• 1
    Feder KP, Majnemer A, Bourbonnais D, Platt R, Blayney M, Synnes A. Handwriting performance in preterm children compared with term peers at age 6 to 7 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 16370.
  • 2
    Feder KP, Majnemer A, Bourbonnais D, Blayney M, Morin I. Handwriting performance on the ETCH-M of students in a grade one regular education program. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2007; 27: 4362.
  • 3
    Rosenblum S. Development, reliability, and validity of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ). Am J Occup Ther 2008; 62: 298307.
  • 4
    McHale K, Cermak SA. Fine motor activities in elementary school: preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 898903.
  • 5
    Tseng MH, Chow SM. Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed. Am J Occup Ther 2000; 54: 838.
  • 6
    Volman MJ, van Schendel BM, Jongmans MJ. Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: a search for underlying mechanisms. Am J Occup Ther 2006; 60: 45160.
  • 7
    Maeland AF. Handwriting and perceptual-motor skills in clumsy, dysgraphic, and ‘normal’ children. Percept Mot Skills 1992; 75: 120717.
  • 8
    Smits-Engelsman BC, Van Galen GP. Dysgraphia in children: lasting psychomotor deficiency or transient developmental delay? J Exp Child Psychol 1997; 67: 16484.
  • 9
    Hamstra-Bletz L, Blote AW. A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. J Learn Disabil 1993; 26: 68999.
  • 10
    Karlsdottir R, Stefansson T. Problems in developing functional handwriting. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 94: 62362.
  • 11
    Pianta RC, Cox MJ, Taylor L, Early D. Kindergarten teachers’ practices related to transition to school: results of a national survey. Elem Sch J 1999; 100: 7186.
  • 12
    Hamre BK, Pianta RC. Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Dev 2001; 72: 62538.
  • 13
    Bart O, Hajami D, Bar-Haim Y. Predicting school adjustment from motor abilities in kindergarten. Infant Child Dev 2007; 16: 597615.
  • 14
    Ratzon NZ, Efraim D, Bart O. A short-term graphomotor program for improving writing readiness skills of first-grade students. Am J Occup Ther 2007; 61: 399405.
  • 15
    Alexander KL, Entwisle DR, Olson LS. Schools, achievement, and inequality: a seasonal perspective. Educ Eval Policy Anal 2001; 23: 17191.
  • 16
    Rimm-Kaufmann SE, Pianta RC. An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: a theoretical framework to guide empirical research. J Appl Dev Psychol 2000; 21: 491511.
  • 17
    Marr D, Cermak S. Predicting handwriting performance of early elementary students with the developmental test of visual-motor integration. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 95: 6619.
  • 18
    Marr D. Consistency of handwriting performance across the early elementary grades. OTJR 2005; 25: 1438.
  • 19
    Feder KP, Majnemer A. Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 3127.
  • 20
    Marr D, Cermak S. Consistency of handwriting in early elementary students. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57: 1617.
  • 21
    Hocking C. Implementing occupation-based assessment. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 4639.
  • 22
    Coster W. Occupation-centered assessment of children. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 33744.
  • 23
    Dunn W. Measurement issues and practices. In: LawM, BaumC, DunnW, editors. Measuring occupational performance supporting best practice in occupational therapy. 2nd edn. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated, 2005: 2132.
  • 24
    Polatajko HJ, Davis JA, Hobson SJ, et al. Meeting the responsibility that comes with the privilege: introducing a taxonomic code for understanding occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2004; 71: 2618.
  • 25
    Polatajko HJ, Davis J, Stewart D, et al. Specifying the domain of concern: occupation as core. In: TownsendEA, PolatjakoHJ, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. 2nd edn. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE, 2007: 1336.
  • 26
    Parush S, Levanon-Erez N, Weintraub N. Ergonomic factors influencing handwriting performance. Work 1998; 11: 295305.
  • 27
    Rosenblum S, Goldstand S, Parush S. Relationships among biomechanical ergonomic factors, handwriting product quality, handwriting efficiency, and computerized handwriting process measures in children with and without handwriting difficulties. Am J Occup Ther 2006; 60: 2839.
  • 28
    Koziatek SM, Powell NJ. Pencil grips, legibility, and speed of fourth-graders’ writing in cursive. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57: 2848.
  • 29
    Dennis JL, Swinth Y. Pencil grasp and children’s handwriting legibility during different-length writing tasks. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 17583.
  • 30
    Ziviani J, Wallen M. The development of graphomotor skills. In: HendersonA, PehoskiC, editors. Hand function in the child, foundations for remediation. 2nd edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier, 2006: 21738.
  • 31
    Edwards SJ, Buckland DJ, McCoy-Powlen JD. Developmental and functional hand grasps. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated, 2002: 578.
  • 32
    Cornhill H, Case-Smith J. Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. Am J Occup Ther 1996; 50: 7329.
  • 33
    Smits-Engelsman BC, Niemeijer AS, Van Galen GP. Fine motor deficiencies in children diagnosed as DCD based on poor grapho-motor ability. Hum Mov Sci 2001; 20: 16182.
  • 34
    Weintraub N, Graham S. The contribution of gender, orthographic, finger function, and visual motor processes to the prediction of handwriting status. OTJR Occup Participation Health 1998; 20: 140.
  • 35
    Tseng MH, Murray E. Differences in perceptual motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. Occup Ther J Res 1994; 14: 1936.
  • 36
    Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 3442.
  • 37
    Beery K, Beery N. The Beery-Buktenica developmental test for Visual Motor Integration, Beery VMI. 5th edn. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson Inc, 2004: 99116.
  • 38
    Henderson SE, Sugden DA. Movement Assessment Battery for Children. 1st edn. London: Psychological Corporation, 1992: [Dutch version 113–23].
  • 39
    Fisher AG, Bryze K, Hume V, Griswold L. School AMPS: school version of the assessment of motor and process skills. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 2005: 1122.
  • 40
    Fingerhut P, Madill H, Darrah J, Hodge M, Warren S. Classroom-based assessment: validation for the school AMPS. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56: 2103.
  • 41
    Granberg M, Rydberg A, Fisher AG. Activities in daily living and schoolwork task performance in children with complex congenital heart disease. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97: 12704.
  • 42
    Pianta RC, McCoy SJ. The first day of school: the predictive validity of early school screening. J Appl Dev Psychol 1997; 18: 122.
  • 43
    Rae G, Hyland P. Generalisability and classical test theory analyses of Koppitz’s Scoring System for human figure drawings. Br J Educ Psychol 2001; 71: 36982.
  • 44
    Short-DeGraff MA, Holan S. Self-drawing as a gauge of perceptual-motor skill. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1992; 12: 5368.
  • 45
    Abell SC, Von Briessen PD, Watz LS. Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods. J Clin Psychol 1996; 52: 6774.
  • 46
    Hall L, Case-Smith J. The effect of sound-based intervention on children with sensory processing disorders and visual-motor delays. Am J Occup Ther 2007; 61: 20915.
  • 47
    Hilgert LD, Adams WF. Using the Bender-Gestalt test to predict graphomotor dimensions of the Draw-A-Person test. Percept Mot Skills 1989; 68: 2732.
  • 48
    Weil MJ, Amundson SJC. Relationship between visuomotor and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48: 9828.
  • 49
    Erford BT. Reliability and validity of the Writing Essential Skill Screener-Preschool version (WESS-P). Assessment for Effective Intervention 1997; 23: 21323.
  • 50
    Exner CE. Content validity of the In-Hand Manipulation Test. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 50513.
  • 51
    Pehoski C, Henderson A, Tickle-Degnen L. In-hand manipulation in young children: translation movements. Am J Occup Ther 1997; 51: 71928.
  • 52
    Pehoski C, Henderson A, Tickle-Degnen L. In-hand manipulation in young children: rotation of an object in the fingers. Am J Occup Ther 1997; 51: 54452.
  • 53
    Bazyk S, Michaud P, Goodman G, Papp P, Hawkins E, Welch MA. Integrating occupational therapy services in a kindergarten curriculum: a look at the outcomes. Am J Occup Ther 2009; 63: 16071.
  • 54
    Pont K, Wallen M, Bundy A, Case-Smith J. Reliability and validity of the Test of In-Hand Manipulation in children ages 5 to 6 years. Am J Occup Ther 2008; 62: 38492.
  • 55
    Smith YA, Hong E, Presson C. Normative and validation studies of the Nine-hole Peg Test with children. Percept Mot Skills 2000; 90: 82343.
  • 56
    Daly CJ, Kelley GT, Krauss A. Relationship between visual-motor integration and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten: a modified replication study. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57: 45962.
  • 57
    Rodger S, Ziviani J, Watter P, Ozanne A, Woodyatt G, Springfield E. Motor and functional skills of children with developmental coordination disorder: a pilot investigation of measurement issues. Hum Mov Sci 2003; 22: 46178.
  • 58
    Gwynne K, Blick B. Motor performance checklist for 5-year-olds: a tool for identifying children at risk of developmental co-ordination disorder. J Paediatr Child Health 2004; 40: 36973.
  • 59
    Gwynne K, Blick B, Hughes L. Use of an occupational therapy motor performance checklist by a school health service: a pilot study. J Paediatr Child Health 1996; 32: 38690.
  • 60
    Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children-2. London: Harcourt Assessment, 2007: 12744.
  • 61
    Brown T, Lalor A. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children – 2nd edn (MABC-2): a review and critique. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2009; 29: 86103.
  • 62
    Kroes M, Vissers YL, Sleijpen FA, et al. Reliability and validity of a qualitative and quantitative motor test for 5- to 6-year-old children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2004; 8: 13543.
  • 63
    Duger T, Bumin G, Uyanik M, Aki E, Kayihan H. The assessment of Bruininks–Oseretsky test of motor proficiency in children. Pediatr Rehabil 1999; 3: 12531.
  • 64
    Miyahara M, Piek J, Barrett N. Accuracy of drawing in a dual-task and resistance-to-distraction study: motor or attention deficit? Hum Mov Sci 2006; 25: 1009.
  • 65
    Deitz JC, Kartin D, Kopp K. Review of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of motor proficiency, 2nd edn. (BOT-2). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2007; 27: 87102.
  • 66
    Miyahara M, Piek JP, Barrett NC. Effect of postural instability on drawing errors in children: a synchronized kinematic analysis of hand drawing and body motion. Hum Mov Sci 2008; 27: 70513.
  • 67
    Bayoglu BU, Bakar EE, Kutlu M, Karabulut E, Anlar B. Can preschool developmental screening identify children at risk for school problems? Early Hum Dev 2007; 83: 6137.
  • 68
    Frankenburgh WK, Dodds J, Archer PA, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 917.
  • 69
    van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der LH. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 15169.
  • 70
    Sakzewski L, Boyd R, Ziviani J. Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 23240.
  • 71
    Marr D, Cermak S, Cohn ES, Henderson A. Fine motor activities in Head Start and kindergarten classrooms. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57: 5507.
  • 72
    Cabell SQ, Justice LM, Zucker TA, McGinty AS. Emergent name-writing abilities of preschool-age children with language impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2009; 40: 5366.
  • 73
    Levin I, Both-De Vries A, Aram D, Bus A. Writing starts with own name writing: from scribbling to conventional spelling in Israeli and Dutch children. Appl Psycholinguist 2005; 26: 46377.
  • 74
    ter Laak J, de GM, Aleva A, van RP. The Draw-A-Person Test: an indicator of children’s cognitive and socioemotional adaptation? J Genet Psychol 2005; 166: 7793.
  • 75
    Smith-Zuzovsky N, Exner CE. The effect of seated positioning quality on typical 6- and 7-year-old children’s object manipulation skills. Am J Occup Ther 2004; 58: 3808.
  • 76
    Breslin DM, Exner CE. Construct validity of the In-Hand Manipulation Test: a discriminant analysis with children without disability and children with spastic diplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53: 3816.
  • 77
    Case-Smith J. The effects of tactile defensiveness and tactile discrimination on in-hand manipulation. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 45: 8118.
  • 78
    Case-Smith J. Comparison of in-hand manipulation skills in children with and without fine motor delays. Occup Ther J Res 1993; 13: 87100.
  • 79
    Law M, King G, Russell D. Guiding therapist decisions about measuring outcomes in occupational therapy. In: LawM, BaumC, DunnW, editors. Measuring occupational performance supporting best practice in occupational therapy. 2nd edn. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated, 2005: 3344.
  • 80
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd edn. Oxford: University Press, 2003: 1378.
  • 81
    Wuang YP, Lin YH, Su CY. Rasch analysis of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency – 2nd edn in intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 2009; 30: 113244.
  • 82
    Wuang YP, Su CY. Reliability and responsiveness of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in children with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil 2009; 30: 84755.
  • 83
    Fisher AG, Bryze K, Atchison BT. Naturalistic assessment of functional performance in school settings: reliability and validity of the School AMPS scales. J Outcome Meas 2000; 4: 491512.
  • 84
    Poole JL, Burtner PA, Torres TA, et al. Measuring dexterity in children using the Nine-hole Peg Test. J Hand Ther 2005; 18: 34851.
  • 85
    Naglirie JA. Draw-A-Person: a quantitative scoring system. San Antonio: TX Psychological Corporation, 1988.
  • 86
    Saklofske DH, Tamaoka K, Hildebrand D. An examination of Japanese children’s performance on the Draw-a-Person: a quantitative scoring system. Psychologia 1996; 39: 1723.
  • 87
    Nasvytiene D. The analysis of psychometric properties of the Human Figure Drawings Test. Psichologija 2007; 36: 6173.