We are grateful to Marcel Hendrickx, Johan Gielissen, and Ron Hellenbrand (Maastricht University) for their technical support. We also wish to thank Jukka Hyönä (University of Turku, Finland) and Pieter Unema (Maastricht University) for their advices on pupillary measurement. Furthermore, we thank Fren Smulders (Maastricht University) and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions concerning the data analysis. The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) is gratefully acknowledged for funding this project. Address reprint requests to: Pascal W. M. Van Gerven, Maastricht University, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Neurocognition, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging
Article first published online: 17 DEC 2003
Volume 41, Issue 2, pages 167–174, March 2004
How to Cite
Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. and Schmidt, H. G. (2004), Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology, 41: 167–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00148.x
- Issue published online: 17 DEC 2003
- Article first published online: 17 DEC 2003
- (Received March 12, 2001; Accepted August 30, 2003)
- Cognitive pupillary response;
- Memory load;
- Memory search;
The effect of memory load on the cognitive pupillary response among 16 young adults and 16 older adults was investigated. Mean pupil dilation and reaction time were measured during a Sternberg memory-search task, which involved six levels of memory load. A classic interaction pattern was obtained in which the reaction times of the elderly participants increased more as a function of memory load than the reaction times of the young participants. In the encoding phase of the experiment, mean dilation increased with memory load. No age differences were observed here. In the search phase of the experiment, however, mean pupil dilation was considerably greater in the young than in the elderly participants. Moreover, mean dilation of the older participants was not sensitive to memory load, whereas mean dilation increased as a function of memory load in the young participants. The results suggest that the usefulness of the pupillary response as a correlate of subtle fluctuations in memory load diminishes with old age.