SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alexandersson R, Johnson SD. 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proccedings of the Royal Society of London B 269: 631636.
  • Anderson IA, Busch JW. 2006. Relaxed pollinator-mediated selection weakens floral integration in self-compatible taxa of Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 860867.
  • Armbruster WS. 1991. Multilevel analysis of morphometric data from natural plant populations: insights into ontogenetic, genetic, and selective correlations in Dalechampia scandens. Evolution 45: 12291244.
  • Armbruster WS, Di Stilio VS, Tuxill JD, Flores TC, Velásquez-Runk JL. 1999. Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation pleiades concept. American Journal of Botany 86: 3955.
  • Armbruster WS, Pélabon C, Hansen TF, Mulder CPH. 2004. Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy. Distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In: PigliucciM, PrestonK, eds. Phenotypic integration. Studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2349.
  • Armbruster WS, Schwaegerle KE. 1996. Causes of covariation of phenotypic traits among populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 261276.
  • Arnold SJ. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 140: S85S107.
  • Ashman T-L, Majetic CJ. 2006. Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns. Heredity 96: 343352.
  • Bell GB. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 224: 223265.
  • Benítez-Vieyra S, Medina AM, Glinos E, Cocucci AA. 2006. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits and size of floral display in Cyclopogon elatus, a sweat bee-pollinated orchid. Functional Ecology 20: 948957.
  • Berg RL. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation Pleiades. Evolution 14: 171180.
  • Campbell DR. 1989. Measurement of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution 43: 318334.
  • Caruso CM. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54: 15461557.
  • Cheverud JM, Wagner GP, Dow MM. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Systematic Zoology 38: 201213.
  • Conner JK. 2001. How strong is natural selection? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 215217.
  • Darwin CR. 1862. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. London, UK: Murray.
  • Domínguez CA, Eguiarte LE, Núñez-Farfán J, Dirzo R. 1998. Flower morphometry of Rhizophora mangle (Rhizophoraceae): geographical variation in Mexican populations. American Journal of Botany 85: 637643.
  • Eble GJ. 2004. The macroevolution of phenotypic integration. In: PigliucciM, PrestonK, eds. Phenotypic integration. Studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 253273.
  • Endler JA. 1995. Multiple-traits coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 2229.
  • Faegri K, Van Der Pijl L. 1966. The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford, UK: Pergman Press.
  • Frey FM. 2007. Phenotypic integration and the potential for independent color evolution in a polymorphic spring ephemeral. American Journal of Botany 94: 437447.
  • Galen C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the Alpine Sky Pilot Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43: 882890.
  • García C, Arroyo JM, Godoy JA, Jordano P. 2005. Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Molecular Ecology 14: 18211830.
  • Garcia D, Chacoff NP. 2007. Scale-dependent effects of habitat fragmentation on Hawthorn pollination, frugivory, and seed predation. Conservation Biology 21: 400411.
  • Gómez JM. 2000. Phenotypic selection and response to selection in Lobularia maritima: importance of direct and correlational components of natural selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 689699.
  • Guitián J, Flores M. 1992. Reproductive biology of Crataegus monogyna in northwestern Spain. Acta Oecologica 13: 311.
  • Heisler IL, Damuth J. 1987. A method for analyzing selection in hierarchically structured populations. The American Naturalist 130: 582602.
  • Herrera CM. 1982. Breeding systems and dispersal-related maternal reproductive effort of southern Spanish bird-dispersed plants. Evolution 36: 12991314.
  • Herrera CM. 1993. Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk moth-pollinated violet. Ecological Monographs 63: 251275.
  • Herrera CM. 2001. Deconstructing a floral phenotype: do pollinators select for corolla integration in Lavandula latifolia? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 574584.
  • Herrera CM, Cerdá X, García MB, Guitián J, Medrano M, Rey PJ, Sánchez-Lafuente AM. 2002. Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 108121.
  • Herrera J. 1984. Vegetation of the valley of Guadahornillos (Sierra de Cazorla, Jaen). Studia Oecologica 3: 7796.
  • Jordano P. 1993. Pollination biology of Prunus mahaleb L.: deferred consequences of gender variation for fecundity and seed size. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 50: 6584.
  • Judd WS, Campbell CS, Kellogg EA, Stevens PF, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Plant systematics. A phylogenetic approach, 2nd edn . Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
  • Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Koekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gilbert P, Beerli P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157: 245261.
  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. 1988. Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Boston, MA, USA: PSW-Kent.
  • Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Maad J. 2000. Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution 54: 112123.
  • Marcus L. 1990. Traditional morphometrics. In: RohlfFJ, BooksteinFL, eds. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication No 2. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 77122.
  • Mathsoft, Inc. 1999. S-Plus 2000 guide to statistics. Seattle, WA, USA: Mathsoft.
  • Maynard-Smith J, Szathmáry E. 1995. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford, UK: WH Freeman/Spektrum.
  • Michod R, Viossat Y, Solari CA, Hurand M, Nedelcu AN. 2006. Life-history evolution and the origin of multicellularity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 239: 257272.
  • Muchhala N. 2006. Nectar bat stows huge tongue in its rib cage. Nature 444: 701702.
  • Murren C. 2002. Phenotypic integration in plants. Plant Species Biology 17: 8999.
  • Murren C, Pendleton N, Pigliucci M. 2002. Evolution of phenotypic integration in Brassica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 655663.
  • Nilsson LA. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 334: 147149.
  • O’Connell LM, Johnston MO. 1998. Male and female pollination success in a deceptive orchid, a selection study. Ecology 79: 12461260.
  • Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F. 2006. Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wild-service tree, Sorbus torminalis (Rosaceae). III. Mating patterns and the ecological maternal neighborhood. American Journal of Botany 93: 16501659.
  • Olson EC, Miller RL. 1958. Morphological integration. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pérez F, Arroyo MTK, Medel R. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of floral integration in Schizanthus (Solanaceae): does pollination truly integrate corolla traits? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 17301738.
  • Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Armbruster WS. 2007. Differences in pollinator faunas may generate geographic differences in floral morphology and integration in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). Oikos 116: 19041918.
  • Pigliucci M. 2003. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecology Letters 6: 265272.
  • Pigliucci M, Preston K. 2004. Phenotypic integration. Studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Potter D, Gao F, Bortiri PE, Oh S-H, Baggett S. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Rosaceae inferred from chloroplast matK and trnL-trnF nucleotide sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 231: 7789.
  • Reyment R, Jöreskog KG. 1993. Applied factor analysis in the natural sciences. Cambridge, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roff D. 2002. Comparing G matrices: a MANOVA approach. Evolution 56: 12861291.
  • SAS Institute Inc. 2005. JMP Version 5. Cary, NC, USA: SAS.
  • Schlichting C. 1989. Phenotypic integration and environmental change. BioScience 39: 460464.
  • Smyth DR. 2005. Morphogenesis of flowers – our evolving view. The Plant Cell 17: 330341.
  • StatSoft, Inc. 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. Tulsa, OK, USA: StatSoft, Inc.
  • Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
  • Stebbins GL. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 307326.
  • Terentjev PV. 1931. Biometrische Untersuchungen über die morphologischen Merkmale von Rana ridibunda Pall. (Amphibia, Salientia). Biometrika 23: 2351.
  • Wagner GP. 1984. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. Journal of Mathematical Biology 21: 7795.
  • Waldmann P, Andersson S. 2000. Comparison of genetic (co)variance matrices within and between Scabiosa canescens and S. columbaria. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 826835.
  • Weberling F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Widén B, Andersson S, Rao G-Y, Widen M. 2002. Population divergence of genetic (co)variance matrices in a subdivided plant species, Brassica cretica. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 961970.