SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • climate;
  • die-off;
  • hydraulics;
  • vegetation mortality;
  • water relations

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Contents

 Summary1
I.Introduction2
II. Consequences of vegetation mortality3
III.Global patterns of mortality3
IV.Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality4
V.Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms5
VI.Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms13
VII.Conclusions15
 Acknowledgements15
 References15

Summary

Severe droughts have been associated with regional-scale forest mortality worldwide. Climate change is expected to exacerbate regional mortality events; however, prediction remains difficult because the physiological mechanisms underlying drought survival and mortality are poorly understood. We developed a hydraulically based theory considering carbon balance and insect resistance that allowed development and examination of hypotheses regarding survival and mortality. Multiple mechanisms may cause mortality during drought. A common mechanism for plants with isohydric regulation of water status results from avoidance of drought-induced hydraulic failure via stomatal closure, resulting in carbon starvation and a cascade of downstream effects such as reduced resistance to biotic agents. Mortality by hydraulic failure per se may occur for isohydric seedlings or trees near their maximum height. Although anisohydric plants are relatively drought-tolerant, they are predisposed to hydraulic failure because they operate with narrower hydraulic safety margins during drought. Elevated temperatures should exacerbate carbon starvation and hydraulic failure. Biotic agents may amplify and be amplified by drought-induced plant stress. Wet multidecadal climate oscillations may increase plant susceptibility to drought-induced mortality by stimulating shifts in hydraulic architecture, effectively predisposing plants to water stress. Climate warming and increased frequency of extreme events will probably cause increased regional mortality episodes. Isohydric and anisohydric water potential regulation may partition species between survival and mortality, and, as such, incorporating this hydraulic framework may be effective for modeling plant survival and mortality under future climate conditions.


I. Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Rapid and large-scale shifts in ecosystem structure and function can result from mortality of forest and woodland plants in response to extreme climate events (see Fig. 1; Condit et al., 1995; Allen & Breshears, 1998; Hanson & Weltzin, 2000; Breshears et al., 2005; Shaw et al., 2005; Berg et al., 2006; Gitlin et al., 2006). Such widespread mortality events can have long-term impacts on community dynamics and species interactions, and may feed back upon atmospheric CO2 and climate. Although many of the consequences of tree mortality are readily apparent, our current understanding of the causes of tree mortality is surprisingly limited, even though a rich literature exists on plant responses to stress. Essentially, we cannot address questions such as: how severe must a drought be to kill a tree; and during drought, which trees will die and which will survive? Consequently, our current ability to predict when regional-scale plant stress will exceed a threshold that results in widespread mortality is lacking, yet is fundamentally needed to assess potential climate-change impacts, including changes in vegetation and associated ecosystems and their feedbacks to the climate system (Keane et al., 2001; Burkett et al., 2005; Scholze et al., 2006; IPCC, 2007).

image

Figure 1. Dead ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees in Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico, USA. (Photograph courtesy of Craig Allen.)

Download figure to PowerPoint

Here we explore the seemingly simple questions of when and why some plants die during drought while others survive. This is a long-standing question (Bossel, 1986; Franklin et al., 1987; Waring, 1987; Manion, 1991) relevant to both low rates of mortality that happen continuously and regional scale ‘die-off’ events that occur less frequently. Scientific focus on this question has increased in recent decades as evidence mounts that climate extremes such as severe drought have rapid, widespread and long-lasting impacts on the vegetation composition of landscapes (Condit et al., 1995; Allen & Breshears, 1998; Hanson & Weltzin, 2000; Berg et al., 2006). Numerous hypotheses to explain mechanisms of survival and mortality have been generated via theoretical, modeling, and experimental analyses. However, a broader framework that encompasses these different hypotheses is lacking, and most hypotheses remain untested. Here we address these issues by providing an overview of the key hypotheses of drought-related plant mortality; developing and employing a predictive hydraulic framework to make testable predictions of the mechanisms of plant mortality; and discussing the implications of the framework in the context of global climate change. This framework is consistent with prior theories (Bossel, 1986; Waring, 1987; Manion, 1991; Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2002), but provides an integrated perspective that recognizes the processes and mechanisms of survival and mortality as mutually inclusive.

We focus on the piñon–juniper woodlands (Pinus edulisJuniperus monosperma) of southwestern USA as a model system, and examine additional evidence from a broader literature review. The piñon–juniper case study is useful because these species experienced different rates of mortality across the southwestern USA during the 2000–2002 drought (up to 95 and 25% mortality for piñon and juniper, respectively; Breshears et al., 2005; Shaw et al., 2005); piñon and juniper represent opposite ends of the spectrum in their hydraulic response to drought (Linton et al., 1998); and sufficient physiological data exist for these two species to allow detailed examination of the hydraulic framework (Barnes, 1986; Lajtha & Barnes, 1991; Cobb et al., 1997; Linton et al., 1998; Pockman & Sperry, 2000; Williams & Ehleringer, 2000; West et al., 2007a,b), including previously unpublished results from one particularly intensively studied site – Mesita del Buey in northern New Mexico (Barnes, 1986; Lajtha & Barnes, 1991; Breshears et al., 2005; Breshears, 2008). At Mesita del Buey approx. 97% of the piñon trees died between 2000 and 2007, whereas only 0.4% of the junipers died during this period (Fig. 2). Although the piñon–juniper example represents an abrupt mortality event, the hypotheses we develop here should also apply, in theory, to the lower and more continuous mortality that occurs in the absence of drought.

image

Figure 2. Percentage mortality of piñon (open circles) and juniper (closed circles) trees at a 1.5 ha site, Mesita del Buey, near Los Alamos, New Mexico. For piñon, 16 of 484 trees survived (97% mortality), whereas for juniper, 559 out of 561 trees survived (< 1% mortality).

Download figure to PowerPoint

II. Consequences of vegetation mortality

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Drought-induced vegetation mortality has implications for ecosystem function, land–atmosphere interactions, and ecosystem services to humans (Dale et al., 2000; NRC, 2007). Overstory mortality reduces photosynthetic uptake, potentially causing ecosystems to become a source of CO2 to the atmosphere for some time period (Kurz & Apps, 1999; Law et al., 2001; Breshears & Allen, 2002; Clark, 2004; Dore et al., in press). Understory vegetation may respond with increased growth (Stone & Wolfe, 1996; Rich et al., 2008), potentially altering successional pathways with feedbacks to surface hydrology and productivity. Reductions in total leaf area impact solar radiation input to the soil surface and subsequent soil processes such as nutrient cycling (Classen et al., 2005; Hughes et al., 2006), mycorrhizal activity (Swaty et al., 2004), and erosion (Davenport et al., 1998; Wilcox et al., 2003). Transpiration (Bosch & Hewlett, 1982; Simonin et al., 2007) and soil evaporation rates (Breshears et al., 1998) are both altered, although the consequences of these changes on subsurface hydrology remain untested (Newman et al., 2006). Vegetation mortality changes albedo and land–atmosphere exchanges of energy and latent heat at regional scales, and is thus likely to feedback on regional climate (Narisma et al., 2003; Dirmeyer et al., 2006). Widespread tree mortality can dramatically alter the availability of products of value to wildlife and humans, such as commodity production, biodiversity, aesthetics, and real estate values. Although climate change may cause migration of species on a decadal to millennial timescale, widespread mortality events have the capacity to radically transform regional scale landscapes on a subdecadal timescale with significant implications for ecosystem structure and function.

III. Global patterns of mortality

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Climate-related vegetation mortality has been observed on all six vegetated continents and all biomes and plant functional types (Auclair, 1993; Allen & Breshears, 2007). In the south Pacific, drought has been associated with mortality in Australian Eucalyptus (Fensham & Holman, 1999; Rice et al., 2004; Jurskis, 2005) and Nothofagus in New Zealand (Wardle & Allen, 1983). The El-Niño Southern Oscillation has been associated with drought-associated mortality from the tropical moist forests of Borneo (Van Nieewstadt & Sheil, 2005), Central America (Clark, 2004) and the Amazon (Williamson et al., 2000; Cox et al., 2004), to temperate Nothofagus and Austrocedrus forests in Patagonia (Villalba & Veblen, 1998; Suarez et al., 2004) and Terminalia forests in Venezuela (Dezzeo et al., 1997). In the northern hemisphere, drought-associated mortality has been observed from subboreal China (Picea meyeri, Liang et al., 2003) to tropical regions of Africa (Sahel species, and Ugandan Uvairopsis: Gonzalez, 2001 and Lwanga, 2003, respectively). In the temperate zone of Europe, drought reduced net primary productivity (Ciais et al., 2005; Bréda et al., 2006) and increased forest mortality (Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2002; Lloret et al., 2004; Bigler et al., 2006). Likewise, regional-scale droughts in North America have recently been correlated with insect outbreaks and associated mortality of both deciduous and conifer species (Swetnam & Betancourt, 1998; Logan et al., 2003; Breshears et al., 2005; Frey et al., 2004; Mueller et al., 2005; Shaw et al., 2005; Allen, 2007, C. Allen & N. Cobb, unpublished).

Examination of the global literature on vegetation mortality frequently points to water limitation being an important driver. Species adapted to dry environments tend to survive and grow better during drought than mesic-adapted species when grown together in common-garden experiments or in natural ecotones (VanSplunder et al., 1996; Allen & Breshears, 1998; Volaire et al., 1998; Sack, 2004; Adams & Kolb, 2005; Engelbrecht et al., 2005). This indicates a role of genetic inheritance of drought survival traits. At the landscape scale, intraspecific mortality is typically highest in more arid locations, such as aspects facing the sun, well drained soils, or ridgetops (VanSplunder et al., 1996; Allen & Breshears, 1998; Ogle et al., 2000; Caspersen & Kobe, 2001; Slik, 2004; Gitlin et al., 2006). Tree ring and long-term studies commonly report that mortality occurs only after exposure to prior droughts that initiate a growth decline (Pedersen, 1998; Demchik & Sharpe, 2000; Lloret et al., 2004), or in response to a prolonged drought (Swetnam & Betancourt, 1998; Breshears et al., 2005; Guarin & Taylor, 2005; Berg et al., 2006; Bigler et al., 2006). Likewise, most tree ring studies have observed that trees predisposed to die have lower mean growth rates or greater growth sensitivity to climate in the years proceeding mortality (Kolb & McCormick, 1993; Pedersen, 1998; Demchik & Sharpe, 2000; Ogle et al., 2000; Wyckoff & Clark, 2002; Suarez et al., 2004, but see Jenkins & Pallardy, 1995). Drought-associated tree mortality also appears to be more likely for plants at either end of size gradients – seedlings on one side and tall trees on the other (Condit et al., 1995; Jenkins & Pallardy, 1995; Ogle et al., 2000; Hanson et al., 2001; Harrison, 2001; Clark, 2004; Lloret et al., 2004; Rice et al., 2004; Slik, 2004; Mueller et al., 2005; Nepstad et al., 2007). The tendency for conifers to maintain larger margins of safety from hydraulic failure than angiosperms may facilitate their survival during drought (Pittermann et al., 2006). Below we show that many patterns discussed above are consistent with a hydraulic basis for mortality.

IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Hypotheses regarding the causes of plant death were formulated through theoretical efforts of Manion (1991) and Bossel (1986). Briefly, Manion (1991) suggested the slow-decline hypothesis in which plants experience a three-stage decline over many years, driven initially by long-term stress, for example poor edaphic location, followed by a severe short-term stress, for example drought, and finally death occurring via a contributing factor, for example pathogen. Manion labeled these three factors the predisposing factors, inciting factors, and contributing factors, respectively. Bossel (1986) and Mueller-Dumbois (1987) hypothesized that longer-term stresses alone could result in rapid mortality, particularly through an imbalance between carbon uptake and loss that results in a negative carbon balance. Other efforts regarding mortality have built off these initial formulations, often with an emphasis towards the carbon balance hypothesis (Waring, 1987; Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2002; Bréda et al., 2006; Güneralp & Gertner, 2007). Here we draw on these perspectives to pose a more general framework in which we focus on three hypothetical mechanisms of mortality: biotic agent demographics, hydraulic failure, and carbon starvation (we use new terms for these hypotheses to avoid misconceptions or misunderstandings that may occur from use of older terms and because these terms most simply represent the current hypotheses). Within our framework, we hypothesize that the relevance of these different mechanisms relates to the intensity and duration of water stress (Fig. 3). The biotic agent demographics hypothesis suggests that drought drives changes in demographics of mortality agents (e.g. insects and pathogens) that subsequently drive forest mortality. Potential demographic changes include increased number of pathogen generations per year as a result of longer growing seasons, or decreased over-winter mortality because of warmer winter minimum temperatures. Biotic agents may amplify, or be amplified by, plant physiological stress (Fig. 3). The hydraulic-failure hypothesis predicts that reduced soil water supply coupled with high evaporative demand causes xylem conduits and the rhizosphere to cavitate (become air-filled), stopping the flow of water and desiccating plant tissues. The hydraulic-failure hypothesis is based on the tenet that complete desiccation leads to cellular death. Hydraulic failure may be particularly likely if drought is sufficiently intense that plants run out of water before they run out of carbon (Fig. 3). The carbon-starvation hypothesis predicts that stomatal closure to prevent hydraulic failure causes photosynthetic uptake of carbon to diminish and the plant starves as a result of continued metabolic demand for carbohydrates. This process may be exacerbated by photoinhibition or increased respiratory demands associated with elevated temperatures during drought. Therefore, carbon starvation is hydraulically driven but nonhydraulic mechanisms may also contribute. Carbon starvation may be particularly likely if drought is not intense enough to cause hydraulic failure, but lasts longer than the equivalent amount of plant carbon reserves (Fig. 3). Biotic agents can amplify either hydraulic failure, such as when beetles inoculate sapwood with xylem-occluding fungi that halts water transport (Larsson et al., 1983; Waring & Pitman, 1985; Wullschleger et al., 2004), or carbon starvation, such as by increasing carbon loss to resin production (Wallin et al., 2003). Likewise, hydraulic failure or carbon starvation can amplify biotic attacks, for example, as a result of low production of carbon-based defensive compounds such as resin, increased emissions of volatiles such as ethanol that attract insects, and alteration of food quality for insects. Thus all three mechanisms may operate either inclusively or exclusively.

image

Figure 3. Theoretical relationship, based on the hydraulic framework, between the temporal length of drought (duration), the relative decrease in water availability (intensity), and the three hypothesized mechanisms underlying mortality. Carbon starvation is hypothesized to occur when drought duration is long enough to curtail photosynthesis longer than the equivalent storage of carbon reserves for maintenance of metabolism. Hydraulic failure is hypothesized to occur if drought intensity is sufficient to push a plant past its threshold for irreversible desiccation before carbon starvation occurs. Biotic agents, such as insects and pathogens, can amplify or be amplified by both carbon starvation and hydraulic failure.

Download figure to PowerPoint

1. A note on genetics

Genetic differences could potentially play an important role in all of these mechanisms (Gutschick & BassiriRad, 2003; Tuberosa et al., 2003; Hamrick, 2004). However, genetic variation does not represent a mechanism of mortality or survival per se. Interspecific inheritance of phenotypic traits that facilitate drought resistance clearly occurs as shown in common-garden and ecotone experiments (VanSplunder et al., 1996; Volaire et al., 1998; Sack, 2004; Adams & Kolb, 2005; Engelbrecht et al., 2005), although the evidence is less clear for intraspecific inheritance. Numerous common-garden studies on woody plants show intraspecific genetic variation in characteristics associated with drought resistance, such as vulnerability of xylem to cavitation (Kavanagh et al., 1999), hydraulic conductance (Comstock, 2000) and water-use efficiency (Zhang et al., 1995), stoma size and density (Mitton et al., 1998), and insect attack (Christensen et al., 1995). Long-lived trees, especially wind-pollinated species, have the highest degrees of genetic variation and thus could be expected to be the most resilient species to future droughts if genetic factors are important to survival (Mitton, 1995; Hamrick, 2004). Although genetic inheritance of drought survival mechanisms is clearly important, the mechanisms under selection are not yet clear.

V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

Substantial evidence exists for the three mutually inclusive mechanisms of mortality: biotic agent demographics, hydraulic failure, and carbon starvation. As we explain below, a hydraulic framework is directly relevant to the latter two mechanisms and can be related to biotic agent demographics.

1. Biotic agent demographics

This hypothesis suggests that drought drives changes in demographics of mortality agents such as insects and pathogens, which subsequently drive forest mortality independently or in conjunction with drought-induced changes in host plant physiological condition. This hypothesis derives from the frequent observation that a temporal correlation exists between drought and outbreaks of insects (White, 1984; Mattson & Haack, 1987; Waring & Cobb, 1992; Clancy et al., 1995; Shaw et al., 2005; Fettig et al., 2007) and pathogens (Houston, 1987; Manion, 1991). Predictions suggest population demographics such as growth rates and reproduction of biotic mortality agents will be exacerbated by climate change largely as a result of increased temperatures (Ayres & Lombardero, 2000; Logan et al., 2003; Gan, 2004; Tran et al., 2007). Empirical evidence and models suggest that drought associated with unusually warm weather will have an impact on many characteristics of insect population dynamics, including intrinsic population growth rate, the number of generations produced per year, synchrony of key developmental phases, winter mortality, and geographic range (Ungerer et al., 1999; Logan & Bentz, 1999; Ayres & Lombardero, 2000; Simberloff, 2000; Logan & Powell, 2001; Logan et al., 2003; Hicke et al., 2006). Droughts may also affect insect and pathogen populations by influencing the abundance of key predators and mutualists (Ayres & Lombardero, 2000); the direction and magnitude of such effects are largely unknown. It is unlikely that drought will be beneficial to all insects that kill trees, or in all locations. For example, outbreaks of western spruce budworm in the southwestern USA are positively related to wet spring weather, negatively related to dry spring weather, and unrelated to temperature (Swetnam & Lynch, 1993). Likewise, the synchrony of insect emergence with temperature may have negative consequences for insect population growth at low elevations but positive impacts on population growth at higher elevations (Hicke et al., 2006). Overall, warm droughts may increase the intensity of outbreaks of biotic mortality agents independent of concomitant changes in tree physiological condition related to drought, although the specific dynamics may vary by agent.

Drought-related mortality does not always include an obvious biotic mortality agent (Lloret et al., 2004) and thus the biotic agents demographics hypothesis can explain, at most, only a portion of observed mortality. However, plants treated with insecticides often survive outbreaks of insects (Hastings et al., 2001; Grosman & Upton, 2006; Romme et al., 2006), indicating that biotic agents play a significant role in mortality. A prediction consistent with observations is that changes in demographics of biotic mortality agents must overlay changes in host plant physiological conditions to cause widespread mortality events (Berryman, 1976; Christiansen et al., 1987).

2. Plant water relations

A review of plant regulation of water use is needed to consider the mechanisms of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation. In particular, it is critical to understand the structural and physiological mechanisms by which plants prevent evapotranspiration (E) from exceeding critical rates (Ecrit) that result in xylem water potentials associated with hydraulic and symplastic failure (Ψcrit). Furthermore, the impacts of Ecrit avoidance on photosynthesis and subsequent dependency on stored carbohydrate reserves are critical to understanding carbon starvation (Cowan & Farquhar, 1977; Katul et al., 2003). In this section we review plant water relations in the context of avoidance of Ecrit and Ψcrit, introduce a modeling framework for investigation of such regulation, and then investigate hypotheses regarding hydraulic failure and carbon starvation using the model and existing evidence from our piñon–juniper case study and the broader literature.

To maintain tissue hydration and photosynthesis, plants must replace water lost through E. As described by the cohesion tension theory, E generates tension that pulls water from the soil through the plant to the crown, where it diffuses to the atmosphere. Thus, E can be explicitly described via the steady-state formulation of the soil–plant–atmosphere hydraulic continuum (modified from Whitehead & Jarvis, 1981; Whitehead, 1998):

  • E = Kls − Ψl − hpwg) (Eqn 1)

In this corollary to Darcy's law, Kl is leaf-specific hydraulic conductance of the soil-plant continuum, Ψs and Ψl are soil and leaf water potentials, respectively, and hpwg is the gravitational pull on a water column of height h and density pw. The tension difference across the plant (Ψs – Ψl) increases in proportion to E as long as Kl remains constant, for example no cavitation occurs. This mechanism is efficient because metabolic energy is not used to lift water to the crown. However, E has an upper limit (Ecrit) because increasing tension causes decreased Kl as a result of air entry through pit pores into conduits, thereby initiating cavitation (nucleation of vaporization) and producing an embolized, or air-filled conduit (Fig. 4). In other words, hydraulic failure occurs when E exceeds the critical Ψ, Kl approaches zero, and the plant can no longer move water. The Ψcrit value causing 100% cavitation varies widely among species (Pockman et al., 1995; Pockman & Sperry, 2000; Maherali et al., 2004) and is thought to be a function of interconduit pit structure (Pittermann et al., 2005). An example of vulnerability to cavitation in stems and roots of piñon and juniper is presented in Fig. 4 (Linton et al., 1998). Roots tend to be more vulnerable than stems, which may serve the advantage of protecting the more energetically costly stem tissues from cavitation (Sperry & Ikeda, 1997; Sperry et al., 2002).

image

Figure 4. The percentage loss of conductivity of excised root (connected circles) and stem (unconnected circles) segments of piñon (open circles) and juniper (closed circles) as a function of xylem pressure. These ‘vulnerability curves’ were obtained by the air-injection method (Linton et al., 1998).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Hydraulic failure also occurs within soils and is functionally similar to xylem cavitation. The hydraulic conductance of soils is a function of texture, water content, hydraulic conductivity, and water table depth. Greater tension is required to pull water through fine-textured soils because of their small pore sizes, and thus fine-textured soils have lower conductance than sandy soils when water is abundant. However, fine-textured soils retain hydraulic conductance longer and at more negative water potentials than coarse-textured soils because the low conductance of fine soils results in slower water loss to transpiration and drainage (Sperry et al., 1998). Therefore, during drought we expect greater hydraulic failure in coarse-textured soil. Depth to water table also has an impact on plant hydraulics by limiting or allowing plants to obtain water during periods of drought (Dawson, 1996; Franks et al., 2007). To compensate for coarse-textured soils or inaccessible water tables, plants may increase their soil-to-root, or rhizosphere conductance via adjusting fine root density (Ewers et al., 2000; Hacke et al., 2000), fine root hydraulic conductance (McElrone et al., 2007) rooting depth, and other root characteristics (Stirzaker & Passioura, 1996).

Plant avoidance of hydraulic failure can be conceptualized using models of the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum. Such models can then be used as the basis for predictions of mortality related to water stress. The relationship between E and Ψl can be modeled based on the hydraulic properties of soil and xylem, root distribution, and root-shoot allocation (Sperry et al., 1998, 2002; Fig. 5). When E is zero, Ψl equilibrates with bulk soil water potential (Fig. 5a). As E increases, Ψl drops (Fig. 5, solid line a–c). For every unit increase in E, the drop in water potential becomes progressively greater because cavitation and rhizosphere drying reduce Kl of the flow path. If E increases past Ecrit, and hence Ψ exceeds Ψcrit, then hydraulic failure will occur (e.g. when the soil-plant Kl falls to zero, Fig. 5c). As drought decreases soil water potential within the rooting zone, hydraulic failure occurs at progressively lower values of E (Fig. 5, compare dashed drought trajectory b–d with a–c). If hydraulic failure is caused by xylem cavitation within stems, Ψcrit corresponds to the pressure where 100% cavitation occurs (e.g. −6.9 MPa in piñon stems; Fig. 4). Drying of the rhizosphere may drive hydraulic failure at more positive Ψcrit because roots and soils are typically more vulnerable than stems (Fig. 4). This does not mean that roots or soils will always be the location of hydraulic failure, however, because stems can reach much more negative water potentials as a result of their longer hydraulic path length (McDowell et al., 2002a; Sperry et al., 2002); hence trees that have reached their maximum height may be particularly vulnerable.

image

Figure 5. Modeled transpiration per unit leaf area as a function of leaf water potential for a plant with relatively abundant soil moisture (solid line) and the same plant with reduced soil moisture availability (dashed line). Letters are referenced within the text.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Using this hydraulic framework we can predict hydraulic failure during drought by plotting the decline in Ecrit as a function of soil water potential (Fig. 6). When the soil water potential reaches Ψcrit, Ecrit is zero and no further water can be extracted (Fig. 6, ‘extraction limit’). The actual water use must fall within this envelope (Fig. 6, ‘realized transpiration’); if the transpiration threshold is exceeded, hydraulic failure results. Plants maintain E below Ecrit over long time periods (e.g. years to centuries) via adjustment of structural features that allow maximum water uptake relative to demand by the plant crown, and over short time periods (e.g. diurnal cycles) via crown-level stomatal conductance (Gs) (Tyree & Sperry, 1988; Sperry et al., 1998).

image

Figure 6. Modeled transpiration per unit leaf area as a function of soil water potential. The solid line represents the transpiration threshold beyond which hydraulic failure occurs, and the dashed line represents realized transpiration, with the difference between the two lines representative of a hydraulic margin of safety.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The long-term structural adjustments that maintain homeostasis between water supply, water demand, and plant metabolism (Whitehead & Jarvis, 1981; Cinnirella et al., 2002; Katul et al., 2003; Bréda et al., 2006) may all play a role in the survival or mortality of plants during drought. These adjustments are influenced over decadal time scales in response to climate, plant size, edaphic properties such as soil texture and depth, and stand density (Maherali & DeLucia, 2001; McDowell et al., 2002a, 2006; Sperry et al., 2002; Mencuccini, 2003). Long-term homeostasis was originally defined mathematically by Whitehead & Jarvis (1981) as a steady-state derivation of Darcy's law similar to Eqn 1:

  • image(Eqn 2)

where ks is saturated permeability of the conducting path, As is sapwood area, Al is leaf area, h is height, η is the viscosity of water, and ΔΨ is Ψs − Ψl − hpwg (Eqn 1). Although Eqn 2 is a simplification of the plant hydraulic system (Domec et al., 2007), it has proven remarkably accurate (Whitehead, 1998; Oren et al., 1999; Schäfer et al., 2000; McDowell et al., 2002a, 2005; Phillips et al., 2002; Barnard & Ryan, 2003). Furthermore, the structural adjustments included in Eqn 2 are consistent with the Sperry et al. (1998) model (Addington et al., 2006). Taken together, homeostatic factors from Eqns 1 and 2 that have been empirically documented include: (i) vulnerability of xylem conductance to low water potentials (see Fig. 4) (Pockman & Sperry, 2000; Ogle & Reynolds, 2002; Maherali et al., 2004); (ii) xylem permeability (Pothier et al., 1989; McElrone et al., 2004); (iii) refilling of cavitated elements (Sperry et al., 1987; Borghetti et al., 1991; Holbrook & Zwieniecki, 1999; Tyree et al., 1999; Salleo et al., 2004; West et al., 2007a); (iv) the soil-to-leaf water potential gradient (Hacke et al., 2000; McDowell et al., 2002a; Barnard & Ryan, 2003); (v) vertical distribution of root density as a function of soil water availability (VanSplunder et al., 1996; Volaire et al., 1998; Ewers et al., 2000; Hacke et al., 2000; Lloret et al., 2004; West et al., 2007b); (vi) ratio of root absorbing area to leaf area (Ewers et al., 2000; Hacke et al., 2000; Magnani et al., 2000); (vii) ratio of sapwood area to leaf area (Mencuccini & Bonosi, 2001; McDowell et al., 2002b, 2006; Barnard & Ryan, 2003); (viii) leaf shedding (Tyree et al., 1993; Suarez et al., 2004; Hultine et al., 2006); (ix) height (McDowell et al., 2005; Addington et al., 2006); and (x) capacitance (water storage, Goldstein et al., 1998; Phillips et al., 2003). Others, such as osmotic regulation of leaf turgor (Kozlowski & Pallardy, 2002), foliar water absorption (Breshears et al., 2008), aquaporin mediation of hydraulic conductance (McElrone et al., 2007) and cellular desiccation tolerance (Gaff, 1971; Dace et al., 1998; Sherwin et al., 1998), may also play a role in drought tolerance or avoidance. Each of these factors may strongly impact the likelihood of plants to survive or succumb to drought. For example, the observation that tall trees tend to die is consistent with Eqns 1 and 2 because height constrains Kl and E such that the margin of safety is reduced. Likewise, the observation that seedlings often die is consistent with their having insufficient soil-to-root Kl during drought.

Note that differences in structural parameters between our case study species, piñon and juniper, are consistent with Eqn 2 with respect to susceptibility to drought-related mortality. Relative to piñon, juniper has more cavitation-resistant xylem (Fig. 4), lower leaf area to sapwood area ratio (Grier et al., 1992), lower leaf area to root area ratio (West et al., 2008), a larger water potential gradient from soil to leaf (Lajtha & Barnes, 1991; West et al., in press), and is shorter (2.7 vs 5.6 m at Mesita del Buey New Mexico).

Over diurnal timescales, plants maintain E below Ecrit through stomatal closure. Plants reduce Gs in response to increasing E (Mott & Parkhurst, 1991), with the degree of closure linked to Ψcrit that causes embolism (Sperry et al., 2002). Gs is in turn regulated not only by water supply and demand, and their impact on E, but also by plant structural adaptations that impact the supply or demand for water, for example rooting volume or leaf area, respectively (Eqn 2). While reducing Gs serves the benefit of reducing water loss, it has the cost of reducing CO2 diffusion from the atmosphere to the site of carboxylation, and thereby constraining photosynthetic CO2 uptake (Cowan & Farquhar, 1977). As we show, this balance between water loss and CO2 uptake may partition plants between survival, hydraulic failure or carbon starvation during drought.

3. Isohydry and anisohydry

Plants fall into two categories across the continuum of stomatal regulation of water status, labeled isohydric and anisohydric regulation (Tardieu, 1993; Tardieu & Simonneau, 1998). Isohydric plants reduce Gs as soil water potential decreases and atmospheric conditions dry, maintaining a relatively constant midday Ψl regardless of drought conditions. Anisohydric species, by contrast, allow midday Ψl to decline as soil Ψ declines with drought. Piñon is a good example of isohydric regulation, maintaining leaf water potentials at c. −2.0 MPa despite severe soil drying (Fig. 7, and see Lajtha & Barnes, 1991; Williams & Ehleringer, 2000; West et al., 2008; Breshears et al., in press). Although no specific thresholds and ranges of isohydric control are generalized in the literature, isohydric behavior has been observed in temperate hardwoods, C4 grasses, Australasian and neotropical trees, and other species of gymnosperms (Tardieu & Davies, 1992; Loewenstein & Pallardy, 1998a,b; Tardieu & Simonneau, 1998; Niinemets et al., 1999; Bonal & Guehl, 2001; Fisher et al., 2006). Anisohydric plants maintain higher Gs for a given Ψl than isohydric species, effectively allowing Ψl to decline with decreasing soil water potential (Fig. 8, Barnes, 1986). Anisohydric behavior has been observed across the same diversity of plant groups: species such as juniper, sugar maple (Acer saccharum), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus gomphocephala) allow a greater Ψl range than isohydric species (Loewenstein & Pallardy, 1998a,b; Tardieu & Simonneau, 1998; Franks et al., 2007; West et al., 2008). Anisohydric species tend to occupy more drought-prone habitats compared with isohydric species and have xylem that is more resistant to negative water potentials (see Fig. 4). There are, however, exceptions to these generalizations and many comparative studies and syntheses (Pockman & Sperry, 2000; Maherali et al., 2004) have not specifically characterized species as isohydric or anisohydric. Anisohydric vs isohydric regulation of water status may be a critical factor in the regulation of survival and mortality during drought (Fig. 3).

image

Figure 7. (a) Midday (11 : 00–13 : 00 h) leaf water potential for piñon (open circles) and juniper (closed circles); and (b) daily precipitation (left axis, bars) and soil water content at 20 cm (right axis, filled symbols) at Mesita del Buey near Los Alamos, New Mexico. Bars in (a) are standard errors. Water potential was measured via pressure chamber within 5 min of twig collection, and consisted of two twigs per individual and five individuals per species per time period. Soil water content was measured via neutron probe.

Download figure to PowerPoint

image

Figure 8. Stomatal conductance vs leaf water potential for piñon (open circles) and juniper (closed circles) at Mesita del Buey, Los Alamos, New Mexico. Data from Barnes (1986).

Download figure to PowerPoint

It is important to clarify that relating the hydraulic framework to plant mortality is based on the premise that whole-plant hydraulic failure will cause death. This premise may be false in cases of resprouting, xylem refilling, or if cells are desiccation-tolerant. Resprouting has been observed following cavitation-induced shoot dieback in shrubs (Davis et al., 2002; Sperry & Hacke, 2002), mesic hardwoods (Tyree et al., 1993), and riparian trees (Horton et al., 2001). A benefit of reducing leaf area via shoot dieback is the resulting improvement in water status of the remaining foliage and subsequent survival of the individual (Tyree & Sperry, 1989; Davis et al., 2002; Bréda et al., 2006). Resprouters may die during drought, however, if persistent hydraulic failure leads to carbon starvation that prevents growth of new stems. Refilling of cavitated elements may occur in some species when drought is relieved by precipitation, although the mechanisms and frequency of refilling remain debated (Sperry et al., 1987; Borghetti et al., 1991; Holbrook & Zwieniecki, 1999; Tyree et al., 1999; Salleo et al., 2004; West et al., 2007a). Refilling has been observed in piñon but not juniper (West et al., 2007a). Desiccation-tolerant cells, such as the live cells of mosses, ferns, seeds and pollen of higher plants, and of resurrection plants (e.g. Xerophyta), can withstand complete drying, and upon wetting they regain complete physiological function (Gaff, 1971; Dace et al., 1998; Sherwin et al., 1998). This ancestral trait is rare amongst vascular plants (Oliver et al., 2000); however, a lesser degree of cellular drought tolerance is common (Kozlowski & Pallardy, 2002). As plants have become larger and more complex, water transport has become more limiting to survival than cell physiology and so vegetative cells may have lost their capacity to tolerate air-drying (Oliver et al., 2000). Based on evidence for correlations between cellular desiccation limits and hydraulic transport limits (Brodribb et al., 2003), cellular drought tolerance may be as colimiting as hydraulics in determining plant physiological limits.

The large number of potential interactions between isohydry, anisohydry and parameters within Eqns 1 and 2 highlights that there is a large number of physiological and structural factors that may be adjusted to either tolerate or avoid water stress during drought. However, these factors may also have species or site-specific limits on how far they can be adjusted; these limits may subsequently predispose plants to hydraulic failure. Next we can apply the hydraulic framework to understand the hydraulically based hypotheses of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation.

4. Hydraulic failure

The concept underlying the hydraulic-failure hypothesis is that drought causes the species- and site-specific Ecrit to be surpassed such that the plant irreversibly desiccates. Hydraulic failure occurs in small plants, as seedling mortality has been linked to excessive cavitation in the field (Williams et al., 1997) and drying experiments with potted plants often result in rapid mortality (Sparks & Black, 1999). The limited rooting volume explored by seedlings exposes them to more negative soil water potentials than plants with larger root systems, decreasing soil-to-root Kl and hence the safety margin between realized E and Ecrit (Fig. 6). For mature trees there are numerous anecdotal observations of mortality occurring in the absence of insect or pathogen attack; however, it is unknown if hydraulic failure or another mechanism was the cause of death.

The piñon–juniper comparison provides an interesting contrast with respect to mortality by hydraulic failure. Modeling Ecrit vs Ψsoil using piñon and juniper vulnerability curves (Fig. 4) and soil and plant architecture and water potential data (West et al., 2008) yields the prediction that the anisohydric strategy of juniper makes it more susceptible to hydraulic failure than piñon, because the water-use envelope of juniper is closer to the xylem cavitation threshold (Fig. 9). Continued transpiration by juniper during drought reduced soil water potential to –6.9 MPa, bringing juniper plants close to hydraulic failure (Fig. 9, solid circle compared with Ecrit) and induced an estimated 40–60% embolism in roots and shoots, respectively (West et al., 2007a, 2008; Fig. 4). The species-specific difference in regulation of the hydraulic safety margins occurs in part via differential relationships between leaf water potential and Gs (Fig. 8; Barnes, 1986; Williams & Ehleringer, 2000; West et al., 2008). Although this strategy allows juniper to maintain photosynthetic activity during drought, ultimately it may result in patchy dieback of crowns if drought is prolonged, as has been observed in juniper during the 2000–2002 severe drought in the southwestern USA (authors’ personal observations). Whether this partial dieback can explain whole tree mortality is unknown, but given a drought of sufficient intensity and duration, it seems a logical hypothesis that hydraulic failure may cause whole-plant mortality in anisohydric plants (Fig. 3).

image

Figure 9. Modeled critical transpiration threshold as a function of soil water potential for piñon (dashed line) and juniper (solid line) and observed minimum leaf water potential for each (filled and open symbol, respectively). Data from West et al. (2008). Dotted vertical lines represent the species-specific margins of hydraulic safety, which are 0.05 and 0.01 mmol m−2 s−1 for piñon and juniper, respectively.

Download figure to PowerPoint

By contrast, the isohydric behavior of piñon prevents excessive cavitation even during extreme drought, making it unlikely to be a victim of hydraulic failure. Piñons lose only an estimated 5–40% of their xylem conductivity (all in their root systems) because stomatal closure keeps xylem water potentials above −2.5 MPa during drought (Figs 7–9). Safety margins from hydraulic failure are relatively large (Fig. 9, compare open circle with Ecrit). Of course, this control of cavitation in piñon comes at the price of negligible gas exchange, which leads to the carbon-starvation hypothesis, which we discuss in the next section.

A notable insight that emerges from the hydraulic framework is that although isohydric species appear more vulnerable to embolism (Fig. 4), isohydric plants should actually be less likely to experience hydraulic failure because they close their stomata rather than risk cavitation. Anisohydric plants instead have higher rates of gas exchange during drought, but risk greater cavitation as a consequence (Fig. 10). Both isohydric and anisohydric species are capable of carbon starvation or hydraulic failure; however, the isohydric species will probably maintain Ψl above its hydraulic failure threshold until carbon starvation occurs (Fig. 10, thick line) and will only reach hydraulic failure if the drought is sufficiently intense to force whole-system cavitation via xylem equilibration with severely dry soil. By contrast, the anisohydric species will allow Ψl to approach (or even surpass, e.g. Fig. 9) its cavitation threshold, thus allowing a longer time period before zero carbon assimilation and hence a longer time period before carbon starvation occurs. However, the closer proximity that the anisohydric species has to its cavitation threshold increases the risk of catastrophic hydraulic failure if drought intensity continues to increase, particularly because it maintains Ψl in realms where both soil moisture release curves and cavitation response curves (i.e. Fig. 4) are steep, such that small changes in water availability can have very large impacts on water potential.

image

Figure 10. Theoretical predictions of the mechanisms of drought-related mortality for species utilizing isohydric vs anisohydric regulation of water potential. This figure is a more detailed representation of the hypotheses exemplified in Fig. 3, highlighting differences between isohydric (I) and anisohydric (A) functional types. The dashed horizontal line represents the point of hydraulic failure for each functional type. Carbon starvation is hypothesized to occur primarily for isohydric species that close stomata relatively early in a drought (solid isohydric line), initiating the phase of reliance on carbohydrate reserves earlier than anisohydric plants (compare solid isohydric and anisohydric lines). Isohydric species may experience hydraulic failure in cases of severe intensity of drought (dotted isohydric line). Anisohydric species have a more curvilinear response (similar to Fig. 9) and are predicted to maintain positive carbon gain for a longer period than isohydric species, thus prolonging the duration of drought they can withstand before carbon starvation (solid anisohydric line). However, anisohydric species have a smaller margin of safety, thus increasing their likelihood of mortality via hydraulic failure (dotted anisohydric line).

Download figure to PowerPoint

5. Carbon starvation

The carbon-starvation hypothesis predicts that stomatal closure to prevent desiccation (e.g. by isohydric plants, Figs 8 and 9), causes photosynthetic carbon uptake to diminish to near zero (Fig. 10). Continued demand for carbohydrates to maintain metabolism will deplete carbohydrate reserves, leading eventually to starvation or an inability to fend off attack from biotic agents, whichever comes first (Fig. 3). Similar to the hydraulic-failure hypothesis, the carbon starvation hypothesis lacks direct tests, although variations on this theme have been modeled as a driver of mortality for decades (Waring, 1987; Manion, 1991; Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2002; Guneralp & Gertner, 2007). Empirical evidence supporting a link between carbon availability and mortality is derived from the numerous studies reporting that trees that die have lower stemwood growth rates, increased growth variability, or increased climatic sensitivity, particularly after severe droughts (Kolb & McCormick, 1993; Pedersen, 1998; Demchik & Sharpe, 2000; Ogle et al., 2000; Lloret et al., 2004; Rolland & Lemperiere, 2004; Suarez et al., 2004; Guarin & Taylor, 2005; Bigler et al., 2006). However, still other studies have shown higher growth rates in trees predisposed to die, particularly in oak species (Jenkins & Pallardy, 1995, T. Levanič & N. McDowell, unpublished data). Modeling studies typically support the carbon-starvation hypothesis (Pedersen, 1998; Guneralp & Gertner, 2007), including models that predict carbon starvation initiated by stomatal closure (Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2002).

The primary means of reduced photosynthesis by isohydric species during drought is the constraint on CO2 diffusion into leaf intercellular spaces as a result of stomatal closure (Figs 8 and 9). For example, piñon net photosynthesis is halved at a rhizosphere water potential of −1.0 MPa, and reaches zero at a water potential of −2.3 MPa (Lajtha & Barnes, 1991). However, respiratory consumption of stored carbohydrates continues during drought to maintain plant metabolism, even if growth is zero (Amthor, 2000). Accounting for nocturnal leaf respiration costs, piñon leaf carbon gain reaches zero at approx. −2.0 MPa (Barnes, 1986). If we make the simple assumption that whole-plant respiration consumes 55% of assimilation (Ryan et al., 1994; Waring et al., 1998; Litton et al., 2007) then piñon trees achieve negative whole-plant carbon balance around rhizosphere water potentials of −1.0 MPa. By contrast, making this same 55% assumption, we predict that juniper reaches a zero whole-plant carbon balance at a rhizosphere water potential of c. −3.0 MPa. In effect, this difference allows the anisohydric species to maintain positive carbon gain for a greater duration of the drought (Fig. 10).

The hypothesis that carbon starvation, not hydraulic failure, is a likely driver of mortality in isohydric species can be examined by parameterizing Barnes’ (1986) empirical model of leaf carbon gain using measurements of predawn water potential generated from the same field site (Mesita del Buey). Three years of monthly predawn water potential measurements demonstrate that piñon regulates water potential within a much narrower range than juniper (Fig. 11a). By contrast, modeled leaf carbon gain is substantially more variable for piñon than juniper (Fig. 11b), owing to the greater stomatal sensitivity of piñon to water stress (Fig. 8). During the 2000–2002 drought, when piñon experienced region-scale mortality, Breshears et al. (in press) observed that piñon and juniper predawn water potential was below –2.0 MPa for 11 months before observed mortality, effectively precluding carbon gain for a year.

image

Figure 11. (a) Three years of monthly observations of predawn water potential of piñon (open circles) and juniper (closed circles) from Mesita del Buey, Los Alamos, New Mexico. Twigs were sampled at least 20 min before sunrise and kept in plastic bags until measurement, which took place within 1 h of collection. Samples consisted of two twigs per tree and a minimum of five trees per species per time period. (b) Seasonal leaf carbon gain for piñon and juniper modeled using Barnes (1986) and the predawn water potentials from (a).

Download figure to PowerPoint

The theory that carbon starvation and hydraulic failure are the dominant mechanisms of mortality for isohydric and anisohydric species, respectively, is further supported when a broader set of plant species is considered. In Fig. 12 we plotted a typical rhizosphere drying curve for a drought period after a precipitation event at time zero. We have overlaid measured Ψ of zero Gs for all isohydric species and Ψ of 100% cavitation for all anisohydric species. These species are described in our literature review from the ‘Isohydry and anisohydry’ section. An assumed time lag of 10 months from zero Gs to carbon starvation is applied uniformly to all isohydric species (from observations of piñon pine; Breshears et al., in press). Figure 12 demonstrates that the isohydry/anisohydry continuum partitions species vulnerability to drought as a function of drought duration. For example, if drought were relieved by precipitation after 10 months, one anisohydric species (sunflower) would have died but all other species would have survived. By contrast, if drought-relieving precipitation did not occur until 15 months then all isohydric species would have died. If the drought were more intense, such that the drying curve were steeper, then the likelihood of more anisohydric species succumbing earlier would increase; and vice versa, if the drought were less intense, such that the drying curve was shallower, proportionally more isohydric species would succumb because they would reach carbon starvation long before anisohydric species reach Ψcrit. Perhaps the most important observation from Fig. 12 is the clear need for information regarding the time required for carbon starvation to occur. Likewise, this analysis points to the need to understand interactions with biotic mortality agents and within-species variation in Ψ of zero Gs (isohydric) and Ψcrit (anisohydric); such variation is known to occur in response to tree height (Yoder et al., 1994; McDowell et al., 2002a; Barnard & Ryan, 2003) or soil texture (Hacke et al., 2000), and may occur in other situations. However, variation in these variables is likely to move species timing of mortality only slightly relative to the larger general pattern of mortality shown in Fig. 12. The patterns in Fig. 12 support the concept that isohydric species are more likely to die of carbon starvation than hydraulic failure, and that partitioning of mortality between isohydric and anishydric plants is a function of drought intensity and duration (Figs 3 and 10).

image

Figure 12. Theoretical mortality response of isohydric and anisohydric species to drought. The curve illustrates the decline in rhizosphere water potential under a 30 month drought scenario. For isohydric species, the horizontal dotted lines extend from where the Ψleaf at zero Gs crosses the rhizosphere Ψ curve to the date of death via carbon starvation (filled symbols). For anisohydric species, Ψcrit is the Ψstem or Ψleaf at which some portion of the plant xylem experiences Ks = 0, and is plotted on top of the rhizosphere Ψ curve (open symbols). For isohydric species, the length of time until carbon starvation is based on observations of piñon pine (see text). Isohydric species (solid symbols): flowering dogwood (square), tatuba (circle), black elderberry (triangle), piñon pine (diamond). Anisohydric species (open symbols): sunflower (downward triangle), sugar maple (hexagon), eucalyptus (square), juniper (upward triangle). Sources are from the literature review provided in Section V.3, Isohydry and anisohydry.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Drought may also reduce photosynthesis by other mechanisms, such as loss of leaf turgor (Dreyer et al., 1992; Rodriguez et al., 1993; Kolb & Sperry, 1999) and leaf shedding (Tyree et al., 1993 and citations mentioned earlier). When elevated temperatures accompany drought (Breshears et al., 2005), a nonhydraulic mechanism of reduced photosynthesis may result from the impact of temperature on photosynthetic optima, both on electron transport and Rubisco activity (Berry & Bjorkman, 1980; Sage & Kubien, 2007). For our case study, juniper has a higher temperature optima for peak photosynthesis (21 vs 17°C) and a broader temperature range above which 90% of maximum photosynthesis is sustained (16.5 vs 14.2°C) than does piñon (Barnes, 1986). Adaptation of the biochemical machinery driving photosynthesis to rising temperatures may occur if the temperature rise is consistent and slow, but will be insufficient if temperature extremes happen rapidly and infrequently. Temperature impacts on photosynthesis occur in broadleaf species that have high interception of solar radiation, and may possibly occur in needleleaf species during periods of low wind speed and high radiative load (Kolb & Robberecht, 1996; Martin et al., 1999). Atmospheric conditions that promote high leaf temperatures in needleleaf species are not frequent; however, just a single day of lethal conditions could severely impede future photosynthesis if there are no stored carbohydrates for use in repair of the photosynthetic apparatus, such as during a severe drought. Mesophyll conductance to CO2 also shows temperature optima, and therefore may also be a constraint on photosynthesis under temperature extremes (Diaz-Espejo et al., 2007).

In addition to reductions in carbon uptake there are increases in carbon use for maintenance respiration and perhaps below-ground root production during drought. Carbon allocation to maintenance respiration may increase as a result of elevated temperatures of foliage, sapwood and roots (Amthor, 2000), although acclimation to temperature and drought may occur that would minimize this effect (Bryla et al., 1997; King et al., 2006). During relatively mild droughts, allocation to roots and sapwood may increase to maintain adequate Kl if there are carbohydrates available (Gower et al., 1994; Cinnirella et al., 2002; Kozlowski & Pallardy, 2002).

Carbon starvation may facilitate mortality from biotic agents (Fig. 3) when carbon starvation and the population abundance of these agents are synchronous (Schoeneweiss, 1981; Marçais & Bréda, 2007). This synchrony is mediated by the degree of water stress imposed on the trees. The growth-differentiation balance hypothesis (Herms & Mattson, 1992; Reeve et al., 1995; Stamp, 2003; Fine et al., 2006) predicts a curvilinear relationship between water stress and carbon allocation to resin because moderate water stress impacts photosynthesis slightly but shifts carbon allocation from growth to storage and defensive chemicals. This shift in carbon allocation results in greater resin flow from phloem wounds in moderately stressed compared with nonstressed trees (Lorio, 1986; Dunn & Lorio, 1993). However, severe droughts cause a cessation of carbon allocation to all sinks, including resin defense, when photosynthetic carbon gain is near zero (Christiansen et al., 1987; Waring, 1987; Herms & Mattson, 1992; Lewinsohn et al., 1993; Reeve et al., 1995; Stamp, 2003). Consistent with the carbon-starvation hypothesis, ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) resin flow decreases with stresses that reduce radial growth (Kolb et al., 1998; McDowell et al., 2007). Drought duration is important because stored carbohydrates may temporarily buffer effects on carbon allocation to resin (consistent with Fig. 10). Studies examining carbohydrate content of tissues in relation to drought and mortality are consistent with the idea that reduced carbon storage is associated with susceptibility to biotic mortality agents (Marçais & Bréda, 2007).

Carbon starvation may also facilitate biotic attack via changes in the release of volatile attractants or changes in the quality of forage for biotic agents. The production of ethanol and other volatiles changes during drought in order to preserve cellular function (Kimmerer & Kozlowski, 1982; Tadege et al., 1999) and perhaps as a byproduct of increased tissue temperatures associated with reduced transpiration (Hietz et al., 2005). Such increases in volatile emissions may be used by insects to locate stressed plants (Kelsey, 2001; Kelsey & Joseph, 2003; Manter & Kelsey, 2008). The composition of defensive compounds within plant tissues may also shift during drought, though little conclusive evidence yet exists (Tognetti et al., 1997; Thoss & Byers, 2006). Host palatability may improve or decline during drought, depending in part on soil nutrient availability (Price, 1991; Waring & Cobb, 1992; Warren et al., 1999; Erbilgin & Raffa, 2000; Campo & Dirzo, 2003; Rieske et al., 2003; Hui & Jin, 2004) and phloem thickness (Amman, 1972; Haack et al., 1984; Amman & Pasek, 1986). Lastly, predisposition to biotic agents from carbon starvation may feed back to hydraulic failure as the proximal cause of mortality. For many pine species, bark beetles attack stressed trees and inoculate them with fungi that occludes the xylem, functionally halting transpiration (Larsson et al., 1983; Waring & Pitman, 1985; Lorio, 1986; Christiansen et al., 1987). It remains an open question whether hydraulic failure or carbon starvation per se leads to mortality in these cases (Wullschleger et al., 2004).

VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

The hypothesized mechanisms of mortality presented in previous sections and their relationships to intensity and duration of water stress have key implications for how tree mortality may occur in response to global climate change. Climate models generally agree that over the next 50 yr the Earth's surface temperatures will increase along with shifts in precipitation that result in greater drought severity and frequency (Cook et al., 2004; IPCC, 2007; Seager et al., 2007). Thus, the recent drought-related mortality events that have been observed worldwide (Suarez et al., 2004; Breshears et al., 2005; Ciais et al., 2005; Jurskis, 2005; Breda et al., 2006; Gitlin et al., 2006; Allen & Breshears, 2007) have the potential to become more frequent and exert an impact on larger areas (Jentsch et al., 2007). Warmer air temperature will exacerbate the impact of drought on plant water loss by elevating the vapor pressure deficit of the atmosphere (D), thereby placing a greater demand on transpiration, as evident in the basic relationship:

  • E=Gs×D  (Eqn 3)

with D being a function of relative humidity and temperature. An increase in temperature will raise D, and hence E, thus forcing isohydric and anisohydric plants closer towards their respective mechanisms of mortality. For example, from Eqn 3 we can predict that a rise in the Earth's surface temperature of 1.1–6.4°C (IPCC, 2007) will result in a 7–48% increase in D and E if Gs remains constant. For isohydric species, Gs will decline to hold E below Ecrit, pushing them closer towards carbon starvation. For anisohydric species, failure to sufficiently reduce Gs in response to rising D will push them closer towards Ψcrit. Increased D will also exacerbate drought by increasing evaporative losses of water from canopy and soil surfaces, and altered net radiation associated with climate change could also increase E (e.g. via the Penman–Monteith relationship on leaf temperature, Monteith & Unsworth, 1990). Rising surface temperatures could also facilitate carbon losses to maintenance respiration as a result of the exponential dependency of respiration on temperature (Amthor, 2000) if temperature acclimation does not keep up with temperature changes (Ciais et al., 2005; King et al., 2006), effectively reducing the time plants may survive on stored carbohydrates. Therefore, increased intensity and duration of future droughts will increase rates of mortality by either hydraulic failure or carbon starvation.

A logical hypothesis is that the increased droughts predicted to occur over the next century will initially result in increased mortality of isohydric species because these species have shown greater susceptibility to drought. However, droughts of sufficient intensity could push anisohydric species past their threshold for hydraulic failure (e.g. Fig. 10). These hypotheses can be shown via a modeling exercise using the piñon–juniper case study (Fig. 13). We predicted leaf carbon gain in the same manner as for Fig. 11(b) and hydraulic failure with a Ψleaf for zero Gs set to –2.5 MPa for piñon and Ψcrit of 100% cavitation set to –6.9 MPa for juniper (West et al., 2008), using predawn water potentials for 2004–2007 from Mesita del Buey as a starting point. We assumed a 3 yr, 50% reduction in rainfall, as occurred in 2000–2002, (Breshears et al., 2005) and a conservative 7% increase in evaporative losses resulting from a D increase associated with a 1.1°C surface temperature increase (IPCC, 2007). Under this scenario, predawn water potential reached Ψ of zero Gs and Ψcrit in 7 and 15 months, respectively (Fig. 13a). Piñon never achieved a positive carbon balance during the simulated drought because the starting Ψ value was already below the zero carbon balance point, whereas juniper maintained a positive carbon gain until Ψcrit was reached (Fig. 13b). This simple exercise assumes no physiological acclimation, but is conservative relative to climate predictions for the next century (IPCC, 2007; Seager et al., 2007).

image

Figure 13. (a) To the left of the gray bar are 3 yr of monthly observations of predawn water potential for piñon (open circles) and juniper (closed circles) as from Fig. 11(a), and to the right of the gray baris a simulation of the water potential response to a severe drought. A description of the simulation is given in the text. (b) Seasonal leaf carbon gain modeled as per Fig. 11(b) using values of juniper predawn water potential as observed between 2004 and 2007 (left of gray bar) or simulated for 2007–2009 (right of gray bar).

Download figure to PowerPoint

It is less clear what the impact of an increased frequency of droughts, or increased climatic variability (IPCC, 2007), will be on mortality. Climatic variability in association with decadal and multidecadal Pacific and Atlantic Ocean oscillations certainly has large impacts on vegetation mortality (Swetnam & Betancourt, 1998; McCabe et al., 2004). However, it is difficult to predict a generalized response to climate oscillations because there is a lack of consistency between observations and predictions of mortality response to climate oscillations. According to the hydraulic framework, nonlethal droughts should promote drought resilience, or ability to survive droughts. This is because plants typically respond to nonlethal drought by acclimation of key hydraulic parameters from Eqn 2 such as leaf area (reductions), root and sapwood area (increases), and cavitation resistance (increases), which should bolster trees against future droughts (Cinnirella et al., 2002; Holste et al., 2006). However, some field observations have shown that trees that die are predisposed to death by a prior drought period. This may depend on species and edaphic circumstances. Some species have shown increased cavitation susceptibility after exposure to drought (Hacke et al., 2001) or a feedback spiral of reduced carbon gain leading to reduced growth and subsequent inability to fight off pathogens or insects in later droughts (Pedersen, 1998). In contrast to dry periods, the hydraulic framework predicts that particularly wet periods will promote susceptibility to future drought via increased growth of leaf area and reduced growth of roots and sapwood, resulting in trees that have high ratios of hydraulic demand (leaf area) to supply (root area) (e.g. Eqn 2; McDowell et al., 2006). This is consistent with the observation of increased mortality in fast-growing compared with slow-growing oak trees (Jenkins & Pallardy, 1995, T. Levanič & N. McDowell, unpublished data). Likewise, this may in part explain the high mortality rates in 1996 and 2002 for piñon pine because southwestern USA experienced above-normal precipitation between the late 1970s and early 1990s (Breshears et al., 2005).

Climate change-driven drought will also increase tree mortality via wildfires, both directly through combustion and, more pertinent to this review, indirectly via structural damage that predisposes trees to biotic attack (McHugh & Kolb, 2003; Sieg et al., 2006). Wildfire extent and severity are strongly influenced by regional temperature and global climate systems such as the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, and are expected to increase with climate change (Swetnam & Betancourt, 1998; Westerling et al., 2006). Trees are killed by fire when exposed to temperatures greater than 60°C, and death of remaining above-ground tissues occurs as a result of disruption of water and carbohydrate transport when heat damages phloem and xylem (Ducrey et al., 1996). For trees that survive, fire reduces whole-tree leaf area and subsequent photosynthesis and carbon allocation to insect defenses (Wallin et al., 2003) and may increase olfactory signals (Kelsey & Joseph, 2003), leading to preferential attack from biotic agents such as bark beetles (Bradley & Tueller, 2001; McHugh & Kolb, 2003; Parker et al., 2006; Perrakis & Agee, 2006). Mortality of fire-damaged trees with low resin defenses caused by bark beetle attacks is likely a consequence of carbon starvation in which the source of low carbon reserves is defoliation from drought-associated fire, rather than from prolonged stomatal closure. Future fires will preferentially shift the landscape towards species that can resprout or quickly recolonize.

VII. Conclusions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

The hydraulic framework allows quantitatively informed analyses of the mechanisms of mortality. Hydraulically mediated carbon starvation, and subsequent predisposition to attack from biotic mortality agents, is a likely cause of mortality in isohydric species because of their large margins of hydraulic safety. Mortality of isohydric species is particularly likely during prolonged droughts of intermediate intensity. This conclusion is consistent with prior theoretical modeling exercises and empirical results. Hydraulic failure is a potential cause of mortality in plants with isohydric constrained hydraulic conductance, such as particularly tall trees with a long hydraulic pathlength or plants with small rooting volumes such as seedlings. Ironically, the relatively drought-tolerant anisohydric species are more likely to die from hydraulic failure than carbon starvation because they maintain a thin margin of hydraulic safety. Mortality of anisohydric species is particularly likely during intense droughts. Demographics of biotic mortality agents may interact with carbon starvation or hydraulic failure to facilitate mortality because periods of drought are generally favorable to increased abundance of insects and pathogens. Mortality in the absence of drought should occur at low rates because some trees may suffer from carbon limitation even during wet climatic periods as a result of prior injury (e.g. from drought or mechanical impact) and the eventual exposure to the ever-present population of biotic mortality agents.

We hypothesize that future droughts will kill isohydric species first via carbon starvation and subsequent predisposition to insect and pathogen attacks, and will result in mortality of anisohydric species only if hydraulic failure is reached as a result of particularly intense droughts, prolonged drought duration, or in cases of edaphic (e.g. soil) or size (i.e. seedling and trees at maximum height) related constraints on hydraulic conductance (Figs 10 and 12). Preferential mortality of isohydric species may have large demographic impacts through a reduction in seed sources, shifting the landscape towards anisohydric species (Mueller et al., 2005). The potential for long-term changes to regional vegetation composition is significant, supporting the need for biogeochemistry and climate models to continue refinement of dynamic vegetation simulations (Neilson et al., 2005; Bonan & Levis, 2006; Scholze et al., 2006). These demographic implications may be exacerbated by shifts in the ranges of biotic mortality agents associated with climate change (Simberloff, 2000). The greater likelihood of extreme climate events during this century, as many climate models predict, together with chronic climate warming will most likely lead to increased vegetation mortality and declining forest cover in many regions. Isohydric and anisohydric regulation of leaf water potential may partition species survival and mortality, and may be an effective approach to modeling plant survival and mortality under future climate conditions.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References

We appreciate the editorial assistance of Clif Meyer, Karla Lopez and Chris Zou. Three anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments. NGM, JP, WTP and EAY were supported by the Office of Science (BER), Department of Energy grant no. DE-FG02–07ER64393. JP was supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. DDB received support from B2 Earthscience at Biosphere 2 through the Philecology Foundation. NC was supported by National Science Foundation grant no. DEB-0443526.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. I. Introduction
  4. II. Consequences of vegetation mortality
  5. III. Global patterns of mortality
  6. IV. Hypotheses on mechanisms of drought-related mortality
  7. V. Evidence for hypothesized mechanisms
  8. VI. Implications of future climate on hypothesized mortality mechanisms
  9. VII. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. References
  • Adams HD, Kolb TE. 2005. Tree growth response to drought and temperature along an elevation gradient on a mountain landscape. Journal of Biogeography 32: 16291640.
  • Addington RN, Donovan LA, Mitchell RJ, Vose M, Pecot SD, Jack SB, Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Oren R. 2006. Adjustments in hydraulic architecture of Pinus palustris maintain similar stomatal conductance in xeric and mesic habitats. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 535545.
  • Allen CD. 2007. Cross-scale interactions among forest dieback, fire, and erosion in northern new mexico landscapes. Ecosystems 10: 797808.
  • Allen CD, Breshears DD. 1998. Drought-induced shift of a forest woodland ecotone: rapid landscape response to climate variation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 1483914842.
  • Allen CD, Breshears DD. 2007. Climate-induced forest dieback as an emergent global phenomenon. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 88: 504505.
  • Amman GD. 1972. Mountain pine beetle brood production in relation to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. Journal of Economic Entomology 65: 138140.
  • Amman GD, Pasek JE. 1986. Mountain pine beetle in ponderosa pine: effects of phloem thickness and egg gallery density. Research Paper, INT-367. Ogden, Utah: USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station.
  • Amthor JS. 2000. The McCree-deWit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later. Annals of Botany 86: 120.
  • Auclair AND. 1993. Extreme climatic fluctuations as a cause of forest dieback in the Pacific Rim. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 66: 207229.
  • Ayres MP, Lombardero MJ. 2000. Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbances for herbivores and pathogens. The Total Science of the Environment 262: 263286.
  • Barnard H, Ryan MG. 2003. A test of the hydraulic limitation hypothesis in fast-growing Eucalyptus saligna. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 12351245.
  • Barnes FJ. 1986. Carbon gain and water relations in pinyon–juniper habitat types. PhD dissertation. Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA: New Mexico State University.
  • Berg EE, Henry D, Fastie JB. 2006. Spruce beetle outbreaks on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon Territory: relationship to summer temperatures and regional differences in disturbance regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 227: 219232.
  • Berry J, Bjorkman O. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31: 491543.
  • Berryman AA. 1976. Theoretical explanation of mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Environmental Entomology 5: 12251233.
  • Bigler C, Braker OU, Bugmann H, Dobbertin M, Rigling A. 2006. Drought as an inciting mortality factor in Scots pine stands of the Valais, Switzerland. Ecosystems 9: 330343.
  • Bonal D, Guehl JM. 2001. Contrasting patterns of leaf water potential and gas exchange responses to drought in seedlings of tropical rainforest species. Functional Ecology 15: 490496.
  • Bonan GB, Levis S. 2006. Evaluating aspects of the community land and atmosphere models (CLM3 and CAM3) using a dynamic global vegetation model. Journal of Climate 19: 22902301.
  • Borghetti M, Edwards WRN, Grace J, Jarvis PG, Raschi A. 1991. The refilling of embolized xylem in Pinus sylvestris L. Plant, Cell & Environment 14: 357369.
  • Bosch JM, Hewlett JD. 1982. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 55: 323.
  • Bossel H. 1986. Dynamics of forest dieback: systems analysis and simulation. Ecological Modeling 34: 259288.
  • Bradley T, Tueller P. 2001. Effects of fire on bark beetle presence on Jeffery pine in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Forest Ecology and Management 142: 205214.
  • Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E. 2006. Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Annals of Forest Science 63: 625544.
  • Breshears DD. 2008. Structure and function of woodland mosaics: consequences of patch-scale heterogeneity and connectivity along the grassland-forest continuum. In: Van AukenOW, ed. Western North American juniperus woodlands: a dynamic vegetation type. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 5892.
  • Breshears DD, Allen CD. 2002. The importance of rapid, disturbance-induced losses in carbon management and sequestration. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 11: 115.
  • Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J et al . 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 1514415148.
  • Breshears DD, McDowell NG, Goddard KL, Dayem KE, Martens SN, Meyer CW, Brown KM. 2008. Foliar absorption of intercepted rainfall improves plant water status and enables drought recovery. Ecology 89: 4147.
  • Breshears DD, Myers OB, Meyer CW, Barnes FJ, Zou CB, Allen CD, McDowell NG, Pockman WT. (in press). Tree die-off in response to global-change-type drought: mortality insights from a decade of plant water potential measurements. Frontiers in Ecology.
  • Breshears DD, Nyhan JW, Heil CE, Wilcox BP. 1998. Effects of woody plants on microclimate in a semiarid woodland: soil temperature and evaporation in canopy and intercanopy patches. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 10101017.
  • Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Edwards EJ, Gutierrez MV. 2003. Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 443450.
  • Bryla DR, Bouma TJ, Eissenstat DM. 1997. Root respiration in citrus acclimates to temperature and slows during drought. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 14111420.
  • Burkett VR, Wilcox DA, Stottlemeyer R, Barrow W, Fagre D, Baron J, Price J, Nielsen JL, Allen CD, Peterson DL et al . 2005. Nonlinear dynamics in ecosystem response to climatic change: case studies and policy implications. Ecological Complexity 2: 357394.
  • Campo J, Dirzo R. 2003. Leaf quality and herbivory responses to soil nutrient addition in secondary tropical dry forests of Yucatán, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19: 525530.
  • Caspersen JP, Kobe RK. 2001. Interspecific variation in sapling mortality in relation to growth and soil moisture. Oikos 92: 160168.
  • Christiansen E, Waring RH, Berryman AA. 1987. Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. Forest Ecology and Management 22: 89106.
  • Christensen KM, Whitham TG, Keim P. 1995. Herbivory and tree mortality across a pinyon pine hybrid zone. Oecologia 101: 2936.
  • Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogee J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A et al . 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437: 529533.
  • Cinnirella S, Magnani F, Saracino A, Borghetti M. 2002. Response of mature Pinus laricio plantation to a three-year restriction of water supply: structural and functional acclimation to drought. Tree Physiology 22: 2130.
  • Clancy KM, Wagner MR, Reich PB. 1995. Ecophysiology and insect herbivory. In: SmithWK, HinkleyTM, eds. Ecophysiology of coniferous forests. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 125180.
  • Clark DA. 2004. Sources or sinks? The responses of tropical forests to current and future climate and atmospheric composition. Philosophical Transcripts of the Royal Society of London, Series B 359: 477491.
  • Classen AT, Hart SC, Whitman TG, Cobb NS, Koch GW. 2005. Insect infestations linked to shifts in microclimate: important climate change implications. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 20492057.
  • Cobb NS, Mopper S, Gehring CA, Caouette M, Christensen KM, Whitham TG. 1997. Increased moth herbivory associated with environmental stress of pinyon pine at local and regional levels. Oecologia 190: 389397.
  • Comstock JP. 2000. Variation in hydraulic architecture and gas-exchange in two desertsub-shrubs, Hymenoclea salsola (T. & G.) and Ambrosia dumosa (Payne). Oecologia 125: 110.
  • Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 1995. Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and shrub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecological Monographs 65: 419439.
  • Cook ER, Woodhouse CA, Eakin CM, Meko DM, Stahle DW. 2004. Long-term aridity changes in the western United States. Science 306: 10151018.
  • Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. 1977. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 31: 475505.
  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Collins M, Harris PP, Huntingford C, Jones CD. 2004. Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 78: 137156.
  • Dace H, Sherwin HW, Illing N, Farrant JM. 1998. Use of metabolic inhibitors to elucidate mechanisms of recovery from desiccation stress in the resurrection plant Xerophyta humilis. Plant Growth Regulation 24: 171177.
  • Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S, Neilson RP. 2000. The interplay between climate change, forest, and disturbances. The Science of the Total Environment 262: 201204.
  • Davenport DW, Breshears DD, Wilcox BP, Allen CD. 1998. Viewpoint: sustainability of pinon–juniper ecosystems: a unifying perspective of soil erosion. Journal of Range Management 51: 231240.
  • Davis SD, Ewers FW, Sperry JS, Portwood KA, Crocker MC, Adams GC. 2002. Shoot dieback during prolonged drought in Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) chaparral of California: a possible case of hydraulic failure. American Journal of Botany 89: 820828.
  • Dawson TE. 1996. Determining water use by trees and forests from isotopic, energy balance and transpiration analyses: the roles of tree size and hydraulic lift. Tree Physiology 16: 263272.
  • Demchik MC, Sharpe WE. 2000. The effect of soil nutrition, soil acidity and drought on northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) growth and nutrition on Pennsylvania sites with high and low red oak mortality. Forest Ecology and Management 136: 199207.
  • Dezzeo N, Hernandez L, Folster H. 1997. Canopy dieback in lower montane forests of Alto Uriman, Venezuelan Guayana. Plant Ecology 132: 197209.
  • Diaz-Espejo A, Nicolas E, Fernandez JE. 2007. Seasonal evolution of diffusional limitations and photosynthetic capacity in olive under drought. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 922933.
  • Dirmeyer PA, Koster RD, Guo Z. 2006. So global models properly represent the feedback between land and atmosphere? Journal of Hydrometeorology 7: 11771198.
  • Domec JC, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Housset J. 2007. Dynamic variation in sapwood specific conductivity in six woody species. Tree Phsyiology 27: 13891400.
  • Dore S, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Sullivan BW, Winslow WD, Hart SC, Kaye JP, Koch GW, Hungate BA. (in press). The effect of stand-replacing fire on ecosystem CO2 exchange of ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona. Global Change Biology.
  • Dreyer E, Epron D, Yog Matig OE. 1992. Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II in rapidly dehydrating leaves of 11 temperate and tropical tree species differing in their tolerance to drought. Annales des Sciences Forestieres (Paris) 49: 615625.
  • Ducrey M, Duhoux F, Huc R, Rigolot E. 1996. The ecophysiological and growth responses of Allepo pine (Pinus halepensis) to controlled heating applied to the base of the truck. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 13661374.
  • Dunn JP, Lorio PL Jr. 1993. Modified water regimes affect photosynthesis, xylem water potential, and resistance of juvenile Pinus taeda L. to Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology 22: 948957.
  • Engelbrecht BMJ, Kursar TA, Tyree MT. 2005. Drought effects on seedling survival in a tropical moist forest. Trees-Structure and Function 19: 312321.
  • Erbilgin N, Raffa KF. 2000. Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetles to their aggregation pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 25272548.
  • Ewers BE, Oren R, Sperry JS. 2000. Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 10551066.
  • Fensham RJ, Holman JE. 1999. Temporal and spatial patterns in drought-related tree dieback in Australian savanna. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 10351050.
  • Fettig CJ, Klepzig KD, Billings RF, Munson AS, Nebeker TE, Negron JF, Nowak JT. 2007. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 238: 2453.
  • Fine PVA, Zachariah JM, Mesones I, Irazuzta S, Appel H, Stevens MHH, Saaksjarvi I, Shultz JC, Coley PD. 2006. The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87: S150S162.
  • Fisher RA, Williams M, Do Vale RL, Da Costa AL, Meir P. 2006. Evidence from Amazonian forests is consistent with isohydric control of leaf water potential. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 151165.
  • Franklin JF, Shugart HH, Harmon ME. 1987. Tree death as an ecological process. Bioscience 27: 259288.
  • Franks PJ, Drake PL, Froend RH. 2007. Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient explained by a stomatal control mechanism incorporating variable plant hydraulic conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 1930.
  • Frey BR, Liefers VJ, Hogg E, Landhausser SM. 2004. Predicting landscape patters of aspen dieback: mechanisms and knowledge gaps. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 13791390.
  • Gaff DF. 1971. Desiccation tolerant flowering plants in southern Africa. Science 174: 10331034.
  • Gan JB. 2004. Risk and damage of southern pine beetle outbreaks under global climate change. Forest Ecology and Management 191: 6171.
  • Gitlin AR, Sthultz CM, Bowker MA, Stumpf S, Paxton KL, Kennedy K, Munoz A, Bailey JA, Whitham TG. 2006. Mortality gradients within and among dominant plant populations as barometers of ecosystem change during extreme drought. Conservation Biology 20: 14771486.
  • Goldstein G, Andrade JL, Meinzer FC, Holbrook NM, Cavelier J, Jackson P, Celis A. 1998. Stem water storage and diurnal patterns of water use in tropical forest canopy trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 397406.
  • Gonzalez P. 2001. Desertification and a shift of forest species in the West African Sahel. Climate Research 17: 217228.
  • Gower ST, Gholz HL, Nakane K, Baldwin VC. 1994. Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. In: GholzHL, LinderS, McMurtrieRE, eds. Pine ecosystems. Copenhagen, Denmark: Ecological Bulletins, 115135.
  • Grier CC, Elliot KJ, McCullough DG. 1992. Biomass distribution and productivity of Pinus edulis-Juniperus monosperma woodlands of north-central Arizona. Forest Ecology and Management 50: 331350.
  • Grosman DM, Upton WW. 2006. Efficacy of systemic insecticides for protection of loblolly pine against southern fine engraver beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and wood borers (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 99: 94101.
  • Guarin A, Taylor AH. 2005. Drought triggered tree mortality in mixed conifer forests in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 218: 229244.
  • Güneralp B, Gertner G. 2007. Feedback loop dominance analysis of two tree mortality models: relationship between structure and behavior. Tree Physiology 27: 269280.
  • Gutschick VP, BassiriRad H. 2003. Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology, and evolution of plants: toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences. New Phytologist 160: 2142.
  • Haack RA, Wilkinson RC, Foltz JL, Corneil JA. 1984. Gallery construction and oviposition by Ips calligraphis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in relation to slash pine phloem thickness and temperature. Canadian Entomologist 116: 625632.
  • Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Ewers B, Schafer K, Oren R. 2000. Influence of soil porosity on water use in Pinus taeda. Oecologia 124: 495505.
  • Hacke UG, Stiller V, Sperry JS, Pittermann J, McCulloh KA. 2001. Cavitation fatigue. Embolism and refilling cycles can weaken the cavitation resistance of xylem. Plant Physiology 125: 779786.
  • Hamrick JL. 2004. Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. Forest Ecology and Management 197: 323335.
  • Hanson PJ, Todd DE Jr, Amthor JS. 2001. A six-year study of sapling and large-tree growth and mortality responses to natural and induced variability in precipitation and throughfall. Tree Physiology 21: 345358.
  • Hanson PJ, Weltzin JF. 2000. Drought disturbance from climate change: response of United States forests. Science of the Total Environment 262: 205220.
  • Harrison RD. 2001. Drought and the consequences of El Nino in Borneo: a case study of figs. Population Ecology 43: 6375.
  • Hastings FL, Holsten EH, Shea PJ, Werner RA. 2001. Carbaryl: a review of its use against bark beetles in coniferous forests of North America. Environmental Entomology 30: 803810.
  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 282335.
  • Hicke JA, Logan JA, Powell J, Ojima DS. 2006. Changing temperatures influence suitability for modeled mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreaks in the western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 111: GO2019.
  • Hietz P, Baier P, Offenthaler I, Fuhrer E, Rosner S, Richter H. 2005. Tree temperatures, volatile organic emissions, and primary attraction of bark beetles. Phyton 45: 341354.
  • Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA. 1999. Embolism repair and xylem tension: do we need a miracle? Plant Physiology 120: 710.
  • Holste EK, Jerke MJ, Matzner SL. 2006. Long-term acclimation of hydraulic properties, xylem conduit size, wall strength and cavitation resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris in response to different environmental effects. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 836843.
  • Horton JL, Kolb TE, Hart SH. 2001. Physiological response to ground water depth varies among species and with river flow regulation. Ecological Applications 11: 10461059.
  • Houston DR. 1987. Forest tree declines of past and present: current understanding. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 9: 349360.
  • Hughes RF, Archer SR, Asner GP, Wessman CA, McMurtry C, Nelson J, Ansley RJ. 2006. Changes in aboveground primary production and carbon and nitrogen pools accompanying woody plant encroachement in a temperate savanna. Global Change Biology 12: 17331747.
  • Hui X, Jin C. 2004. Interspecific variation of plant traits associated with resistance to herbivory among four species of Ficus (Moraceae). Annals of Botany 94: 377.
  • Hultine KR, Koepke DF, Pockman WT, Fravolini A, Sperry JS, Williams DG. 2006. Influence of soil texture on hydraulic properties and water relations of a dominant warm-desert Phreatophyte. Tree Physiology 26: 313323.
  • IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Forth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1009.
  • Jenkins MA, Pallardy SG. 1995. The influence of drought on red oak group species growth and mortality in the Missouri Ozarks. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25: 11191127.
  • Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C. 2007. A new generation of climate-change experiments: events, not trends. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 365374.
  • Jurskis V. 2005. Eucalypt decline in Australia, and a general concept of tree decline and dieback. Forest Ecology and Management 215: 120.
  • Katul G, Leuning R, Oren R. 2003. Relationship between plant hydraulic and biochemical properties derived from a steady-state coupled water and carbon transport model. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 339350.
  • Kavanagh KL, Bond BJ, Aiken SN, Gartner BL, Knowe S. 1999. Shoot and root vulnerability to xylem cavitation in four populations of Douglas-fir seedlings. Tree Physiology 19: 3137.
  • Keane RE, Austin M, Field C, Huth A, Lexer MJ, Peters D, Solomon A, Wyckoff P. 2001. Tree mortality in gap models: application to climate change. Climatic Change 51: 509540.
  • Kelsey RG. 2001. Chemical indicators of stress in trees: their ecological significance and implication for forestry in Eastern Oregon and Washington. Northwest Science 75: 7076.
  • Kelsey RG, Joseph G. 2003. Ethanol in ponderosa pine as an indicator of physiological injury from fire and its relationship to secondary beetles. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 870884.
  • Kimmerer TW, Kozlowski TT. 1982. Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde, and ethanol production by plants under stress. Plant Physiology 69: 840847.
  • King AW, Gunderson CA, Post WM, Weston DJ, Wullschleger SD. 2006. Plant respiration in a warmer world. Science 312: 536537.
  • Kolb TE, Holmberg KM, Wagner MR, Stone JE. 1998. Regulation of ponderosa pine foliar physiology and insect resistance mechanisms by basal area treatments. Tree Physiology 18: 375381.
  • Kolb TE, McCormick LH. 1993. Etiology of sugar maple decline in four Pennsylvania stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 23952402.
  • Kolb PF, Robberecht R. 1996. High temperature and drought stress effects on survival of Pinus ponderosa seedlings. Tree Physiology 16: 665672.
  • Kolb KJ, Sperry JS. 1999. Differences in drought adaptation between subspecies of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Ecology 80: 23732384.
  • Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 2002. Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. Botanical Review 68: 270334.
  • Kurz WA, Apps MJ. 1999. A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecological Applications 9: 526547.
  • Lajtha K, Barnes FJ. 1991. Carbon gain and water use in pinyon–juniper woodlands of northern New Mexico: field vs phytotron chamber measurements. Tree Physiology 9: 5967.
  • Larsson S, Oren R, Waring RH, Barrett JW. 1983. Attacks of mountain pine beetle as related to tree vigor of ponderosa pine. Forest Science 29: 395402.
  • Law BE, Thornton PE, Irvine J, Anthoni PM, Van Tuyl S. 2001. Carbon storage and fluxes in ponderosa pine forests at different developmental stages. Global Change Biology 7: 755777.
  • Lewinsohn E, Gijzen M, Muzika R, Barton K, Croteau R. 1993. Oleoresinosis in Grand Fir (Abies grandis) saplings and mature trees. Plant Physiology 101: 10211028.
  • Liang EY, Shao XM, Kong ZC, Lin JX. 2003. The extreme drought in the 1920s and its effect on tree growth deduced from tree ring analysis: a case study in North China. Annals of Forest Science 60: 145162.
  • Linton MJ, Sperry JS, Williams DG. 1998. Limits to water transport in Juniperus osteosperma and Pinus edulis: implications for drought tolerance and regulation of transpiration. Functional Ecology 12: 906911.
  • Litton CM, Raich JW, Ryan MG. 2007. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Global Change Biology 13: 20892109.
  • Lloret F, Siscart D, Dalmases C. 2004. Canopy recovery after drought dieback in holm-oak Mediterranean forests of Catalonia (NE Spain). Global Change Biology 10: 20922099.
  • Loewenstein NJ, Pallardy SG. 1998a. Drought tolerance, xylem sap abscisic acid and stomatal conductance during soil drying: a comparison of young plants of four temperate deciduous angiosperms. Tree Physiology 18: 421430.
  • Loewenstein NJ, Pallardy SG. 1998b. Drought tolerance, xylem sap abscisic acid and stomatal conductance during soil drying: a comparison of canopy trees of three temperate deciduous angiosperms. Tree Physiology 18: 431439.
  • Logan JA, Bentz BJ. 1999. Model analysis of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) seasonality. Environmental Entomology 28: 924934.
  • Logan JA, Powell JA. 2001. Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scotytidae). American Entolmologist 47: 160173.
  • Logan JA, Regniere J, Powell JA. 2003. Assessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 130137.
  • Lorio PL. 1986. Growth-differentiation balance: a basis for understanding southern pine beetle-tree interactions. Forest Ecology and Management 14: 259273.
  • Lwanga JS. 2003. Localized tree mortality following the drought of 1999 at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda 2003. African Journal of Ecology 41: 194196.
  • Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Grace J. 2000. Age-related decline in stand productivity: the role of structural acclimation under hydraulic constraints. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 251263.
  • Maherali H, DeLucia EH. 2001. Influence of climate-driven shifts in biomass allocation on water transport and storage in ponderosa pine. Oecologia 129: 481491.
  • Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB. 2004. Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 85: 21842199.
  • Manion PD. 1991. Tree disease concepts. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
  • Manter DK, Kelsey RG. 2008. Ethanol accumulation in drought-stressed conifer seedlings. International Journal of Plant Science 169: 361370.
  • Marçais B, Bréda N. 2007. Role of an opportunistic pathogen in the decline of stressed oak trees. Journal of Ecology 94: 12141223.
  • Martin TA, Hinckley TM, Meinzer FC, Sprugel DG. 1999. Boundary layer conductance, leaf temperature and transpiration of Abies amabilis branches. Tree Physiology 19: 35443.
  • Martínez-Vilalta J, Piñol J, Beven K. 2002. A hydraulic model to predict drought-induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean. Ecological Modelling 155: 127147.
  • Mattson WJ, Haack RA. 1987. The role of drought stress in provoking outbreaks of phytophagous insects. In: BarbosaP, SchultzJC, eds. Insect outbreaks. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 365407.
  • McCabe GJ, Palecki MA, Betancourt JL. 2004. Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influences on multi-decadal drought frequency in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 41364141.
  • McDowell NG, Adams HA, Bailey JD, Hess M, Kolb TE. 2006. Homeostatic maintenance of ponderosa pine gas exchange in response to stand density changes. Ecological Applications 16: 11641182.
  • McDowell NG, Adams HD, Bailey JD, Kolb TE. 2007. The role of stand density on growth efficiency, leaf area index and resin flow in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 343355.
  • McDowell NG, Barnard H, Bond BJ, Hinckley T, Hubbard R, Ishii H, Köstner B, Meinzer FC, Marshall JD, Magnani F et al . 2002b. The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia 132: 1220.
  • McDowell NG, Licata J, Bond BJ. 2005. Environmental sensitivity of gas exchange parameters in different-sized trees. Oecologia 145: 920.
  • McDowell NG, Phillips N, Lunch CK, Bond BJ, Ryan MG. 2002a. Hydraulic limitation and compensation in large, old Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiology 22: 763774.
  • McElrone AJ, Bichler J, Pockman WT, Addington RN, Linder CR, Jackson RB. 2007. Aquaporin-mediated changes in hydraulic conductivity of deep tree roots accessed via caves. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 14111421.
  • McElrone AJ, Pockman WT, Martinez-Vilalta J, Jackson RB. 2004. Variation in xylem structure and function in stems and roots of trees to 20 m depth. New Phytologist 163: 507517.
  • McHugh CW, Kolb TE. 2003. Ponderosa pine mortality following fire in northern Arizona. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12: 722.
  • Mencuccini M. 2003. The ecological significance of long-distance water transport: short-term regulation, long-term acclimation and the hydraulic costs of stature across plant life forms. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 163182.
  • Mencuccini M, Bonosi L. 2001. Leaf/sapwood area ratios in Scots pine show acclimation across Europe. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 442456.
  • Mitton JB. 1995. Genetics and the physiological ecology of conifers. In: SmithWK, HinckleyTM, eds. Ecophysiology of coniferous forests. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 136.
  • Mitton JB, Grant MC, Yoshino AM. 1998. Variation in allozymes and stomatal size in pinyon (Pinus edulis, Pinaceae), associated with soil moisture. American Journal of Botany 85: 12621265.
  • Monteith JL, Unsworth MH. 1990. Principles of environmental physics. New York, NY, USA: Edward Arnold, 291.
  • Mott KA, Parkhurst DF. 1991. Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell & Environment 14: 509515.
  • Mueller RC, Scudder CM, Porter ME, Trotter RT III, Gehring CA, Whitham, TG. 2005. Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: evidence for long-term vegetation shifts. Journal of Ecology 93: 10851093.
  • Mueller-Dumbois D. 1987. Natural dieback in forests. Bioscience 37: 575583.
  • Narisma GT, Pittman AJ, Eastman J, Watterson IG, Pielke R, Beltran-Przekurat A. 2003. The role of biospheric feedbacks in the simulation of the impact of historical land cover change on the Australian January climate. Geophysical Research Letters 30: 2168.
  • National Research Council. 2007. Understanding multiple environmental stresses. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
  • Neilson RP, Pitelka LF, Solomon AM, Nathan R, Midgley GF, Fragoso JMV, Lischke H, Thompson K. 2005. Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. Bioscience 55: 749759.
  • Nepstad DC, Tohver IM, Ray D, Moutinho P, Cardinot G. 2007. Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an Amazon forest. Ecology 88: 22592269.
  • Newman BD, Wilcox BP, Archer SR, Breshears DD, Dahm CN, Duffy CJ, McDowell NG, Phillips FM, Scanlon BR, Vivoni ER. 2006. Ecohydrology of water-limited environments: a scientific vision. Water Resources Research 42: W06302.
  • Niinemets U, Sõber A, Kull O, Hartung W, Tenhumen J. 1999. Apparent controls on leaf conductance by soil water availability and via light acclimation of foliage structural and physiological properties in a mixed deciduous temperature forest. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 707721.
  • Ogle K, Reynolds JF. 2002. Desert dogma revisited: coupling of stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in the desert shrub Larrea tridentata. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 909921.
  • Ogle K, Whitham TG, Cobb NS. 2000. Tree-ring variation in pinyon predicts likelihood of death following severe drought. Ecology 81: 32373243.
  • Oliver MJ, Tuba Z, Mishler BD. 2000. The evolution of vegetative desiccation tolerance in land plants. Plant Ecology 151: 85100.
  • Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schäfer KVR. 1999. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 15151526.
  • Parker TJ, Clancy KM, Mathiasen RL. 2006. Interactions among fire, insects, and pathogens in coniferous forests of the interior western United States and Canada. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 8: 167189.
  • Pedersen BS. 1998. The role of stress in the mortality of midwestern oaks as indicated by growth prior to death. Ecology 79: 7993.
  • Perrakis DDB, Agee JK. 2006. Seasonal fire effects on mixed-conifer forest structure and ponderosa pine resin properties. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 238254.
  • Phillips N, Bond BJ, McDowell NG, Ryan MG. 2002. Canopy and hydraulic conductance in young, mature and old Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiology 22: 205211.
  • Phillips N, Ryan MG, Bond BJ, McDowell NG, Hinckley T, Cermak J. 2003. Reliance on stored water increases with tree size in three species in the Pacific Northwest. Tree Physiology 23: 237245.
  • Pittermann J, Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Wheeler JK, Sikkema EH. 2005. Torus-margo pits help conifers compete with angiosperms. Science 310: 1924.
  • Pittermann J, Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Wheeler JK, Sikkema EH. 2006. Inter-tracheid pitting and the hydraulic efficiency of conifer wood: the role of tracheid allometry and cavitation protection. American Journal of Botany 93: 11051113.
  • Pockman WT, Sperry JS. 2000. Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran vegetation. American Journal of Botany 87: 12871299.
  • Pockman WT, Sperry JS, O’Leary JW. 1995. Sustained and significant negative water pressure in xylem. Nature 378: 715716.
  • Pothier D, Margolis HA, Waring RH. 1989. Patterns of change of saturated sapwood permeability and sapwood conductance with stand development. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 432439.
  • Price PW. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62: 244251.
  • Reeve JD, Ayers MP, Lorio PL Jr. 1995. Host suitability, predation, and bark beetle population dynamics. In: CappuccinoN, PricePW, eds. Population dynamics: new approaches and synthesis. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 339357.
  • Rice KJ, Matzner SL, Byer W, Brown JR. 2004. Patterns of tree dieback in Queensland, Australia; the importance of drought stress and the role of resistance to cavitation. Oecologia 139: 190198.
  • Rich PM, Breshears DD, White AB. 2008. Phenology of mixed woody-herbaceous ecosystems following extreme events: net and differential responses. Special feature on phenology. Ecology 89: 342352.
  • Rieske LK, Rhoades CC, Miller SP. 2003. Foliar chemistry and gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), hervibory on pure American chestnut, Castanea dentata (Fam: Fagaceae), and a disease-resistant hybrid. Environmental Entomology 32: 359365.
  • Rodriguez ML, Chaves MM, Wendler R, David MM, Quink WP, Leegood RC, Stitt M, Pereira JS. 1993. Osmotic adjustment in water stressed grapevine leaves in related to carbon assimilation. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 20: 309321.
  • Rolland C, Lemperiere G. 2004. Effects of climate on radial growth of Norway spruce and interactions with attacks by the bark beetle Dendroctonus micans (Kug., Coleoptera: Scolytidae): a dendroecological study in the French Massif Central. Forest Ecology and Management 201: 89104.
  • Romme WH, Clement J, Hicke J, Kulakowski D, MacDonald LH, Schoennagel TL, Veblen TT. 2006. Recent forest insect outbreaks and fire risk in colorado forests: a brief synthesis of relevant research. Colorado Forest Research Institute.
  • Ryan MG, Linder S, Vose JM, Hubbard RM. 1994. Dark respiration of pines. Ecological Bulletins 43: 5063.
  • Sack L. 2004. Responses of temperate woody seedlings to shade and drought: do trade-offs limit potential niche differentiation? Oikos 107: 110127.
  • Sage RF, Kubien DS. 2007. The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 10861106.
  • Salleo S, Lo Gullo MA, Trifilo P, Nardini A. 2004. New evidence for a role of vessel associated cells and phloem in the rapid xylem refilling of cavitated stems of Laurus nobilis L. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 10651076.
  • Schäfer KVR, Oren R, Tenhunen JD. 2000. The effect of tree height on crown level stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 365375.
  • Schoeneweiss DF. 1981. Water stress as a predisposing factor in plant disease. In: KozlowskiTT, ed. Water Deficits and Plant Growth. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
  • Scholze M, Knorr W, Arnell NW, Prentice IC. 2006. A climate-change risk analysis for worlds ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 1311613120.
  • Seager R, Ting M, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang HP, Harnik N, Lau NC, Li C et al . 2007. Model projections on an inminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316: 11811184.
  • Shaw JD, Steed BE, DeBlander L. 2005. Forest inventory and analysis (FIA) annual inventory answers the question: what is happening to pinyon–juniper woodlands? Journal of Forestry 103: 80285.
  • Sherwin HN, Pammenter NW, February E, Vander Willigen C, Farrant JM. 1998. Xylem hydraulic characteristics, water relations and wood anatomy of the resurrection plant Myrothamnus flabellifolius Welw. Annals of Botany 81: 567575.
  • Sieg CH, McMillin JD, Fowler JF, Allen KK, Negron JF, Wadleigh LL, Anhold JA, Gibson KE. 2006. Best predictors for postflre mortality of ponderosa pine trees in the intermountain west. Forest Science 52: 718728.
  • Simberloff D. 2000. Global climate change and introduced species in United States forests. Science of the Total Environment 262: 253261.
  • Simonin K, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Koch GW. 2007. The influence of thinning on components of stand water balance in a ponderosa pine forest stand during and after extreme drought. Agricultural and Forest Metereology 143: 266276.
  • Slik JWF. 2004. El nino droughts and their effects on tree species composition and diversity in tropical rain forests. Oecologia 141: 114120.
  • Sparks JP, Black RA. 1999. Regulation of water loss in populations of Populus trichocarpa: the role of stomatal control in preventing xylem cavitation. Tree Physiology 19: 453459.
  • Sperry JS, Adler FR, Campbell GS, Comstock JP. 1998. Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 347359.
  • Sperry JS, Hacke UG. 2002. Desert shrub water relations with respect to soil characteristics and plant functional type. Functional Ecology 16: 367378.
  • Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP. 2002. Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 251263.
  • Sperry JS, Holbrook NM, Zimmerman MH, Tyree MT. 1987. Spring filling of xylem vessels in wild grapevine. Plant Physiology 83: 414417.
  • Sperry JS, Ikeda T. 1997. Xylem cavitation in roots and stems of Douglas-fir and white fir. Tree Physiology 17: 275228.
  • Stamp N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Quarterly Review of Biology 78: 2355.
  • Stirzaker RJ, Passioura JB. 1996. The water relations of the root-soil interface. Plant, Cell & Environment 19: 201208.
  • Stone WE, Wolfe ML. 1996. Response of understory vegetation to variable tree mortality following a mountain pine beetle epidemic in lodge pine stands in northen Utah. Vegetatio 122: 112.
  • Suarez ML, Ghermandi L, Kitzberger T. 2004. Factors predisposing episodic drought-induced tree mortality in Nothofagus – site, climatic sensitivity, and growth trends. Journal of Ecology 92: 954966.
  • Swaty RL, Deckert RJ, Whitham TG, Gehring CA. 2004. Ectomycorrhizal abundance and community composition shifts with drought: predictions from tree rings. Ecology 85: 10721084.
  • Swetnam TW, Betancourt JL. 1998. Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American southwest. Journal of Climate 11: 31283147.
  • Swetnam TW, Lynch AM. 1993. Multicentury, regional-scale patterns of western spruce budworm outbreaks. Ecological Monographs 64: 399424.
  • Tadege M, Dupuis I, Kuhlemeier C. 1999. Ethanolic fermentation: new functions for an old pathway. Trends in Plant Science 4: 320325.
  • Tardieu F. 1993. Will increases in our understanding of soil-root relations and root signaling substantially alter water flux models? The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Serie B 341: 5766.
  • Tardieu F, Davies WJ. 1992. Stomatal response to abscisic acid is a function of current plant water status. Plant Physiology 98: 540545.
  • Tardieu F, Simonneau T. 1998. Variability of species among stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modeling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 419432.
  • Thoss V, Byers JA. 2006. Monoterpene chemodiversity of ponderosa pine in relation to herbivory and bark beetle colonization. Chemoecology 16: 5158.
  • Tognetti R, Michelozzi M, Giovannelli A. 1997. Geographic variation in water relations, hydraulic architecture and terpene composition of Aleppo pine seedlings from Italian provenances. Tree Physiology 17: 241250.
  • Tran JK, Ylioja T, Billings RF, Regniere J, Ayres MP. 2007. Impact of minimum winter temperatures on the population dynamics of Dendroctonus frontalis. Ecological Applications 17: 882899.
  • Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Maccaferri M, Giuliani S, Landi P. 2003. Searching for quantitative trait loci controlling root traits in maize: a critical appraisal. Plant and Soil 255: 3554.
  • Tyree MT, Cochard H, Cruiziat P, Sinclair B, Ameglio T. 1993. Drought-induced leaf shedding in walnut: evidence for vulnerability segmentation. Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 879882.
  • Tyree M, Salleo S, Nardini A, Lo Gullo M, Mosca R. 1999. Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of Laurel. Do we need a new paradigm? Plant Physiology 120: 1121.
  • Tyree MT, Sperry JS. 1988. Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Plant Physiology 88: 574580.
  • Tyree MT, Sperry JS. 1989. Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 40: 1938.
  • Ungerer MJ, Ayers MP, Lombardero MJ. 1999. Climate and the northern distribution limits of Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Biogeography 26: 11331145.
  • Van Nieewstadt MGL, Sheil D. 2005. Drught, fire and tree survival in a Borneo rain forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Ecology 93: 191201.
  • VanSplunder I, Voesenek LACJ, Coops H, DeVries XJA, Blom CWPM. 1996. Morphological responses of seedlings of four species of Salicaceae to drought. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 19881995.
  • Villalba R, Veblen TT. 1998. Influences of large-scale climatic variability on episodic tree mortality in northern Patagonia. Ecology 79: 26242640.
  • Volaire F, Thomas H, Lelievre F. 1998. Survival and recovery of perennial forage grasses under prolonged Mediterranean drought. I. Growth, death, water relations and solute content in herbage and stubble. New Phytologist 140: 439449.
  • Wallin KF, Kolb TE, Skov KR, Wagner MR. 2003. Effects of crown scorch on ponderosa pine resistance to bark beetles in northern Arizona. Environmental Entomology 32: 652661.
  • Wardle JA, Allen RB. 1983. Dieback in New Zealand Nothofagus forests. Pacific Science 37: 397404.
  • Waring GL, Cobb NS. 1992. The impacts of plant stress on herbivore population dynamics. In: BernaysEA, ed. Plant-insect interactions, Vol. 4. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC, 167226.
  • Waring RH. 1987. Characteristics of trees predisposed to die. Bioscience 37: 569577.
  • Waring RH, Landsberg JJ, Williams M. 1998. Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiology 18: 129134.
  • Waring RH, Pitman GB. 1985. Modifying lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) stands to change susceptibility to mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) attack. Ecology 66: 889897.
  • Warren JM, Allen HL, Booker FL. 1999. Mineral nutrition, resin flow and phloem phytochemistry in loblolly pine. Tree Physiology 19: 655663.
  • West AG, Hultine KR, Burtch KG, Ehleringer JR. 2007b. Seasonal variations in moisture use in a piñon–juniper woodland. Oecologia 153: 787798.
  • West AG, Hultine KR, Jackson TL, Ehleringer JR. 2007a. Contrasting hydraulic strategies explain differential summer moisture use of Pinus edulis and Juniperus osteosperma. Tree Physiology 27: 17111720.
  • West AG, Hultine KR, Sperry JS, Bush SE, Ehleringer JR. 2008. Transpiration and hydraulic strategies in a piñon–juniper woodland. Ecological Applications 18: 911927.
  • Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increases western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313: 940943.
  • White TCR. 1984. The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia 63: 90105.
  • Whitehead D. 1998. Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiology 18: 633644.
  • Whitehead D, Jarvis PG. 1981. Coniferous forest and plantations. In: KozlowskiTT, ed. Water deficits and growth, Vol. 6. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 49152.
  • Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Allen CD. 2003. Ecohydrology of a resource-conserving semiarid woodland: temporal and spatial scaling and disturbance. Ecological Monographs 73: 223239.
  • Williams DG, Ehleringer JR. 2000. Intra- and interspecific variation for summer precipitation use in pinyon–juniper woodlands. Ecological Monographs 70: 517537.
  • Williams JE, Davis SD, Portwood KA. 1997. Xylem embolism in seedlings and resprouts of Adenostema fasciculatum after fire. Australian Journal of Botany 45: 291300.
  • Williamson GB, Laurance WF, Oliveira AA, Delamonica P, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Pohl L. 2000. Amazonia tree mortality during the 1997 El Niño drought. Conservation Biology 14: 15381542.
  • Wullschleger SD, McLaughlin SB, Ayres MP. 2004. High-resolution analysis of stem increment and sap flow for loblolly pine trees attacked by southern pine beetle. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 23872393.
  • Wyckoff PH, Clark JS. 2002. The relationship between growth and mortality for seven co-occurring tree species in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Journal of Ecology 90: 604615.
  • Yoder BJ, Ryan MG, Waring RH, Schoettle AW, Kaufmann MR. 1994. Evidence of reduced photosynthetic rates in old trees. Forest Science 40: 513527.
  • Zhang J, Marshall JD, Jaquish BC. 1995. Genetic differentiation in carbon isotope discrimination and gas exchange in Pseudotsuga menziesii. Oecologia 101: 8087.