1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)
COLPOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL CERVICAL CYTOLOGY
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00805.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology")
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 83, Issue 3, pages 177–182, March 1976
Additional Information
How to Cite
Benedet, J. L., Boyes, D. A., Nichols, T. M. and Millner, A. (1976), COLPOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL CERVICAL CYTOLOGY. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 83: 177–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00805.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary
Because of suspicious or abnormal smears, 620 patients were referred to the Colposcopy Clinic of the British Columbia Cancer Institute between 1st March 1973 and 31st December 1974; it was possible to make a colposcopic examination in 549 of these patients (88–5 per cent). The colposcopic impression was within one histological grade of a colposcopically-directed biopsy in 476 patients (86 per cent). There were 221 patients who had a cone biopsy after a colposcopicallydirected biopsy and in 192 of these (87 per cent) the two biopsies were within one histological grade of each other; but there were two patients with occult invasive carcinoma in a cone biopsy and only carcinoma in situ in a directed biopsy. In the same group of 221 patients the colposcopic evaluation and final diagnosis (the most advanced histological lesion seen in biopsy) agreed in all but seven patients.