DETECTION OF FETAL RISK IN POSTMATURITY
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10690.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 86, Issue 10, pages 759–764, October 1979
Additional Information
How to Cite
Homburg, R., Ludomirski, A. and Insler, V. (1979), DETECTION OF FETAL RISK IN POSTMATURITY. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 86: 759–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10690.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary
Ninety-seven postmature pregnancies were monitored by amnioscopy or amniocentesis (to determine presence or absence of meconium), oxytocin challenge tests (OCT), 24-hour urinary oestriol estimations and fetal movement counts. The colour of the amniotic fluid and the result of the OCT predicted almost all cases of fetal distress in labour and infants with low Apgar scores. Oestriol estimations and fetal movement counts predicted fetal distress only when combined with other positive tests. Of 50 patients with no abnormal test results, 49 had uneventful labours. The Caesarean section rate was not above average and all babies were Iiveborn.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)