Evolving Darwin's ‘most wonderful’ plant: ecological steps to a snap-trap
Article first published online: 1 JUL 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02935.x
© The Authors (2009). Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
Issue

New Phytologist
Special Issue: Plant adaptation - following in Darwin's footsteps
Volume 183, Issue 3, pages 575–587, August 2009
Additional Information
How to Cite
Gibson, T. C. and Waller, D. M. (2009), Evolving Darwin's ‘most wonderful’ plant: ecological steps to a snap-trap. New Phytologist, 183: 575–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02935.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 JUL 2009
- Article first published online: 1 JUL 2009
- Received: 30 March 2009Accepted: 10 May 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Aldrovanda;
- Dionaea;
- Drosera;
- evolution of carnivory;
- snap-trap;
- Venus flytrap
Summary
Among carnivorous plants, Darwin was particularly fascinated by the speed and sensitivity of snap-traps in Dionaea and Aldrovanda. Recent molecular work confirms Darwin's conjecture that these monotypic taxa are sister to Drosera, meaning that snap-traps evolved from a ‘flypaper’ trap. Transitions include tentacles being modified into trigger hairs and marginal ‘teeth’, the loss of sticky tentacles, depressed digestive glands, and rapid leaf movement. Pre-adaptations are known for all these traits in Drosera yet snap-traps only evolved once. We hypothesize that selection to catch and retain large insects favored the evolution of elongate leaves and snap-tentacles in Drosera and snap-traps. Although sticky traps efficiently capture small prey, they allow larger prey to escape and may lose nutrients. Dionaea's snap-trap efficiently captures and processes larger prey providing higher, but variable, rewards. We develop a size-selective model and parametrize it with field data to demonstrate how selection to capture larger prey strongly favors snap-traps. As prey become larger, they also become rarer and gain the power to rip leaves, causing returns to larger snap-traps to plateau. We propose testing these hypotheses with specific field data and Darwin-like experiments. The complexity of snap-traps, competition with pitfall traps, and their association with ephemeral habitats all help to explain why this curious adaptation only evolved once.

1469-8137/asset/NPH_left.gif?v=1&s=08bb9ae88048d5716b3d3495e7b2fcfe48536ab2)