SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • ActionAid, 2000. Indian Farmers Judge GM Crops. ActionAid Citizens’ Jury Initiative. London: ActionAid.
  • AgBioIndia, 2002. ‘Demand for Monsanto's Ouster Picks Up: Karnataka Bans Monsanto's Bt Cotton Seeds’. 11 August. http://ngin.tripod.com/110802b.htm, Accessed 4 February 2008.
  • Appadurai, A., 2000. ‘Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination’. Public Culture, 12 (1): 119.
  • Assadi, M., 2002. ‘Globalisation and the State: Interrogating the Farmers’ Movement in India’. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 4 (1): 4254.
  • Bond, P., 2000. Elite Transition: From Apartheid to Neoliberalism in South Africa. Durban: Natal University Press.
  • Brass, T., ed., 1995. New Farmers’ Movements in India. London: Routledge.
  • Business Day, 2003. ‘Biowatch SA Says Modified Organisms Need Regulation’. 20 August. Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Business Day, 2004. ‘Open Wide for GM Bite’. 6 February. Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Business Line, 2000. ‘MNC Seed Interest vs Farmers’ Plight’. 26 September. Chennai, India.
  • Castells, M., 1997. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture; Volume 2: The Power of Identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Da Silveira, J.M. and I. De Carvalho Borges, 2005. ‘An Overview of the Current State of Agricultural Biotechnology in Brazil’. Paper presented at Science, Technology and Globalization Project, Agricultural Biotechnology for Development – Socioeconomic Issues and Institutional Challenges, Bella Villagio, Bellagio Italy, May–June 2005. Belfer Center, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard.
  • Deccan Herald, 1998. ‘KRRS to File Criminal Case Against Monsanto’. 18 December. Bangalore, India.
  • Dow Jones, 2000. ‘Brazil Government Fights Back Against Anti-GMO Court Ruling’. 10 July. New York, USA.
  • Dow Jones, 2001. ‘GMO Soy Planting in Brazil Said to Be Spreading North’. 18 December. New York, USA.
  • Economic Times, 1999. ‘Monsanto Proposal to Genetically Alter Rice Draws Flak’. 6 August. New Delhi, India.
  • Economic Times, 2001. ‘KRRS Opposed Commercial Release of Bt Cotton Seeds’. 20 June. New Delhi, India.
  • Edelman, M., 2001. ‘Social Movements: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Politics’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30: 285317.
  • Ellison, N., 1997. ‘Towards a New Social Politics: Citizenship and Reflexivity in Late Modernity’. Sociology, 31 (4): 697717.
  • Financial Express, 1999. ‘Farmers Support Biotech Use for Increasing Yield – Monsanto Study’. 31 August. New Delhi, India.
  • Financial Express, 2000. ‘Farmer Leader Pleads for Immediate Release of GM Crops in India’. 24 April. New Delhi, India.
  • Financial Times, 2001. ‘Brazil Police Add to Bové's Radical Status – Anti-Globalisation Activist’. 31 January. London, UK.
  • Financial Times, 2004. ‘Monsanto Takes GM Crusade to Brazil’. 6 February. New York, USA.
  • Friedberg, S. and L. Horowitz, 2004. ‘Converging Networks and Clashing Stories: South Africa's Agricultural Biotechnology Debate’. Africa Today, 51 (2): 325.
  • Glover, D., 2007. ‘The Role of the Private Sector in Modern Biotechnology and Rural Development: The Case of the Monsanto Smallholder Programme’. DPhil thesis, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
  • Habib, A. and V. Padayachee, 2000. ‘Economic Policy and Power Relations in South Africa's Transition to Democracy’. World Development, 28 (2): 24563.
  • Hajer, M., 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Heller, P., 2001. ‘Moving the State: the Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa and Porto Alegre’. Politics and Society, 29 (1): 13163.
  • Herring, R., 2005. ‘Miracle Seeds, Suicide Seeds, and the Poor: Mobilizing Around Genetically Modified Organisms in India’. In Social Movements and Poverty in India, eds R.Ray and M.F.Katzenstein, 20332. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Group.
  • Herring, R., 2007. ‘Stealth Seeds: Bioproperty, Biosafety, Biopolitics’. Journal of Development Studies, 43 (1): 13057.
  • Huang, J., S. Rozelle, C. Pray and W. Qinfang, 2002. ‘Plant Biotechnology in China’. Science, 295: 67477.
  • Jepson, W., 2002. ‘Globalization and Brazilian Biosafety: the Politics of Scale over Biotechnology Governance’. Political Geography, 21 (7): 90525.
  • Lahiff, E., 2003. ‘Land and Livelihoods: The Politics of Land Reform in Southern Africa’. IDS Bulletin, 34 (3): 5463.
  • Leach, M. and I. Scoones, 2007. ‘Mobilising Citizens. Social Movements and the Politics of Knowledge’. IDS Working Paper 276. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Lodge, T., 2003. Politics in South Africa: From Mandela to Mbeki. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Mail and Guardian, 2000. ‘SA Receives Bulk Shipments of Frankenfoods’. 25 February. Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • McAdam, D., S. Tarrow and C. Tilly, 2003. ‘Dynamics of Contention’. Social Movement Studies, 2 (1): 99102.
  • Mercury, 2003. ‘Government Hands Out Free GE Seeds in South Africa’. 27 August. Durban, KwaZulu, South Africa.
  • Nature, 2000. ‘Smugglers Aim to Circumvent GM Court Ban in Brazil’. 25 November. London, UK.
  • New York Times, 2003. ‘Monsanto Pursues Seed Pirates’. 13 June. New York, USA.
  • Omvedt, G., 1998. ‘Terminating Choice’. The Hindu, December 26. Chennai, India.
  • Paarlberg, R., 2000. ‘The Global Food Fight’. Foreign Affairs, 79 (3): 2438.
  • Paarlberg, R., 2001. The Politics of Precaution: Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
  • Patel, R. and A. Muller, 2004. ‘Shining India? Economic Liberalisation and Rural Poverty in the 1990s’. Food First Policy Brief 10. Oakland: Food First.
  • Pimbert, M. and T. Wakeford, 2002. ‘Prajateerpu: A Citizens’ Jury/Scenario Workshop on Food and Farming Futures for Andhra Pradesh, India’. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies and London: International Institute for Environment and Development. http://www.diversefoodsystems.org/lfs_docs/Prajateerpu.pdf, Accessed 4 February 2008.
  • Ray, R. and M.F.Katzenstein, eds, 2005. Social Movements and Poverty in India. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield Publishing Group.
  • Reuters, 2000a. ‘Brazil Turns Away GM Argentine Corn’. 6 June. New York, USA.
  • Reuters, 2000b. ‘Greenpeace Protest for Argentine GM Food Labels’. 20 July. New York, USA.
  • Reuters, 2003a. ‘Brazil Lula Says Legalizing GM Soy Was Best Option’. 8 October. New York, USA.
  • Reuters, 2003b. ‘Monsanto Invests to Improve GMOs’ Image in Brazil’. 8 December. New York, USA.
  • RFSTE (Research Foundation of Science, Technology and Ecology), 1998. ‘Indians Fight Biotechnology Giants: Implement “Operate Cremate Monsanto”’. Monsanto Quit India Campaign Press Release. RDFTE: New Delhi.
  • Rudolph, L. and S. Rudolph, 2001. ‘Redoing the Constitutional Design: From an Interventionist to a Regulatory State’. In The Success of India's Democracy, ed. A.Kohli, 12762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Samykta Karnataka, 1998. ‘Police Protection to all American Companies in Bangalore City’. 25 November. Bangalore, India.
  • Scoones, I., 2005a. Science, Agriculture and the Politics of Policy. The Case of Biotechnology in India. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
  • Scoones, I., 2005b. ‘Contentious Politics, Contentious Knowledges: Mobilising Against GM Crops in India, Brazil and South Africa’. IDS Working Paper 256. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Scoones, I., 2007. ‘The Contested Politics of Technology: Biotech in Bangalore’. Science and Public Policy, 34 (4): 26171.
  • Shah, E., 2005. ‘Local and Global Elites Join Hands: Development and Diffusion of Bt Cotton Technology in Gujarat’. Economic and Political Weekly (Special Articles), 40 (43): 462939.
  • Shiva, V., 1998. ‘Terminating Freedom’. The Hindu, 26 December. Chennai, India.
  • Shiva, V., A. Emani and A. Jafri, 1999. ‘Globalization and Threat to Seed Security: Case of Transgenic Cotton Trials in India’. Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (10): 60113.
  • Shiva, V., A. Jafri, A. Emani and M. Pande, 2000. Seeds of Suicide: The Ecological and Human Costs of Globalization of Agriculture. Delhi: Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology.
  • Stone, G., 2007. ‘Agricultural Deskilling and the Spread of Genetically Modified Cotton in Warangal’. Current Anthropology, 48: 67103.
  • Suhai, S., 2003. ‘Monsanto's Claims are Uninformed’. Times of India, 12 March. New Delhi, India.
  • The Guardian, 2001. ‘Jury Delivers “No” Verdict to GM Crops in Brazil’. 23 May. London, UK.
  • The Guardian, 2002. ‘Brazil's Farms Minister Supports Gene-Modified Crops’. 17 December. London, UK.
  • The Hindu, 1999. ‘Monsanto Turns to Food Crops’. 6 August. Chennai, India.
  • Thirtle, C., L. Beyers, Y. Ismael and J. Piesse, 2003. ‘Can GM Technologies Help the Poor? The Impact of BT Cotton in Makhathini Flats, KawZulu-Natal’. World Development, 31: 71732.
  • Times of India, 1998. ‘Monsanto Trials Illegal, Says Environmentalist’. 21 December. New Delhi, India.
  • Toni, A. and J. Von Braun, 2001. ‘Poor Citizens Decide on the Introduction of GMOs in Brazil’. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 47: 79.
  • Xue, D., 2002. A Summary of Research on the Environmental Impact of Bt cotton in China. Nanjing: Greenpeace/Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences.