Upton Hospital, Slough, Berks. SLI 2BJ.
1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)
SECONDARY POSTPARTUM HAEMORRHAGE
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00636.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology")
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 82, Issue 4, pages 289–292, April 1975
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rome, R. M. (1975), SECONDARY POSTPARTUM HAEMORRHAGE. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 82: 289–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00636.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary
The clinical features of 106 women who had a secondary postpartum haemorrhage were examined in detail; 39 were managed conservatively, 3 had a vaginal laceration resutured and 64 had a curettage. In 46 patients, material obtained by curettage was examined histologically. The clinical features associated with retained products of conception are defined and comparisons are made between conservative and surgical management of secondary postpartum haemorrhage.