SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albrecht E, Chetelat RT. 2009. Comparative genetic linkage map of Solanum sect. Juglandifolia: evidence of chromosomal rearrangements and overall synteny with the tomatoes and related nightshades. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 831847.
  • Anderson L, Covey P, Larsen L, Bedinger P, Stack S. 2010. Structural differences in chromosomes distinguish species in the tomato clade. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 129: 2434.
  • Bohs L, Olmstead RG. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ndhF sequences. Systematic Botany 22: 517.
  • Bonierbale MW, Plaisted RL, Tanksley SD. 1988. RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120: 10951103.
  • Canady MA, Ji Y, Chetelat RT. 2006. Homeologous recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines of cultivated tomato. Genetics 174: 17751788.
  • Chang SB, Yang TJ, Datema E, Van Vugt J, Vosman B, Kuipers A, Meznikova M, Szinay D, Lankhorst RK, Jacobsen E et al. 2008. FISH mapping and molecular organization of the major repetitive sequences of tomato. Chromosome Research 16: 919933.
  • Chetelat RT, Meglic V, Cisneros P. 2000. A genetic map of tomato based on BC1 Lycopersicon esculentum × Solanum lycopersicoides reveals overall synteny but suppressed recombination between these homeologous genomes. Genetics 154: 857867.
  • Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay MC, Lester RN, Tanksley SD. 2002. A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161: 16971711.
  • Fulton TM, Van der Hoeven R, Eannetta NT, Tanksley SD. 2002. Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14: 14571467.
  • Gottschalk W. 1954. Die Chromosomenstruktur der Solanaceen unter Berücksichtigung phylogenetischer Fragestellungen. Chromosoma 6: 539626.
  • Grube RC, Radwanski ER, Jahn M. 2000. Comparative genetics of disease resistance within the Solanaceae. Genetics 155: 873887.
  • Huang YL, Huang CC, Tang CY, Lu CL. 2010. SoRT2: a tool for sorting genomes and reconstructing phylogenetic trees by reversals, generalized transpositions and translocations. Nucleic Acids Research 2010: 17.
  • Iovene M, Wielgus SM, Simon PW, Buell CR, Jiang J. 2008. Chromatin structure and physical mapping of chromosome 6 of potato and comparative analyses with tomato. Genetics 180: 13071317.
  • Jacobs MMJ, Smulders MJM, van den Berg RG, Vosman B. 2011. What’s in a name: genetic structure in Solanum section Petota studied using population-genetic tools. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 42.
  • Jacobs MMJ, van den Berg RG, Vleeshouwers VGAA, Visser M, Mank R, Sengers M, Hoekstra R, Vosman B. 2008. AFLP analysis reveals a lack of phylogenetic structure within Solanum section Petota. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 145.
  • de Jong JH, Wolters AMA, Kok JM, Verhaar H, van Eden J. 1993. Chromosome pairing and potential for intergeneric recombination in some hypotetraploid somatic hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum (+) Solanum tuberosum. Genome 36: 10321041.
  • van der Knaap E, Sanyal A, Jackson SA, Tanksley SD. 2004. High-resolution fine mapping and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of sun, a locus controlling tomato fruit shape, reveals a region of the tomato genome prone to DNA rearrangements. Genetics Society of America 168: 21272140.
  • Livingstone KD, Lackney VK, Blauth JR, van Wijk R, Jahn MK. 1999. Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics 152: 11831202.
  • Lou Q, Iovene M, Spooner DM, Buell CR, Jiang J. 2010. Evolution of chromosome 6 of Solanum species revealed by comparative fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping. Chromosoma 119: 435442.
  • Lysak M, Pecinka A, Schubert I. 2003. Recent progress in chromosome painting of Arabidopsis and related species. Chromosome Research 11: 195204.
  • Lysak MA, Cheung K, Kitschke M, Bures P. 2007. Ancestral chromosomal blocks are triplicated in Brassiceae species with varying chromosome number and genome size. Plant Physiology 145: 402410.
  • Lysak MA, Fransz PF, Ali HB, Schubert I. 2001. Chromosome painting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal 28: 689697.
  • Lysak MA, Lexer C. 2006. Towards the era of comparative evolutionary genomics in Brassicaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 259: 175198.
  • Müller S, Hollatz M, Wienberg J. 2003. Chromosomal phylogeny and evolution of gibbons (Hylobatidae). Human Genetics 113: 493501.
  • Peralta IE, Spooner DM. 2001. Granule-bond starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst. Subsection Lycopersicon. American Journal of Botany 88: 18881902.
  • Peralta IE, Spooner DM, Knapp S. 2008. The taxonomy of tomatoes: a revision of wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon) and their outgroup relatives in section Juglandifolia and Lycopersicoides. Systematic Botany Monographs 84: 1186.
  • Pertuzé RA, Ji Y, Chetelat RT. 2002. Comparative linkage map of the Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens genomes and their differentiation from tomato. Genome 45: 10031012.
  • Peterson DG, Pearson WR, Stack SM. 1998. Characterization of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) genome using in vitro and in situ DNA reassociation. Genome 41: 346356.
  • Rens W, Fu B, O’Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith M. 2006. Cross-species chromosome painting. Nature Protocols 1: 783790.
  • Rodriguez F, Wu F, Ane C, Tanksley S, Spooner DM. 2009. Do potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and what proportion of the genome supports this history? BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 191.
  • Schubert I, Fransz P, Fuchs J, De Jong J. 2001. Chromosome painting in plants. Methods in Cell Science 23: 5769.
  • Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison P. 2000. Practical in situ hybridization. Oxford, UK: BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd. ISBN 1-85996-138-x, 1-203.
  • Seah S, Yaghoobi J, Rossi M, Gleason CA, Williamson VM. 2004. The nematode-resistance gene, Mi-1, is associated with an inverted chromosomal segment in susceptible compared to resistant tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 16351642.
  • Spooner DM, Anderson GJ, Jansen RK. 1993. Chloroplast evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 676688.
  • Spooner DM, Peralta IE, Knapp S. 2005. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. Section Lycopersicon (mill.) wettst.]. Taxon 54: 4361.
  • Spooner DM, Raul Castillo T. 1997. Reexamination of series relationships of South American wild potatoes (Solanaceae: Solanum section Petota): evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. American Journal of Botany 84: 671685.
  • Stamova BS, Chetelat RT. 2000. Inheritance and genetic mapping of cucumber mosaic virus resistance introgressed from Lycopersicon chilense into tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 527537.
  • Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP 4.0: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
  • Szinay D, Chang SB, Khrustaleva L, Peters S, Schijlen E, Bai Y, Stiekema WJ, Van Ham RCHJ, de Jong H, Klein Lankhorst RM. 2008. High-resolution chromosome mapping of BACs using multi-colour FISH and pooled-BAC FISH as a backbone for sequencing tomato chromosome 6. Plant Journal 56: 627637.
  • Tang X, Szinay D, Lang C, Ramanna MS, Van Der Vossen EAG, Datema E, Lankhorst RK, De Boer J, Peters SA, Bachem C et al. 2008. Cross-species bacterial artificial chromosome-fluorescence in situ hybridization painting of the tomato and potato chromosome 6 reveals undescribed chromosomal rearrangements. Genetics 180: 13191328.
  • Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, Devicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB et al. 1992. High-density molecular linkage maps of tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 11411160.
  • Verlaan MG, Szinay D, Hutton SF, de Jong H, Kormelink R, Visser RGF, Scott JW, Bai Y. 2011. Chromosomal rearrangements between tomato and Solanum chilense hamper mapping and breeding of the TYLCV resistance gene Ty-1. Plant Journal 68: 10934403.
  • van der Voort JR, Van Zandvoort P, Van Eck H, Folkertsma R, Hutten R, Draaistra J, Gommers F, Jacobsen E, Helder J, Bakker J. 1997. Use of allele specificity of comigrating AFLP markers to align genetic maps from different potato genotypes. Molecular and General Genetics 255: 438447.
  • Wang Y, Diehl A, Wu F, Vrebalov J, Giovannoni J, Siepel A, Tanksley SD. 2008. Sequencing and comparative analysis of a conserved syntenic segment in the Solanaceae. Genetics, 180: 391408.
  • Weese TL, Bohs L. 2007. A three-gene phylogeny of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae). Systematic Botany 32: 445463.
  • Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Durrett R, Mazourek M, Jahn MM, Tanksley SD. 2009b. A COSII genetic map of the pepper genome provides a detailed picture of synteny with tomato and new insights into recent chromosome evolution in the genus Capsicum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 12791293.
  • Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Tanksley SD. 2009a. A detailed synteny map of the eggplant genome based on conserved ortholog set II (COSII) markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 927935.
  • Wu F, Tanksley SD. 2010. Chromosomal evolution in the plant family Solanaceae. BMC Genomics 182: 14712164.
  • Zuriaga Z, Blanca J, Nuez F. 2009. Classification and phylogenetic relationships in Solanum section Lycopersicon based on AFLP and two nuclear gene sequences. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 663678.