Effects of plant sex on range distributions and allocation to reproduction
Article first published online: 17 FEB 2010
© The Authors (2010). Journal compilation © New Phytologist Trust (2010)
Volume 186, Issue 3, pages 769–779, May 2010
How to Cite
Johnson, M. T. J., Smith, S. D. and Rausher, M. D. (2010), Effects of plant sex on range distributions and allocation to reproduction. New Phytologist, 186: 769–779. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03201.x
- Issue published online: 13 APR 2010
- Article first published online: 17 FEB 2010
- Received: 12 October 2009, Accepted: 17 December 2009
- background selection;
- evolution of sex;
- red queen;
- sex allocation;
- •Despite an abundance of theory, few empirical studies have explored the ecological and evolutionary consequences of sex. We used a comparative phylogenetic approach to examine whether transitions between sexual and asexual reproduction are associated with changes in the size and distribution of species’ geographical ranges, and their investment in reproduction.
- •Here, we reconstructed the phylogeny of the genus Oenothera sections Oenothera and Calylophus (Onagraceae), which contain 35 sexual and 30 functionally asexual species. From each species, we collected data on the geographical distribution and variation in plant traits related to reproduction.
- •Functionally asexual species occurred at higher latitudes, but did not differ in range size, compared with sexual species. Transitions to asexuality were associated with decreased investment in floral structures, including the length of petals, floral tubes and styles. Decreased anther size and increased seed size within asexual species also suggest altered allocation to male and female fitness.
- •The observed range shifts are consistent with superior colonization of environments by asexual species following glaciation, and the observed changes in reproductive allocation support predictions made by models relating to the evolution of selfing. Our results suggest that the evolutionary consequences of asexual reproduction might be less restrictive than previously thought.