This research was supported by an internal grant from Roehampton University. The authors thank Professor Martin Eimer for his advice during the planning of the study, Professor Roberto Dell'Acqua and an anonymous reviewer for valuable suggestions, and Paul Bretherton for his technical assistance. Development of the MacBrain Face Stimulus Set was supported by the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Early Experience and Brain Development; contact Nim Tottenham for details (email@example.com).
Attentional selectivity for emotional faces: Evidence from human electrophysiology
Article first published online: 25 NOV 2008
Copyright © 2008 Society for Psychophysiological Research
Volume 46, Issue 1, pages 62–68, January 2009
How to Cite
Holmes, A., Bradley, B. P., KRAGH Nielsen, M. and Mogg, K. (2009), Attentional selectivity for emotional faces: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychophysiology, 46: 62–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00750.x
- Issue published online: 23 DEC 2008
- Article first published online: 25 NOV 2008
- (Received December 19, 2007; Accepted April 23, 2008)
- Attentional bias;
- Angry face;
- happy face;
- Emotional expression;
This study investigated the temporal course of attentional biases for threat-related (angry) and positive (happy) facial expressions. Electrophysiological (event-related potential) and behavioral (reaction time [RT]) data were recorded while participants viewed pairs of faces (e.g., angry face paired with neutral face) shown for 500 ms and followed by a probe. Behavioral results indicated that RTs were faster to probes replacing emotional versus neutral faces, consistent with an attentional bias for emotional information. Electrophysiological results revealed that attentional orienting to threatening faces emerged earlier (early N2pc time window; 180–250 ms) than orienting to positive faces (after 250 ms), and that attention was sustained toward emotional faces during the 250–500-ms time window (late N2pc and SPCN components). These findings are consistent with models of attention and emotion that posit rapid attentional prioritization of threat.