SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aizen ML. 2003. Down-facing flowers, hummingbirds and rain. Taxon 52: 675680.
  • Armbruster WS, Pelabon C, Hansen TF, Mulder CPH. 2004. Floral integration and modularity: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In: PigliucciM, PrestonK, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2349.
  • Berg RL. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14: 171180.
  • Darwin C. 1885. The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects. London, UK: John Murray.
  • Donoghue MJ, Ree R, Baum DA. 1998. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends in Plant Sciences 3: 311317.
  • Endress PK. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 (6 Suppl.): S3S23.
  • Faegri K, Van der Pijl L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
  • Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Thomson JD, Dudash MR. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 375403.
  • Fenster CB, Cheely G, Reynolds RJ, Dudash MR. 2006. Nectar reward and advertisement in hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 18001807.
  • Fenster CB, Dudash MR. 2001. Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica (Caryophyllacaeae). Ecology 82: 844851.
  • Fulton M, Hodges SA. 1999. Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 266: 22472252.
  • Galen C, Stanton ML. 2003. Sunny-side up: flower heliotropism as a source of parental environmental effects on pollen quality and performance in the snow buttercup, Ranunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 724729.
  • Giurfa M, Dafni A, Neal PR. 1999. Floral symmetry and its role in plant–pollinator systems. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 (6 Suppl.): S41S50.
  • Gomez JM, Perfectti F, Camacho JPM. 2006. Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. American Naturalist 168: 531548.
  • Hansen TF, Carter AJR, Pelabon C. 2006. On adaptive accuracy and precision in natural populations. American Naturalist 168: 168181.
  • Hocking B, Sharplin D. 1965. Flower basking by arctic insects. Nature 206: 215.
  • Huang SQ, Takahashi Y, Dafni A. 2002. Why does the flower stalk of Pulsatilla cernua (Ranunculaceae) bend during anthesis? American Journal of Botany 89: 15991603.
  • Inouye D, Gill DE, Dudash MR, Fenster CB. 1994. A model and a lexicon for pollen fate. American Journal of Botany 12: 15171530.
  • Jordan CY, Harder LD. 2006. Manipulation of bee behavior by inflorescence architecture and its consequences for plant mating. American Naturalist 167: 496509.
  • Kevan PG. 1975. Sun-tracking solar furnaces in high arctic flowers: significance for pollination and insects. Science 189: 723726.
  • Neal PR, Anderson GJ. 2005. Are ‘mating systems’‘breeding systems’ of inconsistent and confusing terminology in plant reproductive biology? Or is it the other way around? Plant Systematics and Evolution 250: 173185.
  • Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M. 1998. Floral symmetry and its role in plant–pollinator systems: terminology, distribution and hypotheses. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 29: 245373.
  • Patiño S, Jeffree C, Grace J. 2002. The ecological role of orientation in tropical convolvulaceous flowers. Oecologia 130: 373379.
  • Reeves PA, Olmstead RG. 2003. Evolution of the TCP ene family in Asteridae: cladistic and network approaches to understanding regulatory gene family diversification and its impact on morphological evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 19972009.
  • Reynolds RJ, Westbrook MJ, Rhode AS, Cridland JM, Fenster CB, Dudash MR. 2009. Pollinator specialization and pollination syndromes of three related North American Silene. Ecology, in press.
  • Robertson C. 1888abc. Zygomorphy and its causes. I–III. Botanical Gazette 13: 146151, 203–208, 224–230.
  • Sargent RD. 2004. Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271: 603608.
  • Sprengel CK. 1793. Das entdeckte geheimniss der natur im bau und in der befruchtung der blumen. Berlin: Vieweg.
  • Stebbins GL. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sun JF, Gong YB, Renner SS, Huang SQ. 2008. Multifunctional bracts in the Dove tree Davidia involucrata (Nyssaceae: Cornales): Rain protection and pollinator attraction. American Naturalist 171: 119124.
  • Tadey M, Aizen MA. 2001. Why do flowers of a hummingbird-pollinated mistletoe face down? Functional Ecology 15: 782790.
  • Totland Ø. 1996. Flower heliotropism in an alpine population of Ranunculus acris (Ranunculaceae): effects on flower temperature, insect visitation, and seed production. American Journal of Botany 83: 452458.
  • Ushimaru A, Hyodo F. 2005. Why do bilaterally symmetrical flowers orient vertically? Flower orientation influences pollinator landing behaviour. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7: 252260.
  • Ushimaru A, Kawase D, Imamura A. 2006. Flowers adaptively face down-slope in 10 forest-floor herbs. Functional Ecology 20: 585591.
  • Vogel S. 1996. Christian Konrad Sprengel's theory of the flower: the cradle of floral ecology. In: LloydDG, BarrettSCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. (Transl. P. Haase.) New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 4462.
  • Warrick DR, Tobalske BW, Powers DR. 2005. Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird. Nature 435: 10941097.