SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Acción Ecológica, 2004. ‘Area de Libre Comercio de las Américas’. http://www.accionecologica.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=165&Itemid=242, Accessed 2 February 2007.
  • Andrioli, A.I., 2006. ‘Soja Orgânica versus Soja Transgênica’. Movimento Dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra, October 30. http://www.mst.org.br/mst/pagina.php?cd=2334, Accessed 21 February 2007.
  • Bellisario, A., 2007. ‘The Chilean Agrarian Transformation: Agrarian Reform and Capitalist “Partial” Counter-Agrarian Reform, 1964–1980: Part 1: Reformism, Socialism and Free-Market Neoliberalism’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7 (1): 134.
  • Benbrook, C.M., 2005. ‘Rust, Resistance, Run Down Soils and Rising Cost: Problems Facing Soybean Producers in Argentina’. AgBioTech InfoNet, Technical paper no. 8. http://www.earthscape.org/p1/ES16592/Greenpeace_rust.pdf, Accessed 12 October 2006.
  • Boff, L., n.d. ‘Transgênicos? Não’. http://www.cebusai.org.br/transgenicos.htm, Accessed 12 May 2006.
  • Borras, S. Jr, 2004. ‘La Vía Campesina: An Evolving Transnational Movement’. TNI Briefing No. 2004/6. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
  • Borras, S. Jr, M. Edelman and C. Kay, 2008. ‘Transnational Agrarian Movements: Editors’ Introduction’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8 (2/3).
  • Boy, A., 2006. ‘Grupo Reflexión Rural’. Presentation, Enzando Alternativas, Vienna, 10–13 May 2006.
  • Burnham, P., 2002. ‘Class Struggle, States and Circuits of Capital’. In Historical Materialism and Globalisation, eds M.Rupert and H.Smith, 11329. London: Routledge.
  • Campolina, A., 2001. ‘Brazilian Small-Scale Farmers and Poor Consumers Reject GMOs’. LEISA Magazine, 29 December.
  • Clapp, J., 2006. ‘The Political Economy of Food Aid in an Era of Agricultural Biotechnology’. In The International Politics of Genetically Modified Food: Diplomacy, Trade and Law, ed. R.Falkner, 85101. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Conway, G., 1999. The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Edelman, M., 2003. ‘Transnational Peasant and Farmer Movements and Networks’. In Global Civil Society, eds H.Anheier, M.Glasius and M.Kaldor, 185221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • EDM (En Defensa del Maíz), 2002. Conclusiones del seminario, Ciudad de México, 23 and 24 January. http://www.ceccam.org.mx/ConclusionesDefensa.htm, Accessed 4 December 2007.
  • Fitting, E., 2006. ‘The Political Uses of Culture: Maize Production and the GM Corn Debates in Mexico’. Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology, 48: 1734.
  • FoEI (Friends of the Earth International), 2007. Who Benefits from GM Crops? An Analysis of the Global Performance of GM Crops (1996–2006). Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth International.
  • Gallagher, A., 2008. ‘Trading away the Ladder? Trade Politics and Economic Development in The Americas. New Political Economy, 13 (1): 3759.
  • Galli, E., 2005. ‘De la Chaucha de Soja al Reactor Nuclear de Investigación’. La Nación, 4 January, 2.
  • Global Exchange, 2004. ‘Top Ten Reasons to Oppose the Free Trade of the Americas’. http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/ftaa/topten.html, Accessed 2 August 2004.
  • Glover, D. and P. Newell, 2004. ‘Business and Biotechnology: Regulation of GM Crops and the Politics of Influence’. In Agribusiness and Society: Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation, eds K.Jansen and S.Vellema, 20031. London: Zed Books.
  • Glover, D., J. Keeley and P. Newell, 2003. Public Participation and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. A Review for DfiD and UNEP-GEF. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Greenpeace, 2006a. ‘Desmontes S.A: Quiénes Están Detrás de la Destrucción de los Ultimos Bosques Nativos de la Argentina’. Greenpeace Argentina Report. http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/argentina/bosques/desmontes-s-a.pdf, Accessed 15 October 2006.
  • Greenpeace, 2006b. ‘A Turning Point in the Fight to Protect the Amazon’. The Guardian, 28 September 17.
  • Hajer, M.A., 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hochstetler, K., 2003. ‘Fading Green? Environmental Politics in the Mercosur Free Trade Agreement’. Latin American Politics and Society, 45 (4): 133.
  • Icaza, R., 2004. Civil Society and Regionalisation. Exploring the Contours of Mexican Transnational Activism. CSGR Working Paper No. 150/04, Warwick University.
  • James, C., 2006. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. ISAAA Briefs No. 35. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.
  • Jansen, K. and S.Vellema, eds, 2004. Agribusiness and Society: Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation. London: Zed Books.
  • Kay, C., 2002. ‘Chile's Neo-Liberal Agrarian Transformation and the Peasantry’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2 (4): 464501.
    Direct Link:
  • Keck, M. and K. Sikkink, 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Kenfield, I. and R. Burbach, 2007. ‘Landless Rural Worker Shot by Security Company Hired by Multinational Syngenta’. Posted on the ‘Brazil Network’ list serve, 21 October 2007.
  • Kossoy, A., 2003. ‘Iniciativas de Asociaciones de Productores Agropecuarios: La Incorporación de la Soja en la Emergencia Alimentaria’. In Respeuestas de la Sociedad Civil a la Emergencia Social, eds I. GonzálezBombal, 89119. Buenos Aires: CEDES.
  • Levidow, L., 1998. ‘Democratizing Technology or Technologizing Democracy? Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe’. Technology in Society, 20 (2): 21126.
  • Lipton, M., 2001. ‘Reviving Global Poverty Reduction: What Role for Genetically Modified Plants?’. Journal of International Development, 13 (7): 82346.
  • McAdam, D., S. Tarrow and C. Tilly, 2003. ‘Dynamics of Contention’. Social Movement Studies, 2 (1): 99102.
  • Murray, W., 2006. ‘Neo-Feudalism in Latin America? Globalisation, Agribusiness and Land Re-Concentration in Chile’. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 33 (4): 64677.
  • Newell, P., 2006. ‘Corporate Power and Bounded Autonomy in the Global Politics of Biotechnology’. In The International Politics of Genetically Modified Food, eds R.Falkner, 6785. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Newell, P., 2007. ‘Trade and Environmental Justice in Latin America’. New Political Economy, 12 (2): 23759.
  • Newell, P. and D. Tussie, 2006. ‘Civil Society Participation in Trade Policy in Latin America: Lessons and Reflections’. IDS Working Paper, 267. Brighton: Institute for Development Studies.
  • Oya, C., 2005. ‘Sticks and Carrots for Farmers in Developing Countries: Agrarian Neo-Liberalism in Theory and Practice’. In Neo-liberalism: A Critical Reader, eds S.Saad-Filho and D.Johnston, 12735. London: Pluto Books.
  • Paarlberg, R., 2001. The Politics of Precaution: Genetically-Modified Crops in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: IFPRI and Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
  • PCL (Pastoral Commission on Land), 2004. ‘Declaration on GMOs’. http://www.cptnac.com.br/?system=news&action=read&id=1230&eid=88, Accessed 21 August 2006.
  • PCL (Pastoral Commission on Land), n.d. ‘The Solution is to Preserve’. http://www.cptnac.com.br/?system=news&eid=87, Accessed 21 August 2006.
  • Peleaz, V. and W. Schmidt, 2004. ‘Social Struggles and the Regulation of Transgenic Crops in Brazil’. In Agribusiness and Society: Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation, eds K.Jansen and S.Vellema, 23261. London: Zed Books.
  • Pengue, W.A., 2005. Agricultura Industrial y Transnationalización en América Latina: ¿La Transgénesis de un Continente? Mexico City: PNUMA and Buenos Aires: GEPAMA.
  • Petras, J. and H. Veltmeyer, 2005. Social Movements and State Power. London: Pluto Press.
  • Pimbert, M. and T. Wakeford, 2002. Prajateerpu: A Citizen's Jury/Scenario Workshop on Food and Farming Futures for Andhra Pradesh India. Brighton: Institute for Development Studies and London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
  • RACDV (Rede Alerta Contra o Deserto Verde), n.d. ‘Comunidades e Monocultures de Arvores’. http://www.wrm.org/uy/inicio.html, Accessed 12 April 2006.
  • Radio Mundo Real, n.d. ‘Terminator Seeds are Killer Seeds, of Other Crops and of Peasants’. http://www.viacampesina.org/main_sp, Accessed 12 December 2006.
  • RALLT (Red por una Americá Latina Libre de Transgenicos), 2007. ‘Una Red de Resistencia a los Organismos Transgénicos en América Latina’. http://www.rallt.org.menus/mision.htm, Accessed 12 September 2007.
  • Santos, I.F., n.d. ‘Action Day Against Terminator Mobilizes Vía Campesina and Environmentalists’. http://www.viacampesina.org/main_sp, Accessed 30 March 2006.
  • Santos, M., 2006. ‘Inimigo é Parceria Entre Latifúndio, Agronegócio e Empresas Transnacionais’. Movimento Dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra, 13 December. http://www.mst.org.br/mst/pagina.php?cd=2593, Accessed 9 February 2007.
  • Scoones, I., 2005. ‘Contentious Politics, Contentious Knowledges: Mobilising Against GM Crops in India, South Africa and Brazil’. IDS Working Paper, 256. Brighton: Institute for Development Studies.
  • Scoones, I. and J.Thompson, eds, 2003. ‘Participatory Processes for Policy Change: Learning from Experiments in Deliberative Democracy’. PLA Notes 4.
  • Stedile, J.P., 2004. ‘Who Does the Agribusiness Model of Agriculture Serve?’ Movimento Dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra, 1 June. http://www.mst.org.br/mst/pagina.php?cd=500, Accessed 6 March 2007.
  • Tarrow, S., 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Teubal, M. and J. Rodríguez, 2002. Agro y Alimentos en la Globalizacíon: Una Perspectiva Crítica. Buenos Aires: La Colmena.
  • The Economist, 2006. ‘Argentina's Government and its Farmers’. 26 October. http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=E1_RDRGRTJ, Accessed 2 November 2006.
  • Third World Network, 2006. ‘US FTA Likely to Open Peru to GMOs?’. 2 October. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: TWN Biosafety Information Service.
  • Thrupp, L.A., 1996. ‘New Harvests, Old Problems: The Challenges Facing Latin America's Agro-Export Boom’. In Green Guerrillas: Environmental Conflicts and Initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. H.Collinson, 12232. London: Latin America Bureau.
  • Vara, A.M., 2005. ‘Argentina, GM Nation; Chances and Choices in Uncertain Times’. NYU Project on International GMO Regulatory Conflicts. (http://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/etc/profrans/Argentina%20Country%20Case%20Sept%20%202005>vara.doc’), Accessed 10 October 2005.
  • Vía Campesina, 2007. ‘Attack by Syngenta's Armed Militia Results in Deaths and Wounded in Brazil’. Press Release, 21 October.
  • Vía Campesina, n.d. a. ‘Open Letter from Vía Campesina to President Lula’. http://www.viacampesina.org/main_sp, Accessed 12 January 2007.
  • Vía Campesina, n.d. b. ‘Vía Campesina Brazil and the Question of Seeds’. http://www.cptnac.om.br/?system=news&action=read&id=1226&eid=87, Accessed 20 December 2006.
  • Vía Campesina, n.d. c. ‘Victory of Peasants in Defense of Seeds and Against the Terminator’. http://www.mmcbrasil.comb.br/noticias/080306/060406_via_campe.htm, Accessed 12 April 2006.
  • Warwick, H., 2000. ‘Sygenta: Switching off Farmers’ Rights?’ Report by Genewatch Action Aid, The Berne Declaration and the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation.
  • WRM (World Rainforest Movement), 2006. ‘Petition to the CBD to Ban the Releast of GM Trees’. http://www.wrm.org.uy/temas/AGM/cartaCBD.html, Accessed 2 April 2006.
  • Wynne, B., 2001. ‘Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs’. Science as Culture, 10 (4): 44581.