SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bertness MD, Callaway R. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 191192.
  • Bruno JF, Fridley JD, Bromberg KD, Bertness MD. 2005. Insights into biotic interactions from studies of species invasions. In: SaxDF, GainesSD, StachowiczJJ, eds. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer, 1340.
  • Closset-Kopp D, Chabrerie O, Valentin B, Delachapelle H, Decocq G. 2007. When Oskar meets Alice: does a lack of trade-off in r/K-strategies make Prunus serotina a successful invader of European forests. Forest Ecology and Management 247: 120130.
  • D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 23: 6387.
  • Dehlin H, Peltzer DA, Allison VJ, Yeates GW, Nilsson M-C, Wardle DA. 2008. Tree seedling performance and below-ground properties in stands of invasive and native tree species. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 32: 6779.
  • Lin C. 2000. Plant blue-light receptors. Trends in Plant Science 5: 337342.
  • Martin PH, Canham CD. 2010. Dispersal and recruitment limitation in native versus exotic tree species: life-history strategies and Janzen-Connell effects. Oikos 119: 807824.
  • Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL. 2008. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 142149.
  • Pagès J-P, Pache G, Joud D, Magnan N, Michalet R. 2003. Direct and indirect effects of shade on four forest tree seedlings in the French Alps. Ecology 84: 27412750.
  • Reinhart KO, Gurnee J, Tirado R, Callaway RM. 2006. Invasion through quantitative effects: Intense shade drives native decline and invasive success. Ecological Applications 16: 18211831.
  • Saccone P, Pagès J-P, Girel J, Brun J-J, Michalet R. 2010. Acer negundo invasion along a successional gradient: early direct facilitation by natives and late indirect facilitation by conspecifics. New Phytologist 187: 831842.
  • Simberloff D. 2004. Community ecology: is it time to move on? American Naturalist 163: 787799.
  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B. 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1: 2132.
  • Smith H. 1982. Light quality, photoperception and plant strategy. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33: 481518.
  • Smith H. 2000. Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants – an emerging synthesis. Nature 407: 585591.
  • Valladares F, Niinemets U. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 39: 237257.