SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Christophe A, Dupoux E, Bertoncini J, Mehler J. Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 157080.
  • 2
    Hayes B. Metrical stress theory. Principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 3
    Sansavini A, Bertoncini J, Giovanelli G. Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed words. Dev Psychol 1997; 33: 311.
  • 4
    Moon C, Panneton-Cooper R, Fifer WP. Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behav Dev 1993; 16: 495500.
  • 5
    Wiese R. The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
  • 6
    Cutler A, Carter DM. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Comp Speech Lang 1987; 2: 13342.
  • 7
    Jusczyk PW, Houston DM, Newsome M. The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cog Psychol 1999; 39: 159207.
  • 8
    Jusczyk PW, Cutler A, Redanz N. Infants’ preference for the predominant stress pattern of English words. Child Dev 1993; 64: 67587.
  • 9
    Höhle B. [The initial acquisition of grammar. The importance of the interface between phonology and syntax for processing and acquiring language.] Freie Universität Berlin, Habilitation, 2002. (In German)
  • 10
    Friederici AD, Friedrich M, Christophe A. Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Curr Biol 2007; 17: 120811.
  • 11
    Leceanuet J, Granier-Deferre C. Speech stimuli in the fetal environment. In: De Boysson-BardiesB, De SchonenS, JusczykP, McNeilageP, MortonJ, editors. Developmental neurocognition. Speech and face processing in the first year of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993: 23738.
  • 12
    Hall JW. Development of the ear and hearing. J Perinatol 2000; 20: 1220.
  • 13
    Abrams RM, Gerhardt KJ. The acoustic environment and physiological responses of the fetus. J Perinatol 2000; 20: 3136.
  • 14
    Fenton TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda’s chart with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 13.
  • 15
    Papile L. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weight less than 1500gm. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 52934.
  • 16
    Walsh MC, Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis. Treatment based on staging criteria. Ped Clin North Am 1986; 33: 179201.
  • 17
    White RD. Recommended standards for newborn ICU design. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 218.
  • 18
    Morgan AM, Aldag JC. Early motor pattern profile. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 69297.
  • 19
    Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 2nd edn. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1993.
  • 20
    Hirsh-Pasek K, Kemler Nelson DG, Jusczyk PW, Wright Cassidy K, Druss B, Kennedy L. Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition 1987; 26: 26986.
  • 21
    Newman R, Ratner NB, Jusczyk AM, Jusczyk PW, Dow KA. Infant’s early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: a retrospective analyses. Dev Psychol 2006; 42: 64355.
  • 22
    R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2006.
  • 23
    Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 24
    Thierry G, Vihman M, Roberts M. Familiar words capture the attention of 11-month-olds in less than 250 ms. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 230710.
  • 25
    Rose SA, Feldmann JF, Jankowski JJ. Processing speed in the 1st year of life: a longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Dev Psychol 2002; 38: 895902.
  • 26
    Stromswold K, Sheffield E. Neonatal intensive care unit and language development. NICU noise and language development. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report, 2004: 115.
  • 27
    Weisglas-Kuperus N, Baerts W, DeGraff WA, Van Zanten GA, Sauer PJ. Hearing and language in preeschool very low birthweight children. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 26: 12940.
  • 28
    Jansson-Verkasalo E, Valkama M, Vainionpää L, Pääkko E, Ilkko E, Lehtithalmes M. Language development in very low birth weight premature children: a follow-up study. Folia Phonaitr Logop 2004; 56: 10819.
  • 29
    Briscoe J, Gathercole SE, Marlow N. Short-term memory and language outcomes after extreme prematurity at birth. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 65466.
  • 30
    Singer LT, Siegel AC, Lewis B, Hawkins S, Yamashita MA, Toyoko D, Bayley JMD. Preschool language outcomes of children with history of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and very low birth weight. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2001; 22: 1926.
  • 31
    Holdgrafer G. Syntactic abilities of neurologically normal and suspect preterm children. Percept Mot Skills 1996; 83: 61518.
  • 32
    Saigal S, Hoult LA, Streiner DL, Stoskopf BL, Rosenbaum PL. School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 32531.
  • 33
    Ment LR, Vohr B, Alan W, et al. Change in cognitive function over time in very low-birthweight infants. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 289: 70511.
  • 34
    Sansavini A, Guarini A, Alesandroni R, Faldella G, Giovaneli G, Salvioli G. Early relations between lexical and grammatical development in very immature Italian preterms. J Child Lang 2006; 33: 199216.
  • 35
    Weber C, Hahne A, Friedrich M, Friederici AD. Reduced stress pattern discrimination in 5-month-olds as a marker of risk for later language impairment: neurophysiological evidence. Cogn Brain Res 2005; 25: 18087.
  • 36
    Thiessen ED, Saffran JR. When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Dev Psychol 2003; 39: 70616.