Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults

  1. Tepring Piquado,
  2. Derek Isaacowitz,
  3. Arthur Wingfield

Article first published online: 11 JAN 2010

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x

Issue

Psychophysiology

Psychophysiology

Volume 47, Issue 3, pages 560–569, May 2010

Additional Information

How to Cite

Piquado, T., Isaacowitz, D. and Wingfield, A. (2010), Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 47: 560–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x

Author Information

  1. Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA

*Address reprint requests to: Arthur Wingfield, Volen National Center for Complex Systems, MS 013, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA. E-mail: wingfield@brandeis.edu

  1. The authors acknowledge support from NIH Grant AG019714 from the National Institute on Aging. We also gratefully acknowledge support from the W.M. Keck Foundation.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 6 APR 2010
  2. Article first published online: 11 JAN 2010
  3. (Received December 3, 2008; Accepted May 29, 2009)

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (206K)

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Siyuan Chen, Julien Epps, Automatic classification of eye activity for cognitive load measurement with emotion interference, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2013, 110, 2, 111

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Sophia E. Kramer, Artur Lorens, Frans Coninx, Adriana A. Zekveld, Anna Piotrowska, Henryk Skarzynski, Processing load during listening: The influence of task characteristics on the pupil response, Language and Cognitive Processes, 2013, 28, 4, 426

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Stefanie E. Kuchinsky, Jayne B. Ahlstrom, Kenneth I. Vaden, Stephanie L. Cute, Larry E. Humes, Judy R. Dubno, Mark A. Eckert, Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss, Psychophysiology, 2013, 50, 1
    Direct Link:
  4. 4
    Jonathan L. Rosch, Jennifer J. Vogel-Walcutt, A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training, Cognition, Technology & Work, 2012,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Tepring Piquado, Jonathan I. Benichov, Hiram Brownell, Arthur Wingfield, The hidden effect of hearing acuity on speech recall, and compensatory effects of self-paced listening, International Journal of Audiology, 2012, 51, 8, 576

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Adriana A. Zekveld, Sophia E. Kramer, Joost M. Festen, Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response, Ear and Hearing, 2011, 32, 4, 498

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Martina Zellin, Ann Pannekamp, Ulrike Toepel, Elke van der Meer, In the eye of the listener: Pupil dilation elucidates discourse processing, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2011, 81, 3, 133

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Benjamin Gagl, Stefan Hawelka, Florian Hutzler, Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction, Behavior Research Methods, 2011, 43, 4, 1171

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Current awareness in geriatric psychiatry, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2010, 25, 10
    Direct Link:
  10. 10
    Chris M. R. Smerecnik, Ilse Mesters, Loes T. E. Kessels, Robert A. C. Ruiter, Nanne K. De Vries, Hein De Vries, Understanding the Positive Effects of Graphical Risk Information on Comprehension: Measuring Attention Directed to Written, Tabular, and Graphical Risk Information, Risk Analysis, 2010, 30, 9
    Direct Link:
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (206K)