1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)
Comparisons of data from regional perinatal mortality surveys
Article first published online: 22 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07855.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology")
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 93, Issue 12, pages 1224–1232, December 1986
Additional Information
How to Cite
MACFARLANE, A., COLE, S. and HEY, E. (1986), Comparisons of data from regional perinatal mortality surveys. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 93: 1224–1232. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07855.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 22 AUG 2005
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. The standard format in which NHS regions are invited to submit data from their perinatal mortality surveys for comparative analysis in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology is described. Some examples of the way these data can and will be used to compare regional differences in mortality patterns are given and possible future developments are discussed. Although the term perinatal mortality is used in the title, it is hoped that surveys will cover stillbirths and neonatal deaths and also, where possible, late fetal deaths of less than 28 weeks gestation.