This report was prepared during the tenure of NIMH Special Research Fellowship No. 1-F3-MH-34,080-01. The author is indebted to Marvin Stein, Henri Begleiter, and Burt Austen for their critical reading of the manuscript, and to his research assistant, Kenneth Taylor, for his aid in the statistical analyses.
TO WHAT DOES THE ORIENTING RESPONSE RESPOND?
Article first published online: 30 JAN 2007
Volume 6, Issue 3, pages 338–350, November 1969
How to Cite
Bernstein, A. S. (1969), TO WHAT DOES THE ORIENTING RESPONSE RESPOND?. Psychophysiology, 6: 338–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1969.tb02911.x
- Issue published online: 30 JAN 2007
- Article first published online: 30 JAN 2007
- Orienting response;
- Base admittance level;
- 2-stage hypothesis
Forty-eight Ss received 10 repetitive 1-sec light presentations at either 5 or 25 foot candles (ft c), followed by a switch on Trial 11. After approximately 2 months the experiment was repeated. Of 34 Ss who correctly described the stimulus change on initial testing, only 18 gave a (GSR) OR. On retest, most Ss retained their characteristic response, but previously responsive 25 5 ft c. Ss became non-responsive on Trial 11. There were no differences between OR-responders and non-responders to Trial 1 flash though responders subsequently took longer to habituate and made more ORs overall. There was no difference in base admittance (BAL) increase following initial onset of stimulation, but OR-responders subsequently showed a continuing BAL rise while nonresponders returned to resting levels. The OR is not an automatic accompaniment to perceptible stimulus novelty. A 2-stage process was hypothesized in triggering an OR, stressing the role of cognitive-motivational variables.