: Senior Registrar, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF.
Carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix: is post-hysterectomy cytology worthwhile?
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb05281.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 91, Issue 1, pages 67–72, January 1984
Additional Information
How to Cite
FAWDRY, R. D. S. (1984), Carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix: is post-hysterectomy cytology worthwhile?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 91: 67–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb05281.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Received 5 November 1982; Accepted 27 June 1983
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. The cytological records for the years 1950–1980 from South East Scotland revealed 1062 patients who had had histologically confirmed carcinoma-in-situ (or severe dysplasia) of the cervix at the time of hysterectomy. Ten cases of early ‘recurrence’ were detected in the first year of follow-up. During 4304 women-years of subsequent regular follow-up by vaginal vault smears, only one further confirmed recurrence was detected, this being a poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma in a 26-year-old patient, 4 years after hysterectomy. Two further patients not in regular follow-up presented clinically with invasive carcinoma. The implications for follow-up policies are discussed.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)