Thanks are due to Eilish Boisvert, Phuong Luong, and Priya Mitra for their help with data collection and data analysis. Gratitude is also due to Tory Hart for programming the paradigm and to Giordana Grossi for helpful comments on a previous draft. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This research was supported by funds from Dartmouth College.
The case of letter rhyming: An ERP study
Version of Record online: 24 SEP 2008
Copyright © 2008 Society for Psychophysiological Research
Volume 45, Issue 6, pages 949–956, November 2008
How to Cite
Coch, D., George, E. and Berger, N. (2008), The case of letter rhyming: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 45: 949–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00701.x
- Issue online: 15 OCT 2008
- Version of Record online: 24 SEP 2008
- (Received November 27, 2007; Accepted March 6, 2008)
- Event-related potentials (ERPs);
- Rhyming effect;
- Letter processing;
- Phonological processing;
- Letter case
Previous visual event-related potential (ERP) studies using prime–target pairs of word and pseudoword stimuli have reported a robust rhyming effect such that nonrhyming targets elicit a larger N450 than rhyming targets. However, results of similar studies using simpler linguistic stimuli—single letters—are equivocal. We used lowercase and uppercase letter pairs in a simple ERP prime–target rhyming paradigm to further investigate whether single letters could elicit the typical rhyming effect and, if so, whether the rhyming effect was sensitive to physical orthography (which differed between the case conditions). The typical N450 rhyming effect was observed in both the lowercase and uppercase letter pair conditions, with similar amplitude and latency between conditions. This pattern of results suggests that the N450 rhyming effect is not sensitive to physical (case) orthography and likely primarily indexes phonological processing related to the rhyme task.