Interspecific competition alters natural selection on shade avoidance phenotypes in Impatiens capensis

Authors

  • Brechann V. McGoey,

    1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S3B2, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • John R. Stinchcombe

    1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S3B2, Canada
    2. Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author

Author for correspondence:
John R. Stinchcombe
Tel: +1 416 946 5986
Email: john.stinchcombe@utoronto.ca

Summary

  • • Shade avoidance syndrome is a known adaptive response for Impatiens capensis growing in dense intraspecific competition. However, I. capensis also grow with dominant interspecific competitors in marshes. Here, we compare the I. capensis shade-avoidance phenotypes produced in the absence and presence of heterospecific competitors, as well as selection on those traits.
  • • Two treatments were established in a marsh; in one treatment all heterospecifics were removed, while in the other, all competitors remained. We compared morphological traits, light parameters, seed output and, using phenotypic selection analysis, examined directional and nonlinear selection operating in the different competitive treatments.
  • • Average phenotypes, light parameters and seed production all varied depending on competitive treatment. Phenotypic selection analyses revealed different directional, disruptive, stabilizing and correlational selection. The disparities seen in both phenotypes and selection between the treatments related to the important differences in elongation timing depending on the presence of heterospecifics, although environmental covariances between traits and fitness could also contribute.
  • • Phenotypes produced by I. capensis depend on their competitive environment, and differing selection on shade-avoidance traits between competitive environments could indirectly select for increased plasticity given gene flow between populations in different competitive contexts.

Ancillary