SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Becerra JX. 2003. Synchronous coadaptation in an ancient case of herbivory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 1280412807.
  • Becerra JX. 2005. Timing the origin and expansion of the Mexican tropical dry forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 1091910923.
  • Brown DE, Unmack PJ, Brennan TC. 2007. Digitized map of biotic communities for plotting and comparing distributions of North American animals. The Southwestern Naturalist. 52: 610616.
  • Cevallos-Ferriz SRS, González-Torres EA. 2005. Geological setting and phytodiversity in Mexico. In: Vega J, ed. Studies on Mexican paleontology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 118.
  • Chan KMA, Moore BR. 2002. Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversification rates. Systematic Biology 51: 855865.
  • Chan KMA, Moore BR. 2005. SYMMETREE: whole-tree analysis of differential diversification rates. Bioinformatics 21: 17091710.
  • Collinson M. 1983. Fossil plants of the London Clay. Palaeontological association field guides to fossils No. 1. London, UK: The Palaeontological Association.
  • CONABIO. 2008. Capital natural de México, vol. I: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad. Ciudad de México, Mexico: CONABIO.
  • Dick CW, Wright J. 2005. Tropical mountain cradles of dry forest diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 1075710758.
  • Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
  • Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 113.
  • Gentry AH. 1982a. Neotropical floristic diversity: phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean orogeny? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69: 557593.
  • Gentry AH. 1982b. Patterns of neotropical plant species diversity. Evolutionary Biology 15: 184.
  • Gentry AH. 1995. Divdersity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E, eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 146194.
  • Goloboff P. 1999. NONA, version 2. Tucumán, Argentina: Published by the author.
  • Graham A. 2010. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of Latin American vegetation and terrestrial environments. St Louis, MO, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
  • Graham A, Dilcher D. 1995. The Cenozoic record of tropical dry forest in northern Latin America and the southern United States. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E, eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 124141.
  • Hernández F. 1942. Historia de las plantas de Nueva España. Tomos I–III. México D.F., México: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754755.
  • Irwin DE. 2002. Phylogeographic breaks without geographic barriers to gene flow. Evolution 56: 23832394.
  • Lavin M. 2006. Floristic and geographic stability of discontinuous seasonally dry tropical forests explains patterns of plant phylogeny and endemism. In: Pennington RT, Lewis GP, Ratter JA, eds. Neotropical savannas and seasonally dry forests: plant biodiversity, biogeography and conservation. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 433447.
  • Lavin M, Schrire BD, Lewis G, Pennington RT, Delgado-Salinas A, Thulin M, Hughes CE, Matos AB, Wojciechowski MF. 2004. Metacommunity processes rather than continental tectonic history better explain geographically structured phylogenies in legumes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359: 15091522.
  • Lavin M, Wojciechowski MF, Gasson P, Hughes CE, Wheeler E. 2003. Phylogeny of robinioid legumes (Fabaceae) revisited: Coursetia and Gliricidia recircumscribed, and a biogeographical appraisal of the Caribbean endemics. Systematic Botany 28: 387409.
  • León de la Luz JÑ, Pérez-Navarro JJ. 2010. Dos nuevos taxa de Bursera (Burseraceae) de Baja California Sur, México. Acta Botánica Mexicana 91: 3749.
  • Linares-Palomino R, Oliveira-Filho AT, Pennington RT. 2011. Neotropical seasonally dry forests: diversity, endemism and biogeography of woody plants. In: Dirzo R, Mooney H, Ceballos G, Young H, eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests: biology and conservation. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 321.
  • Lott EJ, Atkinson TH. 2006. Mexican and Central American seasonally dry tropical forests: Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco, as a focal point for comparision. In: Pennington RT, Lewis GP, Ratter JA, eds. Neotropical savannas and seasonally dry forests: plant biodiversity, biogeography and conservation. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 315342.
  • Lott EJ, Bullock SH, Solis-Magallanes JA. 1987. Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco. Biotropica 19: 228235.
  • Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2005. MacClade 4. Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2010. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.74. [WWW document]. URL http://mesquiteproject.org [accessed 12 April 2010].
  • Magallón S, Castillo A. 2009. Angiosperm diversification through time. American Journal of Botany 96: 349365.
  • Magallón S, Sanderson MJ. 2001. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55: 17621780.
  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853858.
  • Nixon KC. 2002. WinClada, version 1.00.08. Ithaca, NY, USA: Published by the author.
  • Pennington RT, Lavin M, Oliveira-Filho A. 2009. Woody plant diversity, evolution and ecology in the tropics: perspectives from seasonally dry tropical forests. The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 437457.
  • Pennington RT, Lavin M, Prado DE, Pendry CA, Pell S, Butterworth CA. 2004. Historical climate change and speciation: Neotropical seasonally dry forest plants show patterns of both Tertiary and Quaternary diversification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359: 515538.
  • Pirie MD, Klitgaard BB, Pennington RT. 2009. Revision and biogeography of Centrolobium (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). Systematic Botany 34: 345559.
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817818.
  • Quental TB, Marshall CR. 2009. Extinctions during evolutionary radiations: reconciling the fossil record with molecular phylogenies. Evolution 63: 31583167.
  • Rabosky DL. 2006a. Likelihood methods for inferring temporal shifts in diversification rates. Evolution 60: 11521164.
  • Rabosky DL. 2006b. LASER: a maximum likelihood toolkit for detecting temporal shifts in diversification rates from molecular phylogenies. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 2: 257260.
  • Rambaut A. 2002. SE-AL v.2.0a11: sequence alignment editor. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal .
  • Rosell JA, Olson ME, Weeks A, De-Nova JA, Medina-Lemos R, Pérez-Camacho J, Feria TP, Gómez-Bermejo R, Montero JC, Eguiarte LE. 2010. Diversification in species complexes: tests of species origin and delimitation in the Bursera simaruba clade of tropical trees (Burseraceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 798811.
  • Rzedowski J. 1962. Contribuciones a la fitogeografía florística e histórica de México. I. Algunas consideraciones acerca del elemento endémico en la flora mexicana. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 27: 5265.
  • Rzedowski J, Calderón de Rzedowski G. 2008. Dos especies nuevas de Bursera (Burseraceae) del estado de Oaxaca (México). Acta Botánica Mexicana 82: 7585.
  • Schrire BD, Lavin M, Barker NP, Forest F. 2009. Phylogeny of the tribe Indigofereae (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae): geographically structured more in succulent-rich and temperate settings than in grass rich environments. American Journal of Botany 96: 816852.
  • Sessé M, Mociño JM. 1887. Plantae Novae Hispaniae. Ciudad de México, Mexico: Oficina Tipográfica de la Secretaría de Fomento.
  • Toledo Manzur CA. 1982. El género Bursera (Burseraceae) en el estado de Guerrero. BSc dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., México.
  • Trejo I, Dirzo R. 2002. Floristic diversity of Mexican seasonally dry tropical forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 20632084.
  • Villaseñor JL. 2004. Los géneros de plantas vasculares de la flora de México. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 75: 105135.
  • Webb CO. 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. American Naturalist 156: 145155.
  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24: 20982100.
  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 475505.
  • Weeks A, Daly DC, Simpson BB. 2005. The phylogenetic history and biogeography of the frankincense and myrrh family (Burseraceae) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 85101.
  • Weeks A, Simpson BB. 2007. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Commiphora (Burseraceae) yields insight on the evolution and historical biogeography of an “impossible” genus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42: 6279.
  • Wiens JJ, Graham CH, Moen DS, Smith SA, Reeder TW. 2006. Evolutionary and ecological causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs: treefrog trees unearth the roots of high tropical diversity. American Naturalist 168: 579596.
  • Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL. 2004. AWTY: a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference [WWW document]. URL http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty [accessed 5 May 2010].