1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)
DETECTION OF URINARY INCONTINENCE
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb00938.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology")
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 88, Issue 1, pages 59–61, January 1981
Additional Information
How to Cite
Robinson, H. and Stanton, S. L. (1981), DETECTION OF URINARY INCONTINENCE. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 88: 59–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb00938.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Received May 15, 1980/Accepted July 8, 1980
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary
Thirty patients complaining of stress incontinence were investigated by clinical examination, videocystourethrography and Urilos device. The latter was the most effective method of confirming the history. Standing and lying made no difference to detection of incontinence on clinical examination. A scheme for use of these investigations was proposed.