Place of delivery: a review
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07965.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 93, Issue 7, pages 675–683, July 1986
Additional Information
How to Cite
CAMPBELL, R. and MACFARLANE, A. (1986), Place of delivery: a review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 93: 675–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07965.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Received 8 November 1985, Accepted 26 February 1986
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. Policies about place of delivery have tended to be formulated without either looking at existing evidence or doing new research into the relative safety for women and babies of delivery in different settings. This article reviews published research on the subject, and finds that many of the data required have not been collected. Furthermore, many analyses fail to take account of selection biases or differences in the birth weight distribution and the incidence of congenital malformations among babies born in different settings. Nevertheless, some tentative conclusions can be drawn. The available evidence does not support claims that, for the baby, the iatrogenic risks of obstetric intervention outweigh the possible benefits. At the same time, there is no evidence to support the claim that the shift to hospital delivery is responsible for the decline in perinatal mortality in England and Wales nor the claim that the safest policy is for all women to be delivered in hospital.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)