SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arnesen T. 1999. Vegetation dynamics following trampling in rich fen at Solendet, central Norway; a 15 year study of recovery. Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 313327.
  • Arroniz-Crespo M, Gwynn-Jones D, Callaghan TV, Nunez-Olivera E, Martinez-Abaigar J, Horton P, Phoenix GK. 2011. Impacts of long-term enhanced UV-B radiation on bryophytes in two sub-Arctic heathland sites of contrasting water availability. Annals of Botany 108: 557565.
  • Astrom M, Dynesius M, Hylander K, Nilsson C. 2005. Effects of slash harvest on bryophytes and vascular plants in southern boreal forest clear-cuts. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 11941202.
  • Astrom M, Dynesius M, Hylander K, Nilsson C. 2007. Slope aspect modifies community responses to clear-cutting in boreal forests. Ecology 88: 749758.
  • Astrup R, Coates KD, Hall E. 2008. Recruitment limitation in forests: lessons from an unprecedented mountain pine beetle epidemic. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 17431750.
  • Baldwin LK, Bradfield GE. 2007. Bryophyte responses to fragmentation in temperate coastal rainforests: a functional group approach. Biological Conservation 136: 408422.
  • Baldwin LK, Bradfield GE. 2010. Resilience of bryophyte communities in regenerating matrix forests after logging in temperate rainforests of coastal British Columbia. Botany 88: 297314.
  • Basilier K. 1979. Moss-associated nitrogen-fixation in some mire and coniferous forest environments around Uppsala, Sweden. Lindbergia 5: 8488.
  • Belland RJ, Schofield WB. 1994. The ecology and phytogeography of the bryophytes of Cape-Breton Highlands National-Park, Canada. Nova Hedwigia 59: 275309.
  • Belyea LR, Baird AJ. 2006. The limits to peat bog growth: cross-scale feedback in peatland development. Ecological Monographs 76: 299322.
  • Benscoter BW, Thompson DK, Waddington JM, Flannigan MD, Wotton BM, de Groot WJ, Turetsky MR. 2011. Interactive effects of vegetation, soil moisture and bulk density on depth of burning of thick organic soils. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20: 418429.
  • Benscoter BW, Vitt DH. 2008. Spatial patterns and temporal trajectories of the bog ground layer along a post-fire chronosequence. Ecosystems 11: 10541064.
  • Benscoter BW, Wieder RK. 2003. Variability in organic matter lost by combustion in a boreal bog during the 2001 Chisholm fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 25092513.
  • Blok D, Heijmans MMPD, Schaepman-Strub G, van Ruijven J, Parmentier FJW, Maximov TC, Berendse F. 2011. The cooling capacity of mosses: controls on water and energy fluxes in a Siberian tundra site. Ecosystems 14: 10551065.
  • Bonan GB, Pollard D, Thompson SL. 1992. Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate. Nature 359: 716718.
  • Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST, Ahl DE, Thornton PE. 2005. Reimplementation of the Biome-BGC model to simulate successional change. Tree Physiology 25: 413424.
  • Bond-Lamberty B, Peckham SD, Ahl DE, Gower ST. 2007. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance. Nature 450: 89.
  • Botting RS, Fredeen AL. 2006. Contrasting terrestrial lichen, liverwort, and moss diversity between old-growth and young second-growth forest on two soil textures in central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany 84: 120132.
  • Breeuwer A, Robroek BJM, Limpen J, Heijmans MMPD, Schouten MGC, Berendse F. 2009. Decreased summer water table depth affects peatland vegetation. Basic and Applied Ecology 10: 330339.
  • Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Janssens JA, Chapin C, Malterer TJ. 1996. Multiple limiting gradients in peatlands: a call for a new paradigm. Wetlands 16: 4565.
  • Brown CD, Johnstone JF. 2011. How does increased fire frequency affect carbon loss from fire? A case study in the northern boreal forest. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20: 829837.
  • Camill P, Chihara L, Adams B, Andreassi C, Barry A, Kalim S, Limmer J, Mandell M, Rafert G. 2010. Early life history transitions and recruitment of Picea mariana in thawed boreal permafrost peatlands. Ecology 91: 448459.
  • Chapin FS, Bret Harte MS, Hobbie SE, Zhong HL. 1996. Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 347358.
  • Chapin FS III, Oechel WC, Van Cleve K, Lawrence W. 1987. The role of mosses in the phosphorus cycling of an Alaskan black spruce forest. Oecologia 74: 310315.
  • Chapin FS, Sala OE, Burke IC, Grime JP, Hooper DU, Lauenroth WK, Lombard A, Mooney HA, Mosier AR, Naeem S et al. 1998. Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity – experimental evidence and a research agenda for the future. BioScience 48: 4552.
  • Chapin FS, Shaver GR, Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Laundre JA. 1995. Responses of Arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76: 694711.
  • Chapin FS, Walker LR, Fastie CL, Sharman LC. 1994. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecological Monographs 64: 149175.
  • Clymo RS, Hayward PM. 1982. The ecology of Sphagnum. In: Smith AJE, ed. Bryophyte ecology. New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall, 229288.
  • Cornelissen HC, Lang SI, Soudzilovskaia NA, During HJ. 2007. Comparative cryptogam ecology: a review of bryophyte and lichen traits that drive biogeochemistry. Annals of Botany 99: 9871001.
  • Crowley KF, Bedford BL. 2011. Mosses influence phosphorus cycling in rich fens by driving redox conditions in shallow soils. Oecologia 167: 253264.
  • Darell P, Cronberg N. 2011. Bryophytes in black alder swamps in south Sweden: habitat classification, environmental factors and life-strategies. Lindbergia 34: 929.
  • DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Gentili F, Sellstedt A, Nilsson M-C. 2007. Ecosystem controls on nitrogen fixation in boreal feather moss communities. Oecologia 152: 121130.
  • Devi N, Hagedorn F, Moiseev P, Bugmann H, Shiyatov S, Mazepa V, Rigling A. 2008. Expanding forests and changing growth forms of Siberian larch at the Polar Urals treeline during the 20th century. Global Change Biology 14: 15811591.
  • Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, van Logtestijn RSP. 2004. Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub-arctic bog. Global Change Biology 10: 93104.
  • Drever CR, Peterson G, Messier C, Bergeron Y, Flannigan M. 2006. Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 22852299.
  • During HJ. 1992. Ecological classifications of bryophytes and lichens. In: Bates J, Farmer A, eds. Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: Clarendon Press, 131.
  • Dynesius M, Hylander K. 2007. Resilience of bryophyte communities to clear-cutting of boreal stream-side forests. Biological Conservation 135: 423434.
  • Dynesius M, Hylander K, Nilsson C. 2009. High resilience of bryophyte assemblages in streamside compared to upland forests. Ecology 90: 10421054.
  • Elumeeva TG, Soudzilovskaia NA, During HJ, Cornelissen JHC. 2011. The importance of colony structure versus shoot morphology for the water balance of 22 subarctic bryophyte species. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 152164.
  • Euskirchen ES, McGuire AD, Chapin FS. 2007. Energy feedbacks of northern high-latitude ecosystems to the climate system due to reduced snow cover during 20th century warming. Global Change Biology 13: 24252438.
  • Euskirchen ES, McGuire AD, Chapin FS III, Yi S, Thompson CC. 2009. Changes in vegetation in northern Alaska under scenarios of climate change, 2003–2100: implications for climate feedbacks. Ecological Applications 19: 10221043.
  • Fenton NJ, Bergeron Y. 2006. Facilitative succession in a boreal bryophyte community driven by changes in available moisture and light. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 6576.
  • Foster DR. 1985. Vegetation development following fire in Picea mariana (Black Spruce)- Pleurozium forests of south-eastern Labrador, Canada. Journal of Ecology 73: 517534.
  • Frelich LE, Reich PB. 1999. Neighborhood effects, disturbance severity, and community stability in forests. Ecosystems 2: 151166.
  • Friedel MH, Bastin GN, Griffin GF. 1988. Range sssessment and monitoring in arid lands – the derivation of functional-groups to simplify vegetation data. Journal of Environmental Management 27: 8597.
  • Frisvoll AA, Presto T. 1997. Spruce forest bryophytes in central Norway and their relationship to environmental factors including modern forestry. Ecography 20: 318.
  • Frolking S, Roulet NT, Tuittila E, Bubier JL, Quillet A, Talbot J, Richard PJH. 2010. A new model of Holocene peatland net primary production, decomposition, water balance, and peat accumulation. Earth System Dynamics 1: 121.
  • Gerdol R, Petraglia A, Bragazza L, Iacumin P, Brancaleoni L. 2007. Nitrogen deposition interacts with climate in affecting production and decomposition rates in Sphagnum mosses. Global Change Biology 13: 18101821.
  • Gignac LD, Vitt DH. 1990. Habitat limitations of Sphagnum along climatic, chemical, and physical gradients in mires of western Canada. Bryologist 93: 722.
  • Glaser PH, Janssens JA, Siegel DI. 1990. The response of vegetation to chemical and hydrological gradients in the Lost River Peatland, Northern Minnesota. Journal of Ecology 78: 10211048.
  • Glenn-Lewin DC, Van Der Maarel E. 1992. Patterns and processes of vegetation dynamics. In: Glenn-Lewin DC, Peet RK, Veblen TT, eds. Population and community biology series; plant succession: theory and prediction. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 1159.
  • Gordon C, Wynn JM, Woodin SJ. 2001. Impacts of increased nitrogen supply on high Arctic heath: the importance of bryophytes and phosphorus availability. New Phytologist 149: 461471.
  • Gornall JL, Jonsdottir IS, Woodin SJ, Van der Wal R. 2007. Arctic mosses govern below-ground environment and ecosystem processes. Oecologia 153: 931941.
  • Gornall JL, Woodin SJ, Jónsdóttir IS, van der Wal R. 2011. Balancing positive and negative plant interactions: how mosses structure vascular plant communities. Oecologia 166: 769782.
  • Graglia E, Jonasson S, Michelsen A, Schmidt IK, Havström M, Gustavsson L. 2001. Effects of environmental perturbations on abundance of subarctic plants after three, seven and ten years of treatments. Ecography 24: 512.
  • Grellmann D. 2002. Plant responses to fertilization and exclusion of grazers on an arctic tundra heath. Oikos 98: 190204.
  • Grime JP. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Grosse G, Harden J, Turetsky M, McGuire AD, Camill P, Tarnocai C, Frolking S, Schuur EAG, Jorgenson T, Marchenko S et al. 2011. Vulnerability of high-latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 116. G00K06, doi:10.1029/2010JG001507.
  • Gunderson LH. 2000. Ecological resilience – in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 425439.
  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
  • Gunnarsson U. 2005. Global patterns of Sphagnum productivity. Journal of Bryology 27: 269279.
  • Gunnarsson U, Granberg G, Nilsson M. 2004. Growth, production and interspecific competition in Sphagnum: effects of temperature, nitrogen and sulphur treatments on a boreal mire. New Phytologist 163: 349359.
  • Gunnarsson U, Rydin H. 2000. Nitrogen fertilization reduces Sphagnum production in bog communities. New Phytologist 147: 527537.
  • Haeussler S, Bartemucci P, Bedford L. 2004. Succession and resilience in boreal mixedwood plant communities 15–16 years after silvicultural site preparation. Forest Ecology and Management 199: 349370.
  • Haeussler S, Bedford L, Leduc A, Bergeron Y, Kranabetter JM. 2002. Silvicultural disturbance severity and plant communities of the southern Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fennica 36: 307327.
  • Hájek T, Ballance S, Limpens J, Zijlstra M, Verhoeven JTA. 2011. Cell-wall polysaccharides play an important role in decay resistance of Sphagnum and actively depressed decomposition in vitro. Biogeochemistry 103: 4557.
  • Hájek T, Tuittila E-S, Ilomets M, Laiho R. 2009. Light responses of mire mosses – a key to survival after water-level drawdown? Oikos 118: 240250.
  • Harden JW, Manies KL, Turetsky MR, Neff JC. 2006. Effects of wildfire and permafrost on soil organic matter and soil climate in interior Alaska. Global Change Biology 12: 23912403.
  • Harley PC, Tenhunen JD, Murray KJ, Beyers J. 1989. Irradiance and temperature effects on photosynthesis of tussock tundra Sphagnum mosses from the foothills of the Philip Smith Mountains, Alaska. Oecologia 79: 251259.
  • Hedderson TA, Longton RE. 1996. Life history variation in mosses: water relations, size and phylogeny. Oikos 77: 3143.
  • Heijmans M, Klees H, Berendse F. 2002. Competition between Sphagnum magellanicum and Eriophorum angustifolium as affected by raised CO2 and increased N deposition. Oikos 97: 415425.
  • Heijmans M, Mauquoy D, van Geel B, Berendse F. 2008. Long-term effects of climate change on vegetation and carbon dynamics in peat bogs. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 307320.
  • Higuera PE, Chipman ML, Barnes JL, Urban MA, Hu FS. 2011. Variability of tundra fire regimes in Arctic Alaska: millennial-scale patterns and ecological implications. Ecological Applications 21: 32113226.
  • Hill GB, Henry GHR. 2010. Responses of High Arctic wet sedge tundra to climate warming since 1980. Global Change Biology 17: 276287.
  • Hinzman LD, Bettez ND, Bolton WR, Chapin FS, Dyurgerov MB, Fastie CL, Griffith B, Hollister RD, Hope A, Huntington HP et al. 2005. Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other arctic regions. Climatic Change 72: 251298.
  • Hobbie SE, Chapin FS. 1998. Response of tundra plant biomass, aboveground production, nitrogen, and CO2 flux to experimental warming. Ecology 79: 15261544.
  • Hobbie SE, Schimel JP, Trumbore SE, Randerson JR. 2000. Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high-latitude soils. Global Change Biology 6: 196210.
  • Hobbie SE, Shevtsova A, Chapin FS. 1999. Plant responses to species removal and experimental warming in Alaskan tussock tundra. Oikos 84: 417434.
  • Hodson J, Fortin D, LeBlanc M-L, Belanger L. 2010. An appraisal of the fitness consequences of forest disturbance for wildlife using habitat selection theory. Oecologia 164: 7386.
  • Hogg EH. 1993. Decay potential of hummock and hollow Sphagnum peats at different depths in a Swedish raised bog. Oikos 66: 269278.
  • Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 123.
  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 335.
  • Hotes S, Grootjans AP, Takahashi H, Ekschmitt K, Poschlod P. 2010. Resilience and alternative equilibria in a mire plant community after experimental disturbance by volcanic ash. Oikos 119: 952963.
  • Hu FS, Higuera PE, Walsh JE, Chapman WL, Duffy PA, Brubaker LB, Chipman ML. 2010. Tundra burning in Alaska: linkages to climatic change and sea ice retreat. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 115: G04002.
  • Hudson JMG, Henry GHR. 2009. Increased plant biomass in a High Arctic heath community from 1981 to 2008. Ecology 90: 26572663.
  • Hughes PDM, Barber KE. 2003. Mire development across the fen-bog transition on the Teifi floodplain at Tregaron Bog, Ceredigion, Wales, and a comparison with 13 other raised bogs. Journal of Ecology 91: 253264.
  • Hughes PDM, Dumayne-Peaty L. 2002. Testing theories of mire development using multiple successions at Crymlyn Bog, West Glamorgan, South Wales, UK. Journal of Ecology 90: 456471.
  • Hunt SL, Gordon AM, Morris DM. 2005. Aspects of ecological development in managed stands of jack pine and black spruce in northern Ontario: understory vegetation and nutrient relations. Forestry Chronicle 81: 6172.
  • Hylander K, Dynesius M. 2006. Causes of the large variation in bryophyte species richness and composition among boreal streamside forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 333346.
  • Hylander K, Johnson S. 2010. In situ survival of forest bryophytes in small-scale refugia after an intense forest fire. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 10991109.
  • Ivanov KE. 1981. Water movement in mirelands. Translated from Russian by Thompson A, Ingram HAP, eds. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Jagerbrand AK, Lindblad KEM, Bjork RG, Alatalo JM, Molau U. 2006. Bryophyte and lichen diversity under simulated environmental change compared with observed variation in unmanipulated alpine tundra. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 44534475.
  • Jandt R, Joly K, Meyers CR, Racine C. 2008. Slow recovery of lichen on burned caribou winter range in Alaska tundra: potential influences of climate warming and other disturbance factors. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 40: 8995.
  • Janssens JA, Hansen BCS, Glaser PH, Whitlock C. 1992. Development of a raised-bog complex. In: Wright HE Jr, Coffin BA, Aaseng NE, eds. The patterned peatlands of Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press, 189221.
  • Jefferies RL, Jano AP, Abraham KF. 2006. A biotic agent promotes large-scale catastrophic change in the coastal marshes of Hudson Bay. Journal of Ecology 94: 234242.
  • Johnson LC, Damman AWH. 1991. Species-controlled Sphagnum decay on a south Swedish raised bog. Oikos 61: 234242.
  • Johnstone J, Chapin F. 2006. Effects of soil burn severity on post-fire tree recruitment in boreal forest. Ecosystems 9: 1431.
  • Johnstone JF. 2006. Response of boreal plant communities to variations in previous fire-free interval. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15: 497508.
  • Johnstone JF, Chapin FS III, Hollingsworth TN, Mack MC, Romanovsky V, Turetsky MR. 2010. Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40: 13021312.
  • Jonasson S. 1992. Plant-responses to fertilization and species removal in tundra related to community structure and clonality. Oikos 63: 420429.
  • Jonasson S, Michelsen A, Schmidt IK, Nielsen EV. 1999. Responses in microbes and plants to changed temperature, nutrient, and light regimes in the arctic. Ecology 80: 18281843.
  • Jonsson BG, Soderstrom L. 1988. Growth and reproduction in the leafy hepatic Ptilidium Pulcherrimum (G. Web.) Vainio during a 4-year period. Journal of Bryology 15: 315325.
  • Jorgenson JC, Hoef JMV, Jorgenson MT. 2010. Long-term recovery patterns of arctic tundra after winter seismic exploration. Ecological Applications 20: 205221.
  • Jorgenson MT, Osterkamp TE. 2005. Response of boreal ecosystems to varying modes of permafrost degradation in Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 21002111.
  • Juutinen S, Bubier JL, Moore TR. 2010. Responses of vegetation and ecosystem CO2 exchange to 9 years of nutrient addition at Mer Bleue Bog. Ecosystems 13: 874887.
  • Kallio P, Heinonen S. 1975. Carbon dioxide exchange and growth of Rhacomitrium lanuginosum and Dicranum elongatum. In: Wielgolaski FE, ed. Fennoscandian Tundra Ecosystems. Part 1. Ecological Studies 16. New York, USA: Springer Verlag, 138148.
  • Karlsson JM, Bring A, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ, Destouni G. 2011. Opportunities and limitations to detect climate-related regime shifts in inland Arctic ecosystems through eco-hydrological monitoring. Environmental Research Letters 6: 014015.
  • Kattge J, Diaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice C, Leadley P, Boenisch G, Garnier E, Westoby M, Reich PB, Wright IJ et al. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology 17: 29052935.
  • Kelley AM, Epstein HE. 2009. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on plant communities of nonsorted circles in moist nonacidic Tundra, Northern Alaska. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 41: 119127.
  • Kemper JT, Macdonald SE. 2009. Effects of contemporary winter seismic exploration on low Arctic plant communities and permafrost. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 41: 228237.
  • Keuper F, Dorrepaal E, Van Bodegom PM, Aerts R, Van Logtestijn RSP, Callaghan TV, Cornelissen JHC. 2011. A race for space? How Sphagnum fuscum stabilizes vegetation composition during long-term climate manipulations. Global Change Biology 17: 21622171.
  • Kip N, Ouyang W, van Winden J, Raghoebarsing A, van Niftrik L, Pol A, Pan Y, Bodrossy L, van Donselaar EG, Reichart G-J et al. 2011. Detection, isolation, and characterization of acidophilic methanotrophs from Sphagnum mosses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77: 56435654.
  • Kistler R, Kalnay E, Collins W, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Kanamitsu M, Kousky V, et al. 2001. The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. AMS Bulletin 82: 247267.
  • Korhola AA. 1992. Mire induction, ecosystem dynamics and lateral extension on raised bogs in the southern coastal area in Finland. Fennia 170: 2594.
  • Kreyling J, Schmiedinger A, Macdonald E, Beierkuhnlein C. 2008. Slow understory redevelopment after clearcutting in high mountain forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 23392355.
  • Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Neilson ET, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L. 2008. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452: 987990.
  • Kuusinen M. 1996. Importance of spruce swamp-forests for epiphyte diversity and flora on Picea abies in southern and middle boreal Finland. Ecography 19: 4151.
  • Lang SI, Cornelissen JHC, Hoelzer A, ter Braak CJF, Ahrens M, Callaghan TV, Aerts R. 2009a. Determinants of cryptogam composition and diversity in Sphagnum-dominated peatlands: the importance of temporal, spatial and functional scales. Journal of Ecology 97: 299310.
  • Lang SI, Cornelissen JHC, Klahn T, van Logtestijn RSP, Broekman R, Schweikert W, Aerts R. 2009b. An experimental comparison of chemical traits and litter decomposition rates in a diverse range of subarctic bryophyte, lichen and vascular plant species. Journal of Ecology 97: 886900.
  • Lang SI, Cornelissen JHC, Shaver GR, Matthias A, Callaghan TV, Molau U, Ter Braak CJF, Holzer A, Aerts R. 2011. Arctic warming on two continents has consistent negative effects on lichen diversity and mixed effects on bryophyte diversity. Global Change Biology. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02570.x.
  • Lavorel S, Garnier E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16: 545556.
  • Lawrence DM, Slater AG, Romanovsky VE, Nicolsky DJ. 2008. Sensitivity of a model projection of near-surface permafrost degradation to soil column depth and representation of soil organic matter. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface 113: F02011.
  • Lindo Z, Gonzalez A. 2010. The bryosphere: an integral and influential component of the earth’s biosphere. Ecosystems 13: 612627.
  • Liston GE, Hiemstra CA. 2011. The changing cryosphere: Pan-Arctic snow trends (1979–2009). Journal of Climate 24: 56915712.
  • Longton RE. 1988. Adaptations and strategies of polar bryophytes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 253268.
  • Mack MC, Bret-Harte MS, Hollingsworth TN, Jandt RR, Schuur EAG, Shaver GR, Verbyla DL. 2011. Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire. Nature 475: 489492.
  • Mack MC, Treseder KK, Manies KL, Harden JW, Schuur EAG, Vogel JG, Randerson JT, Chapin FS. 2008. Recovery of aboveground plant biomass and productivity after fire in mesic and dry black spruce forests of interior Alaska. Ecosystems 11: 209225.
  • Maikawa E, Kershaw KA. 1976. Studies on lichen-dominated systems. XIX. The postfire recovery sequence of black spruce – lichen woodland in the Abitau Lake Region, NWT. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 26792687.
  • Malmer N, Albinsson C, Svensson BM, Wallen B. 2003. Interferences between Sphagnum and vascular plants: effects on plant community structure and peat formation. Oikos 100: 469482.
  • Markham JH. 2009. Variation in moss-associated nitrogen fixation in boreal forest stands. Oecologia 161: 353359.
  • Marozas V, Racinskas J, Bartkevicius E. 2007. Dynamics of ground vegetation after surface fires in hemiboreal Pinus sylvestris forests. Forest Ecology and Management 250: 4755.
  • McCann KS. 2000. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405: 228233.
  • Michel P, Lee WG, During HJ, Cornelissen JHC. 2012. Species traits and their non-additive interactions control the water economy of bryophyte cushions. Journal of Ecology 100: 222231.
  • Mills SE, Macdonald SE. 2004. Predictors of moss and liverwort species diversity of microsites in conifer-dominated boreal forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 189198.
  • Molau U, Alatalo JM. 1998. Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change: biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens, and vascular plants. Ambio 27: 322329.
  • Mulder CPH, Bazeley-White E, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Hector A, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B. 2004. Species evenness and productivity in experimental plant communities. Oikos 107: 5063.
  • Muller SD, Richard PJH, Larouche AC. 2003. Holocene development of a peatland (southern Quebec): a spatio-temporal reconstruction based on pachymetry, sedimentology, microfossils and macrofossils. Holocene 13: 649664.
  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Stainforth DA. 2004. Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430: 768772.
  • Murray KJ, Tenhunen JD, Nowak RS. 1993. Photoinhibition as a control on photosynthesis and production of Sphagnum mosses. Oecologia 96: 200207.
  • Naeem S. 1998. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology 12: 3945.
  • Nakicenovic N, Swart R. 2000. IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Newmaster SG, Bell FW. 2002. The effects of silvicultural disturbances on cryptogam diversity in the boreal-mixedwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 3851.
  • Newmaster SG, Bell FW, Vitt DH. 1999. The effects of glyphosate and triclopyr on common bryophytes and lichens in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 11011111.
  • Nilsson MC, Wardle DA. 2005. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 421428.
  • Nilsson MC, Wardle DA, Zackrisson O, Jaderlund A. 2002. Effects of alleviation of ecological stresses on an alpine tundra community over an eight-year period. Oikos 97: 317.
  • Nungesser M. 2003. Modelling microtopography in boreal peatlands: hummocks and hollows. Ecological Modelling 165: 175207.
  • Oechel WC, Sveinbjörnsson B. 1978. Primary production processes in arctic bryophytes at Barrow, Alaska. In: Tieszen LL, ed. Vegetation and production ecology of an Alaskan arctic tundra. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, 269298.
  • Okland RH. 1995. Population biology of the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens in Norwegian boreal spruce forests. I. Demography. Journal of Ecology 83: 697712.
  • Oreskes N, Shraderfrechette K, Belitz K. 1994. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical-models in the earth-sciences. Science 263: 641646.
  • Paine RT, Tegner MJ, Johnson EA. 1998. Compounded perturbations yield ecological surprises. Ecosystems 1: 535545.
  • Pastor J, Peckham B, Bridgham S, Weltzin J, Chen J. 2002. Plant community dynamics, nutrient cycling, and alternative stable equilibria in peatlands. The American Naturalist 160: 553568.
  • Pausas JG, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Keeley JE. 2004. Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology 85: 10851100.
  • Payette S, Bhiry N, Delwaide A, Simard M. 2000. Origin of the lichen woodland at its southern range limit in eastern Canada: the catastrophic impact of insect defoliators and fire on the spruce-moss forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 288305.
  • Payette S, Delwaide A. 2003. Shift of conifer boreal forest to lichen–heath parkland caused by successive stand disturbances. Ecosystems 6: 540550.
  • Pharo EJ, Zartman CE. 2007. Bryophytes in a changing landscape: the hierarchical effects of habitat fragmentation on ecological and evolutionary processes. Biological Conservation 135: 315325.
  • Phoenix GK, Gwynn-Jones D, Callaghan TV, Sleep D, Lee JA. 2001. Effects of global change on a sub-Arctic heath: effects of enhanced UV-B radiation and increased summer precipitation. Journal of Ecology 89: 256267.
  • Potter JA, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1995. Growth responses of Polytrichum commune and Hylocomium splendens to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic. New Phytologist 131: 533541.
  • Prach K, Kosnar J, Klimesova J, Hais M. 2010. High Arctic vegetation after 70 years: a repeated analysis from Svalbard. Polar Biology 33: 635639.
  • Press MC, Potter JA, Burke MJW, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1998. Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change. Journal of Ecology 86: 315327.
  • Prins HHT. 1982. Why are mosses eaten in cold environments only? Oikos 38: 374380.
  • Proctor MCF, Tuba Z. 2002. Poikilohydry and homoihydry: antithesis or spectrum of possibilities? New Phytologist 156: 327349.
  • Racine C, Jandt R, Meyers C, Dennis J. 2004. Tundra fire and vegetation change along a hillslope on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, USA. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 36: 110.
  • Richardson SJ, Press MC, Parsons AN, Hartley SE. 2002. How do nutrients and warming impact on plant communities and their insect herbivores? A 9-year study from a sub-Arctic heath. Journal of Ecology 90: 544556.
  • Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, de Ruiter PC, van de Koppel J. 2004. Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305: 19261929.
  • Riutta T, Laine J, Tuittila E-S. 2007. Sensitivity of CO2 exchange of fen ecosystem components to water level variation. Ecosystems 10: 718733.
  • Rixen C, Mulder CPH. 2005. Improved water retention links high species richness with increased productivity in arctic tundra moss communities. Oecologia 146: 287299.
  • Robinson AL, Vitt DH, Timoney KP. 1989. Patterns of community structure and morphology of bryophytes and lichens relative to edaphic gradients in the subarctic forest-tundra of northwestern Canada. The Bryologist 92: 495512.
  • Robinson CH, Wookey PA, Lee JA, Callaghan TV, Press MC. 1998. Plant community responses to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert. Ecology 79: 856866.
  • Romanovsky VE, Kholodov AL, Marchenko SS, Oberman NG, Drozdov DG, Malkova GV, Moskalenko NG, Vasiliev AA, Sergeev DO, Zheleznyak MN. 2008. Thermal state and fate of permafrost in Russia: first results of IPY. In: Kane DL, Hinkel EM, eds. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Permafrost. Fairbanks, AK, USA: Institute of Northern Engineering, 15111518.
  • Rudolphi J, Gustafsson L. 2011. Forests regenerating after clear-cutting function as habitat for bryophyte and lichen species of conservation concern. PLoS ONE 6: e18639.
  • Running SW, Hunt ERJ. 1993. Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC and an application for global-scale models. In: Ehleringer JR, Field CB, eds. Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press Inc, 141158.
  • Rydgren K, Okland RH, Hestmark G. 2004. Disturbance severity and community resilience in a boreal forest. Ecology 85: 19061915.
  • Rydin H. 1993. Mechanisms of interactions among Sphagnum species along water-level gradients. Advances in Bryology; Biology of Sphagnum, 5: 153185.
  • Rydin H, Sjörs H, Löfroth M. 1999. Mires. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 84: 92112.
  • Saarnio S, Jarviö S, Saarinen T, Vasander H, Silvola J. 2003. Minor changes in vegetation and carbon gas balance in a boreal mire under a raised CO2 or NH4NO3 supply. Ecosystems 6: 4660.
  • Sarkkola S, Alenius V, Hökkä H, Laiho R, Päivänen J, Penttilä T. 2003. Changes in structural inequality in Norway spruce stands on peatland sites after water-level drawdown. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 222231.
  • Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591596.
  • Serreze MC, Walsh JE, Chapin FS, Osterkamp T, Dyurgerov M, Romanovsky V, Oechel WC, Morison J, Zhang T, Barry RG. 2000. Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude environment. Climatic Change 46: 159207.
  • Shaver GR, Bret-Harte SM, Jones MH, Johnstone J, Gough L, Laundre J, Chapin FS. 2001. Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity. Ecology 82: 31633181.
  • Shetler G, Turetsky MR, Kane ES, Kasischke E. 2008. Sphagnum mosses limit total carbon consumption during fire in Alaskan black spruce forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 23282336.
  • Skre O, Oechel WC. 1981. Moss functioning in different taiga ecosystems in interior Alaska.1. Seasonal, phenotypic, and drought effects on photosynthesis and response patterns. Oecologia 48: 5059.
  • Slack NG. 1982. Bryophytes in relation to ecological niche theory. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 52: 199217.
  • Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI. 1997. Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystems properties and global change. IGBP Book Series No. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Söderström L. 1988. The occurrence of epixylic bryophyte and lichen species in an old natural and a managed forest stand in northeast Sweden. Biological Conservation 45: 169178.
  • Soja AJ, Tchebakova NM, French NHF, Flannigan MD, Shugart HH, Stocks BJ, Sukhinin AI, Varfenova EI, Chapin FS, Stackhouse PW. 2007. Climate-induced boreal forest change: predictions versus current observations. Global and Planetary Change 56: 274296.
  • Sonesson M, Callaghan TV, Carlsson BA. 1996. Effects of enhanced ultraviolet radiation and carbon dioxide concentration on the moss Hylocomium splendens. Global Change Biology 2: 6773.
  • Sonesson M, Carlsson BÅ, Callaghan TV, Halling S, Björn LO, Bertgren M, Johanson U. 2002. Growth of two peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions and effects of simulated climate change. Oikos 99: 151160.
  • Soudzilovskaia NA, Cornelissen JHC, During HJ, van Logtestijn RSP, Lang SI, Aerts R. 2010. Similar cation exchange capacities among bryophyte species refute a presumed mechanism of peatland acidification. Ecology 91: 27162726.
  • Soudzilovskaia NA, Graae BJ, Douma JC, Grau O, Milbau A, Shevtsova A, Wolters L, Cornelissen JHC. 2011. How do bryophytes govern generative recruitment of vascular plants? New Phytologist 190: 10191031.
  • Speed JDM, Cooper EJ, Jonsdottir IS, van der Wal R, Woodin SJ. 2010. Plant community properties predict vegetation resilience to herbivore disturbance in the Arctic. Journal of Ecology 98: 10021013.
  • Steijlen I, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O. 1995. Seed regeneration of scots pine in boreal forest stands dominated by lichen and feather moss. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25: 713723.
  • Straková P, Anttila J, Spetz P, Kitunen V, Tapanila T, Laiho R. 2010. Litter quality and its response to water level drawdown in boreal peatlands at plant species and community level. Plant and Soil 335: 501520.
  • Sturm M, Racine C, Tape K. 2001. Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411: 546547.
  • Suding KN, Lavorel S, Chapin FS III, Cornelissen JHC, Diaz S, Garnier E, Goldberg D, Hooper DU, Jackson ST, Navas M-L. 2008. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology 14: 11251140.
  • Tahvanainen T. 2011. Abrupt ombrotrophication of a boreal aapa mire triggered by hydrological disturbance in the catchment. Journal of Ecology 99: 404415.
  • Tape K, Sturm M, Racine C. 2006. The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Global Change Biology 12: 686702.
  • Tape KD, Hallinger M, Welker JM, Ruess RW. 2012. Landscape heterogeneity of shrub expansion in arctic Alaska. Ecosystems 10.1007, doi: 10.1007/s10021-012-9540-4.
  • Thornton PE. 1998. Regional ecosystem simulation: combining surface- and satellite-based observations to study linkages between terrestrial energy and mass budgets. PhD thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
  • Thornton PE, Law BC, Gholz HL, Clark KL, Falge E, Ellsworth DS, Goldstein AH, Monson RK, Hollinger D, Falk M et al. 2002. Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 113: 185222.
  • Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT. 1997. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94: 18571861.
  • Titus JE, Wagner DJ, Stephens MD. 1983. Contrasting water relations of photosynthesis for two Sphagnum mosses. Ecology 64: 11091115.
  • Tolonen K. 1971. On the regeneration of north European bogs Part 1 Klaukkalan Isosuo in Southern Finland. Suomen Maataloustieteellisen Seuran Julkaisuja 123: 143166.
  • Tuittila ES, Väliranta M, Laine J, Korhola A. 2007. Quantifying patterns and controls of mire vegetation succession in a southern boreal bog in Finland using partial ordinations. Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 891902.
  • Turetsky MR. 2003. The role of bryophytes in carbon and nitrogen cycling. Bryologist 106: 395409.
  • Turetsky MR, Crow SE, Evans RJ, Vitt DH, Wieder RK. 2008. Trade-offs in resource allocation among moss species control decomposition in boreal peatlands. Journal of Ecology 96: 12971305.
  • Turetsky MR, Kane ES, Harden JW, Ottmar RD, Manies KL, Hoy E, Kasischke ES. 2011. Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands. Nature Geoscience 4: 2731.
  • Turetsky MR, Mack MC, Hollingsworth TN, Harden JW. 2010. The role of mosses in ecosystem succession and function in Alaska’s boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40: 12371264.
  • Turetsky MR, Wieder RK, Vitt DH, Evans RJ, Scott KD. 2007. The disappearance of relict permafrost in boreal north America: effects on peatland carbon storage and fluxes. Global Change Biology 13: 19221934.
  • Turner MG, Dale VH, Everham EH. 1997. Fires, hurricanes, and volcanoes: comparing large disturbances. BioScience 47: 758768.
  • Van Breemen N. 1995. Nutrient cycling strategies. In: Nilsson LO, Hüttl RF, Johansson UT, eds. Developments in plant and soil Sciences; nutrient uptake and cycling in forest ecosystems. London, UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 321326.
  • Vitt DH. 1990. Growth and production dynamics of boreal mosses over climatic, chemical and topographic gradients. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 3559.
  • Vitt DH, Glime JM. 1984. The structural adaptations of aquatic musci. Lindbergia 10: 95110.
  • Vitt DH, Pakarinen P. 1977. The bryophyte vegetation, production, and organic components of Truelove Lowland. In: Bliss LC, ed. Truelove Lowland, Devon Island, Canada: a High Arctic ecosystem. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta Press, 225244.
  • Vitt DH, Wieder K, Halsey LA, Turetsky M. 2003. Response of Sphagnum fuscum to nitrogen deposition: a case study of ombrogenous peatlands in Alberta, Canada. Bryologist 106: 235245.
  • Waite M, Sack L. 2010. How does moss photosynthesis relate to leaf and canopy structure? Trait relationships for 10 Hawaiian species of contrasting light habitats. New Phytologist 185: 156172.
  • Waite M, Sack L. 2011. Does global stoichiometric theory apply to bryophytes? Tests across an elevation × soil age ecosystem matrix on Mauna Loa, Hawaii. Journal of Ecology 99: 122134.
  • van der Wal R. 2006. Do herbivores cause habitat degradation or vegetation state transition? Evidence from the tundra. Oikos 114: 177186.
  • van der Wal R, Brooker RW. 2004. Mosses mediate grazer impacts on grass abundance in arctic ecosystems. Functional Ecology 18: 7786.
  • van der Wal R, Pearce ISK, Brooker RW. 2005. Mosses and the struggle for light in a nitrogen-polluted world. Oecologia 142: 159168.
  • Walker B. 1995. Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conservation Biology 9: 747752.
  • Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J. 1999. Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2: 95113.
  • Wang W, Ichii K, Hashimoto H, Michaelis AR, Thornton PE, Law BE, Nemani RR. 2009. A hierarchical analysis of terrestrial ecosystem model Biome-BGC: equilibrium analysis and model calibration. Ecological Modelling 220: 20092023.
  • Wania R, Ross I, Prentice IC. 2009. Integrating peatlands and permafrost into a dynamic global vegetation model: 1. Evaluation and sensitivity of physical land surface processes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23: GB3014.
  • Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Barker GM, Yeates GW, Nicholson KS, Bardgett RD, Watson RN, Ghani A. 1999. Plant removals in perennial grassland: vegetation dynamics, decomposers, soil biodiversity, and ecosystem properties. Ecological Monographs 69: 535568.
  • Wardle DA, Lagerström A, Nilsson M-C. 2008. Context dependent effects of plant species and functional group loss on vegetation invasibility across an island area gradient. Journal of Ecology 96: 11741186.
  • Weltzin JF, Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Chen JQ, Harth C. 2003. Potential effects of warming and drying on peatland plant community composition. Global Change Biology 9: 141151.
  • Weltzin JF, Harth C, Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Vonderharr M. 2001. Production and microtopography of bog bryophytes: response to warming and water-table manipulations. Oecologia 128: 557565.
  • Weltzin JF, Pastor J, Harth C, Bridgham SD, Updegraff K, Chapin C. 2000. Response of bog and fen plant communities to warming and water-table manipulations. Ecology 81: 34643478.
  • White MA, Thornton PE, Running SW, Nemani RR. 2000. Parameterization and sensitivity analysis of the BIOME-BGC terrestrial ecosystem model: net primary production controls. Earth Interactions 4: 185.
  • Wiedermann MM, Nordin A, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson MB, Ericson L. 2007. Global change shifts vegetation and plant–parasite interactions in a boreal mire. Ecology 88: 454464.
  • Wielgolaski FE, Bliss LC, Svoboda J, Doyle G. 1981. Primary production of tundra. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ, eds. Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 187225.
  • Wisser D, Marchenkoa S, Talbot J, Treat C, Frolking S. 2011. Soil temperature response to 21st century global warming: the role of and some implications for peat carbon in thawing permafrost soils in North America. Earth System Dynamics 2: 161210.
  • Yachi S, Loreau M. 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 14631468.
  • Yi S, McGuire AD, Harden J, Kasischke E, Manies K, Hinzman L, Liljedahl A, Randerson J, Liu H, Romanovsky V et al. 2009. Interactions between soil thermal and hydrological dynamics in the response of Alaska ecosystems to fire disturbance. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 114: G02015.
  • Yi SH, Woo MK, Arain MA. 2007. Impacts of peat and vegetation on permafrost degradation under climate warming. Geophysical Research Letters 34: L16504.
  • Yurova A, Wolf A, Sagerfors J, Nilsson M. 2007. Variations in net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a boreal mire: modeling mechanisms linked to water table position. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 112: 113.
  • Zhuang Q, McGuire AD, O’Neill KP, Harden JW, Romanovsky VE, Yarie J. 2002. Modeling soil thermal and carbon dynamics of a fire chronosequence in interior Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 108: 8147.
  • Zhuang Q, Melillo JM, Sarofim MC, Kicklighter DW, McGuire AD, Felzer BS, Sokolov A, Prinn RG, Steudler PA, Hu S. 2006. CO2 and CH4 exchanges between land ecosystems and the atmosphere in northern high latitudes over the 21st century. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L17403.
  • Zoltai SC, Siltanen RM, Johnson RD. 2000. A wetland database for the western boreal, subarctic, and arctic regions of Canada, NORX-368. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre.