Notice: Wiley Online Library will be unavailable on Saturday 27th February from 09:00-14:00 GMT / 04:00-09:00 EST / 17:00-22:00 SGT for essential maintenance. Apologies for the inconvenience.
•Fusion of floral carpels (syncarpy) in angiosperms is thought to have allowed for significant improvements in offspring quantity and quality in syncarpous species over gymnosperms and apocarpous (free-carpelled) angiosperms. Given the disadvantages of apocarpy, it remains an evolutionary puzzle why many angiosperm lineages with free carpels (apocarpy) have been so successful and why some lineages show reversals to apocarpy.
•To investigate whether some advantages of syncarpy may accrue in other ways to apocarpous species, we reviewed previous studies of pollen-tube growth in apocarpous species and also documented pollen-tube growth in nine additional apocarpous species in six families.
•Anatomical studies of a scattering of apocarpous paleodicots, monocots, and eudicots show that, after transiting the style, ‘extra’ pollen tubes exit fully fertilized carpels and grow to other carpels with unfertilized ovules. In many species this occurs via openings in the simple carpels, as we report here for Sagittaria potamogetifolia, Sagittaria pygmaea, Sedum lineare, and Schisandra sphenanthera.
•The finding that extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth is widespread in apocarpous species eliminates the possibility of a major fitness cost of apocarpy relative to syncarpy and may help to explain the persistence of, and multiple reversals to, apocarpy in the evolutionary history of angiosperms.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Flowering plants (angiosperms) are today the most diverse and ecologically important group of land plants world-wide. They achieved global dominance over gymnosperms during the Cretaceous and early Tertiary, and have formed the foundation of nearly all terrestrial ecosystems ever since. In considering features responsible for angiosperm success, carpel closure (and concomitant germination of pollen on stigmas rather than ovule micropyles) and carpel fusion (syncarpy) are commonly invoked as among the most important key innovations (Stebbins, 1974; Mulcahy, 1979; Endress, 2001). These features, in combination with animal pollination, are thought to be partly responsible for angiosperms gradually displacing gymnosperms as the dominant photosynthetic organisms on land (Regal, 1977; Mulcahy, 1979; Carr & Carr, 1961; Stebbins, 1974; Endress, 1982, 2001; Armbruster et al., 2002; but see Bond, 1989; Berendse & Scheffer, 2009 for additional hypotheses).
Adaptive explanations for the frequency of transitions to syncarpy and their contribution to angiosperm success have focused on enhanced physical protection of the ovules and economy of ovary construction (Stebbins, 1974), greater floral precision in pollination (Armbruster et al., 2002, 2009), improved dispersal capacity (Stebbins, 1974; Endress, 1982), intensified pollen competition (Endress, 1982; Williams et al., 1993; Armbruster et al., 2002), and fertilization of a larger proportion of the ovules (‘pollen-tube dispersion’; Carr & Carr, 1961; Endress, 1982; Armbruster et al., 2002). Recent research has suggested that improvements in the number and quality of offspring through pollen-tube dispersion and intensified pollen competition are probably the most important factors (Endress, 1982; Armbruster et al., 2002). However, all analyses of the evolutionary trends in, and adaptive significance of, syncarpy are based on the assumption that movement of pollen tubes between separate carpels is impossible when carpels are physically isolated (apocarpy), except when there is obvious adhesion of stigmas or secretions between them (‘extra-gynoecial compita’; Endress, 1982; Endress et al., 1983). New research calls this assumption into question and may force us to change our ideas about the evolution of carpel fusion in angiosperms.
One question to arise from the adaptive analysis of syncarpy is that, if syncarpy is so advantageous, why do so many angiosperms (c. 20%; Soltis et al., 2005) lack syncarpy and why have there been multiple reversals to apocarpy (Endress, 2001, 2011; Armbruster et al., 2002; Endress & Doyle, 2009; Rudall et al., 2011)? Further, if a major advantage of angiosperms over gymnosperms accrued through syncarpy (Mulcahy, 1979; Endress, 1982), why did apocarpous angiosperms diversify, possibly at the expense of the gymnosperm? We suggest that the advantages of increased fertilization and pollen competition normally associated with syncarpy may accrue also to many apocarpous plants by virtue of having cryptic routes of pollen-tube communication between carpels (extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth (EGPG)). More specifically, infra-stylar EGPG has been largely overlooked and presents adaptive advantages not seen in the more widely observed supra-stylar EGPG.
Previous studies have shown unusual pollen-tube growth in a few aquatic plants, for example, pollen tubes growing into receptacle, pedicel, or even stem tissues (Philbrick, 1984; Wang et al., 2002, 2006; Huang, 2003). Other studies have shown unusual pollen-tube growth patterns in cleistogamous flowers, where pollen germinates in undehisced anthers and tubes grow down the filaments and receptacle to the carpels (Anderson, 1980; Márquez-Guzmán et al., 1993). One study of a basal angiosperm showed pollen-tube communication (EGPG) between free carpels via the ‘apical residuum’ or receptacle (Williams et al., 1993). Finally, many additional angiosperms, especially in the basal paleodicots, have EGPG, where tubes grow between carpels before, or without, transiting the style (see Endress & Igersheim, 2000). We call this supra-stylar and extra-stylar EGPG, respectively. Such unexpected pollen-tube behavior has been largely regarded as exceptional, solving special fertilization problems (but see Endress & Igersheim, 1997, 1999, 2000). However, if pollen tubes commonly surmount physical barriers to pass between free carpels, we would have to re-evaluate not only major evolutionary trends in angiosperms (see Endress & Doyle, 2009), but also the adaptive significance of the numerous independent origins (and reversals) of syncarpy and the role of syncarpy as a key innovation in the diversification and success of angiosperms.
Here we examined nine apocarpous species in six families to assess whether apocarpy generally precludes pollen-tube growth to unfertilized ovules in other carpels or whether, instead, EGPG is common and widespread. We were particularly interested in whether pollen tubes passed between carpels (EGPG) before or after travelling down the styles. We therefore investigated in detail the routes of pollen-tube growth and examined carpel anatomy in these species to explore why pollen tubes can grow between carpels in some species but not in others. Our survey reveals that infra-stylar EGPG is widespread, with about half of the apocarpous species surveyed showing this pattern of inter-carpellary fertilization. This observation, in combination with previous published work, forces us to re-evaluate the commonly cited advantages of morphological syncarpy and may provide an explanation for the frequency of reversals from syncarpy to apocarpy in flowering plants.
Materials and Methods
To examine the possibility of extra-gynoecial growth of pollen tubes in apocarpous species generally, we surveyed pollen-tube growth pathway and carpel anatomy in nine species in the Alismataceae (Sagittaria potamogetifolia Merr. and Sagittaria pygmaea Miq.), Crassulaceae (Sedum lineare Thunb.), Cabombaceae (Cabomba caroliniana L.), Ranunculaceae (Ranunculus ternatus Thunb. and Ranunculus sieboldii Miq.), Rosaceae (Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke and Rosa multiflora var. cathayensis), and Schisandraceae (Schisandra sphenanthera Rehd. et Wils.).
Using the same methods (see the `Observations of pollen-tube growth' section below) as in the survey, we also examined one species, S. potamogetifolia, in greater detail. This species is an herbaceous, aquatic monocot, endemic to southeast China (Chen, 1989). It is monoecious, with female (pistillate) flowers in a basal whorl of racemes blooming earlier and numerous male flowers blooming later. As in other Sagittaria (arrowheads), each whorl generally has three flowers, each bearing three white petals. The gynoecia of the female flowers comprise c. 160 separate carpels on a globose receptacle, and the androecia of male flowers comprise c. 20 stamens (Wang et al., 2002). Carpels are uniovulate and flattened, with short, papillate, stigmatic crests. This species is summer-flowering and insect-pollinated, and single flowers last 1 d. Forty individuals were collected from a population in a marsh in Chaling County, Hunan Province, China (26°50′N, 113°40′E) and established in a glasshouse at Wuhan University, Wuhan.
Observations of pollen-tube growth
We used the aniline-blue fluorescence method (see Williams et al., 1993) to observe the routes of pollen-tube growth. We bagged single inflorescences before the female flowers opened. When petals of the female flowers opened and the gynoecia were exposed, we hand-pollinated a subset of stigmas using fresh pollen from another plant. The mix of pollinated and unpollinated carpels in a single flower allowed us to assess the potential for intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes (EGPG; i.e. detect those tubes coming from pollen on stigmas of other carpels). Gynoecia were collected 5 h after pollination and were fixed in formalin–acetic acid–alcohol (FAA), and then rinsed with water, cleared and stained with aniline blue. In addition to making cross-sections by hand to observe (under an epifluorescence microscope) pollen-tube growth within the apocarpous gynoecia (Wang et al., 2002), we also carefully removed the pistils from the receptacle and made thin sections of the receptacle in order to observe pollen-tube growth between separate carpels.
The standard paraffin-embedding method was used to obtain longitudinal sections of the pistils to show the transmitting tissue of the carpel, and the route of pollen-tube growth between carpels. Serial sections of thickness 10 μm were taken and stained with safranin–fast green and observed under a light microscope. Studies have suggested that the extracellular matrix (ECM) of transmitting tissue in carpels is associated with intercarpellary growth of pollen tubes (Lyew et al., 2007). To detect ECM through the carpels, we used a semi-thin sectioning method to observe transverse sections from the six positions of the mature gynoecia of S. potamogetifolia. Opened flowers from the bagged inflorescences were randomly picked and fixed, dehydrated and embedded. The embedded samples were sectioned with a glass knife to a thickness of 1 μm. The sections were stained with 0.5% toluidine blue (Wang et al., 2006).
The literature on EGPG was compiled and the type of EGPG classified and tabulated (see reviews in Armbruster et al., 2002; Huang, 2003; Endress & Doyle, 2009 and original studies cited in Table 3). Intra- and extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth and the recognized types of EGPG were optimized onto a pruned angiosperm phylogeny based on the representative angiosperm molecular trees published in Soltis et al. (2005) and combined molecular-morphological trees published in Endress & Doyle (2009).
Pollen-tube growth in Sagittaria potamogetifolia
Virtually all pollen grains deposited on a stigma germinated, and the pollen tubes grew through the transmitting tissue to the ovule. When numerous pollen tubes arrived at the basal part of one ovary, one or two pollen tubes could be seen growing toward the ovule, but only one pollen tube tip entered the embryo sac through the micropyle (Fig. 1a). Other pollen tubes were observed growing through the ovary base or otherwise failing to orient to the ovule and were seen wandering near the ovule. Some tubes were observed to pass into and across the receptacle to enter ovules in nearby ovaries (if these ovules were not already occupied by pollen tubes). Typically, the tubes entered the surface layer of receptacle tissue, turned to the basal part of another carpel, and entered the ovule (Fig. 1b). Observing the receptacle from which pistils had been removed, we found a network of pollen tubes stretching across the surface of the receptacle. Pollen tubes grew between carpel attachment points, with some twisting on the surface of the receptacle and some successfully entering the carpels (Fig. 1c), and (seen in other preparations) the embryo sac. This behavior results in fertilization of otherwise unfertilized ovules and should thus increase seed set.
Structure of the gynoecium in Sagittaria potamogetifolia
Longitudinal sections of the carpel showed that there is a long, narrow canal in the style and an obvious opening at the base of each ovary (Fig. 1d). This opening corresponds exactly to the point at which the pollen tubes grew from the ovary toward the receptacle. This opening also corresponds to the position at which pollen tubes entered the base of other carpels to access the embryo sac. Fig. 1(b) summarizes diagrammatically our observations of the pollen-tube pathway.
Transverse sections of a mature pistil of S. potamogetifolia indicated that the stigmatic crests were lip-like (Fig. 1e), the styles were hollow (Fig. 1f,g), and the extracellular matrix was distributed continuously down the stylar canal, and across the inner surface of the ovary wall (Fig. 1h) and the outer surface of the funiculus to the opening of the ovary (Fig. 1i), leading to the surface of the receptacle (Fig. 1j). Pollen tubes were strictly limited to this tract (Fig. 1b).
Similar extra-gynoecial growth of pollen tubes was observed in species from Alismataceae, Crassulaceae and Schisandraceae (Table 1; Fig. 2). Examination of carpel anatomy indicated that the entry of pollen tubes into ovules of neighboring carpels was associated with gynoecial architecture similar to that observed in S. potamogetifolia. Extra-gynoecial growth of pollen tubes in S. pygmaea and S. guyanensis was the same as in S. potamogetifolia, in which pollen-tube growth was restricted to the stylar canal of one carpel but could escape the canal to nearby ovaries via the surface of the receptacle. In Sedum lineare and Schisandra sphenanthera, pollen tubes could grow to nearby carpels via a passage permitting pollen-tube exit and entry (Fig. 2e–g). In these species, some pollen tubes grew down the surface of the style and continued to the ovary, while other tubes could cross to and enter nearby ovaries from the middle of the style on which the pollen was deposited. The pollen-tube pathway was on the sealing edge of the carpel. EGPG was not observed in the five species sampled from the Cabombaceae, Rosaceae, and Ranunculaceae. For example, we observed that numerous pollen tubes reached positions near the base of ovules, but no tubes could leave the ovary to access other ovules in Ranunculus rostratum (Fig. 2a). Correspondingly, longitudinal sections of the carpel and continuous transverse sections suggested that the carpels lack an outlet for pollen tubes (Fig. 2b–d).
Table 1. Distribution of extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth (EGPG) across apocarpous angiosperms
Extra-gynoecial pollen-tube route
Supra-stylar EGPG, extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth to the stigma such that pollen-tubes do not compete for access to ovules in different carpels. Infra-stylar EGPG, extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth to other carpels after passage down the style, which permits pollen competition for access to ovules in different ovules. Extra-stylar EGPG, extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth to other carpels, where pollen tubes do not pass down styles. This should also permit pollen competition for access to ovules in different ovules.
A review of previous studies indicates similar patterns of supra-, extra-, or infra-stylar EGPG across taxa in a total of 14 families. This information is summarized in Table 1.
Phylogeny of EGPG
When we add our observations of EGPG to those published in the literature and map this information onto a well-supported skeleton angiosperm phylogeny, we find that EGPG (‘extra-gynoecial compita’ in the terminology of Endress & Doyle (2009) is both phylogenetically widespread and probably the basal condition in angiosperms (Fig. 3; see also Endress & Doyle, 2009). Distinguishing between supra-stylar, extra-stylar, and infra-stylar EGPG is important because only the last consistently promotes pollen competition (although extra-stylar EGPG may do so sometimes, depending on the details of the pollen-tube route). The basal angiosperms have supra-stylar EGPG (reconstructed as the basal state; Fig. 3), with one origin of infra-stylar EGPG in a supra-stylar lineage (Austrobaileyales; Fig. 3). There were at least three additional independent origins of infra-stylar EGPG, two origins of extra-stylar EGPG, and three origins of supra-stylar EGPG (Fig. 3).
Our study of extra-stylar pollen-tube growth (EGPG) leads us to distinguish among three types of EGPG: supra-stylar, extra-stylar, and infra-stylar. Supra-stylar EGPG depends largely on appressed stigmas and/or secretion of fluids through which pollen tubes can grow to reach stigmas and styles of carpels other than those on which the pollen originally landed. Extra-stylar EGPG is found in species in which pollen tubes do not penetrate the stigmas, and is seen in only a few specialized situations (e.g. cleistogamous flowers). In contrast, infra-stylar EGPG involves pollen tubes growing down the stigma and style on which they landed and exiting the ovary to reach unfertilized ovules in other carpels. Our investigation of nine species showed that infra-stylar EGPG occurs in species with carpels that have openings through which pollen tubes can exit, but appears to be absent in species with carpels that are completely sealed. This suggests that infra-stylar EGPG is influenced by carpel morphology.
We found EGPG to be surprisingly common, even in species whose flowers did not have obvious extra-gynoecial compita (see Endress & Igersheim, 1997, 1999, 2000). For example, in the apocarpous monocot genus Sagittaria, we found that ‘extra’ pollen tubes grew out of the ovary through a basal opening of the incompletely sealed carpel, and across the surface of the receptacle, to other carpels, thus fertilizing virgin ovules. In this species, the opening provides a passage for pollen tubes to exit the ovary, allowing them to grow freely across the receptacle to other carpels, and form a network of pollen tubes interconnecting otherwise separate carpels.
The distinction among supra-stylar, extra-stylar, and infra-stylar EGPG has not been previously emphasized (although see Armbruster et al., 2002; Endress, 2011). It is important not only because of the markedly different morphologies and developmental patterns involved, but because of the different adaptive consequences of the three types of EGPG. Supra-stylar and extra-stylar EGPG can improve the seed set of flowers under pollen limitation, as can infra-stylar EGPG. However, only infra-stylar EGPG can consistently increase the intensity of pollen competition and reduce rates of fertilization by genetically inferior male gametophytes (pollen). (Certain types of extra-stylar EGPG can potentially also lead to pollen competition, e.g. cleistogamous Malpighiaceae). The logic of this is the same as expressed for partially syncarpous pistils (Armbruster et al., 2002): pollen tubes that are committed to a single carpel above the style compete only with pollen tubes in their own style. By contrast, pollen tubes that can cross between carpels below the style effectively compete with all pollen tubes in all styles. Because infra-stylar EGPG is more difficult to recognize than morphological mechanisms promoting pollen competition (e.g. morphological compita; Endress, 1982), its frequency and importance have probably been seriously underestimated.
The discovery that infra-stylar, extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth is phylogenetically widespread (Fig. 3) and perhaps common in apocarpous angiosperms leads us to reassess several aspects of angiosperm evolutionary history. First, redistribution of pollen tubes among carpels and effective pollen competition are not restricted to plants with fused ovaries (syncarpy), as noted by Endress and collaborators (e.g. Endress, 1982, 2011; Endress & Doyle, 2009). This means that the repeated shifts from apocarpy to syncarpy may not always be driven by selection for the increased quantity and quality of offspring via pollen-tube redistribution, given that one or both of these capacities may already occur in the apocarpous ancestor. This increases the balance of evidence for alternative hypotheses that have been proposed but hitherto thought less important, at least recently, including reduced reproductive investment in ovary walls per seed and/or increased protection of developing ovules for a given investment (Stebbins, 1974), improved seed-dispersal mechanisms (Stebbins, 1974; Endress, 1982), and/or increased floral precision and adaptive accuracy in pollination (Armbruster et al., 2002, 2009). Also, the shifts from syncarpy to apocarpy seen repeatedly in angiosperms may not incur the costs of reduced offspring quantity and quality. This may help explain the occurrence of these otherwise surprising transitions (Soltis et al., 2005; Endress & Doyle, 2009; Endress, 2011; Rudall et al., 2011). For example, if pollen tubes in other apocarpous monocots behave as we observed in Sagittaria and Ranalisma rostratum, there would be little or no selective cost in terms of pollen redistribution (seed set) and pollen competition (seed quality) in the four or more transitions from syncarpy to apocarpy in monocots (Fig. 3; Endress & Doyle, 2009 (Fig. 10b); Rudall et al., 2011).
Another interesting facet of infra-stylar EGPG is that the average pollen-tube length is increased dramatically for those pollen grains participating in between-carpel fertilizations. This means that the potential intensity and effectiveness of pollen competition are increased (hence potentially increasing mean offspring fitness) relative to both intra-gynoecial and supra-stylar EGPG (Mulcahy, 1983; Armbruster et al., 1995). This feature may be especially important in species such as Schisandra sphenanthera and Sagittaria spp. that have relatively short styles (Fig. 1).
Mechanism of tropism in extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth
For successful fertilization, pollen must germinate on the stigma, grow tubes, usually through the style, and find and penetrate the ovule micropyle. These processes require growing pollen tubes to undergo numerous changes in growth orientation. The cues in the pistil that guide pollen-tube orientation are believed to be mechanical and chemotropic, but their nature is not well understood (Hülskamp et al., 1995; Johnson & Preuss, 2002; Holdaway-Clarke & Hepler, 2003; Chae & Lord, 2011). The guidance of the pollen tube has been assumed to depend on the architecture and chemical properties of the female reproductive tissues and/or ovules to provide a signal for the target-directed growth of the pollen tube. We observed pollen tubes growing freely but not randomly among carpels and apparently attracted by unfertilized ovules. This observation demonstrates that, if there is a signal to direct pollen tube growth, the signal is probably released only by ‘virgin’ ovules (Okuda & Higashiyama, 2010).
Significance of extra-gynoecial pollen-tube routes to pollen-tube reallocation
The repeated evolution of syncarpy is one of the dominant features of angiosperm macroevolution. A minimum of 17 independent evolutionary transitions from apocarpy to syncarpy have occurred; about three-quarters of these transitions allowed pollen tubes to cross between carpels and fertilize ovules that would otherwise be left unfertilized (Armbruster et al., 2002). This will generally occur if there is a joint pollen-tube transmission tissue shared by the carpels (the ‘compitum’; Carr & Carr, 1961), allowing pollen tubes to cross between carpels (Carr & Carr, 1961; Walker, 1978; Endress, 1982; Williams et al., 1993; van der Schoot et al., 1995). This condition is thought to be the rule in flowers with fully syncarpous ovaries that are unilocular or incompletely multilocular, but occurs also in many flowers with multilocular ovaries and post-genital (after initial formation) fusion of styles or stigmas, forming a compitum (Carr & Carr, 1961; Endress, 1982; Endress et al., 1983).
However, some apocarpous flowers possess extra-gynoecial compita (allowing EGPG). In such cases, pollen tubes can travel on or through a functional (extra-gynoecial) compitum to cross between separate carpels, usually through secretions joining appressed or adjacent ovaries or stigmas (Walker, 1978; Endress, 1982; Endress et al., 1983; Renner et al., 1997). The present study shows the importance of distinguishing between supra- and infra-stylar crossings between carpels, whether by intra-gynoecial compita, obvious extra-gynoecial compita, or other forms of extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth, such as through the receptacle. Whereas both supra- and infra-stylar crossings of pollen tubes between carpels potentially enhance seed set under pollen limitation, only the latter can enhance offspring quality though intensified pollen competition.
In several apocarpous species, we found long, narrow stylar canals with obvious openings at each end. Pollen tubes could travel along this track and reallocate between carpels by exiting the base of the canal. This allows apocarpous flowers to function more like syncarpous flowers in terms of the redistribution of pollen tubes between carpels and pollen competition. Our detailed study of S. potamogetifolia revealed that inter-carpellary pollen-tube growth can be very extensive (Fig. 1) and may therefore play a major role in increasing both the quantity and the quality of seeds produced by flowers of apocarpous species with infra-stylar EPGP.
Phylogeny of extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth
Endress and colleagues (Table 1; Endress & Doyle, 2009) have shown that extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth (EGPG; via extra-gynoecial compita) is widely distributed among basal angiosperms and is probably the basal state (Table 1; Endress & Doyle, 2009). The work presented here adds support to this conclusion. Most basal angiosperms with EGPG have supra-stylar EGPG, but some Austrobaileyales have infra-stylar EGPG (Fig. 3). Repeated evolution of both forms of EGPG in primitively or secondarily apocarpous lineages (Fig. 3) supports the hypothesis that selection for increased offspring quantity and/or quality has promoted this transition.
Experimental studies are needed to assess whether pollen competition is more intense and offspring quality is improved in plants with infra-stylar extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth. We anticipate that such experiments will reveal that many apocarpous angiosperms indeed benefit from greater seed set and more intense pollen competition through infra-stylar EGPG, much like in plants with fused carpels and intra-gynoecial compita. Experimental confirmation of these benefits would help explain both ‘anomalous’ reversals to apocarpy and the early success and radiations of apocarpous angiosperms and their role in replacing gymnosperms as the dominant higher plant life form.
We thank P.K. Endress and S. Renner for critically reading and providing valuable comments on the manuscript, and Y-Z. Chen, W. Du, X-S. Li and Y-B. Tao for technical assistance. W.S.A. acknowledges the 111 project B06018 of the Education Ministry of China for travel expenses. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30970194 and 30825005).