Introduction
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
Cereal crops are generally inefficient in their uptake and use of soil nitrogen (N) with, for example, only 30–40% of the applied N absorbed by paddy rice (Kronzucker et al., 1998; Raun & Johnson, 1999; Miller & Cramer, 2004). This inefficiency has a significant impact on farm economies and environmental quality. Thus, improvement of crop N-use efficiency has long been recognized as a valuable research topic and a crucial factor contributing to sustainable agriculture and environmental protection.
Although ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) represent major soil-N species preferentially used by plants (Jackson & Volk, 1992; Miller & Cramer, 2004), urea can serve as a rapidly available N-source for plant growth (Wang et al., 2008). The degradation of nitrogenous compounds from animals generates great amounts of urea in nature (Wang et al., 2008). In addition, agricultural N-fertilization has led to a tremendous urea input into the biosphere with an annual amount of over 50 million tons accounting for > 50% of the world N-fertilizer consumption (http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/Home-Page/STATISTICS/Production-and-trade, 2008). However, in natural environments urea accumulation is generally low (< 70 μM in farming soils, Wang et al., 2008), because of the ubiquitous existence of urease, a nickel (Ni)-activated urea-hydrolysing enzyme (Watson et al., 1994). The accessibility of urea to plants is thought to depend mainly on soil microorganism-derived urease activity, which generates NH3/NH4+ that can be subsequently taken up and assimilated by plant cells. However, this process is inevitably associated with the N-loss owing to NH3 volatilization, nitrification and denitrification (Miller & Cramer, 2004). Field experiments showed that the application of urease inhibitors in paddy soils could increase N recovery of rice plants fertilized with urea (Freney et al., 1993), perhaps owing to slow release of NH3 from urea in the soils, thus reducing the rate of N loss. The increase in urea uptake by using urease inhibitors could also be caused by increased absorption of urea directly by roots before its degradation.
The direct absorption of urea as a N source by plants was suggested by several independent physiological observations. Reduction of plant endogenous urease activity, which was caused by Ni depletion in a nutrient solution or using inhibitors or genetic disruption of the urease gene, caused a higher urea accumulation in crop plants (e.g. rice, soybean and potato) when externally provided with urea to either roots or leaves (Stebbins et al., 1991; Gerendás et al., 1998; Witte et al., 2002), suggesting that an increase in urea content in those crops resulted at least in part from the uptake of external urea by plant cells. A pot-soil experiment using [14C]- and [15N]-urea revealed that rice roots did absorb molecular urea, which represented c. 9% of total N uptake from applied urea-N (Safeena et al., 1999). Profiling of amino acids in upper part tissues of Arabidopsis supplied with [15N]urea and 15NH4+ tracers provided evidence that urea and NH4+ shared similar assimilation pathways in the cells (Merigout et al., 2008a), again strengthening the likelihood of a direct use of urea as a N source by the plants. Thus, study of urea transport processes in crops is of agricultural and ecological significance.
To date, molecular identities of urea transporters in higher plants have been studied only in the dicot-model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. The transporter-mediated urea uptake in Arabidopsis roots with a high affinity and low affinity was recently affirmed by quantitative and short-time influx assays of [15N]urea (Kojima et al., 2007). Molecularly, two types of urea-transporting proteins (i.e. DUR3 orthologs and certain MIP members) have been reported in planta (Kojima et al., 2006). Arabidopsis DUR3 (At5g45380), which belongs to the sodium-solute symporter (SSS) superfamily, was characterized as a urea/H+ symporter with a Km of 3–4 μM for urea transport (Liu et al., 2003a; Kojima et al., 2007). The transcriptional upregulation of AtDUR3 in roots under N deficiency and by urea resupply after plant N starvation, as well as the loss of a high-affinity urea transport component observed in the atdur3-mutant lines emphasizes that AtDUR3 may be a major active urea transporter in Arabidopsis (Kojima et al., 2007). Regarding low-affinity urea transporters, a number of isoforms from the PIP, TIP and NIP subfamilies of plant aquaporins were reported to facilitate urea movement with a linear concentration dependency, but their urea transport activity was only evident in heterologous systems (e.g. yeast and frog oocytes) (Gerbeau et al., 1999; Klebl et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2003b). Most recently, the overexpression of AtTIP4;1 driven by the CaMV 35S promoter was reported to enable Arabidopsis leaf cells to absorb more externally supplied [14C]urea, but no distinguishable phenotype of growth and development could be observed in the transgenic lines compared with their wild type (Kim et al., 2008).
We report here for the first time among crop plants the physiological and molecular characterization of urea uptake by OsDUR3 from rice. Kinetic properties of urea influx into rice roots were examined. Heterologous expression of OsDUR3 allowed us to show the functionality of OsDUR3 in urea transport with a high substrate affinity. Moreover, our data gained from protein subcellular localization studies, gene expression analysis and transgenic approaches performed to assess the physiological function of OsDUR3 provide strong evidence that OsDUR3 is a crucial genetic factor for urea transport and plays a significant physiological role in the effective use of low external urea as a N source by rice plants.
Acknowledgements
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
We thank Dr von Wirén (IPK, Gatersleben, Germany) for kindly providing the atdur3-1 mutant, Dr Schumacher (UH, Germany), Dr Ludewig (TUD, Germany) and Dr Boles (GUF, Germany) for gifts of plasmids (pHXT426, pCF203, pOO2). We also thank Dr Roy, Dr Cotsaftis and Dr Kaiser (ACPFG, Australia) for their kind help during W-HW’s 1-yr joint-work in Australia. This work was financially supported by the NHTRD-Program 863 of China (no. 2006AA10Z166), NSF of China (NSFC) (no. 30771288, 31070223), and The Innovative Group Grant (no. 30821003) of the NSFC.