SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerman JD. 2000. Abiotic pollen and pollination: ecological, functional, and evolutionary perspectives. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 167185.
  • Affre L, Thompson JD, Debussche M. 1995. The reproductive biology of the mediterranean endemic Cyclamen balearicum Willk. (Primulaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 118: 309330.
  • Aide TM. 1986. The influence of wind and animal pollination on variation in outcrossing rates. Evolution 40: 434435.
  • Barrett SCH, Eckert CG. 1990. Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In: KawanoS, ed. Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. London, UK: Academic Press, 229254.
  • Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Worley AC. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 351: 12711280.
  • Barrett SCH, Harder LD. 1996. Ecology and evolution of plant mating. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 7379.
  • Bosch M, Simon J, Molero J, Blanche C. 2001. Breeding systems in tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae) in the western Mediterranean area. Flora 196: 101113.
  • Bulmer MG, Taylor PD. 1980. Dispersal and the sex ratio. Nature 284: 448449.
  • Casper BB. 1982. The efficiency of pollen transfer and rates of embryo initiation in Cryptantha (Boraginaceae). Oecologia 59: 262268.
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 15: 5774.
  • Charnov EL. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76: 24802484.
  • Charnov EL. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Chouteau M, Barabe D, Gibernau M. 2006. A comparative study of inflorescence characters and pollen-ovule ratios among the genera Philodendron and Anthurium (Araceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 167: 817829.
  • Cruden RW. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 3246.
  • Cruden RW. 2000. Pollen grains: why so many? Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 143165.
  • Cruden RW, Lyon DL. 1989. Facultative xenogamy: Examination of a mixed mating system. In: BockJH, LinhartYB, eds. The evolutionary ecology of plants. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 171207.
  • Cruden RW, Miller-Ward S. 1981. Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen size, and the ratio of stigmatic area to the pollen-bearing area of the pollinator: an hypothesis. Evolution 35: 964974.
  • Darrault RO, Schlindwein C. 2005. Limited fruit production in Hancomia speciosa (Apocynaceae) and pollination by nocturnal and diurnal insects. Biotropica 37: 381388.
  • de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL, Rademaker MCJ. 1999. How geitonogamous selfing affects sex allocation in hermaphrodite plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 166176.
  • de Jong TJ, Van Batenburg FHD, van Dijk J. 2002. Seed sex ratio in dioecious plants depends on relative dispersal of pollen and seeds: an example using a chessboard simulation model. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 373379.
  • Erbar C, Langlotz M. 2005. Pollen to ovule ratios: standard or variation – a compilation. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 126: 71132.
  • Faegri K, Van der Pijl L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
  • Farris MA, Mitton JB. 1984. Population density, outcrossing rate, and heterozygote superiority in Ponderosa Pine. Evolution 38: 11511154.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125: 115.
  • Felsenstein J. 2004. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author.
  • Friedman J, Barrett SCH. 2008. A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of wind pollination in the angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 4958.
  • Gallardo R, Dominguez E, Munoz JM. 1994. Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen size, and breeding system in Astragalus (Fabaceae) subgenus Epiglottis – a pollen and seed allocation approach. American Journal of Botany 81: 16111619.
  • Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 4779.
  • Götzenberger L, Durka W, Kühn I, Klotz S. 2006. The relationship between the pollen-ovule ratio and seed size: a comparative test of a sex allocation hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8: 11011116.
  • Götzenberger L, Durka W, Kühn I, Klotz S. 2007. The relationship between the pollen-ovule ratio and pollen size: another comparative test of a sex allocation hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9: 11451161.
  • Götzenberger L, Kühn I, Klotz S. 2008. Effect of habitat disturbance and pollination type on the interspecific variation in pollen–ovule ratios. Preslia 80: 423437.
  • Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 326: 119157.
  • Hamilton WD. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156: 477488.
  • Harder LD. 1998. Pollen-size comparisons among animal-pollinated angiosperms with different pollination characteristics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 513525.
  • Harder LD, Johnson SD. 2008. Function and evolution of aggregated pollen in angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 5978.
  • Harder LD, Richards SA, Routley MB. 2008. Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites. Evolution 62: 157172.
  • Harder LD, Thomson JD. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. American Naturalist 133: 323344.
  • Honig MA, Linder HP, Bond WJ. 1992. Efficacy of wind pollination – pollen load size and natural microgametophyte populations in wind-pollinated Staberoha banksii (Restionaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 443448.
  • Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 5470.
  • Igic B, Kohn JR. 2006. The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 60: 10981103.
  • Ishida K. 2006. Maintenance of inbreeding depression in a highly self-fertilizing tree, Magnolia obovata Thunb. Evolutionary Ecology 20: 173191.
  • James EA, Knox RB. 1993. Reproductive biology of the Australian species of the genus Pandorea (Bignoniaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 41: 611626.
  • Johnston MO, Porcher E, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Kalisz S, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Vallejo-Marin M et al . 2009. Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants. American Naturalist 173: 111.
  • Jones FA, Chen J, Weng GJ, Hubbell SP. 2005. A genetic evaluation of seed dispersal in the neotropical tree Jacaranda copaia (Bignoniaceae). American Naturalist 166: 543555.
  • Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 2002. Pollen grain numbers, ovule numbers and pollen-ovule ratios in Caryophylloideae: correlation with breeding system, pollination, life form, style number, and sexual system. Sexual Plant Reproduction 14: 279289.
  • Klekowski EJ. 1988. Progressive cross-sterility and self-sterility associated with aging in fern clones and perhaps other plants. Heredity 61: 247253.
  • Klinkhamer PGL, deJong TJ, Metz H. 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12: 260265.
  • Koelewijn HP. 2004. Sibling competition, size variation and frequency dependent outcrossing advantage in Plantago coronopus. Evolutionary Ecology 18: 5174.
  • Linder HP. 1998. Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. In: OwensSJ, RudallPJ, eds. Reproductive biology in systematics, conservation and economic botany. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Garden, 123135.
  • Lloyd DG. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. In: DirzoR, SarukhanJ, eds. Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer, 277300.
  • Mac Nally R. 2000. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between and reconciliation of ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 655671.
  • Martins EP, Hansen TF. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. American Naturalist 149: 646667.
  • Mazer SJ, Delesalle VA. 1996. Floral trait variation in Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae): ontogenetic, maternal family, and population effects. Heredity 77: 269281.
  • Michalski SG, Durka W. 2007. High selfing and high inbreeding depression in peripheral populations of Juncus atratus. Molecular Ecology 16: 47154727.
  • Mione T, Anderson GJ. 1992. Pollen-ovule ratios and breeding system evolution in Solanum section Basarthrum (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 279287.
  • Ng SC, Corlett RT. 2000. Comparative reproductive biology of the six species of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) in Hong Kong, South China. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 221229.
  • Niklas KJ. 1985. The aerodynamics of wind pollination. The Botanical Review 51: 328386.
  • Olesen JM, Forfang AS, Baez M. 1998. Stress-induced male sterility and mixed mating in the island plant Cedronella canariensis (Lamiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 212: 159176.
  • Parachnowitsch AL, Elle E. 2004. Variation in sex allocation and male-female trade-offs in six populations of Collinsia parviflora (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). American Journal of Botany 91: 12001207.
  • Paradis E. 2006. Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R. New York, USA: Springer.
  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289290.
  • Plitmann U, Levin DA. 1990. Breeding systems in the Polemoniaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 170: 205214.
  • Pohl F. 1929. Beziehungen zwischen Pollenbeschaffenheit, Bestäubungsart und Fruchtknotenbau. Beihefte des Botanischen Centralblatts 46: 247285.
  • Pohl F. 1937. Die Pollenerzeugung der Windblütler. Beihefte des Botanischen Centralblatts 56: 365470.
  • Porcher E, Lande R. 2005. Reproductive compensation in the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytologist 166: 673684.
  • Preston RE. 1986. Pollen-ovule ratios in the Cruciferae. American Journal of Botany 73: 17321740.
  • Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Luh HK. 1994. Truth or consequences – effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. Journal of theoretical biology 167: 293300.
  • Queller DC. 1984. Pollen–ovule ratios and hermaphrodite sexual allocation strategies. Evolution 38 11481151.
  • Ramirez N, Seres A. 1994. Plant reproductive biology of herbaceous monocots in a Venezuelan tropical cloud forest. Plant Systematics and Evolution 190: 129142.
  • Ritland C, Ritland K. 1989. Variation of sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 76: 17311736.
  • Ross MD, Gregorius HR. 1983. Outcrossing and sex function in hermaphrodites – a resource allocation model. American Naturalist 121: 204222.
  • Roulston TH, Cane JH, Buchmann SL. 2000. What governs protein content of pollen: pollinator preferences, pollen-pistil interactions, or phylogeny? Ecological Monographs 70: 617643.
  • Routley MB, Mavraganis K, Eckert CG. 1999. Effect of population size on the mating system in a self-compatible, autogamous plant, Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Heredity 82: 518528.
  • Schoen DJ. 1977. Morphological, phenological, and pollen-distribution evidence of autogamy and xenogamy in Gilia achilleifolia (Polemoniaceae). Systematic Botany 2: 280286.
  • Scofield DG, Schultz ST. 2006. Mitosis, stature and evolution of plant mating systems: low-Phi and high-Phi plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273: 275282.
  • Sherry RA, Lord EM. 1996. Developmental stability in leaves of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae) as related to population outcrossing rates and heterozygosity. Evolution 50: 8091.
  • Smissen RD, Garnock-Jones RJ. 2002. Relationships, classification and evolution of Scleranthus (Caryophyllaceae) as inferred from analysis of morphological characters. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 1529.
  • Sneddon BV. 1999. The taxonomy and breeding system of Colobanthus squarrosus (Caryophyllaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 37: 195204.
  • Uma Shanker R, Ganeshaiah KN. 1984. Does pollination efficiency shape the pollen grain to ovule ratio? Current Science 53: 751753.
  • Vasek FC, Weng V. 1988. Breeding systems of Clarkia Sect. Phaeostoma (Onagraceae). 1. Pollen-ovule ratios. Systematic Botany 13: 336350.
  • Vogler DW, Kalisz S. 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55: 202204.
  • Walsh C, Mac Nally R. 2008. hier.part: hierarchical partitioning. R package. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hier.part/index.html
  • Wang YQ, Zhang DX, Chen ZY. 2004. Pollen histochemistry and pollen–ovule ratios in Zingiberaceae. Annals of Botany 94: 583591.
  • Warton D, Ormerod J. 2007. smatr: (Standardised) major axis estimation and testing routines. R package. Available at: http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~dwarton.
  • Warton DI, Weber NC. 2002. Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biometrical Journal 44: 161174.
  • Whitehead DR. 1969. Wind pollination in angiosperms: evolutionary and environmental considerations. Evolution 23: 2835.