recommendations for agricultural and horticultural crops. London: Stationery Office, 177.
  • Magarey RC, Yip HY, Bull JI, Johnson EJ. 1997. Effect of the fungicide mancozeb on fungi associated with sugarcane yield decline in Queensland. Mycological Research 101: 858862.
  • Marron N, Dillen SY, Ceulemans R. 2007. Evaluation of leaf traits for indirect selection of high yielding poplars. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61: 103116.
  • McCracken AR, Dawson WM. 1997. Growing clonal mixtures of willow to reduce effect of Melampsora epitea var. epitea. European Journal of Forest Pathology 27: 319329.
  • McCracken AR, Dawson WM. 2003. Rust disease (Melampsora epitea) of willow (Salix spp.) grown as short rotation coppice (SRC) in inter- and intra-species mixtures. Annals of Applied Biology 143: 381393.
  • McLaughlin SB, Adams Kszos L. 2005. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass & Bioenergy 28: 515535.
  • McLaughlin SB, Kiniry JR, Taliaferro CM, Ugarte DD. 2006. Projecting yield and utilization potential of switchgrass as an energy crop. Advances in Agronomy 90: 267297.
  • McLaughlin SB, Walsh ME. 1998. Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass & Bioenergy 14: 317324.
  • Midorikawa B, Shimada Y, Iwaki N, Ohga N. 1975. Root production in semi-natural grassland community dominated by Miscanthus sinensis in the Kawatabi area. JIBP Synthesis 13: 114122.
  • Miguez F. 2007. Hairy vetch and nitrogen effects on Miscanthus. In: The 2007 Special Research Initiative: Biomass Energy Symposium, 11 January 2007, University of Illinois. http://miscanthus.uiuc.edu/index.php/symposium/2007-symposium/
  • Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Wood AW. 1996. Growth of sugarcane under high input conditions in tropical Australia 2. Sucrose accumulation and commercial yield. Field Crops Research 48: 2736.
  • Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Lakshminarasimhan C. 1999. Diazotrophic associations in sugar cane cultivation in South India. Tropical Agriculture 76: 171178.
  • De Neergaard A, Porter JR, Gorissen A. 2002. Distribution of assimilated carbon in plants and rhizosphere soil of basket willow (Salix viminalis l.). Plant and Soil 245: 307314.
  • Nordman EE, Robison DJ, Abrahamson LP, Volk TA. 2005. Relative resistance of willow and poplar biomass production clones across a continuum of herbivorous insect specialization: univariate and multivariate approaches. Forest Ecology and Management 217: 307318.
  • Osowski S, Fahlenkamp H. 2006. Regenerative energy production using energy crops. Industrial Crops and Products 24: 196203.
  • Otegui ME, Andrade FH, Suero EE. 1995. Growth, water-use, and kernel abortion of maize subjected to drought at silking. Field Crops Research 40: 8794.
  • Paradi I, Barr J. 2006. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity in willow forests of different age along the River Waal, the Netherlands. Forest Ecology and Management 237: 366372.
  • Pedersen JF, Vogel KP, Funnell DL. 2005. Impact of reduced lignin on plant fitness. Crop Science 45: 812819.
  • Pei MH, Bayon C, Ruiz C, Yuan ZW, Hunter T. 2002. Genetic variation in Melampsora larici-epitea on biomass willows assessed using AFLP. European Journal of Plant Pathology 108: 229236.
  • Pei MH, Royle DJ, Hunter T. 1993. Identity and host alternation of some willow rusts (Melampsora spp.) in England. Mycological Research 97: 845851.
  • Pei MH, Ruiz C, Bayon C, Hunter T. 2004. Rust resistance in Salix to Melampsora larici-epitea. Plant Pathology 53: 770779.
  • Pei MH, Ruiz C, Bayon C, Hunter T, Lonsdale D. 2005. Pathogenic variation in poplar rust Melampsora larici-populina from England. European Journal of Plant Pathology 111: 147155.
  • Pei MH, Ruiz C, Hunter T, Bayon C. 2003. Rust resistance in Salix induced by inoculations with avirulent and virulent isolates of Melampsora larici-epitea. Forest Pathology 33: 383394.
  • Pei MH, Whelan MJ, Halford NG, Royle DJ. 1997. Distinction between stem- and leaf-infecting forms of Melampsora rust on Salix viminalis using RAPD markers. Mycological Research 101: 710.
  • Philippot S. 1996. Simulation models of short-rotation forestry production and coppice biology. Biomass & Bioenergy 11: 8593.
  • Phyllis 2007. Phyllis, database for biomass and waste. Petten, the Netherlands: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands. http://www.ecn.nl/phyllis
  • Porter JJ, Kirsch MMN, Streibig J, Felby C. 2007. Choosing crops as energy feedstocks. Nature Biotechnology 25: 716717.
  • Porter JR, Parfitt RI, Arnold GM. 1993. Leaf demography in willow short-rotation coppice. Biomass & Bioenergy 5: 325336.
  • Powlson DS, Riche AB, Shield I. 2005. Biofuels and other approaches for decreasing fossil fuel emissions from agriculture. Annals of Applied Biology 146: 193201.
  • Price AH. 2006. Believe it or not, QTLs are accurate. Trends in Plant Science 11: 213216.
  • Price L, Bullard M, Lyons H, Anthony S, Nixon P. 2004. Identifying the yield potential of Miscanthus×giganteus: an assessment of the spatial and temporal variability of M.×giganteus biomass productivity across England and Wales. Biomass & Bioenergy 26: 313.
  • Proe MF, Griffiths JH, Craig J. 2002. Effects of spacing, species and coppicing on leaf area, light interception and photosynthesis in short rotation forestry. Biomass & Bioenergy 23: 315326.
  • Rae AM, Tricker PJ, Bunn SM, Taylor G. 2007. Adaptation of tree growth to elevated CO2: quantitative trait loci for biomass in Populus. New Phytologist 175: 5969.
  • Rafaschieri A, Rapaccini M, Manfrida G. 1999. Life cycle assessment of electricity production from poplar energy crops compared with conventional fossil fuels. Energy Conversion and Management 40: 14771493.
  • Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL et al . 2006. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311: 484489.
  • Raven JA. 1992. The physiology of Salix. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 98B: 4962.
  • Reynolds M, Calderini D, Condon A, Vargas M. 2007. Association of source/sink traits with yield, biomass and radiation use efficiency among random sister lines from three wheat crosses in a high-yield environment. Journal of Agricultural Science 145: 316.
  • Reynolds MP, Pellegrineschi A, Skovmand B. 2005. Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 146: 3949.
  • Rice RW, Gilbert RA, Lentini RS. 2007. Nutrient requirements for sugarcane production on Florida muck soils. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SC026
  • Ritchie JT, Otter S. 1985. Description and performance of CERES-wheat: a user-oriented wheat yield model. In: WillisWO, ed. ARS Wheat Yield Project. Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 159175.
  • Robertson MJ, Wood AW, Muchow RC. 1996. Growth of sugarcane under high input conditions in tropical Australia 1. Radiation use, biomass accumulation and partitioning. Field Crops Research 48: 1125.
  • Robinson KM, Karp A, Taylor G. 2004. Defining leaf traits linked to yield in short-rotation coppice Salix. Biomass & Bioenergy 26: 417431.
  • Rodriguez D, Van Oijen M, Schapendonk AHMC. 1999. LINGRA-CC: a sink−source model to simulate the impact of climate change and management on grassland productivity. New Phytologist 144: 359368.
  • Ronnberg-Wastljung AC. 2001. Genetic structure of growth and phenological traits in Salix viminalis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research − Revue Canadienne de Recherche Forestiere 31: 276282.
  • Ronnberg-Wastljung AC, Ahman I, Glynn C, Widenfalk O. 2006. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to herbivores in willow: field experiments with varying soils and climates. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 118: 163174.
  • Ronnberg-Wastljung AC, Glynn C, Weih M. 2005. QTL analyses of drought tolerance and growth for a Salix dasyclados ×Salix viminalis hybrid in contrasting water regimes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 537549.
  • Ronnberg-Wastljung AC, Gullberg U. 1999. Genetics of breeding characters with possible effects on biomass production in Salix viminalis (L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 531540.
  • Rose JKC, Saladie M, Catala C. 2004. The plot thickens: new perspectives of primary cell wall modification. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 296301.
  • Ross J, Ross V. 1998. Statistical description of the architecture of a fast growing willow coppice. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 91: 2327.
  • Rowe RL, Street NR, Taylor G. 2007. Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008
  • Russell WA. 1985. Evaluations for plant, ear, and grain traits of maize cultivars representing seven eras of breeding. Maydica 30: 8596.
  • Sage RF, Pearcy RW, Seemann JR. 1987. The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants; III. Leaf nitrogen effects on the activity of carboxylating enzymes in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.) Plant Physiology 85: 355359.
  • Samson R, Mani S, Boddey R, Sokhansanj S, Quesada D, Urquiaga S, Reis V, Ho Lem C. 2005. The potential of C4 perennial grasses for developing a global bioheat industry. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24: 461495.
  • Sannervik AN, Eckersten H, Verwijst T, Kowalik P, Nordh NE. 2006. Simulation of willow productivity based on radiation use efficiency, shoot mortality and shoot age. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 156164.
  • Sartori F, Lal R, Ebinger MH, Parrish DJ. 2006. Potential soil carbon sequestration and CO2 offset by dedicated energy crops in the USA. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 25: 441472.
  • Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Hinckley TM, Stettler RF, Heilman PE, Isebrands JG. 1999. Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. III. Seasonal carbon allocation patterns from branches. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 14191432.
  • Schapendonk AHCM, Stol W, Van Kraalingen DWG, Bouman BAM. 1998. LINGRA, a sink/source model to simulate grassland productivity in Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 9: 87100.
  • Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK. 2008. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 464469.
  • Sennerby-Forsse L. 1986. Seasonal variation in the ultrastructure of the cambium in young stems of willow (Salix viminalis) in relation to phenology. Physiologia Plantarum 67: 529737.
  • Sennerby-Forsse L. 1995. Growth processes. Biomass & Bioenergy 9: 3543.
  • Sennerby-Forsse L, Zsuffa L. 1995. Bud structure and resprouting in coppiced stools of Salix viminalis L., S. eriocephala Michx, and S. amygdaloides Anders. Trees − Structure and Function 9: 224234.
  • Sims REH, Hastings A, Schlamadinger B, Taylor G, Smith P. 2006. Energy crops: current status and future prospects. Global Change Biology 12: 20542076.
  • Sorrells ME. 2007. Application of new knowledge, technologies, and strategies to wheat improvement. Euphytica 157: 299306.
  • Sticklen M. 2006. Plant genetic engineering to improve biomass characteristics for biofuels. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 17: 315319.
  • Stott KG . 1984. Improving the biomass potential of willow by selection and breeding. In: PerttuKL, ed. Ecology and management of forest biomass production systems. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 233260.
  • Strasil Z. 1999. Production of above-ground biomass in Miscanthus sinensis in the Czech Republic. Rostlinna Vyroba 45: 539543.
  • Street NR, Skogstrom O, Sjodin A, Tucker J, Rodriguez-Acosta M, Nilsson P, Jansson S, Taylor G. 2006. The genetics and genomics of the drought response in Populus. Plant Journal 48: 321341.
  • Suplick MR, Read JC, Matuson MA, Johnson JP. 2002. Switchgrass leaf appearance and lamina extension rates in response to fertilizer nitrogen. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25: 21152127.
  • Sylvester-Bradley R, Lunn G, Foulkes J, Shearman VJ, Spink JH, Ingram J. 2002. Management strategies for high yields of cereals and oilseed rape. In: HGCA Conference on Agronomic Intelligence: The Basis for Profitable Production. Coventry, UK: Home-Grown Cereals Authority, 8.1–8.17.
  • Szczukowski S, Tworkowski J, Klasa A, Stolarski M. 2002. Productivity and chemical composition of wood tissues of short rotation willow coppice cultivated on arable land. Rostlinna Vyroba 48: 413417.
  • Taylor G, Beckett KP, Robinson KM, Stiles K, Rae AM. 2001. Identifying QTL for yield in UK biomass poplar. Aspects of Applied Biology 65: 173182.
  • Taylor G. 2002. Populus. Arabidopsis for forestry. Do we need a model tree? Annals of Botany 90: 681689.
  • Tharakan PJ, Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, White EH. 2003. Energy feedstock characteristics of willow and hybrid poplar clones at harvest age. Biomass & Bioenergy 25: 571580.
  • Tharakan PJ, Volk TA, Nowak CA, Abrahamson LP. 2005. Morphological traits of 30 willow clones and their relationship to biomass production. Canadian Journal of Forest Research − Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 35: 421431.
  • Tollenaar M. 1989. Genetic-improvement in grain-yield of commercial maize hybrids grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Science 29: 13651371.
  • Tollenaar M, Lee EA. 2002. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research 75: 161169.
  • Torney F, Moeller L, Scarpa A, Wang K. 2007. Genetic engineering approaches to improve bioethanol production from maize. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 18: 193199.
  • Tsarouhas V, Gullberg U, Lagercrantz U. 2003. Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling timing of bud flush in Salix. Hereditas 138: 172178.
  • Tschanplinski TJ, Blake TJ. 1989. Photosynthetic reinvigoration of leaves following shoot decapitation and accelerated growth of coppice shoots. Physiologia Plantarum 75: 175165.
  • Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A et al . 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 15961604.
  • Uribelarrea M, Carcova J, Otegui ME, Westgate ME. 2002. Pollen production, pollination dynamics, and kernel set in maize. Crop Science 42: 19101918.
  • USDA. 2005. Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: a joint research agenda. Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Energy.
  • USDA. 2006. ARS Timeline: History of research at the US Department of Agriculture and Agricultural Research Service. Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Energy. http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/timeline/green.htm
  • Verwijst T. 1996a. Cyclic and progressive changes in short-rotation willow coppice systems. Biomass & Bioenergy 11: 161165.
  • Verwijst T. 1996b. Stool mortality and development of a competitive hierarchy in a Salix viminalis coppice system. Biomass & Bioenergy 10: 245250.
  • Vihera-Aarnio A, 1988. Variation in coppicing characteristics and biomass production of willow clones and hybrids from the breeders point of view. In: Proceedings of the IEA Task II Meeting and Workshops on Cell Culture and Coppicing. Paris: International Energy Agency.
  • Volk TA, Verwijst T, Tharakan PJ, Abrahamson LP, White EH. 2004. Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 411418.
  • Weih M. 2003. Trade-offs in plants and the prospects for breeding using modern biotechnology. New Phytologist 158: 79.
  • Weih M, Nordh NE. 2002. Characterising willows for biomass and phytoremediation: growth, nitrogen and water use of 14 willow clones under different irrigation and fertilisation regimes. Biomass & Bioenergy 23: 397413.
  • Weih M, Ronnberg-Wastljung AC. 2007. Shoot biomass growth is related to the vertical leaf nitrogen gradient in Salix canopies. Tree Physiology 27: 15511559.
  • Weng Y, Azhaguvel P, Devkota RN, Rudd JC. 2007. PCR-based markers for detection of different sources of 1AL.1RS and 1BL.1RS wheat−rye translocations in wheat background. Plant Breeding 126: 482486.
  • Wilkinson AG, Evans EJ, Bilsborrow PE, Wright C, Hewison WO, Pilbeam DJ. 1999. Poplars and willows for soil erosion control in New Zealand. Biomass & Bioenergy 16: 263274.
  • Worldwatch Institute. 2006. Biofuels for transportation: global potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy in the 21st century. Prepared for the German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) in coordination with German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and the German Agency of Renewable Resources (FNR). Washington, DC, USA: Worldwatch Institute.
  • Wright L. 2006. Worldwide commercial development of bioenergy with a focus on energy crop-based projects. Biomass & Bioenergy 30: 706714.
  • Wulschleger S, Jansson S, Taylor G. 2002. Genomics and forest biology –Populus emerges as the perennial favourite. The Plant Cell 14: 26512655.