SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Almeida NF, Yan S, Lindeberg M, Studholme DJ, Schneider DJ, Condon B, Liu H, Viana CJ, Warren A, Evans C et al. 2009. A draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato T1 reveals a type III effector repertoire significantly divergent from that of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 22: 5262.
  • Atienza S, Jafary H, Niks RE. 2004. Accumulation of genes for susceptibility to rust fungi for which barley is nearly a nonhost results in two barley lines with extreme multiple susceptibility. Planta 220: 7179.
  • Block A, Li G, Fu Z, Alfano JR. 2008. Phytopathogen type III effector weaponry and their plant targets. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11: 396403.
  • Boyd LA, Smith PH, Foster EM, Brown LKM. 1996. Defence gene induction in barley in response to the development of powdery mildew fungi. In: KemaGHJ, NiksRE, DaamenRA, eds. Proc. of the 9th European and Mediterranean cereal rusts & powdery mildew conference. 2–6 September 1996, Lunteren, the Netherlands, 4043.
  • Carver TLW, Lyngkjær MF, Neyron L, Strudwicke CC. 1999. Induction of cellular accessibility and inaccessibility and suppression and potentiation of cell death in oat attacked by Blumeria graminis f.sp. avenae. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 55: 183196.
  • Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ. 2006. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 124: 803814.
  • Collinge DB, Jensen MK, Lyngkjaer MF, Rung J. 2008. How can we exploit functional genomics approaches for understanding the nature of plant defences? Barley as a case study European Journal of Plant Pathology 121: 257266.
  • Consonni C, Humphry ME, Hartmann HA, Livaja M, Durner J, Westphal L, Vogel J, Lipka V, Kemmerling B, Schulze-Lefert P et al. 2006. Conserved requirement for a plant host cell protein in powdery mildew pathogenesis. Nature Genetic 38: 716720.
  • Douchkov D, Nowara D, Zierold U, Schweizer P. 2005. A high-throughput gene-silencing system for the functional assessment of defense-related genes in barley epidermal cells. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18: 755761.
  • Eichmann R, Schultheiss H, Kogel KH, Hückelhoven R. 2004. The barley apoptosis suppressor homologue bax inhibitor-1 compromises nonhost penetration resistance of barley to the inappropriate pathogen Blumeria graminis f. sp tritici. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 17: 484490.
  • Eshed N, Wahl I. 1970. Host ranges and interrelations of Erysiphe graminis hordei, E. graminis tritici, and E. graminis avenae. Phytopathology 60: 628634.
  • Hardison JR. 1944. Specialization of pathogenicity in Erysiphe graminis on wild and cultivated grasses. Phytopathology 34: 120.
  • Heath MC. 2000. Nonhost resistance and nonspecific plant defences. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 315319.
  • van der Hoorn RAL, Kamoun S. 2008. From guard to decoy: a new model for perception of plant pathogen effectors. Plant Cell 20: 20092017.
  • Hückelhoven R. 2007. Cell wall-associated mechanisms of disease resistance and susceptibility. Annual Review of Phytopathology 45: 101127.
  • Hückelhoven R, Dechert C, Kogel KH. 2001. Non-host resistance of barley is associated with hydrogen peroxide burst at sites of attempted penetration by wheat powdery mildew fungus. Molecular Plant Pathology 2: 199205.
  • Jafary H, Szabo LJ, Niks RE. 2006. Innate nonhost immunity in barley to different heterologous rust fungi is controlled by sets of resistance genes with different and overlapping specificities. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 19: 12701279.
  • Jafary H, Albertazzi G, Marcel TC, Niks RE. 2008. High diversity of genes for nonhost resistance of barley to heterologous rust fungi. Genetics 178: 23272339.
  • Koga H, Bushnell WR, Zeyen RJ. 1990. Specificity of cell type and timing of events associated with papilla formation and the hypersensitive reaction in leaves of Hordeum vulgare attacked by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 23442352.
  • Lin MR, Edwards HH. 1974. Primary penetration process in powdery mildewed barley related to host cell age, cell type, and occurrence of basic staining material. New Phytologist 73: 131137.
  • Lipka V, Dittgen J, Bednarek P, Bhat R, Wiermer M, Stein M, Landtag J, Brandt W, Rosahl S, Scheel D et al. 2005. Pre- and postinvasion defences both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 310: 11801183.
  • Lyngkjær MF, Carver TLW. 1999. Induced accessibility and inaccessibility to Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei in barley epidermal cells attacked by a compatible isolate. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 55: 151162.
  • Mains EB, Dietz SM. 1930. Physiologic forms of barley mildew, Erysiphe graminis hordei Marchal. Phytopathology 20: 229239.
  • Marcel TC, Varshney RK, Barbieri M, Jafary H, de Kock MJD, Graner A, Niks RE. 2007. A high-density consensus map of barley to compare the distribution of QTLs for partial resistance to Puccinia hordei and of defense gene homologues. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 487500.
  • Menzies JG, MacNeill BH. 1989. Infection of species of the Gramineae by Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei and Erysiphe graminis f.sp. tritici. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 69: 105108.
  • Miklis M, Consonni C, Bhat RA, Lipka V, Schulze-Lefert P, Panstruga R. 2007. Barley mlo modulates actin-dependent and actin-independent antifungal defense pathways at the cell periphery. Plant Physiology 144: 11321143.
  • Mysore KS, Ryu CM. 2004. Nonhost resistance: how much do we know? Trends in Plant Science 9: 97104.
  • Niks RE, Marcel TC. 2009. Non-host and basal resistance: how to explain specificity? New Phytologist 182: 817828.
  • Nürnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B., Piater L. 2004. Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunological Reviews 198: 249266.
  • O’Connell RJ, Panstruga R. 2006. Tête à tête inside the plant cell: establishing compatibility between plants and biotrophic fungi and oomycetes. New Phytologist 171: 699718.
  • Olesen KL, Carver TLW, Lyngkjær MF. 2003. Fungal suppression of resistance against inappropriate Blumeria graminis formae speciales in barley, oat and wheat. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 62: 3750.
  • Peterhänsel C, Freialdenhoven A, Kurth J, Kolsch R, Schulze-Lefert P. 1997. Interaction analyses of genes required for resistance responses to powdery mildew in barley reveal distinct pathways leading to leaf cell death. Plant Cell 9: 13971409.
  • Schweizer P. 2007. Nonhost resistance of plants to powdery mildew- New opportunities to unravel the mystery. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 70: 37.
  • Thordal-Christensen H. 2003. Fresh insights into processes of non-host resistance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6: 351357.
  • Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Collinge DB. 1997. Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants: H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant Journal 11: 11871194.
  • Tosa Y. 1989. Genetic analysis of the avirulence of wheatgrass powdery mildew fungus on commons wheat. Genome 32: 913917.
  • Tosa Y, Shishiyama J. 1984. Defense reactions of barley cultivars to an inappropriate forma specialis of the powdery mildew fungus of gramineous plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 21142117.
  • Trujillo M, Troeger M, Niks RE, Kogel KH, Hückelhoven R. 2004. Mechanistic and genetic overlap of barley host and non-host resistance to Blumeria graminis. Molecular Plant Pathology 5: 389396.
  • Wolf G, Frič F. 1981. A rapid method for staining Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei in and on whole barley leaves with a protein-specific dye. Phytopathology 71: 596598.