Alien plant species with a wider global distribution are better able to capitalize on increased resource availability
Version of Record online: 12 MAR 2012
© 2012 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2012 New Phytologist Trust
Volume 194, Issue 3, pages 859–867, May 2012
How to Cite
Dawson, W., Rohr, R. P., van Kleunen, M. and Fischer, M. (2012), Alien plant species with a wider global distribution are better able to capitalize on increased resource availability. New Phytologist, 194: 859–867. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04104.x
- Issue online: 10 APR 2012
- Version of Record online: 12 MAR 2012
- Received: 5 December 2011, Accepted: 27 January 2012
- 1985. Resource limitation in plants – an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 16: 363–392. , , .
- 2005. Inter-related causes of plant invasion. Science 310: 243–244. .
- 2009. Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 7899–7904. , , , .
- 2009. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. , , , .
- 2010. Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 310–318. , , , .
- 2004. A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Diversity and Distributions 10: 387–397. .
- 2011. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species, and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 14: 419–431. , , .
- 2001. Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecology Letters 4: 421–428. , .
- 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528–534. , , .
- 2011. Maximum relative growth rate of common UK plant species is positively associated with their global invasiveness. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20: 299–306. , , .
- 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 135–139. , .
- 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125: 1–15. .
- 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160: 712–726. , , .
- 2008. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. Journal of Ecology 96: 1162–1173. .
- 2010. Physiological responses to short-term water and light stress in native and invasive plant species in southern California. Biological Invasions 12: 1685–1694. , .
- Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, eds. 1996. Markov chain monte carlo in practice. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall.
- 2011. Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity. Functional Ecology 25: 1248–1259. , , .
- 2010. Can ecological stoichiometry help explain patterns of biological invasions? Oikos 119: 779–790. , , , , , .
- 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London Series B – Biological Sciences 326: 119–157. .
- 1999. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80: 1142–1149. , .
- 2005. Can differential responses to nutrients explain the success of environmental weeds? Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 77–84. , .
- 2010. Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science, 324: 636–638. , , .
- 2008. Effect of soil nitrogen stress on the relative growth rate of annual and perennial grasses in the Intermountain West. Plant and Soil 310: 201–210. .
- 2011. A phylogenetic comparative study of preadaptation for invasiveness in the genus Silene (Caryophyllaceae). Biological Invasions 13: 1471–1486. , .
- 2010. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters, 13: 947–958. , , , , .
- 2007. Effects of self-compatibility on the distribution range of invasive European plants in North America. Conservation Biology 21: 1537–1544. , .
- 2011. Pre-adapted for invasiveness: do species traits or their plastic responses to shading differ between invasive and non-invasive plant species in their native range? Journal of Biogeography 38: 1294–1304. , , , .
- 2005. Experimental evidence for the effects of additional water, nutrients and physical disturbance on invasive plants in low fertility Hawkesbury Sandstone soils, Sydney, Australia. Journal of Ecology 93: 38–49. , .
- 2010. Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. Journal of Ecology 98: 28–42. , , .
- 2008. Why are evergreen trees so contrary about shade? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 299–303. , , , , .
- 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature, 421: 625–627. , .
- 2010. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science 15: 684–692. , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2010. Functional differences between native and alien species: a global-scale comparison. Functional Ecology 24: 1353–1361. , , .
- 2011. Invaisve plants do not display greater phenotypic plasticity than their native or non-invasive counterparts: a meta-analysis. Oikos 120: 1393–1401. , .
- 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289–290. , , .
- 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist 193: 30–50. , , , , , .
- 2009. The global invasion success of central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits. Diversity and Distributions 15: 891–903. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W, ed. Biological invasions. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 97–126. , .
- R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- 2002. A global compendium of weeds. Melbourne, Vic., Australia: RG and FJ Richardson. .
- 1998. Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light. Functional Ecology 12: 327–338. , , , , .
- 1996. The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: opinion. Plant and Soil 185: 75–97. , .
- 2006. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9: 981–993. , , , , .
- 2000. MetaWin version 2: statistical software for meta-analysis with resampling tests. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates. , , .
- 2002. The combined impacts of deep shade and drought on the growth and biomass allocation of shade-tolerant woody seedlings. Oecologia 131: 175–185. , .
- 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774. , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2010. A multi-species experiment in their native range indicates pre-adaptation of invasive alien plant species. New Phytologist 185: 1087–1099. , , , .
- 2010. Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land-use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them? Journal of Ecology 98: 17–27. , , , .
- University of Texas Health Science Center. 2002. UTHSCA Image Tool version 3.0. San Antonio, TX, USA: University of Texas Health Science Center. [WWW document]. URL. http://ddsdx.uthscsa.edu/dig/download.html. [accessed on 10 January 2010].
- USDA ARS National Genetic Resources Program 2010. Germplasm Resources Information Network - (GRIN) [Online Database]. Beltsville, MD, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. [WWW document]. URL http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxgenform.pl?language=en [accessed on 15 June 2010].
- 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 39: 237–257. , .
- 2005. Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 181–183. , .
- 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821–827. , , , , , , , , , et al.