In-vivo accuracy of ultrasound measurements of intrauterine ume in pregnancy
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb05276.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 91, Issue 1, pages 37–40, January 1984
Additional Information
How to Cite
GEIRSSON, R. T., PATEL, N. B. and CHRISTIE, A. D. (1984), In-vivo accuracy of ultrasound measurements of intrauterine ume in pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 91: 37–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb05276.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Received 29 March 1983; Accepted 5 July 1983
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. The accuracy of ultrasonic measurements of intra-amniotic ume using a parallel planimetric area method was assessed in 18 women by comparison against different measures of the same ume space. In nine patients undergoing second-trimester termination of pregnancy amniotic fluid ume was measured using a dye dilution method and fetal ume was measured by either water displacement or calculated from fetal weight. The estimated intra-amniotic ume by this method was not significantly different from the ultrasonic measurement. In one patient who had a hysterotomy, fetal and amniotic fluid umes showed a difference of 1.01% between ultrasonically-measured and actual intra-amniotic ume. In eight patients studied in the third trimester the mean difference between ultrasonic and estimated intra-amniotic ume at delivery was 6.2%.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)