Birthweight-for-gestational age charts based on early ultrasound estimation of gestational age
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07877.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 93, Issue 2, pages 128–134, February 1986
Additional Information
How to Cite
SECHER, N. J., HANSEN, P. K., LENSTRUP, C., PEDERSEN-BJERGAARD, L., ERIKSEN, P. S., THOMSEN, B. L. and KEIDING, N. (1986), Birthweight-for-gestational age charts based on early ultrasound estimation of gestational age. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 93: 128–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07877.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Received 4 February 1985, Accepted 17 June 1985
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. Birthweight-for-gestational age charts were based on the analysis of 3888 consecutive births in which the gestational age was estimated by measuring the fetal biparietal diameter before the 20th week of gestation. The data showed, in contrast to previous studies, a linear relation between gestational age and birthweight without inflection after term. The regression parameters showed a strongly significant difference between girls and boys. Thus, boys were 1·5% heavier than girls at 190 days gestation and 3·6% heavier at 300 days gestation. The linearity in the birthweight-for-gestational age charts could be due to the more reliable gestational age based on early ultrasound.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)