SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 274284.
  • Barrett SCH. 2010. Darwin’s legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of flowers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 365: 351368.
  • Bernardello G. 2007. A systematic survey of floral nectaries In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E eds. Nectaries and Nectar. Dordretch, Germany: Springer, 19128.
  • Bohs L, Weese T, Myers N, Lefgren V, Thomas N, Wagenen AV, Stern S. 2007. Zygomorphy and heteranthery in Solanum in a phylogenetic context. Acta Horticulture 745: 201224.
  • Bowers KAW. 1975. The pollination ecology of Solanum rostratum (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 62: 633638.
  • Bremer B, Bremer K, Chase MW, Fay MF, Reveal JL, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Stevens PF, Anderberg AA, Moore MJ et al. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105121.
  • Buchmann SL. 1983. Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In: Jones CE, Little RJ, eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. New York, NY, USA: Scientific and Academic Editions, 73113.
  • D’Arcy WG, Keating RC, eds. 1995. The anther: form, function and phylogeny. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London, UK: John Murray.
  • Darwin F. 1899. The botanical work of Darwin. Annals of Botany 13: ixxix.
  • Davies TJ, Barraclough TG, Chase MW, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Savolainen V. 2004. Darwin’s abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 19041909.
  • Dulberger R. 1981. The floral biology of Cassia didymobotrya and Cassia auriculata (Caesalpiniaceae). American Journal of Botany 68: 13501360.
  • Dulberger R, Ornduff R. 1980. Floral morphology and reproductive biology of 4 species of Cyanella (Tecophilaeaceae). New Phytologist 86: 45.
  • Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Endress PK. 1996. Diversity and evolutionary trends in angiosperm anthers. In: D’Arcy WG, Keating RC, eds. The anther: form, function and phylogeny. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 92110.
  • Endress PK. 1997. Relationships between floral organization, architecture, and pollination mode in Dillenia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 206: 99118.
  • Forbes HO. 1882. Two kinds of stamens with different functions in the same flower. Nature 26: 386.
  • Gao JY, Ren PY, Yang ZH, Li QJ. 2006. The pollination ecology of Paraboea rufescens (Gesneriaceae): a buzz-pollinated tropical herb with mirror-image flowers. Annals of Botany 97: 371376.
  • Graham SW, Barrett SCH. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of Pontederiales: implications for breeding-system evolution. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew, UK: Royal Botanical Gardens, 415441.
  • Gross CL. 1993. The breeding system and pollinators of Melastoma affine (Melastomataceae): a pioneer shrub in tropical Australia. Biotropica 25: 468474.
  • Harder LD, Wilson WG. 1998. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. The American Naturalist 152: 684695.
  • Hargreaves AL, Harder LD, Johnson SD. 2009. Consumptive emasculation: the ecological and evolutionary consequences of pollen theft. Biological Reviews 84: 259276.
  • Harris JA, Kuchs OM. 1902. Observations on the pollination of Solanum rostratum Dunal and Cassia chamaecrista L. Kansas University Science Bulletin 1: 1541.
  • Jesson LK, Barrett SCH. 2003. The comparative biology of mirror-image flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: S237S249.
  • Laporta C. 2005. Floral biology and reproductive system of enantiostylous Senna corymbosa (Caesalpiniaceae). Revista De Biologia Tropical 53: 4961.
  • Levin RA, Myers NR, Bohs L. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among the “spiny solanums” (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 157169.
  • Lloyd DG. 1992. Evolutionary stable strategies of reproduction in plants: who benefits and how? In: Wyatt R, ed. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 137168.
  • Luo Z, Zhang D, Renner SS. 2008. Why two kinds of stamens in buzz-pollinated flowers? Experimental support for Darwin’s division-of-labour hypothesis. Functional Ecology 22: 794800.
  • Luo ZL, Gu L, Zhang DX. 2009. Intrafloral differentiation of stamens in heterantherous flowers. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 47: 4356.
  • Marazzi B, Endress PK. 2008. Patterns and development of floral asymmetry in Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae). American Journal of Botany 95: 2240.
  • Müller F. 1883. Two kinds of stamens with different functions in the same flower. Nature 27: 364365.
  • Müller H. 1881. Two kinds of stamens with different functions in the same flower. Nature 24: 307308.
  • Pagel M, Meade A. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. The American Naturalist 167: 808825.
  • Pagel MD. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 255: 3745.
  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289290.
  • Renner SS. 1989. A survey of reproductive biology in Neotropical Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 76: 496518.
  • Simpson MG. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of the Haemodoraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77: 722784.
  • Stevens WD, Ulloa Ulloa M, Pool A, Montiel OM, eds. 2001. Flora de Nicaragua. II. (Fabaceae-Oxalidaceae). St Louis, MI, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden.
  • Tang LL, Huang SQ. 2007. Evidence for reductions in floral attractants with increased selfing rates in two heterandrous species. New Phytologist 175: 588595.
  • Vallejo-Marín M, Manson JS, Thomson JD, Barrett SCH. 2009. Division of labour within flowers: heteranthery, a floral strategy to reconcile contrasting pollen fates. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 828839.
  • Vogel S. 1978. Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers. In: Richards AJ, ed. The pollination of flowers by insects. London, UK: Academic Press, 8996.
  • Whalen MD. 1979. Taxonomy of Solanum section Androceras. Gentes Herbarum 11: 359426.
  • Zomlefer WB. 1994. Flowering plant families. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press.