Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms.
Ecological trade-offs between jasmonic acid-dependent direct and indirect plant defences in tritrophic interactions
Article first published online: 11 OCT 2010
© The Authors (2010). Journal compilation © New Phytologist Trust (2010)
Volume 189, Issue 2, pages 557–567, January 2011
How to Cite
Wei, J., Wang, L., Zhao, J., Li, C., Ge, F. and Kang, L. (2011), Ecological trade-offs between jasmonic acid-dependent direct and indirect plant defences in tritrophic interactions. New Phytologist, 189: 557–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03491.x
- Issue published online: 22 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 11 OCT 2010
- Received: 15 April 2010, Accepted: 24 August 2010
Fig. S1 Photographs of larval leafminers collected from three tomato genotypes.
Fig. S2 Liriomyza huidobrensis performance on three tomato genotypes.
Table S1 The mean number of larvae (mean ± SEM) per plant used in different experiments
Table S2 Presence of volatile compounds released from undamaged plants (UDPs) and L. huidobrensis larvae-damaged plants (Lh-LDPs) of three tomato genotypes
Table S3 Presence of volatile compounds released from 0.5% alcohol-treated plants (ALPs) and jasmonic acid-treated plants (JAPs) of three tomato genotypes
Table S4 Statistical analysis of total volatile emissions among genotypes or between the undamaged and leafminer-infested plants, or between 0.5% alcohol-treated (jasmonic acid (JA) controls) and JA-treated tomato plants
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.
|NPH_3491_sm_FigsS1-2.doc||549K||Supporting info item|
|NPH_3491_sm_TablesS1-4.doc||121K||Supporting info item|