CASE NOTE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PLACENTA: ARE THEY WORTHWHILE?
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10606.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 86, Issue 5, pages 337–339, May 1979
Additional Information
How to Cite
Penfold, P., Drury, L., Lewis, L., Royston, J. P. and Hytten, F. E. (1979), CASE NOTE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PLACENTA: ARE THEY WORTHWHILE?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 86: 337–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10606.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary
In 429 placentae, measurements were made of weight, diameter, shape, eccentricity of the cord and weight and length of the cord, and the results were compared with Apgar score of the infant at birth and its standardized birth weight. There was no evidence that cord eccentricity, placental shape or ‘thickness’, or the dimensions of the cord had any significant relation to the growth of the fetus or its condition at birth. The value of routine recording of crude measurements and qualitative assessments of the placenta in case notes is questioned.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)