SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aerts R. 1999. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant–soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany 50: 2937.
  • Aerts R, Chapin FS. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30: 167.
  • Anderson PD, Tomlinson PT. 1998. Ontogeny affects response of northern red oak seedlings to elevated CO2 and water stress: I. Carbon assimilation and biomass production. New Phytologist 140: 477491.
  • Antunez I, Retamosa EC, Villar R. 2001. Relative growth rate in phylogenetically related deciduous and evergreen woody species. Oecologia 128: 172180.
  • Atkin OK, Schortemeyer M, McFarlane N, Evans JR. 1999. The response of fast- and slow-growing Acacia species to elevated atmospheric CO2: an analysis of the underlying components of relative growth rate. Oecologia 120: 544554.
  • Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek LACJ. 2008. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59: 313339.
  • Barrett DJ, Ash JE. 1992. Growth and carbon partitioning in rainforest and eucalypt forest species of south coastal New South Wales, Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 40: 1325.
  • Berendse F, Möller F. 2009. Effects of competition on root–shoot allocation in Plantago lanceolata L.: adaptive plasticity or ontogenetic drift? Plant Ecology 201: 567573.
  • Bernacchi CJ, Coleman JS, Bazzaz FA, McConnaughay KDM. 2000. Biomass allocation in old-field annual species grown in elevated CO2 environments: no evidence for optimal partitioning. Global Change Biology 6: 855863.
  • Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA. 1985. Resource limitation in plants – an economic analogue. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 363392.
  • Bloomberg M, Mason EG, Jarvis P, Sedcole R. 2008. Predicting seedling biomass of radiata pine from allometric variables. New Forests 36: 103114.
  • Brouwer R. 1962. Distribution of dry matter in the plant. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences 10: 361376.
  • Brouwer R. 1963. Some aspects of the equilibrium between overground and underground plant parts. Jaarboek van het Instituut voor Biologisch en Scheikundig onderzoek aan Landbouwgewassen 1963: 3139.
  • Brüggemann N, Gessler A, Kayler Z, Keel SG, Badeck F, Barthel M, Boeckx P, Buchmann N, Brugnoli E, Esperschütz J et al. 2011. Carbon allocation and carbon isotope fluxes in the plant–soil–atmosphere continuum: a review. Biogeosciences Discussions 8: 36193695.
  • Cai ZQ, Poorter L, Cao KF, Bongers F. 2007. Seedling growth strategies in Bauhinia species: comparing lianas and trees. Annals of Botany 100: 831838.
  • Canham CD, Berkowitz AR, Kelly VR, Lovett GM, Ollinger SV, Schnurr J. 1996. Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 15211530.
  • Cannell MGR, Dewar RC. 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modelling. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 59104.
  • Casper BB, Cahill JF, Hyatt LA. 1998. Above-ground competition does not alter biomass allocated to roots in Abutilon theophrasti. New Phytologist 140: 231238.
  • Chapin FS, Groves RH, Evans LT. 1989. Physiological determinants of growth rate in response to phosphorus supply in wild and cultivated Hordeum species. Oecologia 79: 96105.
  • Climent J, Chambel MR, Pardos M, Lario F, Villar-Salvador P. 2011. Biomass allocation and foliage heteroblasty in hard pine species respond differentially to reduction in rooting volume. European Journal of Forest Research 130: 841850.
  • Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM, Ackerly DD. 1994. Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 187191.
  • Comas LH, Eissenstat DM, Lakso AN. 2000. Assessing root death and root system dynamics in a study of grape canopy pruning. New Phytologist 147: 171178.
  • Coutand C, Dupraz C, Jaouen G, Ploquin S, Adam B. 2008. Mechanical stimuli regulate the allocation of biomass in trees: demonstration with young Prunus avium trees. Annals of Botany 101: 14211432.
  • Darwin C. 1867. The movements and habits of climbing plants. Journal of the Linnean Society of Botany 9: 1118.
  • De’ath G, Fabricius KE. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81: 31783192.
  • Debez A, Koyro HW, Grignon C, Abdelly C, Huchzermeyer B. 2008. Relationship between the photosynthetic activity and the performance of Cakile maritima after long-term salt treatment. Physiologia Plantarum 133: 373385.
  • De Groot CC, Marcelis LFM, Van den Boogaard R, Lambers H. 2001. Growth and dry-mass partitioning in tomato as affected by phosphorus nutrition and light. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 13091317.
  • Den Dubbelden KC, Verburg RW. 1996. Inherent allocation patterns and potential growth rates of herbaceous climbing plants. Plant and Soil 184: 341347.
  • De Pinheiro Henriques AR, Marcelis LFM. 2000. Regulation of growth at steady-state nitrogen nutrition in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.): interactive effects of nitrogen and irradiance. Annals of Botany 86: 10731080.
  • Dias-Filho MB, De Carvalho CJR. 2000. Physiological and morphological responses of Brachiaria spp. to flooding. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 35: 19591966.
  • Donald CM. 1958. The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 421435.
  • Dybzinski R, Farrior C, Wolf A, Reich PB, Pacala SW. 2011. Evolutionarily stable strategy of carbon allocation to foliage, wood, and fine roots in trees competing for light and nitrogen: an analytically tractable, individual-based model and quantitative comparisons to data. American Naturalist 177: 153166.
  • Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ. 2002. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295: 15171520.
  • Enquist BJ, West GB, Charnov EL, Brown JH. 1999. Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature 401: 907911.
  • Eriksson ME, Israelsson M, Olsson O, Moritz T. 2000. Increased gibberellin biosynthesis in transgenic trees promotes growth, biomass production and xylem fiber length. Nature Biotechnology 18: 784788.
  • Eshel A, Srinivasa Rao C, Benzioni A, Waisel Y. 2001. Allometric relationships in young seedlings of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) following removal of certain root types. Plant and Soil 233: 161166.
  • Evans GC. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Faget M, Herrera JM, Stamp P, Aulinger-Leipner I, Frossard E, Liedgens M. 2009. The use of green fluorescent protein as a tool to identify roots in mixed plant stands. Functional Plant Biology 36: 930937.
  • Farrar JF, Jones DL. 2000. The control of carbon acquisition by roots. New Phytologist 147: 4353.
  • Fitter AH, Stickland TR. 1991. Architectural analysis of plant root systems. 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytologist 118: 383389.
  • Forster MA, Ladd B, Bonser SP. 2011. Optimal allocation of resources in response to shading and neighbours in the heteroblastic species, Acacia implexa. Annals of Botany 107: 219228.
  • Franklin KA. 2008. Shade avoidance. New Phytologist 179: 930944.
  • Franzaring J, Tonneijck AEG, Kooijman AWN, Dueck TA. 2000. Growth responses to ozone in plant species from wetlands. Environmental and Experimental Botany 44: 3948.
  • Funnell KA, Hewett EW, Warrington IJ, Plummer JA. 1998. Leaf mass partitioning as a determinant of dry matter accumulation in Zantedeschia. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123: 973979.
  • Garnier E. 1991. Resource capture, biomass allocation and growth in herbaceous plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 126131.
  • Gedroc JJ, Mcconnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. 1996. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Functional Ecology 10: 4450.
  • Gersani M, Brown JS, O’Brien EE, Maina GM, Abramsky Z. 2001. Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. Journal of Ecology 89: 660669.
  • Givnish TJ. 1988. Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 6392.
  • Givnish TJ. 2002. Adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves: solving the triple paradox. Silva Fennica 36: 703743.
  • Glimskär A, Ericsson T. 1999. Relative nitrogen limitation at steady-state nutrition as a determinant of plasticity in five grassland plant species. Annals of Botany 84: 413420.
  • Gojon A, Dapoigny L, Lejay L, Tillard P, Rufty TW. 1998. Effects of genetic modification of nitrate reductase expression on 15NO3– uptake and reduction in Nicotiana plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 13653040.
  • Grantz DA, Gunn S, Vu HB. 2006. O3 impacts on plant development: a meta-analysis of root/shoot allocation and growth. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 11931209.
  • Hancock JE, Loya WM, Giardina CP, Li L, Chiang VL, Pregitzer KS. 2007. Plant growth, biomass partitioning and soil carbon formation in response to altered lignin biosynthesis in Populus tremuloides. New Phytologist 173: 14698137.
  • Hedden P. 2003. The genes of the Green Revolution. Trends in Genetics 19: 59.
  • Hermans C, Hammond JP, White PJ, Verbruggen N. 2006. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends in Plant Science 11: 610617.
  • Hess L, De Kroon H. 2007. Effects of rooting volume and nutrient availability as an alternative explanation for root self/non-self discrimination. Journal of Ecology 95: 241251.
  • Holzapfel C, Alpert P. 2003. Root cooperation in a clonal plant: connected strawberries segregate roots. Oecologia 134: 7277.
  • Huxley JS. 1932. Problems of relative growth, 2nd edn. New York, NY, USA: Dover.
  • Ingestad T, Ågren G. 1991. The influence of plant nutrition on biomass allocation. Ecological Applications 1: 168174.
  • Iwasa Y, Roughgarden J. 1984. Shoot/root balance of plants: optimal growth of a system with many vegetative organs. Theoretical Population Biology 25: 78105.
  • Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108: 389411.
  • Jackson RB, Pockman WT, Hoffmann WA, Bleby TM, Armas C. 2007. Structure and function of root systems. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladeres F, eds. Handbook of plant functional ecology, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Taylor & Francis Group, 151173.
  • Jahnke S, Menzel MI, Van Dusschoten D, Roeb GW, Bühler J, Minwuyelet S, Blümler P, Temperton VM, Hombach T, Streun M et al. 2010. Combined MRI–PET dissects dynamic changes in plant structures and functions. The Plant Journal 59: 634644.
  • Jansen C, Van de Steeg HM, De Kroon H. 2005. Investigating a trade-off in root morphological responses to a heterogeneous nutrient supply and to flooding. Functional Ecology 19: 952960.
  • Jeudy C, Ruffel S, Freixes S, Tillard P, Santoni AL, Morel S, Journet EP, Duc G, Gojon A, Lepetit M et al. 2010. Adaptation of Medicago truncatula to nitrogen limitation is modulated via local and systemic nodule developmental responses. New Phytologist 185: 817828.
  • Kaneko Y, Homma K. 2006. Differences in the allocation patterns between liana and shrub Hydrangea species. Plant Species Biology 21: 147153.
  • Kasai M. 2008. Regulation of leaf photosynthetic rate correlating with leaf carbohydrate status and activation state of Rubisco under a variety of photosynthetic source/sink balances. Physiologia Plantarum 134: 216226.
  • Keuskamp DH, Pierik R. 2010. Photosensory cues in plant–plant interactions: regulation and functional significance of shade avoidance responses. In: Baluška F, Ninkovic V, eds. Signaling and communication in plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 159178.
  • King JS, Giardana CP, Pregitzer KS, Friend AL. 2007. Biomass partitioning in red pine (Pinus resinosa) along a chronosequence in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 93102.
  • Kirschbaum MUF, Bellingham DW, Cromer RN. 1992. Growth analysis of the effect of phosphorus nutrition on seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 19: 5566.
  • Körner C. 1994. Biomass fractionation in plants: a reconsideration of definitions based on plant functions. In: Roy J, Garnier E, eds. A whole plant perspective on carbon–nitrogen interactions. The Hague, the Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing, 173185.
  • Krauss KW, Allen JA. 2003. Influences of salinity and shade on seedling photosynthesis and growth of two mangrove species, Rhizophora mangle and Bruguiera sexangula, introduced to Hawaii. Aquatic Botany 77: 311324.
  • Kruse J, Hänsch R, Mendel RR, Renneberg H. 2010. The role of root nitrate reduction in the systemic control of biomass partitioning between leaves and roots in accordance to the C/N-status of tobacco plants. Plant and Soil 332: 387403.
  • Lambers H, Atkin OK, Millenaar FF. 2002. Respiratory patterns in roots in relation to their functioning. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U, eds. Plant roots, the hidden half, 3rd edn. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, 521552.
  • Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL. 2008. Plant physiological ecology. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
  • Ledig FT, Perry TO. 1966. Physiological genetics of the shoot–root ratio. In: Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters Annual Meeting 1965: 3943.
  • Lefebvre S, Lawson T, Fryer M, Zakhleniuk OV, Lloyd JC, Raines CA. 2005. Increased sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase activity in transgenic tobacco plants stimulates photosynthesis and growth from an early stage in development. Plant Physiology 138: 451460.
  • Litton CM, Ryan MG, Tinker DB, Knight DH. 2003. Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 351363.
  • Loh FCW, Grabosky JC, Bassuk NL. 2003. Growth response of Ficus benjamina to limited soil volume and soil dilution in a skeletal soil container study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2: 5362.
  • Ludwig LJ, Charles-Edwards DA, Withers AC. 1975. Tomato leaf photosynthesis and respiration in various light and carbon dioxide environments. In: Marcelle R, ed. Environmental and biological control of photosynthesis. The Hague, the Netherlands: Junk, 2936.
  • Luo FL, Nagel KA, Zeng B, Schurr U, Matsubara S. 2009. Photosynthetic acclimation is important for post-submergence recovery of photosynthesis and growth in two riparian species. Annals of Botany 104: 14351444.
  • Lusk CH, Falster DS, Jara-Vergara CK, Jimenez-Castillo M, Saldaña-Mendoza A. 2008. Ontogenetic variation in light requirements of juvenile rainforest evergreens. Functional Ecology 22: 454459.
  • Lusk CH, Pérez-Millaqueo MM, Piper FI, Saldaña A. 2011. Ontogeny, understorey light interception and simulated carbon gain of juvenile rainforest evergreens differing in shade tolerance. Annals of Botany 108: 419428.
  • Makino A, Harada M, Kaneko K, Mae T, Shimada T, Yamamoto N. 2000. Whole-plant growth and N allocation in transgenic rice plants with decreased content of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase under different CO2 partial pressures. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 112.
  • Martínez-Berdeja A, Valverde T. 2008. Growth response of three globose cacti to radiation and soil moisture: an experimental test of the mechanism behind the nurse effect. Journal of Arid Environments 72: 17661774.
  • McCarthy MC, Enquist BJ. 2007. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology 21: 713720.
  • McCarthy MC, Enquist BJ, Kerkhoff AJ. 2007. Organ partitioning and distribution across the seed plants: assessing the relative importance of phylogeny and function. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168: 751761.
  • Minchin PEH, Thorpe MR. 2003. Using the short-lived isotope 11C in mechanistic studies of photosynthate transport. Functional Plant Biology 30: 831841.
  • Mitscherlich E. 1909. Das Gesetz des Minimum, das Gesetz des Abnahmenden Bodenertrages. Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch 38: 537552.
  • Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS. 2006. Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology 12: 8496.
  • Mommer L, Van Ruijven J, De Caluwe H, Smit-Tiekstra AE, Wagemaker CAM, Ouborg NJ, Bögemann GM, Van Der Weerden GM, Berendse F, De Kroon H. 2010. Unveiling below-ground species abundance in a biodiversity experiment: a test of vertical niche differentiation among grassland species. Journal of Ecology 98: 11171127.
  • Mommer L, Wagemaker CAM, De Kroon H, Ouborg NJ. 2008. Unravelling below-ground plant distributions: a real-time polymerase chain reaction method for quantifying species proportions in mixed root samples. Molecular Ecology 8: 947953.
  • Monsi M, Saeki T. 2005. On the factor light in plant communities and its importance for matter production. Annals of Botany 95: 549567. (originally: Japanese Journal of Botany14: 22–52).
  • Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J. 2000. The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3: 115127.
  • Nagel OW, Lambers H. 2002. Carbon and nitrogen economies of GA-deficient tomato mutants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 883891.
  • Nagel OW, Konings H, Lambers H. 1994. Growth rate, plant development and water relations of the ABA-defident tomato mutant sitiens. Physiologia Plantarum 92: 102108.
  • Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, Poot P, Purugganan MD, Richards CL, Valladares F et al. 2010. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science 15: 684692.
  • Nieves M, Nieves-Cordones M, Poorter H, Simón MD. 2011. Leaf nitrogen productivity is the major factor behind the growth reduction induced by long term salt stress. Tree Physiology 31: 92101.
  • Niklas KJ. 1994. Plant allometry. The scaling of form and process. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Niklas KJ. 1998. Effects of vibration on mechanical properties and biomass allocation pattern of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae). Annals of Botany 82: 147156.
  • Niklas KJ. 2000. The evolution of plant body plans – a biomechanical perspective. Annals of Botany 85: 411438.
  • Niklas KJ. 2004. Plant allometry: is there a grand unifying theory? Biological Reviews 79: 871889.
  • Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ. 2002. On the vegetative biomass partitioning of seed plant leaves, stems, and roots. American Naturalist 159: 482497.
  • Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ. 2003. An allometric model for seed plant reproduction. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 7988.
  • Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ. 2004a. Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. American Journal of Botany 89: 812819.
  • Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ. 2004b. Biomass allocation and growth data of seeded plants. Data set. Oak Ridge, TN, USA: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center. http://www.daac.ornl.gov. doi: 10.3334/ORNLDAAC/703.
  • Ninkovic V. 2003. Volatile communication between barley plants affects biomass allocation. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 19311939.
  • Nunes-Nesi A, Carrari F, Lytovchenko A, Smith AMO, Loureiro ME, Ratcliffe RG, Sweetlove LJ, Fernie AR. 2005. Enhanced photosynthetic performance and growth as a consequence of decreasing mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Physiology 137: 611622.
  • O’Brien EE, Gersani M, Brown JS. 2005. Root proliferation and seed yield in response to spatial heterogeneity of below-ground competition. New Phytologist 168: 401412.
  • Oleksyn J, Modrzyński J, Tjoelker MG, Zytkowiak R, Reich PB, Karolewski P. 1998. Growth and physiology of Picea abies populations from elevational transects: common garden evidence for altitudinal ecotypes and cold adaptation. Functional Ecology 12: 573590.
  • Oliveira MRG, Van Noordwijk M, Gaze SR, Brouwer G, Bona S, Mosca G, Hairiah K. 2000. Auger sampling, ingrowth cores and pinboard methods. In: Smit AL, Bengough AG, Engels C, Van Noordwijk M, Pellerin S, Van de Geijn SC, eds. Root methods, a handbook. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, 175210.
  • Osone Y, Tateno M. 2005. Nitrogen absorption by roots as a cause of interspecific variations in leaf nitrogen concentration and photosynthetic capacity. Functional Ecology 19: 460470.
  • Padilla FM, Miranda JD, Jorquera MJ, Pugnaire FI. 2009. Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs. Plant Ecology 204: 261270.
  • Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible WR. 2008. MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. The Plant Journal 53: 731738.
  • Parent C, Capelli N, Berger A, Crèvecoeur M, Dat JF. 2008. An overview of plant responses to soil waterlogging. Plant Stress 2: 2027.
  • Pate JS, Bell TL. 1999. Application of the ecosystem mimic concept to the species-rich Banksia woodlands of Western Australia. Agroforestry Systems 45: 303341.
  • Paul MJ, Pellny TK. 2003. Carbon metabolite feedback regulation of leaf photosynthesis and development. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 539547.
  • Pearcy RW, Muraoka H, Valladares F. 2005. Crown architecture in sun and shade environments: assessing function and trade-offs with a three-dimensional simulation model. New Phytologist 166: 791800.
  • Pierik R, Voesenek LACJ, De Kroon H, Visser EJW. 2004. Density-induced plant size reduction and size inequalities in ethylene-sensing and ethylene-insensitive tobacco. Plant Biology 6: 201205.
  • Pilon-Smits EAH, Ebskamp MJM, Paul MJ, Jeuken MJW, Weisbeek PJ, Smeekens SCM. 1995. Improved performance of transgenic fructan-accumulating tobacco under drought stress. Plant Physiology 107: 125130.
  • Pons TL. 1977. An ecophysiological study in the field layer of ash coppice. II. Experiments with Geum urbanum and Cirsium palustre in different light intensities. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 26: 2942.
  • Poorter H, Nagel O. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 595607.
  • Poorter H, Navas ML. 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. Tansley review. New Phytologist 157: 175198.
  • Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytologist 182: 565588.
  • Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Walter A, Fiorani F, Schurr U. 2010. A method to construct dose–response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 20432055.
  • Poorter H, Pothmann P. 1992. Growth and carbon economy of a fast-growing and a slow-growing species as dependent on ontogeny. New Phytologist 120: 159166.
  • Poorter H, Remkes C. 1990. Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83: 553559.
  • Poorter H, Van der Werf A. 1998. Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuuren MMI, eds. Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 309336.
  • Poorter H, Villar R. 1997. Chemical composition of plants: causes and consequences of variation in allocation of C to different plant constituents. In: Bazzaz F, Grace J, eds. Plant resource allocation. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 3972.
  • Poot P, Lambers H. 2003. Growth responses to waterlogging and drainage of woody Hakea (Proteaceae) seedlings, originating from contrasting habitats in south-western Australia. Plant and Soil 253: 5770.
  • Puijalon S, Bornette G. 2006. Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species. American Journal of Botany 93: 10901099.
  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA. 2005. Reproductive allocation in plants. Burlington, VT, USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Reich P. 2002. Root–shoot relations: optimality in acclimation and adaptation or the “Emperor’s new clothes”? In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U, eds. Plant roots, the hidden half, 3rd edn. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, 205220.
  • Reich PB, Buschena C, Tjoelker MG, Wrage K, Knops J, Tilman D, Machado JL. 2003. Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: a test of functional group differences. New Phytologist 157: 617631.
  • Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Walters MB, Vanderklein DW, Buschena C. 1998. Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light. Functional Ecology 12: 327338.
  • Renton M, Poorter H. 2011. Using log–log scaling slope analysis for determining the contributions to variability in biological variables such as leaf mass per area (LMA): why it works, when it works and how it can be extended. New Phytologist 190: 58.
  • Reynolds HL, D’Antonio C. 1996. The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: opinion. Plant and Soil 185: 7597.
  • Robinson D. 2004. Scaling the depths: below-ground allocation in plants, forests and biomes. Functional Ecology 18: 290295.
  • Roumet C, Picon-Cochard C, Dawson LA, Joffre R, Mayes R, Blanchard A, Brewer MJ. 2006. Quantifying species composition in root mixtures using two methods: near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and plant wax markers. New Phytologist 170: 631638.
  • Ruark GA, Bockheim JG. 1987. Below-ground biomass of 10-, 20-, and 32-year old Populus tremuloides in Wisconsin. Pedobiologia 30: 207217.
  • Ryser P, Verduyn B, Lambers H. 1997. Phosphorus allocation and utilization in three grass species with contrasting response to N and P supply. New Phytologist 137: 293302.
  • Scheible WR, Lauerer M, Schulze ED, Caboche M, Stitt M. 1997. Accumulation of nitrate in the shoot acts as a signal to regulate shoot–root allocation in tobacco. The Plant Journal 11: 671691.
  • Schenk HJ. 2006. Root competition: beyond resource depletion. Journal of Ecology 94: 725739.
  • Schenk HJ, Jackson RB. 2002. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 90: 480494.
  • Schmitt J, Dudley SA, Pigliucci M. 1999. Manipulative approaches to testing adaptive plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade-avoidance responses in plants. American Naturalist 154: S43S54.
  • Schulte auf’m Erley G, Rademacher I, Kühbauch W. 2001. Die Blattanatomie eines schnell und eines langsam wachsenden Grases in Abhängigkeit von der Stickstoffversorgung. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 187: 231239.
  • Searles PS, Caldwell MM, Winter K. 1995. The response of five tropical dicotyledon species to solar ultraviolet-B radiation. American Journal of Botany 82: 445453.
  • Shipley B, Meziane D. 2002. The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Functional Ecology 16: 326331.
  • Stitt M, Feil R. 1999. Lateral root frequency decreases when nitrate accumulates in tobacco transformants with low nitrate reductase activity: consequences for the regulation of biomass partitioning between shoots and root. Plant and Soil 215: 143153.
  • Sugiura D, Tateno M. 2011. Optimal leaf-to-root ratio and leaf nitrogen content determined by light and nitrogen availabilities. PLoS ONE 6: e22236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022236.
  • Taub DR. 2002. Analysis of interspecific variation in plant growth responses to nitrogen. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 3441.
  • Te Beest M, Stevens N, Olff H, Van Der Putten WH. 2009. Plant–soil feedback induces shifts in biomass allocation in the invasive plant Chromolaena odorata. Journal of Ecology 97: 12811290.
  • Tholen D, Voesenek LACJ, Poorter H. 2004. Ethylene insensitivity does not increase leaf area or relative growth rate in Arabidopsis, Nicotiana tabacum, and Petunia × hybrida. Plant Physiology 134: 18031812.
  • Thomas RB, Strain BR. 1991. Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Physiology 96: 627634.
  • Thornley JHM. 1972. A balanced quantitative model for root : shoot ratios in vegetative plants. Annals of Botany 36: 431441.
  • Tilman D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB. 1998. Temperature and ontogeny mediate growth response to elevated CO2 in seedlings of five boreal tree species. New Phytologist 140: 197210.
  • Veenendaal EM, Swaine MD, Lecha RT, Walsh MF, Abebrese IK, Owusu-Afriyie K. 1996. Responses of West African forest tree seedlings to irradiance and soil fertility. Functional Ecology 10: 501511.
  • Veneklaas EJ, Poorter L. 1998. Growth and carbon partitioning of tropical tree seedlings in contrasting light environments. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuuren MMI, eds. Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 337361.
  • Veneklaas EJ, Santos Silva MPRM, den Ouden F. 2002. Determinants of growth rate in Ficus benjamina L. compared to related faster-growing woody and herbaceous species. Scientia Horticulturae 93: 7584.
  • Walters MB, Reich PB. 1989. Response of Ulmus americana seedlings to varying nitrogen and water status. 1. Photosynthesis and growth. Tree Physiology 5: 159172.
  • Wang X, Taub DR. 2010. Interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and environmental stresses on root mass fraction in plants: a meta-analytical synthesis using pairwise techniques. Oecologia 163: 111.
  • Weiner J, Campbell LG, Pino J, Echarte L. 2009. The allometry of reproduction within plant populations. Journal of Ecology 97: 12201233.
  • Werger MJA. 1983. Wurzel/Spross-Verhältnis als Merkmal der Pflanzenstrategie. In: Böhm W, Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E, eds. Wurzelökologie und ihre Nutzanwendung. Gumpenstein, Irdning, Austria: Bundesanstalt für alpenländische Landwirtschaft, 323334.
  • Wilson JB. 1988. A review of evidence on the control of shoot : root ratio, in relation to models. Annals of Botany 61: 433449.
  • Winter K, Richter A, Engelbrecht B, Posada J, Virgo A, Popp M. 1997. Effect of elevated CO2 on growth and Crassulacean-Acid-Metabolism activity of Kalanchoe pinnata under tropical conditions. Planta 201: 389396.
  • Wong SC, Kriedemann PE, Farquhar GD. 1992. CO2 × nitrogen interaction on seedling growth of four species of eucalypt. Australian Journal of Botany 40: 457472.
  • Wong SC, Osmond B. 1991. Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. III. Interactions between Triticum aestivum (C3) and Echinochloa frumentacea (C4) during growth in mixed culture under different CO2, N nutrition and irradiance treatments, with emphasis on below-ground responses estimated using the δ13C value of root biomass. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18: 137152.
  • Yang Z, Midmore DJ. 2009. Self-organisation at the whole-plant level: a modeling study. Functional Plant Biology 36: 5665.