SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly DD, Bazzaz FA. 1995. Seedling crown orientation and interception of diffuse radiation in tropical forest gaps. Ecology 76: 11341146.
  • Adam B, Donès N, Sinoquet H. 2002. VegeSTAR – software to compute light interception and canopy photosynthesis from images of 3D digitised plants, Version 3.0. Clermont-Ferrand, France: UMR PIAF INRA-UBP.
  • Baldocchi DD, Hutchison BA, Matt DR, McMillen RT. 1985. Canopy radiative transfer models for spherical and known leaf inclination angle distributions: a test in an oak-hickory forest. Journal of Applied Ecology 22: 539555.
  • Barber CB, Dobkin DP, Huhdanpaa H. 1996. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 22: 469483.
  • Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y. 2007. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of Botany 99: 375407.
  • Brites D, Valladares F. 2005. Implications of opposite phyllotaxis for light interception efficiency of Mediterranean woody plants. Trees – Structure and Function 19: 671679.
  • Campbell GS, Norman JM. 2000. An introduction to environmental biophysics. New York, NY, USA: Springer Verlag.
  • Cannell MGR, Milne R, Sheppard LJ, Unsworth MH. 1987. Radiation interception and productivity of willow. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 261278.
  • Cescatti A. 1998. Effects of needle clumping in shoots and crowns on the radiative regime of a Norway spruce canopy. Annales Des Sciences Forestières 55: 89102.
  • Cescatti A, Zorer R. 2003. Structural acclimation and radiation regime of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) shoots along a light gradient. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 429442.
  • Chen Q, Baldocchi D, Gong P, Dawson T. 2008. Modeling radiation and photosynthesis of a heterogeneous savanna woodland landscape with a hierarchy of model complexities. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148: 10051020.
  • Delagrange S, Montpied P, Dreyer E, Messier C, Sinoquet H. 2006. Does shade improve light interception efficiency? A comparison among seedlings from shade-tolerant and -intolerant temperate deciduous tree species. New Phytologist 172: 293304.
  • Duursma RA, Mäkelä A. 2007. Summary models for light interception and light-use efficiency of non-homogeneous canopies. Tree Physiology 27: 859870.
  • Duursma RA, Mäkelä A, Reid DEB, Jokela EJ, Porté A, Roberts SD. 2010. Self-shading affects allometric scaling in trees. Functional Ecology 24: 723730.
  • Falster DS, Brännström Å, Dieckmann U, Westoby M. 2011. Influence of four major plant traits on average height, leaf-area cover, net primary productivity, and biomass density in single-species forests: a theoretical investigation. Journal of Ecology 99: 148164.
  • Falster DS, Westoby M. 2003. Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: what consequences for light interception? New Phytologist 158: 509525.
  • Farque L, Sinoquet H, Colin F. 2001. Canopy structure and light interception in Quercus petraea seedlings in relation to light regime and plant density. Tree Physiology 21: 12571267.
  • Gálvez D, Pearcy RW. 2003. Petiole twisting in the crowns of Psychotria limonensis: implications for light interception and daily carbon gain. Oecologia 135: 2229.
  • Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB. 1978. Tropical trees and forests: an architectural analysis. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Jackson JE, Palmer JW. 1979. A simple model of light transmission and interception by discontinuous canopies. Annals of Botany 44: 381383.
  • Kucharik CJ, Norman JM, Gower ST. 1999. Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach. Tree Physiology 19: 695706.
  • Küppers M. 1989. Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants: a question of cost-benefit relationships. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4: 375379.
  • Kvålseth TO. 1985. Cautionary note about R2. The American Statistician 39: 279285.
  • Lang ARG. 1991. Application of some of Cauchy’s theorems to estimation of surface-areas of leaves, needles and branches of plants, and light transmittance. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 55: 191212.
  • Lusk CH, Falster DS, Perez-Millaqueo MM, Saldana A. 2006. Ontogenetic variation in light interception, self-shading and biomass distribution of seedlings of the conifer Araucaria araucana (Molina) K. Koch. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 79: 321328.
  • Lusk CH, Pérez-Millaqueo MM, Piper FI, Saldaña A. 2011. Ontogeny, understorey light interception and simulated carbon gain of juvenile rainforest evergreens differing in shade tolerance. Annals of Botany 108: 419428.
  • Mäkelä A. 1997. A carbon balance model of growth and self-pruning in trees based on structural relationships. Forest Science 43: 724.
  • Mäkelä A, Sievänen R. 1992. Height growth strategies in open-grown trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology 159: 443467.
  • Massonnet C, Regnard JL, Lauri PÉ, Costes E, Sinoquet H. 2008. Contributions of foliage distribution and leaf functions to light interception, transpiration and photosynthetic capacities in two apple cultivars at branch and tree scales. Tree Physiology 28: 665678.
  • Monsi M, Saeki T. 1953. Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany 14: 2252.
  • Monsi M, Saeki T. 2005. On the factor light in plant communities and its importance for matter production. Annals of Botany 95: 549567.
  • Monteith JL. 1977. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 281: 277294.
  • Moorcroft PR, Hurtt GC, Pacala SW. 2001. A method for scaling vegetation dynamics: the ecosystem demography model (ED). Ecological Monographs 71: 557586.
  • Niinemets Ü, Sparrow A, Cescatti A. 2005. Light capture efficiency decreases with increasing tree age and size in the southern hemisphere gymnosperm Agathis australis. Trees – Structure and Function 19: 177190.
  • Nilson T. 1971. A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands. Agricultural Meteorology 8: 2538.
  • Nilson T. 1999. Inversion of gap frequency data in forest stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 98–99: 437448.
  • Ni-Meister W, Yang W, Kiang NY. 2010. A clumped-foliage canopy radiative transfer model for a global dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model. I: theory. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150: 881894.
  • Oker-Blom P, Smolander H. 1988. The ratio of shoot silhouette area to total needle area in Scots pine. Forest Science 34: 894906.
  • Pearcy RW, Duursma RA, Falster DS, PrometheusWiki contributors. 2011. Studying plant architecture with Y-plant and 3D digitising. PrometheusWiki. [WWW document] URL : http://prometheuswiki.publish.csiro.au/tiki-index.php?page=Studying+plant+architecture+with+Y-plant+and+3D+digitising [accessed on 26 September 2011].
  • Pearcy RW, Muraoka H, Valladares F. 2005. Crown architecture in sun and shade environments: assessing function and trade-offs with a three-dimensional simulation model. New Phytologist 166: 791800.
  • Pearcy RW, Valladares F, Wright SJ, de Paulis EL. 2004. A functional analysis of the crown architecture of tropical forest Psychotria species: do species vary in light capture efficiency and consequently in carbon gain and growth? Oecologia 139: 163177.
  • Pearcy RW, Yang W. 1996. A three-dimensional crown architecture model for assessment of light capture and carbon gain by understory plants. Oecologia 108: 112.
  • Planchais I, Sinoquet H. 1998. Foliage determinants of light interception in sunny and shaded branches of Fagus sylvatica (L.). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 89: 241253.
  • R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org.
  • Reich P, Falster D, Ellsworth D, Wright I, Westoby M, Oleksyn J, Lee T. 2009. Controls on declining carbon balance with leaf age among 10 woody species in Australian woodland: do leaves have zero daily net carbon balances when they die? New Phytologist 183: 153166.
  • Roderick ML, Farquhar GD, Berry SL, Noble IR. 2001. On the direct effect of clouds and atmospheric particles on the productivity and structure of vegetation. Oecologia 129: 2130.
  • Ross J. 1981. The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. The Hague, the Netherlands: Dr W. Junk.
  • Sinoquet H, Sonohat G, Phattaralerphong J, Godin C. 2005. Foliage randomness and light interception in 3-D digitized trees: an analysis from multiscale discretization of the canopy. Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 11581170.
  • Sinoquet H, Stephan J, Sonohat G, Lauri PE, Monney P. 2007. Simple equations to estimate light interception by isolated trees from canopy structure features: assessment with three-dimensional digitized apple trees. New Phytologist 175: 94106.
  • Stenberg P. 1996. Correcting LAI-2000 estimates for the clumping of needles in shoots of conifers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 79: 18.
  • Stenberg P. 1998. Implications of shoot structure on the rate of photosynthesis at different levels in a coniferous canopy using a model incorporating grouping and penumbra. Functional Ecology 12: 8291.
  • Stenberg P. 2006. A note on the G-function for needle leaf canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 136: 7679.
  • Sterck FJ, Schieving F. 2007. 3-D growth patterns of trees: effects of carbon economy, meristem activity, and selection. Ecological Monographs 77: 405420.
  • Takenaka A. 1994. Effects of leaf blade narrowness and petiole length on the light capture efficiency of a shoot. Ecological Research 9: 109114.
  • Valentine HT, Mäkelä A. 2005. Bridging process-based and empirical approaches to modeling tree growth. Tree Physiology 25: 769779.
  • Valiente-Banuet A, Verdú M, Valladares F, García-Fayos P. 2010. Functional and evolutionary correlations of steep leaf angles in the mexical shrubland. Oecologia 163: 2533.
  • Valladares F, Dobarro I, Sánchez-Gómez D, Pearcy RW. 2005. Photoinhibition and drought in Mediterranean woody saplings: scaling effects and interactions in sun and shade phenotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 483494.
  • Valladares F, Niinemets Ü. 2007. The architecture of plant crowns: from design rules to light capture and performance. In: Pugnaire F, Valladares F, eds. Functional plant ecology. New York, NY, USA: Taylor and Francis, 101149.
  • Valladares F, Pearcy RW. 1998. The functional ecology of shoot architecture in sun and shade plants of Heteromeles arbutifolia M. Roem., a Californian chaparral shrub. Oecologia 114: 110.
  • Valladares F, Pearcy RW. 1999. The geometry of light interception by shoots of Heteromeles arbutifolia: morphological and physiological consequences for individual leaves. Oecologia 121: 171182.
  • Valladares F, Skillman JB, Pearcy RW. 2002. Convergence in light capture efficiencies among tropical forest understory plants with contrasting crown architectures: a case of morphological compensation. American Journal of Botany 89: 1275.
  • Valladares F, Wright SJ, Lasso E, Kitajima K, Pearcy RW. 2000. Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81: 19251936.
  • Vos J, Evers JB, Buck-Sorlin GH, Andrieu B, Chelle M, de Visser PHB. 2010. Functional–structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 21012115.
  • Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews 81: 259291.
  • Whitehead D, Grace JC, Godfrey MJS. 1990. Architectural distribution of foliage in individual Pinus radiata D. Don crowns and the effects of clumping on radiation interception. Tree Physiology 7: 135155.