SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alvarez-Castro JM, Alvarez G. 2005. Models of general frequency-dependent selection and mating-interaction effects and the analysis of selection patterns in Drosophila inversion polymorphisms. Genetics 170: 11671179.
  • Alvarez-Castro JM, Carlborg O. 2008. The yank of Dobzhansky’s bequest. Evolutionary Biology 35: 176181.
  • Balao F, Herrera J, Talavera S. 2011. Phenotypic consequences of polyploidy and genome size at the microevolutionary scale: a multivariate morphological approach. New Phytologist 192: 256265.
  • Ball PW, Reznicek AA, Murray DF. 2002. Cyperaceae Jussieu. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 23. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 3608.
  • Barton N. 1995. A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genetical Research 65: 123144.
  • Bell G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
  • Betancourt AJ, Welch JJ, Charlesworth B. 2009. Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination. Current Biology 19: 655660.
  • Bogdanowicz AM, Olejniczak P, Lembicz M, Zukowski W. 2011. Costs of reproduction in life history of a perennial plant Carex secalina. Central European Journal of Biology 6: 870877.
  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
  • Burt A. 2000. Perspective: sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection – was Weismann right? Evolution 54: 337351.
  • Butler M, King AA. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modelling approach for adaptive evolution. American Naturalist 164: 683695.
  • Butlin RK. 2005. Recombination and speciation. Molecular Ecology 14: 26212635.
  • Chater AO. 1980. Carex L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea, vol. 5. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 290323.
  • Chung K-S, Hipp AL, Roalson EH. 2012. Chromosome number evolves independently of genome size in a clade with non-localized centromeres (Carex: Cyperaceae). Evolution. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01624.x.
  • Chung K-S, Weber JA, Hipp AL. 2011. Dynamics of chromosome number and genome size variation in a cytogenetically variable sedge (Carex scoparia var. scoparia, Cyperaceae). American Journal of Botany 98: 122129.
  • Cope TA, Stace CA. 1985. Cytology and hybridization in the Juncus bufonius L. aggregate in Western Europe. Watsonia 15: 103320.
  • Davies EW. 1956. Cytology, evolution and origin of the aneuploid series in the genus Carex. Hereditas 42: 349365.
  • Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4: 699710.
  • Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
  • Dumond BL, Payseur BA. 2008. Evolution of the genomic rate of recombination in mammals. Evolution 62: 276294.
  • Edwards AWF. 1992. Likelihood, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Escudero M, Hipp AL, Luceño M. 2010. Karyotype stability and predictors of chromosome number variation in sedges: a study in Carex section Spirostachyae (Cyperaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 353363.
  • Escudero M, Hipp AL, Waterway M, Valente LM. 2012. Diversification rates and chromosome evolution in the most diverse angiosperm genus of the temperate zone (Carex, Cyperaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.005.
  • Faulkner JS. 1972. Chromosome studies on Carex section Acutae in northwest Europe. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 65: 271301.
  • Felsenstein J. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. American Naturalist 171: 713725.
  • Forni-Martins ER, da Cruz ND. 1996. Recombination indices in species of Erythtina L. (Leguminoseae, Papilionoideae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 122: 163170.
  • Friedman J, Barrett SCH. 2009. The consequences of monoecy and protogyny for mating in wind-pollinated Carex. New Phytologist 181: 489497.
  • Grant VE. 1958. The regulation of recombination in plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 23: 337363.
  • Greilhuber J. 1995. Chromosomes of the monocotiledons (general aspects). In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ, eds. Monocotiledons: systematic and evolution. London, UK: Royal Botanical Gardens Kew, 379414.
  • Hansen TF. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51: 13411351.
  • Hansen TF, Bartoszek K. 2012. Interpreting the evolutionary regression: the interplay between observational and biological errors in phylogenetic comparative studies. Systematic Biology. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr122.
  • Hansen TF, Pienaar J, Orzack SH. 2008. A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment. Evolution 62: 19651977.
  • Heilborn O. 1924. Chromosome numbers and dimensions, species formations and phylogeny in genus Carex. Hereditas 5: 129216.
  • Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J. 2010. dismo: species distribution modeling. R package. [WWW document] URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dismo/index.html [accessed 18 November 2011].
  • Hipp AL. 2007. Nonuniform processes of chromosome evolution in sedges (Carex: Cyperaceae). Evolution 61: 21752194.
  • Hipp AL, Rothrock PE, Roalson EH. 2009. The evolution of chromosome arrangements in Carex (Cyperaceae). Botanical Review 75: 96109.
  • Hipp AL, Rothrock PE, Whitkus R, Weber JA. 2010. Chromosomes tell half of the story: the correlation between karyotype rearrangements and genetic diversity in sedges, a group with holocentric chromosomes. Molecular Ecology 19: 31243138.
  • Hoffmann AA, Rieseberg LH. 2008. Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39: 2142.
  • Kükenthal G. 1909. Cyperaceae-Caricoideae. In: Engler A (ed.). Das Pflanzenreich, vol 4 (20). Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann, 1814.
  • Labra A, Pienaar J, Hansen TF. 2009. Evolution of thermal physiology in Liolaemus lizards: adaptation, phylogenetic inertia, and niche tracking. American Naturalist 174: 204220.
  • Lawrence ME. 1985. Senecio L. (Asteraceae) in Australia: recombination systems of a polyploid series. Australian Journal of Botany 33: 209219.
  • Luceño M. 1993. Chromosome studies on Carex (L.) section Mitratae Kükenth. (Cyperaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Cytologia 58: 321330.
  • Luceño M, Castroviejo S. 1991. Agmatoploidy in Carex laevigata (Cyperaceae) fusion and fission of chromosomes as the mechanism of cytogenetic evolution in Iberian populations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 177: 149159.
  • Luceño M, Guerra M. 1996. Numerical variations in species exhibiting holocentric chromosomes: a nomenclatural proposal. Caryologia 49: 301309.
  • Mather K. 1943. Polygenic inheritance and natural selection. Biological Review 18: 3264.
  • Mola LM, Papeschi AG. 2006. Holocentric chromosomes at a glance. Journal of Basic and Applied Genetics 17: 1733.
  • Nokkala S, Kuznetsova VG, Maryanska-Nadachowska A, Nokkala C. 2004. Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. I. Restriction of the number of chiasmata in bivalents. Chromosome Research 12: 733739.
  • Otto SP, Barton NH. 2001. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55: 19211931.
  • Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34: 401437.
  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289290.
  • Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C. 2001. Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals. Mammalian Genome 12: 318322.
  • Pianka ER. 1970. On r and K selection. American Naturalist 104: 592597.
  • R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Reznicek AA. 1990. Evolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 14091432.
  • Roalson EH. 2008. A synopsis of chromosome number variation in the Cyperaceae. Botanical Review 74: 209393.
  • Sadava D, Heller HC, Orians GH, Purves WK, Hillis DM. 2007. Life: the science of biology, 8th edn. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates and New York, NY, USA: WH Freeman.
  • Sonesson M, Callaghan TV. 1991. Strategies of survival in plants of the Fennoscandian tundra. Arctic 44: 95105.
  • Stebbins GL. 1958. The inviability, weakness and sterility of interspecific hybrids. Advances in Genetics 9: 147215.
  • Stone GN, Nee S, Felsenstein J. 2011. Controlling for non-independence in comparative analysis of patterns across populations within species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 14101424.
  • Waterway MJ, Hoshino T, Masaki T. 2009. Phylogeny, species richness, and ecological specialization in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae. Botanical Review 75: 138159.
  • Yan-Cheng T, Qiu-Yun X. 1989. Cytological studies of Carex siderosticta Hance (Cyperaceae) and its importance in phytogeography. Cathaya 1: 4960.