SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • biome assembly;
  • Bursera;
  • coevolution;
  • phylogenetic structure;
  • tropical forests

Phylogenetic reconstructions of diverse tropical groups have yielded biological insights that extend well beyond the field of systematics, illuminating such topics as biome assembly and plant–insect coevolution. In this issue of New Phytologist, De-Nova et al. (pp. 276–287) present a rigorous time-calibrated phylogeny of the Neotropical tree genus Bursera in order to estimate lineage ages, and to investigate how geography and ecology have structured its species diversification. Because Bursera is a dominant component of Mesoamerican seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs), the study provides evidence relating to the origin and expansion of this important biome. The study also sets the record straight on the age of a well-known plant–herbivore interaction.

‘… and it is intriguing to imagine seasonally dry forests in the Miocene with many of the same species as today, found in the same geographic locations, but under global temperatures that were warmer than the present day.’

Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) and Bursera trees

  1. Top of page
  2. Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) and Bursera trees
  3. Biome dynamics
  4. Acknowledgements
  5. References

SDTFs occur on fertile soils and maintain a more or less continuous woody canopy. They are patchily distributed in lowland tropical regions and experience several leafless months in the dry season (< 100 mm per month). Despite the arid conditions, fire is not a natural feature of SDTFs and most of its species, which often include succulents, have few adaptations to fire. This sets SDTF apart from both grassland and wooded savannas (Pennington et al., 2009). Because of their good soils, STDFs have been largely displaced by agriculture, and are considered the most threatened type of tropical forest in the world.

Like other tropical American SDTFs, Mesoamerican dry forests are dominated by the legume family (Leguminosae or Fabaceae), but Bursera (Burseraceae) is a characteristic and often dominant element, especially in some areas of Mexico (Fig. 1). Burseraceae is a pantropical family of trees with aromatic terpenoid resins, which are often maintained at high-pressure in specialized leaf canals and in bark. The resins have found their way into the fabric of human culture as the source of biblical frankincense and myrrh, and the Mesoamerican incense copal, which is derived from Bursera and Protium species. Flea beetles (Blepharida) counter Bursera’s ‘squirt defense’ by chewing at the canals to reduce the pressure, and by evolving metabolic pathways that enable them to digest the toxins (Speight et al., 2008). The Bursera and Blepharida phylogenies are topologically congruent (Becerra, 2003) and because Blepharida and Bursera relatives occur both in Africa and tropical America, Becerra (2003) inferred that the Bursera–Blepharida interaction originated 112 million yr ago (Ma), when the future continents were still connected as part of the Gondwana landmass.

image

Figure 1. Bursera morelensis behind a line of columnar cacti and mimosoid legume shrubs in the seasonally dry tropical forest (SDTF) biome in Mexico. Photograph taken in the Valley of Tehuacán, Puebla, courtesy of Rosalinda Medina.

Download figure to PowerPoint

There are an estimated 106 species of Bursera distributed from Mexico to Peru and the Caribbean. Most of the species (c. 80) are endemic to various SDTF nuclei in Mexico. Using a phylogeny calibrated with fossil and biogeographic evidence, including a presumed Gondwanan (97.5 Ma) origin of the sister genus Commiphora, Becerra (2005) inferred a mid-Miocene (c. 15 Ma) origin of clades located near the western Sierra Madre mountains, with subsequent radiation along the more southern Mexican Transvolcanic belt. Because the timing of two major pulses of Bursera speciation appeared to overlap in time and space with the uplift of the two mountain chains, Becerra (2005) proposed that these mountains created the climatic conditions necessary for Bursera speciation and for the expansion of Mexican SDTFs.

De-Nova et al. have built upon previous work in many ways, including: increasing the taxonomic sampling to include 93 out of the 106 known species; using several additional genome regions in phylogenetic estimation; increasing the number of fossil calibration points to 17; and excluding biogeographic calibration points such as hypotheses of Gondwana vicariance.

The new analysis has produced a much younger estimate for the age of the Bursera (c. 50 Ma; see table 1 in De-Nova et al.). The fact that Bursera may be > 60 million yr younger than the prior estimates does not come as a surprise. In a careful phylogenetic analysis of the Burseraceae, Weeks et al. (2005) estimated that the family shared a common ancestor with the Anacardiaceae c. 60 Ma, which would make the Burseraceae, and all of its subclades, much too recent to be of Gondwanan origin. Because most of the relevant fossils occurred in high latitudes, Weeks et al. (2005) hypothesized that the family originated in North America at a time when frost intolerant (‘boreotropical’) vegetation covered much of that continent. Boreotropical dispersal has supplanted Gondwana vicariance as a preeminent explanation for many pantropical plant distributions (Davis et al., 2002). The weight of the evidence points to an Eocene origin for Bursera, which suggests that the notion of an ancient 112 million yr history of coevolution between Bursera and Blepharida (Becerra et al., 2009) should be discarded [correction added after online publication, 2 December 2011: the preceding sentence has been corrected to omit the citation for Speight et al., 2008].

Despite this and other discrepancies in the revised set of divergence time estimates (see table 1 in De-Nova et al.), the timing of diversification in both studies overlaps with mountain uplift events. As De-Nova et al. point out, however, the mountain building spans such a broad time frame (starting from the middle Cretaceous for the Sierra Madres) that it would be remarkable to not find some overlap. Uncertainty around geological and molecular clock estimates makes it difficult to find strong correlations, let alone causal relationships, between specific geological events and the origin of the SDTF biome.

Biome dynamics

  1. Top of page
  2. Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) and Bursera trees
  3. Biome dynamics
  4. Acknowledgements
  5. References

De-Nova et al. dated the origin of most Bursera species to the Miocene, and they report an average species age of > 7 Ma. Such old species are unusual in the tropical plant literature (but see Dick et al., 2003; Pennington et al., 2010). Most species in the Neotropical tree genus Inga (Fabaceae; c. 300 species), for example, originated during the last two million yr of the Pleistocene (Richardson et al., 2001). The method used by De-Nova et al. estimates the age of the common ancestor of putative sister species and may overestimate individual species ages, particularly if the actual sister species has not been sampled (or is extinct). Nevertheless, these are very old species, and it is intriguing to imagine seasonally dry forests in the Miocene with many of the same species as today, found in the same geographic locations, but under global temperatures that were warmer than the present day.

De-Nova et al. found evidence of phylogenetic clustering of Bursera species with respect to geographic distribution. This strong signal of phylogenetic geographic structure, where sister species are likely to be found sharing the same SDTF nucleus, has also been found in legumes of South American SDTFs (Pennington et al., 2009). There were few evolutionary transitions in Bursera to non-SDTF habitats, and migration among SDTF nuclei was rare. This suggests that non-SDTF habitats pose a barrier to migration, even over evolutionary time scales, and perhaps that even if propagules reach a new SDTF area, establishment is infrequent. The limited interchange of species between the SDTF nuclei has resulted in high beta (among site) diversity in Bursera, and in the woody plant component of the SDTF as a whole (Linares et al., 2011). The high phylogenetic geographic structure found in Neotropical SDTFs may not be duplicated in Neotropical rain forests such as the Amazon (Pennington et al., 2009), where the geographic structure of plant phylogenies is much lower. This may partly reflect the fact that dispersal – even across major oceans – has been important in shaping tropical rain forests communities over evolutionary time scales (Pennington & Dick, 2004).

In Bursera, habitat switching most frequently occurs from the SDTFs to more xeric habitats, with a single transition to wetter forests. This phylogenetic niche conservatism may reflect physiological trade-offs that largely confine Bursera to the STDF biome. For example, trade-offs between growth and drought tolerance might keep Bursera from competing in wetter forests (Engelbrecht et al., 2007). Or, as in the case of Amazonian Burseraceae in the genus Protium, the trade-off may involve production of chemical defenses at the expense of faster growth. This was shown experimentally for Protium found in white-sand forest in the Amazon basin (Fine et al., 2006). A similar experimental approach may uncover some of the physiological trade-offs that restrict Bursera and some legume clades to the SDTF biome.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) and Bursera trees
  3. Biome dynamics
  4. Acknowledgements
  5. References

We would like to thank P. Fine, A. Weeks and S. Magallón for reading over the manuscript.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) and Bursera trees
  3. Biome dynamics
  4. Acknowledgements
  5. References
  • Becerra JX. 2003. Synchronous coadaptation in an ancient case of herbivory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 1280412807.
  • Becerra JX. 2005. Timing the origin and expansion of the Mexican tropical dry forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 1091910923.
  • Becerra JX, Noge K, Venable DL. 2009. Macroevolutionary chemical escalation in an ancient plant–herbivore arms race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 1806218066.
  • Davis CC, Bell CD, Mathews S, Donoghue M. 2002. Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 68336837.
  • De-Nova JA, Medina R, Montero JC, Weeks A, Rosell JA, Olson ME, Eguiarte LE, Magallón S. 2012. Insights into the historical construction of species-rich Mesoamerican seasonally dry tropical forests: the diversification of Bursera (Burseraceae, Sapindales). New Phytologist 193: 276287 [correction added after online publication, 2 December 2011: the publication year of this reference has been corrected to 2012 instead of 2011].
  • Dick CW, Abdul-Salim K, Bermingham E. 2003. Molecular systematics reveals cryptic Tertiary diversification of a widespread tropical rainforest tree. American Naturalist 162: 691703.
  • Engelbrecht BMJ, Comita LS, Condit R, Kursar TA, Tyree MT, Turner BL, Hubbell SP. 2007. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature 447: 8083.
  • Fine PVA, Miller ZJ, Mesones I, Irazuzta S, Appel HM, Stevens MHH, Saaksjarvi I, Schultz LC, Coley PD. 2006. The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87: S150S162.
  • Linares R, Oliveira Filho AT, Pennington RT. 2011. Neotropical seasonally dry forests: diversity, endemism and bioeography of woody plants. In: Dirzo R, Mooney H, Ceballos G, Young H, eds. Latin American seasonally dry tropical forests. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 322.
  • Pennington RT, Dick CW. 2004. The role of immigrants in the assembly of the South American rainforest tree flora. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences 359: 16111622.
  • Pennington RT, Lavin M, Oliveira A. 2009. Woody plant diversity, evolution, and ecology in the tropics: perspectives from seasonally dry tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 40: 437457.
  • Pennington RT, Lavin M, Sarkinen T, Lewis GP, Klitgaard BB, Hughes CE. 2010. Contrasting plant diversification histories within the Andean biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 1378313787.
  • Richardson JE, Pennington RT, Pennington TD, Hollingsworth PM. 2001. Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of neotropical rain forest trees. Science 293: 22422245.
  • Speight MR, Hunter MD, Watt AD. 2008. Ecology of insects: concepts and applications. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Weeks A, Daly DC, Simpson BB. 2005. The phylogenetic history and biogeography of the frankincense and myrrh family (Burseraceae) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 85101.